Jump to content

  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Nervous About Biopsy Results

sneezydiva

Recommended Posts

sneezydiva Apprentice
sneezydiva
Posted

Hi I posted here over a week ago with my whole sob story--New Here and Overwhelmed. To make a long story short, I've been running on empty for almost 10 years now. I started getting severe stomch pains, bloating, and bowel problems, and weight loss 3 months ago. I had an endoscopy done May 31st, and was told there was "inflammation" and they "took a few biopsies". I can't get a straight answer about what they are looking for with the biopsies. I found out about Celiac while tying get an idea of what they possibly could be looking for besides cancer. My appointment is next Monday to finally find out the results. This appointment was scheduled on May 31st immediately after the endoscopy. The waiting has been torture.

Anyway, I strongly suspect I am celiac or at least gluten intolerant. I've continued to eat gluten in case they did not look for it in the biopsy so that I could ask for blood tests. But what should I do if they actually do diagnose celiac through the biopsy? Should I even bother with the blood test? Or what if they biopsied for celiac, but tell me it is negative? Should I still demand the bood tests? It sounds like there are a lot of false negatives with the blood tests, but the biopsy is definite. Money isn't an issue as I do have good insurance. But I'm tired of arguing with doctors who say I'm the picture of health when I'm not. But at the same time, I want a real diagnosis if possible. I know I will try the diet regardless, but it would life easier explaining it to others, especially family that acts like I am a hypochondriac.

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


DarkIvy Explorer
DarkIvy
Posted
Hi I posted here over a week ago with my whole sob story--New Here and Overwhelmed. To make a long story short, I've been running on empty for almost 10 years now. I started getting severe stomch pains, bloating, and bowel problems, and weight loss 3 months ago. I had an endoscopy done May 31st, and was told there was "inflammation" and they "took a few biopsies". I can't get a straight answer about what they are looking for with the biopsies. I found out about Celiac while tying get an idea of what they possibly could be looking for besides cancer. My appointment is next Monday to finally find out the results. This appointment was scheduled on May 31st immediately after the endoscopy. The waiting has been torture.

Anyway, I strongly suspect I am celiac or at least gluten intolerant. I've continued to eat gluten in case they did not look for it in the biopsy so that I could ask for blood tests. But what should I do if they actually do diagnose celiac through the biopsy? Should I even bother with the blood test? Or what if they biopsied for celiac, but tell me it is negative? Should I still demand the bood tests? It sounds like there are a lot of false negatives with the blood tests, but the biopsy is definite. Money isn't an issue as I do have good insurance. But I'm tired of arguing with doctors who say I'm the picture of health when I'm not. But at the same time, I want a real diagnosis if possible. I know I will try the diet regardless, but it would life easier explaining it to others, especially family that acts like I am a hypochondriac.

A positive biopsy result is the most "real" diagnosis you can possibly get. There can be false negatives, even with the endoscopy, but if the biopsy is positive, you don't need any further testing. Usually, though, they give you bloodwork BEFORE the biopsy. If I were you I'd call the doctor and ask him/her exactly what they looked for in the biopsy. Ask if they checked for celiac. This way at least you know what they are looking for.

I know how you feel, though. I'm in a very similar position. I had some bloodwork done that was negative -probably because I'd been gluten free for a while already. I've been back on gluten for three weeks now and my endoscopy is scheduled for Wednesday. I'm also very anxious... pretty much everyone who knows me is supportive and thinks I have celiac, and it runs in my family anyway, so odds are that's what it is. I have this really nagging feeling in the back of my head saying "what if you ARE a hypochondriac? What if the biopsy comes back negative?" I can really relate, it's a frustrating, long process. Good luck!

ravenwoodglass Mentor
ravenwoodglass
Posted
I have this really nagging feeling in the back of my head saying "what if you ARE a hypochondriac? What if the biopsy comes back negative?" I can really relate, it's a frustrating, long process. Good luck!

First, your not a hypochondriac. I feel like yelling that but I won't. You are not imagining your pain or your symptoms. Do not let the doctors try to convince you that you are.

If the biopsy should come back negative you need to try the diet strictly for at least a couple of months. False negatives abound even with the biopsies. You have 22 ft of small intestine and if the right spot is not biopsied or read correctly or if damage is not severe enough yet you can get a false negative. If you do have a negative result do the diet as if it was positive for a month or two at least and also cut out dairy at the same time. If needed a dietary challenge after sympoms resolve is really all the proof you need.

debmidge Rising Star
debmidge
Posted

My advice when it comes to relatives, acquaintences, co workers, casual friends.....don't over explain unless you have to point out something about the gluten free status of food or the diet; don't give them any more information about you're being positive or negative other than saying "yes, the tests concluded that I have celiac disease." For some stupid reason some people are fixated on blurting out that if the test is negative, then why do you have to eat gluten free? As if there's no such thing as a false negative on a test.

For example; let's say that you got a negative test for lung cancer and you're a smoker. After hearing that your test was negative (and your thanking your God) would your closest people say to you "Oh boy, now you can keep smoking!" No.

I found that the less personal information I give out, the easier it is to deal with other people. Just our experience. For instance, my husband had positive blood test but negative biopsy (as he was gluten-free for a year before biopsy). I just tell people, yeah he's positive for celiac and end the speculation there.

sneezydiva Apprentice
sneezydiva
Posted
  • Author

Thanks all. So to recap, if they did indeed biopsy for Celiac and it is positive, then that's it, I have my answer. But if they biopsied and it is negative, I should still push ahead and demand the blood tests?

Obviously, if all they did was look for bacteria I will demand the blood testing. I have tried asking them what they biopsied for, and I can't get a straight answer. All they say is "to find the cause of the inflammation" Well, Duh! I already knew that, but what do you suspect it is?! Argh!

I'm just so convinced I am at the very least gluten intolerant. After so many years of suffering, and either being told it's just my allergies or all in my head, I think I can see the light. It was a bit of a fluke me being referred to the GI doc and him ordering the endoscopy as everyone seemed so convinced I has an ulcer. But now I feel*this* close to getting some answers. I just pray they biopsied for celiac.

Debmidge, that is good advice as far as dealing with family. Your smoking analogy is a very good one.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):

  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      133,338
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748
    Erica Johnson
    Newest Member
    Erica Johnson
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.6k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):

  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • par18
      IBS-D vs Celiac

      By par18 · Posted

      Been off this forum for years. Is it that important that you get an official diagnosis of something? It appears like you had a trigger (wheat, gluten, whatever) and removing it has resolved your symptom. I can't speak for you, but I had known what my trigger was (gluten) years before my diagnosis I would just stay gluten-free and get on with my symptom free condition. I was diagnosed over 20 years ago and have been symptom free only excluding wheat, rye and barley. I tolerate all naturally gluten free whole foods including things like beans which actually helps to form the stools. 
    • trents
      IBS-D vs Celiac

      By trents · Posted

      No coincidence. Recent revisions to gluten challenge guidelines call for the daily consumption of at least 10g of gluten (about the amount in 4-6 slices of wheat bread) for a minimum of 3 weeks. If possible, I would extend that two weeks to ensure valid testing.
    • SilkieFairy
      IBS-D vs Celiac

      By SilkieFairy · Posted

      Thank you both for the replies. I decided to bring back gluten so I can do the blood test. Today is Day #2 of the Challenge. Yesterday I had about 3 slices of whole wheat bread and I woke up with urgent diarrhea this morning. It was orange, sandy and had the distinctive smell that I did not have when I was briefly gluten free. I don't know if it's a coincidence, but the brain fog is back and I feel very tired.   
    • knitty kitty
      Desperately need a vitamin D supplement. I've reacted to most brands I've tried.

      By knitty kitty · Posted

      @Jane02, I hear you about the kale and collard greens.  I don't do dairy and must eat green leafies, too, to get sufficient calcium.  I must be very careful because some calcium supplements are made from ground up crustacean shells.  When I was deficient in Vitamin D, I took high doses of Vitamin D to correct the deficiency quickly.  This is safe and nontoxic.  Vitamin D level should be above 70 nmol/L.  Lifeguards and indigenous Pacific Islanders typically have levels between 80-100 nmol/L.   Levels lower than this are based on amount needed to prevent disease like rickets and osteomalacia. We need more thiamine when we're physically ill, emotionally and mentally stressed, and if we exercise like an athlete or laborer.  We need more thiamine if we eat a diet high in simple carbohydrates.  For every 500 kcal of carbohydrates, we need 500-1000 mg more of thiamine to process the carbs into energy.  If there's insufficient thiamine the carbs get stored as fat.  Again, recommended levels set for thiamine are based on minimum amounts needed to prevent disease.  This is often not adequate for optimum health, nor sufficient for people with absorption problems such as Celiac disease.  Gluten free processed foods are not enriched with vitamins like their gluten containing counterparts.  Adding a B Complex and additional thiamine improves health for Celiacs.  Thiamine is safe and nontoxic even in high doses.  Thiamine helps the mitochondria in cells to function.  Thiamine interacts with each of the other B vitamins.  They are all water soluble and easily excreted if not needed. Interesting Reading: Clinical trial: B vitamins improve health in patients with coeliac disease living on a gluten-free diet https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19154566/ Safety and effectiveness of vitamin D mega-dose: A systematic review https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34857184/ High dose dietary vitamin D allocates surplus calories to muscle and growth instead of fat via modulation of myostatin and leptin signaling https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38766160/ Safety of High-Dose Vitamin D Supplementation: Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31746327/ Vitamins and Celiac Disease: Beyond Vitamin D https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11857425/ Investigating the therapeutic potential of tryptophan and vitamin A in modulating immune responses in celiac disease: an experimental study https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40178602/ Investigating the Impact of Vitamin A and Amino Acids on Immune Responses in Celiac Disease Patients https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10814138/
    • Jane02
      Desperately need a vitamin D supplement. I've reacted to most brands I've tried.

      By Jane02 · Posted

      Thank you so much @knitty kitty for this insightful information! I would have never considered fractionated coconut oil to be a potential source of GI upset. I will consider all the info you shared. Very interesting about the Thiamine deficiency.  I've tracked daily averages of my intake in a nutrition software. The only nutrient I can't consistently meet from my diet is vitamin D. Calcium is a hit and miss as I rely on vegetables, dark leafy greens as a major source, for my calcium intake. I'm able to meet it when I either eat or juice a bundle of kale or collard greens daily haha. My thiamine intake is roughly 120% of my needs, although I do recognize that I may not be absorbing all of these nutrients consistently with intermittent unintentional exposures to gluten.  My vitamin A intake is roughly 900% (~6400 mcg/d) of my needs as I eat a lot of sweet potato, although since it's plant-derived vitamin A (beta-carotene) apparently it's not likely to cause toxicity.  Thanks again! 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.