Jump to content

  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):

    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Gi Doc Said Dont Need To Eat Gluten For Blood Test?

tbradley93

Recommended Posts

tbradley93 Apprentice
tbradley93
Posted

I read on this forum that you need to eat wheat (gluten) to get an accurate result for blood panel. My GI doc said that as long as it hasnt been 3 years w no gluten the test would still pick up the antibodies he is looking for.

I guess it really doesn't matter b/c he said either way the results go he will still do the endoscopy and test my intestines (I think I said that right).

Has anyone got a pos blood panel after not eating gluten for a little over a month? I have had an accident on halloween where I took a bite of a candy bar that had gluten in it.

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


dolly Apprentice
dolly
Posted

I am not a doctor so I don't know for certain, but that doesn't sound correct to me. Hopefully, more knowledgable others on this board will respond. Good Luck!!

Ursa Major Collaborator
Ursa Major
Posted

Unfortunately, this doctor doesn't have a clue what he is talking about. Three years? By then your intestines will be perfectly healed, and you'd be told you definitely don't have celiac disease, even if you do.

After being gluten-free for a month you will likely get a false negative on your blood tests, possibly even on your endoscopy, unless the damage was very severe to begin with.

Yes, you absolutely have to eat A LOT of gluten to test positive. After being gluten-free for a month, probably four slices of bread for about three to six months might result in an accurate test result.

Your only chance of getting accurate results at this point would be to get tested with Enterolab.

Emily Elizabeth Enthusiast
Emily Elizabeth
Posted

The endoscopy is the "gold standard" for diagnosis right now (so I'm told) so as long as he does that you should know for sure. I have read that you have to be ingesting gluten for at least 2 months (I think it was) to get accurate, no fail blood test results. I know my doctor told me that 1 year after diagnosis he will order another blood test for me and as long as I am successful with following the diet then the test should be completely normal. So I don't think the 3 years amount is correct. Like Dolly though, I'm not a doctor. I can only share what I have learned over the last six months. Good luck!

I read on this forum that you need to eat wheat (gluten) to get an accurate result for blood panel. My GI doc said that as long as it hasnt been 3 years w no gluten the test would still pick up the antibodies he is looking for.

I guess it really doesn't matter b/c he said either way the results go he will still do the endoscopy and test my intestines (I think I said that right).

Has anyone got a pos blood panel after not eating gluten for a little over a month? I have had an accident on halloween where I took a bite of a candy bar that had gluten in it.

Ursa Major Collaborator
Ursa Major
Posted
The endoscopy is the "gold standard" for diagnosis right now (so I'm told) so as long as he does that you should know for sure. I have read that you have to be ingesting gluten for at least 2 months (I think it was) to get accurate, no fail blood test results. I know my doctor told me that 1 year after diagnosis he will order another blood test for me and as long as I am successful with following the diet then the test should be completely normal. So I don't think the 3 years amount is correct. Like Dolly though, I'm not a doctor. I can only share what I have learned over the last six months. Good luck!

Well, you don't seem to understand that the blood tests after a year are supposed to tell the doctor if you've followed the diet. If you have been cheating and haven't healed as a result, your blood tests could come back elevated. If, on the other hand, you've been strictly gluten-free, your numbers should be in the normal range.

The three years are garbage. Most people heal perfectly within six months to a year. Only older people with a lot of damage over many years might never heal properly, because of permanent damage. And then of course those unfortunate people who have refractory sprue, who will never heal.

And you can never get 'no fail' blood test results, as they aren't all that reliable. Neither are the biopsies, as the damage is so easily missed.

nora-n Rookie
nora-n
Posted

I think they actually call it refractory celiac disease if there is still damage after three years off gluten...

Sometimes people post on the forums with something like that, but it is rare.

nora

tbradley93 Apprentice
tbradley93
Posted
  • Author

the doc did say that I need to eat wheat the night before the endoscopy procedure. He said that the damage is done right after I eat the wheat product.

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


Ridgewalker Contributor
Ridgewalker
Posted
the doc did say that I need to eat wheat the night before the endoscopy procedure. He said that the damage is done right after I eat the wheat product.

:o Well, now THAT is definitely wacky. . :( So he's saying you don't need to eat gluten for a blood test, but you do for an endoscopy- but just right before the procedure? This is nonsense.

First of all, it takes consistent ingestion of gluten to raise antibody levels and cause intestinal damage.

Secondly, what would that prove? That gluten still causes damage? ie- That you still have Celiac? Of course you do, you have it forever.

:( I am generally hesitant about badmouthing doctors, but this one truly sounds like he doesn't know what he's talking about.

The only point of having further endoscopies would be to see how well you're healing- which, with your level of damage, I don't blame you for wanting to do, for your peace of mind!

Edit-- Actually, I have no idea what level of damage you have, or if this is your 1st endoscopy- got you mixed up with someone else there for a sec ;) Sorry. Doesn't really affect anything else I said above.

nora-n Rookie
nora-n
Posted

Some researchers take biopsies and then expose the biopsies to gluten or lgiadin and then measure the antibodies with immunfluorescence.

Only then would the test be accurate, if you happen to be a subject in one of these studies......

They do not do that in us ordinary patients (yet)

The researchers are also in the middel of studies for a new test, where you must have been gluten-free for at least a week and then they measure freshly activated T cells in resposne to gluten:

Open Original Shared Link

nora

Joss Rookie
Joss
Posted

Your GI man must have gone to school with my idiot doctor because he told me that if I am truly gluten intolerant, there are always detectable traces of gluten anitbodies. I tokld him he was an idiot, nicely of course.

ravenwoodglass Mentor
ravenwoodglass
Posted
The endoscopy is the "gold standard" for diagnosis right now (so I'm told) so as long as he does that you should know for sure.

The endo may be the gold standard for diagnosis but it is not as accurate as you think. The endo and blood tests can tell you that you definately have full blown celiac but they can not rule it out if they are negative. Also many GI do not recognize the many forms of damage that are seen before you get to the point where you are almost dead. I have actually heard a GI tell a family member that they were not celiac...yet. The guy said if they wanted they could keep eating the gluten until the biopsies showed positive. Celaic has to be one of the few disease in the world where doctors want us to be almost ready to die before they will confirm we have it.

The best diagnostic tool, IMHO, is your bodies reaction to being gluten free and then perhaps a SHORT gluten challenge (until you react) after your problems have resolved a bit. Enterolab is also another valid route to diagnosis, and you don't have to be poisoning yourself to do the tests.

Tequila Newbie
Tequila
Posted

I was symptomatic for a week before i got the blood tests. My mother has celiac so I knew what to look for, didn't even see the dr. Just called her and told her to order the tests. They were all positive. I'll never know if they would have been positive the week before, but I had sudden onset of digestive symptoms. So hard to know how long they had been building up. Anyway, I went gluten-free right away. It was pretty easy since I knew what to do. Not that its that easy getting used to eating rice bread :D . Three months later all blood tests negative, and biopsy was negative also after three months. Hope that helps. I have also heard varying ideas on how long you must ingest gluten. I've heard that the damage can appear immediately. Not sure about that, but sure feels like it does. For sure the blood tests would take longer, it takes a while for the immune response to build up. How long that is I'm not sure, I have not read a study on that. I would have offered to be a guinea pig but the GI docs don't seem to be interested in learning anything new.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):


  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,642
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748
    BethC
    Newest Member
    BethC
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):


  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
      Buckwheat

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      I agree, there can be contamination at many points--milling is another possible source of contamination for any flours.
    • trents
      Buckwheat

      By trents · Posted

      Keep in mind that with manufactured food products, "gluten free" doesn't equate to no gluten. Things that are naturally gluten free can be cross-contaminated with gluten in the field, in shipping and in processing. In the U.S. companies can use the gluten free label as long as the product doesn't exceed 20ppm of gluten. That amount still may cause a reaction in some people.
    • deanna1ynne
      Inconclusive results

      By deanna1ynne · Posted

      Dd10 was tested for celiac four years ago bc two siblings were dx’d (positive labs and biopsies). Her results at the time were positive ema  and ttg (7x the UL), but a negative biopsy. We checked again three months later and her ttg was still positive (4x the UL), but ema and biopsy were negative. Doc said it was “potential celiac” and to keep eating gluten, but we were concerned about harming her growth and development while young and had her go gluten-free because we felt the labs and ema in particular were very suggestive of early celiac, despite the negative biopsies. She also had stomach aches and lethargy when eating it. We just felt it’d be better to be safe than sorry. Now, four years later, she doesn’t want to be gluten-free if she doesn’t “have to be,” so underwent a 12 week gluten challenge. She had labs done before starting and all looked great (celiac panel all negative, as expected.) Surprisingly, she experienced no noticeable symptoms when she began eating gluten again, which we felt was a positive sign. However, 12 weeks in, her labs are positive again (ttg 4x the UL and ema positive again as well). Doc says that since she feels fine and her previous two biopsies showed nothing, she can just keep eating gluten and we could maybe biopsy again in two years. I was looking up the ema test and the probability of having not just one but two false positives, and it seems ridiculously low.  Any advice? Would you biopsy again? She’s old enough at this point that I really feel I need her buy-in to keep her gluten-free, and she feels that if the doc says it’s fine, then that’s the final word — which makes me inclined to biopsy again and hope that it actually shows damage this time (not because I want her to have celiac like her sisters, but because I kind of think she already does have it, and seeing the damage now would save her more severe damage in the long run that would come from just continuing to eat gluten for a few more years before testing again.)  Our doc is great - we really like him. But we are very confused and want to protect her. One of her older sibs stopped growing and has lots of teeth problems and all that jazz from not catching the celiac disease sooner, and we don’t want to get to that point with the younger sis. fwiw- she doesn’t mind the biopsy at all. It’s at a children’s hospital and she thinks it’s kind of fun. So it’s not like that would stress her out or anything.
    • Inkie
      Buckwheat

      By Inkie · Posted

      Thanks for the replies. I already use a gluten-free brand of buckwheat flakes I occasionally get itchy bumps. I'm still reviewing all my food products. I occasionally eat prepackaged gluten-free crackers and cookies, so I'll stop using those. I use buckwheat flakes and Doves Farm flour as a base for baking. Would you recommend eliminating those as well? It's a constant search.
    • Wheatwacked
      Frequent nausea after gluten-free diet

      By Wheatwacked · Posted

      Gluten free food is not fortified with vitamins and minerals as regular food is.  Vitamin deficiencies are common especially in recently diagnosed persons,  Get a 25(OH)Vitamin D blood test. And work on raising it.  The safe upper blood level is around 200 nmol/L.    "Low serum levels of 25(OH)D have been associated with increased risk of autoimmune disease onset and/or high disease activity. The role of vitamin D in autoimmune diseases   🏋️‍♂️Good job!   I find the commercial milk will give me mild stomach burn at night, while pasture/grassfed only milk does not bother me at all.  While you are healing, listen to your body.  If it hurts to eat something, eat something else.  You may be able to eat it later, or maybe it is just not good for you.  Lower your Omega 6 to 3 ratio of what you eat.  Most omega 6 fatty acids are inflammation causing.    The standard american diet omega 6:3 ratio is estimated at upward of 14:1.  Thats why fish oil works
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.