Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):
  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Got Blood Test Results - No Idea What They Mean!


Lissa

Recommended Posts

Lissa Apprentice

So my doctor printed off my paper, said they results were negative, and sent me on my way. I have no idea what these things mean, and I'm a little disappointed my results were negative. (Lie - I'm way disappointed) What should I do now? My doctor referred me to a GI, but the waiting list is 2 years. Should I go for the biopsy? My doctor thinks its stupid I'm persuing Celiac, I don't know even she'll even let me do it. But anyways, the results:

Anti-Gliadin IgA Antibody 18KEU/L (less than 20)

Anti-Gliadin IgG Antibody 11KEU/L (less than 20)

Tissue Transglutaminase Iga Ab 8KEU/L (less than 20)

False negative results may occur in patients who are IgA deficient.

Celiac Disease Interpretation

Negative IgA Endomysial (IgA Transglutaminase) antibodies and normal IgA and IgG Gliadin antibodies rule out active Celiac Disease in virtually all cases and Dermatitis Herpetiformis in approximately 80% of cases.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



mftnchn Explorer

GI referral is a two year wait? That's bizarre. Do you have any other options?

Some people here have had negative blood work and positive biopsy. So if you have symptoms I think you should keep pursuing the celiac question.

Lissa Apprentice
GI referral is a two year wait? That's bizarre. Do you have any other options?

Some people here have had negative blood work and positive biopsy. So if you have symptoms I think you should keep pursuing the celiac question.

Oh sorry, my mistake. It's only 16 months. 16 months is the average wait to get to see the GI. Or so my doctor tells me. My mom told me it was 2 years, but I believe the doc. <_<

ravenwoodglass Mentor

Have you done a gluten-free trial? Sometimes that is the best way to tell if gluten is a problem. There are a number of folks who are celiac but still have negative blood work, that can delay diagnosis for a long time. A gluten-free trial and challenge may be more informative for you. You don't need a doctors permission to try living gluten-free to see if it helps.

lob6796 Contributor
So my doctor printed off my paper, said they results were negative, and sent me on my way. I have no idea what these things mean, and I'm a little disappointed my results were negative. (Lie - I'm way disappointed) What should I do now? My doctor referred me to a GI, but the waiting list is 2 years. Should I go for the biopsy? My doctor thinks its stupid I'm persuing Celiac, I don't know even she'll even let me do it. But anyways, the results:

Anti-Gliadin IgA Antibody 18KEU/L (less than 20)

Anti-Gliadin IgG Antibody 11KEU/L (less than 20)

Tissue Transglutaminase Iga Ab 8KEU/L (less than 20)

False negative results may occur in patients who are IgA deficient.

Celiac Disease Interpretation

Negative IgA Endomysial (IgA Transglutaminase) antibodies and normal IgA and IgG Gliadin antibodies rule out active Celiac Disease in virtually all cases and Dermatitis Herpetiformis in approximately 80% of cases.

Is it possible for you to get a second opinion? Where I live, and IgA of higher than 2.9 is a complete positive diagnosis of celiac, and an IgG of over 10 is a probable diagnosis of celiac with a follow biopsy ordered to confirm. Do you live in Canada? I'm just wondering because of the 16 month wait for a GI. The one downside to healthcare for everyone is long waits. I would still try to get s second opinion. If that isnt possible, I would go gluten free and see how you feel after a few months on it.

mamaloca2 Apprentice
So my doctor printed off my paper, said they results were negative, and sent me on my way. I have no idea what these things mean, and I'm a little disappointed my results were negative. (Lie - I'm way disappointed) What should I do now? My doctor referred me to a GI, but the waiting list is 2 years. Should I go for the biopsy? My doctor thinks its stupid I'm persuing Celiac, I don't know even she'll even let me do it. But anyways, the results:

Anti-Gliadin IgA Antibody 18KEU/L (less than 20)

Anti-Gliadin IgG Antibody 11KEU/L (less than 20)

Tissue Transglutaminase Iga Ab 8KEU/L (less than 20)

False negative results may occur in patients who are IgA deficient.

Celiac Disease Interpretation

Negative IgA Endomysial (IgA Transglutaminase) antibodies and normal IgA and IgG Gliadin antibodies rule out active Celiac Disease in virtually all cases and Dermatitis Herpetiformis in approximately 80% of cases.

My nutritionalist explained to me that you can have neg. results for celiac but be gluten intolerant instead. He explained that the two act the same but the difference is that in Celiac the villi are destroyed, and if you are gluten intolerant your intestines are inflamed. Both lead to malabsorbtion just differ in the mechanisms that cause it. In the case of gluten intolerance, it can be tested by checking ("cytokine"?) levels. I don't know if that's the right exact word or not. Anyway, my daughter was also supposedly neg for Celiac, so he is running food allergy blood tests on her which should hopefully tell us if she's gluten intolerant. He seems to know what he's talking about...hope this helps.

CarlaB Enthusiast

I'd go on the diet. If you get better, you know you have a gluten problem ... whether it's celiac or gluten intolerance doesn't matter.

If you don't get better, start looking for what else may be causing your problems.

I wonder why they didn't test your total Iga to see if you were deficient ... they even wrote on the test that some are deficient ... that's something they can test for.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Lissa Apprentice
Is it possible for you to get a second opinion? Where I live, and IgA of higher than 2.9 is a complete positive diagnosis of celiac, and an IgG of over 10 is a probable diagnosis of celiac with a follow biopsy ordered to confirm. Do you live in Canada? I'm just wondering because of the 16 month wait for a GI. The one downside to healthcare for everyone is long waits. I would still try to get s second opinion. If that isnt possible, I would go gluten free and see how you feel after a few months on it.

Haha, yes, I live in Canada.

Lissa Apprentice

I have a question....are the results different in Canada then the States? (I'm assuming so)

and I would like to point out that my doctor is an idiot. She said that celiac and gluten intolerance are the same thing.

CarlaB Enthusiast

I don't think there's a universal test. There should be a reference range on your results that tell you what is normal.

Lissa Apprentice
I don't think there's a universal test. There should be a reference range on your results that tell you what is normal.

I think that's what the (less than 20) means.

CarlaB Enthusiast
I think that's what the (less than 20) means.

Yeah ... :lol: I didn't scroll back up when I posted to see if the range was there. I'd go with the reference range the lab set. It can vary.

SpikeMoore Apprentice

Hi everyone

I get the celiac newsletter online as a result of registering for this site. I think it was in the one from May 9 that summarizes the rate of false negatives from a study in the April 2004 Journal of digestives diseases and sciences.. It differentiates between total villus atrophy and partial atrophy. I can't remember exactly, but for the patients with partial atrophy, blood work was positive for celiac only 30% of the time. The rate of false negatives for total atrophy was also very significant. The summary is that blood work is not nearly as accurate as doctors are lead to believe it is.

I had the same response from my doctor. He said "the blood work was negative, therefore you are not celiac." I chose not to go for a referral to a GI, because in the end I asked myself what is important. Having someone in a lab coat say "yes, you are right, don't eat gluten, it's bad for you" after another 6 months to a year+ of waiting and postponing potential healing, or trying it to see how you feel and if you feel better, you have your answer.

I've never felt better and won't look back.

mamabear Explorer

This is why everyone gets bent out of shape! You know something is wrong....the tests are negative..you wait 2 months to 16 months(geographically speaking!) to get a referral to a GI with NO guarantee they will biopsy you.....so you choose to go gluten free....Maybe you feel great for a few months, but if you get sick again, do you think your own diagnosis was wrong.....or do you keep searching for the hidden gluten???????? Will your PCP or the GI try and unravel what is kinked up??

There are no easy answers here. Waiting 16 months for a GI seems unbearable to me. With 200+ symptoms of celiac disease, it is hard to keep pushing for the 1% diagnosis.....if all the serologic tests were negative. BUT! Listen to your gut feelings(all puns intended)....and with your national health service limitations......I'd be inclined to go ahead and try the diet.

BTW, they(GI traditionalists) are recently understanding there HAS to be a category of non-biopsy positive gluten sensitives non- celiac....it will make the GI's job all the more complex and take them longer to unravel...well, I think you know where I'm going with this. They don't cope if they can't scope! You can quote me on that! B)

aikiducky Apprentice
They don't cope if they can't scope! You can quote me on that! B)

Love that! And I will quote you! :D

With such a long waiting list I would be inclined to try the diet, too.

Pauliina

bugstabber Rookie
I'd go on the diet. If you get better, you know you have a gluten problem ... whether it's celiac or gluten intolerance doesn't matter.

If you don't get better, start looking for what else may be causing your problems.

I wonder why they didn't test your total Iga to see if you were deficient ... they even wrote on the test that some are deficient ... that's something they can test for.

So, what would a lab range for total IgA be?

natalie Apprentice

I live in Canada as well. In my area ( Waterloo Ontario) I waited about 7 months to the the GI doctor and then 4 weeks to have the scope. It was well worth the wait because my scope was positive. Because my daughter was diagnosed at 2 with celiac the doctor took me a little more serious. I had all negative blood work except for the Igg was slightly positive. Do you have anyone in your family who has celiac?

Have you tried the Entrolab test? I had that and my numbers were through the roof, I think that those results helped the GI doctor to do the scope.

Good Luck

Natalie

Lissa Apprentice

WOW! Thanks all, for your help. I really appreciate it. However, I'm in need of some help, please....

I'm not sure I'm Celiac anymore. Lately, I've still been feeling like crap but my runs arent as bad as usual. I'm really confused. However, all the gluten I've been eating lately has been a bagel at breakfast, but shouldn't I be getting the runs from that? My blood test was negative, maybe that's telling me something. Perhaps I'm looking at the wrong thing. So my question...

If I am not Celiac and I try the diet, will I be messing up my body? (cutting gluten out, seeing it doesn't help, then going back to gluten?)

And can anyone tell me what some proper Celiac are? I can tell you I get the runs (which I'm not getting as often) but what else could be affecting me?

Whats the difference between gluten intolerance and Celiac?

What kinds of foods can I eat on a gluten free diet? Which are the major not-commonly-know-but-are-in-fact-glutenized products?

How much is an Enterolab test?

Thanks, everyone. I'll be happy with any help you can give me.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - Scott Adams replied to SilkieFairy's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      2

      IBS-D vs Celiac

    2. - Scott Adams replied to Amy Barnett's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      1

      Question

    3. - catnapt replied to catnapt's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      8

      how much gluten do I need to eat before blood tests?

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      133,321
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    James Minton
    Newest Member
    James Minton
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.6k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):
  • Who's Online (See full list)

  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
      What you’re describing really does not read like typical IBS-D. The dramatic, rapid normalization of stool frequency and form after removing wheat, along with improved tolerance of legumes and plant foods, is a classic pattern seen in gluten-driven disease rather than functional IBS. IBS usually worsens with fiber and beans, not improves. The fact that you carry HLA-DQ2.2 means celiac disease is absolutely possible, even if it’s less common than DQ2.5, and many people with DQ2.2 present later and are under-diagnosed. Your hesitation to reintroduce gluten is completely understandable — quality of life matters — and many people in your position choose to remain strictly gluten-free and treat it as medically necessary even without formal biopsy confirmation. If and when you’re ready, a physician can help you weigh options like limited gluten challenge, serology history, or documentation as “probable celiac.” What’s clear is that this wasn’t just random IBS — you identified the trigger, and your body has been very consistent in its response.
    • Scott Adams
      Here are some results from a search: Top Liquid Multivitamin Picks for Celiac Needs MaryRuth's Liquid Morning Multivitamin Essentials+ – Excellent daily choice with a broad vitamin/mineral profile, easy to absorb, gluten-free, vegan, and great overall value. MaryRuth's Liquid Morning Multivitamin – Classic, well-reviewed gluten-free liquid multivitamin with essential nutrients in a readily absorbable form. MaryRuth's Morning Multivitamin w/ Hair Growth – Adds beauty-supporting ingredients (biotin, B vitamins), also gluten-free and easy to take. New Chapter Liquid Multivitamin and New Chapter Liquid Multivitamin Orange Mango – Fermented liquid form with extra nutrients and good tolerability if you prefer a whole-food-based formula. Nature's Plus Source Of Life Gold Liquid – Premium option with a broad spectrum of vitamins and plant-based nutrients. Floradix Epresat Adult Liquid Multivitamin – Highly rated gluten-free German-made liquid, good choice if taste and natural ingredients matter. NOW Foods Liquid Multi Tropical Orange – Budget-friendly liquid multivitamin with solid nutrient coverage.
    • catnapt
      oh that's interesting... it's hard to say for sure but it has *seemed* like oats might be causing me some vague issues in the past few months. It's odd that I never really connect specific symptoms to foods, it's more of an all over feeling of unwellness after  eating them.  If it happens a few times after eating the same foods- I cut back or avoid them. for this reason I avoid dairy and eggs.  So far this has worked well for me.  oh, I have some of Bob's Red Mill Mighty Tasty Hot cereal and I love it! it's hard to find but I will be looking for more.  for the next few weeks I'm going to be concentrating on whole fresh fruits and veggies and beans and nuts and seeds. I'll have to find out if grains are truly necessary in our diet. I buy brown rice pasta but only eat that maybe once a month at most. Never liked quinoa. And all the other exotic sounding grains seem to be time consuming to prepare. Something to look at later. I love beans and to me they provide the heft and calories that make me feel full for a lot longer than a big bowl of broccoli or other veggies. I can't even tolerate the plant milks right now.  I have reached out to the endo for guidance regarding calcium intake - she wants me to consume 1000mgs from food daily and I'm not able to get to more than 600mgs right now.  not supposed to use a supplement until after my next round of testing for hyperparathyroidism.   thanks again- you seem to know quite a bit about celiac.  
    • trents
      Welcome to the celiac.com community, @SilkieFairy! You could also have NCGS (Non Celiac Gluten Sensitivity) as opposed to celiac disease. They share many of the same symptoms, especially the GI ones. There is no test for NCGS. Celiac disease must first be ruled out.
    • trents
      Under the circumstances, your decision to have the testing done on day 14 sounds very reasonable. But I think by now you know for certain that you either have celiac disease or NCGS and either way you absolutely need to eliminate gluten from your diet. I don't think you have to have an official diagnosis of celiac disease to leverage gluten free service in hospitals or institutional care and I'm guessing your physician would be willing to grant you a diagnosis of gluten sensitivity (NCGS) even if your celiac testing comes up negative. Also, you need to be aware that oats (even gluten free oats) is a common cross reactor in the celiac community. Oat protein (avenin) is similar to gluten. You might want to look at some other gluten free hot  breakfast cereal alternatives.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.