Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

How Accurate Are The Antibody Tests?


angie315

Recommended Posts

angie315 Apprentice

I have just found out today that my 4-year-old daughter has test positive for Celiac (the antibody blood test). I was wondering how accurate these tests are. We are trying to get in with the only pediatric gastro. dr in are area and they say it could be months before we can get in for a biopsy. Of course they are asking me to keeping her on a gluten diet until after the biopsy. Is there a percentage of false positives with this test? She doesnt have alot of signs of celiac. The reason she got the test was because she just turned 4 and weighed in at 28lbs. It makes me mad that they waited till now to test her. I have expressed worry about her weight since she turned one.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



tarnalberry Community Regular

tests aren't accurate in young children, which is probably (hopefully) one of the reasons they waited. additionally, false positives are pretty much unheard of, outside of the lab returning you someone else's results. her being underweight IS a symptom, but many people - particularly children - show few of the major symptoms like diahrea or significant intestinal distress. you can talk to the doctor about forgoing the biopsy and diagnosing based on blood tests alone, or just wait for the biopsy, but he's right in keeping her on gluten for that in order for it to be a reliable test.

thepeach80 Rookie

I would call and ask them why they need a biopsy and will they diagnose w/out that. Then ask what an 'official' diagnosis will do for you. Ask if the + results and her gaining weight on a gluten free diet will count instead? When my son was having reflux issues it took us 2.5mos to get into the GI and then if it weren't for our nurse, it would've taken us another 3 mos to get in somewhere else for a second opinion. We tested Evan (he's 26# at 3 and 34.5") and his was negative which is more common this age, than a +, especially since he's only eaten gluten for about 1/2 his life. I got tested today and don't plan on getting the biopsy if it's +. I hope the diet helps and I would start it ASAP.

jenilee Newbie
I have just found out today that my 4-year-old daughter has test positive for Celiac (the antibody blood test). I was wondering how accurate these tests are. We are trying to get in with the only pediatric gastro. dr in are area and they say it could be months before we can get in for a biopsy. Of course they are asking me to keeping her on a gluten diet until after the biopsy. Is there a percentage of false positives with this test? She doesnt have alot of signs of celiac. The reason she got the test was because she just turned 4 and weighed in at 28lbs. It makes me mad that they waited till now to test her. I have expressed worry about her weight since she turned one.

I've gotten mixed opinions on accuracy of this test. My 3 1/2yo is only 29.5lbs and is a boy! he's like in the 8th % for his weight. No concerns from our ped though.

thepeach80 Rookie
I've gotten mixed opinions on accuracy of this test. My 3 1/2yo is only 29.5lbs and is a boy! he's like in the 8th % for his weight. No concerns from our ped though.

Weight is so tricky! For us Evan just doesn't fit w/ our family size wise, lol. Sounds terrible doesn't it and I know there's always recessive genes etc, but no one is small in our families. It won't be long before Evan and his sister (2 yrs younger) look like twins, they're only about 4# difference. Evan has obvious bouts where he grew, when he was Neocate only he took off in weight and height and when we introed foods back, he slowed down so it's hard. Right now we're o.k. w/ his 5% weight, it's his height that worries us sometimes (0%).

Juliet Newbie

Angie -

I just found this on the Celiac Disease Center at Columbia University website:

"Causes of false positive celiac serologic tests

The endomysial antibody test is virtually 100% specific for celiac disease. However anti-tTG has been reported to be positive in the presence of liver disease, especially cirrhosis [33], diabetes [34, 35] and severe heart failure [36], as well as arthritis [37] and various autoimmune disorders [38]. The use of human tTG as the antigen in the test kit adds some greater specificity. Antigliadin antibodies may be present in inflammatory bowel disease [39], collagen vascular disease [40], and in many healthy people as well [41].

Positive serologic tests in the presence of a normal biopsy

This situation occasionally arises. The presence of a positive EMA with a normal biopsy indicates either the presence of celiac disease that was not detected in the biopsy, either because of too few pieces being taken or misinterpretation. The biopsy should be reviewed by an expert gastrointestinal pathologist. If it is considered to be truly a normal biopsy the patient may well have latent celiac disease and will probably develop the disease at a later date."

I would think that unless there is a problem with cirrhosis, diabetes, etc., you could take that positive blood test as a positive diagnosis for Celiac Disease. And you can test for these other problems, too, and then if all are negative, it leaves only one possibility.

Like someone else suggested, find out if this g.i. doctor would diagnose without doing the biopsy with a combination of positive blood test and (if you try it) positive response to the diet. You could also get a gene test to see if your child has the gene for it. If your doctor and/or insurance won't do it, you can get one done through enterolab.com. Some of their other tests available are not yet recognized by the general medical community, but their gene test is reliable in the sense that if your child has HLA-DQ2 or HLA-DQ8, then your child has one of the Celiac Disease genes. The other gluten intolerant genes that they recognized are not yet also recognized as so by the medical community (and I'm not agreeing or disagreeing with their position - I need to research more myself before having an opinion). Some g.i. doctors will take the positive blood test with a positive gene test as enough for a diagnosis.

And (please keep in mind, this is only my two cents and I hope I'm not offending anyone) I would get your child onto a gluten free diet as soon as you can. Every day someone with Celiac Disease is exposed to gluten they are being damaged. This can lead to several other complications besides low weight: other autoimmune diseases, low bone density, liver problems, increased risk of cancer, etc. And some of the emotional/behavioral/mental issues that others experience (and your child may be experiencing as well and you just don't know about because this has been your "normal" for so long) can be very scary. Waiting that long just to get a positive biopsy (and as you can see from the quote above, it does happen) just seems to me a little scary.

angie315 Apprentice
Angie -

I just found this on the Celiac Disease Center at Columbia University website:

"Causes of false positive celiac serologic tests

The endomysial antibody test is virtually 100% specific for celiac disease. However anti-tTG has been reported to be positive in the presence of liver disease, especially cirrhosis [33], diabetes [34, 35] and severe heart failure [36], as well as arthritis [37] and various autoimmune disorders [38]. The use of human tTG as the antigen in the test kit adds some greater specificity. Antigliadin antibodies may be present in inflammatory bowel disease [39], collagen vascular disease [40], and in many healthy people as well [41].

Positive serologic tests in the presence of a normal biopsy

This situation occasionally arises. The presence of a positive EMA with a normal biopsy indicates either the presence of celiac disease that was not detected in the biopsy, either because of too few pieces being taken or misinterpretation. The biopsy should be reviewed by an expert gastrointestinal pathologist. If it is considered to be truly a normal biopsy the patient may well have latent celiac disease and will probably develop the disease at a later date."

I would think that unless there is a problem with cirrhosis, diabetes, etc., you could take that positive blood test as a positive diagnosis for Celiac Disease. And you can test for these other problems, too, and then if all are negative, it leaves only one possibility.

Like someone else suggested, find out if this g.i. doctor would diagnose without doing the biopsy with a combination of positive blood test and (if you try it) positive response to the diet. You could also get a gene test to see if your child has the gene for it. If your doctor and/or insurance won't do it, you can get one done through enterolab.com. Some of their other tests available are not yet recognized by the general medical community, but their gene test is reliable in the sense that if your child has HLA-DQ2 or HLA-DQ8, then your child has one of the Celiac Disease genes. The other gluten intolerant genes that they recognized are not yet also recognized as so by the medical community (and I'm not agreeing or disagreeing with their position - I need to research more myself before having an opinion). Some g.i. doctors will take the positive blood test with a positive gene test as enough for a diagnosis.

And (please keep in mind, this is only my two cents and I hope I'm not offending anyone) I would get your child onto a gluten free diet as soon as you can. Every day someone with Celiac Disease is exposed to gluten they are being damaged. This can lead to several other complications besides low weight: other autoimmune diseases, low bone density, liver problems, increased risk of cancer, etc. And some of the emotional/behavioral/mental issues that others experience (and your child may be experiencing as well and you just don't know about because this has been your "normal" for so long) can be very scary. Waiting that long just to get a positive biopsy (and as you can see from the quote above, it does happen) just seems to me a little scary.

Juliet-

Thanks so much for the attachment. I finally got an appointment with the GI ped. doctor on March 13th but they do have us on a cancellation list to get in sooner. They seem to understand that there is some urgency. My pediatrician has also expressed an urgency on getting her gluten free soon. I am having a very hard time continuing to feed my daughter gluten...I now feel like I am poisoning her. My husband has a lot of signs of Celiac Disease himself. I am sending him in for a blood test to see if that comes out positive. I will defintely speak to the doctor about skipping the biopsy if that test comes positive and about the gene test. Thank you!


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



mom with gf toddler Newbie

Hi,

just reading some of this........its been months since I was on this website. My now 3 year old had the biopsy and it was not bad at all. I am glad we did that because this gluten free diet can be hard at times and I have confirmation with the biopsy and will just keep moving forward gluten free. Also, my husband tested positive....good luck at your appointment.

thepeach80 Rookie

Has your DR called the GI to get your dd in? I know I was going to have to wait 3 mos for a 2nd opinion on Evan, but when our nurse called and explained what was going on, we got in the next week.

  • 2 weeks later...
angie315 Apprentice
Has your DR called the GI to get your dd in? I know I was going to have to wait 3 mos for a 2nd opinion on Evan, but when our nurse called and explained what was going on, we got in the next week.

We are in for March 13th but on a cancellation list. I am going to call again tommorow to see if she has any openings. We are trying different gluten free foods sporadically. We are still not gluten free but I thought it was a way of finding out what she likes so we can be ready. She is SOOO picky. She has not liked anything we have introduced! Ugh.

EmmaQ Rookie
We are in for March 13th but on a cancellation list. I am going to call again tommorow to see if she has any openings. We are trying different gluten free foods sporadically. We are still not gluten free but I thought it was a way of finding out what she likes so we can be ready. She is SOOO picky. She has not liked anything we have introduced! Ugh.

Definitely stay glutened up a lot. Children heal so quickly that any slack could result in less villi atrophy and then a negative biopsy.

Have you considered driving to a different Pedi GI that can get you in more quickly? We drove to Baltimore to Dr. Fasano. I would not say he is the best though, the number of biopsy samples taken was too little, they only took 4, I understand they should have taken at mininum twice that amount.

That is aweful to have to wait that long. I would be on the phone trying every angle I could, even going out of state.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,642
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    BethC
    Newest Member
    BethC
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
      I agree, there can be contamination at many points--milling is another possible source of contamination for any flours.
    • trents
      Keep in mind that with manufactured food products, "gluten free" doesn't equate to no gluten. Things that are naturally gluten free can be cross-contaminated with gluten in the field, in shipping and in processing. In the U.S. companies can use the gluten free label as long as the product doesn't exceed 20ppm of gluten. That amount still may cause a reaction in some people.
    • deanna1ynne
      Dd10 was tested for celiac four years ago bc two siblings were dx’d (positive labs and biopsies). Her results at the time were positive ema  and ttg (7x the UL), but a negative biopsy. We checked again three months later and her ttg was still positive (4x the UL), but ema and biopsy were negative. Doc said it was “potential celiac” and to keep eating gluten, but we were concerned about harming her growth and development while young and had her go gluten-free because we felt the labs and ema in particular were very suggestive of early celiac, despite the negative biopsies. She also had stomach aches and lethargy when eating it. We just felt it’d be better to be safe than sorry. Now, four years later, she doesn’t want to be gluten-free if she doesn’t “have to be,” so underwent a 12 week gluten challenge. She had labs done before starting and all looked great (celiac panel all negative, as expected.) Surprisingly, she experienced no noticeable symptoms when she began eating gluten again, which we felt was a positive sign. However, 12 weeks in, her labs are positive again (ttg 4x the UL and ema positive again as well). Doc says that since she feels fine and her previous two biopsies showed nothing, she can just keep eating gluten and we could maybe biopsy again in two years. I was looking up the ema test and the probability of having not just one but two false positives, and it seems ridiculously low.  Any advice? Would you biopsy again? She’s old enough at this point that I really feel I need her buy-in to keep her gluten-free, and she feels that if the doc says it’s fine, then that’s the final word — which makes me inclined to biopsy again and hope that it actually shows damage this time (not because I want her to have celiac like her sisters, but because I kind of think she already does have it, and seeing the damage now would save her more severe damage in the long run that would come from just continuing to eat gluten for a few more years before testing again.)  Our doc is great - we really like him. But we are very confused and want to protect her. One of her older sibs stopped growing and has lots of teeth problems and all that jazz from not catching the celiac disease sooner, and we don’t want to get to that point with the younger sis. fwiw- she doesn’t mind the biopsy at all. It’s at a children’s hospital and she thinks it’s kind of fun. So it’s not like that would stress her out or anything.
    • Inkie
      Thanks for the replies. I already use a gluten-free brand of buckwheat flakes I occasionally get itchy bumps. I'm still reviewing all my food products. I occasionally eat prepackaged gluten-free crackers and cookies, so I'll stop using those. I use buckwheat flakes and Doves Farm flour as a base for baking. Would you recommend eliminating those as well? It's a constant search.
    • Wheatwacked
      Gluten free food is not fortified with vitamins and minerals as regular food is.  Vitamin deficiencies are common especially in recently diagnosed persons,  Get a 25(OH)Vitamin D blood test. And work on raising it.  The safe upper blood level is around 200 nmol/L.    "Low serum levels of 25(OH)D have been associated with increased risk of autoimmune disease onset and/or high disease activity. The role of vitamin D in autoimmune diseases   🏋️‍♂️Good job!   I find the commercial milk will give me mild stomach burn at night, while pasture/grassfed only milk does not bother me at all.  While you are healing, listen to your body.  If it hurts to eat something, eat something else.  You may be able to eat it later, or maybe it is just not good for you.  Lower your Omega 6 to 3 ratio of what you eat.  Most omega 6 fatty acids are inflammation causing.    The standard american diet omega 6:3 ratio is estimated at upward of 14:1.  Thats why fish oil works
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.