Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Importance Of Tests


foxdog

Recommended Posts

foxdog Newbie

My naturopathic doctor discovered my gluten allergy through a four week allergy elimination diet. I didn't eat corn, soy, wheat, dairy, eggs, for four weeks. When I added these back in to my diet, I had a very bad reaction to wheat.

I've been strictly gluten-free for one year, and somewhat gluten-free for the two years prior to that.

In that time my vision problems, fatigue, endometriosis like problems, ovarian cysts, migranes, joint pain, has gone away, and I've lost a lot of weight. In short, I feel great, better than I ever have.

Should I even bother with the expensive diagnostic tests?

What are the benefits to having a test?


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



lob6796 Contributor
My naturopathic doctor discovered my gluten allergy through a four week allergy elimination diet. I didn't eat corn, soy, wheat, dairy, eggs, for four weeks. When I added these back in to my diet, I had a very bad reaction to wheat.

I've been strictly gluten-free for one year, and somewhat gluten-free for the two years prior to that.

In that time my vision problems, fatigue, endometriosis like problems, ovarian cysts, migranes, joint pain, has gone away, and I've lost a lot of weight. In short, I feel great, better than I ever have.

Should I even bother with the expensive diagnostic tests?

What are the benefits to having a test?

Unless you need the test to give yourself piece of mind, I wouldn't even bother. You have the evidence you need to keep being gluten free, so just stick with it. In the future you can tell doctors that you have either celiac or a gluten intolerance proven by an elimination diet. That should be good enough for their purposes. To be tested for celiac you would have to go back on gluten for quite some time, given that you have been gluten free for so long. They could order you to be on gluten for up to 6 months before they would feel the tests to be accurate. I personally wouldn't want to go back to feeling so crummy and lose all that I had worked towards.

mftnchn Explorer

There is no benefit for you at this point, because you will have to go back to eating gluten, perhaps for months, for the tests to be positive.

Enterolab, which does not diagnose celiac, only gluten sensitivity may work for up to a year after you stop eating gluten. But at this point it is really hard to say if anything will show up for you.

I think you do what you know is right for yourself.

My suggestion: if you have first degree relatives with symptoms, encourage them to do testing before going gluten free. With a confirmed celiac in the family, if others have symptoms, doctors may take this more seriously. I.E. other may benefit.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,201
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Judy Wysocki
    Newest Member
    Judy Wysocki
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Xravith
      I'm very confused... My blood test came out negative, I checked all antibodies. I suppose my Total IgA levels are normal (132 mg/dl), so the test should be reliable. Still, I'm not relieved as I can't tolerate even a single biscuit. I need to talk to my doctor about whether a duodenal biopsy is necessary. But it is really possible to have intestinal damage despite having a seronegative results? I have really strong symptoms, and I don't want to keep skipping university lectures or being bedridden at home.
    • Scott Adams
      They may want to also eliminate other possible causes for your symptoms/issues and are doing additional tests.  Here is info about blood tests for celiac disease--if positive an endoscopy where biopsies of your intestinal villi are taken to confirm is the typical follow up.    
    • Scott Adams
      In the Europe the new protocol for making a celiac disease diagnosis in children is if their tTg-IgA (tissue transglutaminase IgA) levels are 10 times or above the positive level for celiac disease--and you are above that level. According to the latest research, if the blood test results are at certain high levels that range between 5-10 times the reference range for a positive celiac disease diagnosis, it may not be necessary to confirm the results using an endoscopy/biopsy: Blood Test Alone Can Diagnose Celiac Disease in Most Children and Adults TGA-IgA at or Above Five Times Normal Limit in Kids Indicates Celiac Disease in Nearly All Cases No More Biopsies to Diagnose Celiac Disease in Children! May I ask why you've had so many past tTg-IgA tests done, and many of them seem to have been done 3 times during short time intervals?    
    • trents
      @JettaGirl, "Coeliac" is the British spelling of "celiac". Same disease. 
    • JettaGirl
      This may sound ridiculous but is this supposed to say Celiacs? I looked up Coeliacs because you never know, there’s a lot of diseases related to a disease that they come up with similar names for. It’s probably meant to say Celiacs but I just wanted to confirm.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.