Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Benefit Of Seeing Gi Doctor?


Mama Ruthies

Recommended Posts

Mama Ruthies Rookie

We had our 3.5 year old son tested through Enterolab in October and he came back elevated in everything with a celiac gene and a gluten sensitivity gene. We've had him gluten free since.

Is there any benefit to seeing a GI doctor? We wouldn't put him back on gluten for additional testing as we trust Enterolabs results. We also wouldn't have him scoped. I'm thinking it would be a better use of our money to have him see a naturopath to help us heal his body.

Does anyone have any things that they have seen as positives to having a GI doc? If the GI doctor wouldn't accept Enterolabs results, we wouldn't think of even paying the co-pay.

Thanks for any advice!

Amy


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Guest j_mommy

Since he's been gluten-free since October, unless you want to do the gluten challenge, I don't think a GI is going to do much. THey can't really do any testing, b/c the tests won't be "true".

happygirl Collaborator

However, the doctor can look for other reasons that he is still having symptoms. I am assuming by your post that even though he's been gluten-free for 3-4 months, he is still having symptoms.

Sometimes gluten isn't the problem, or something gluten isn't the only problem.

HAK1031 Enthusiast

Does his pediatrician at least know? Doctor's notes for school can be important so that his needs are taken seriously. Also his nutrient levels in his blood and his growth may need to be mroe carefully monitored.But I agree that you definitely should NOT put him back on gluten for testing.

Mama Ruthies Rookie

Actually, our son didn't have any digestive symptoms. We had him tested thru Enterolab because he had tested positive to all twenty items the allergist tested him for (10 food/10 environmental). He has speech delays, and we didn't feel he could effectively tell us when food bothered him when we did food elimination trials so we decided to test thru Enterolab. We were shocked at his results!

Now we feel that his speech delays probably are attributed to the gluten. I nursed him until around 16 months and he got some vaccines around 19 months. His younger sister was born when he was 20 months and we noticed his speech regressed after she was born.

We have seen a gradual improvement in his speech since pulling the gluten and family members who don't see him often say they have noticed a big change.

We don't plan on having him have gluten again. Now I need to pull our other four kids (all double DQ1) off gluten and see how they respond.

I wasn't sure if there was anything else the GI would do. I'm very interested in making nutritional changes to help his body---supplements, etc. My guess is a lot of GI doctors don't deal much with that.

One gal from our church said her son's GI tested for enzyme levels. Have you heard of this? He was lacking some enzymes.

Thanks for your responses!

Amy

HAK1031 Enthusiast

I would not put a child that young on any supplements without a doctor's advice, but if your pediatrician (who should be aware of your son's gluten problems) advises you, then I'd say there's no need for advice from a GI on that count. You might consider a nutrionist though, or a naturopath like you mentioned. But do talk to your pediatrician as they may be more comfortable with a GI treating your son- my pediatrician is clueless about celiac. As for the enzyme levels, I have no idea. Good luck!

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      133,162
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Carolyn harkless
    Newest Member
    Carolyn harkless
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):
  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      Let me hasten to add that if you will be undergoing an endoscopy/biopsy, it is critical that you do not begin efforts to reduce gluten beforehand. Doing so will render the results invalid as it will allow the small bowel lining to heal and, therefore, obscure the damage done by celiac disease which is what the biopsy is looking for.
    • Scott Adams
      This article, and the comments below it, may be helpful:    
    • Scott Adams
      That’s a really tough situation. A few key points: as mentioned, a gluten challenge does require daily gluten for several weeks to make blood tests meaningful, but negative tests after limited exposure aren’t reliable. Dermatitis herpetiformis can also be tricky to diagnose unless the biopsy is taken from normal-looking skin next to a lesion. Some people with celiac or DH don’t react every time they’re exposed, so lack of symptoms doesn’t rule it out. Given your history and family cancer risk, this is something I’d strongly discuss with a celiac-experienced gastroenterologist or dermatologist before attempting a challenge on your own, so risks and benefits are clearly weighed.
    • Greymo
      https://celiac.org/glutenexposuremarkers/    yes, two hours after accidents ingesting gluten I am vomiting and then diarrhea- then exhaustion and a headache. see the article above- There is research that shows our reactions.
    • trents
      Concerning the EMA positive result, the EMA was the original blood test developed to detect celiac disease and has largely been replaced by the tTG-IGA which has a similar reliability confidence but is much less expensive to run. Yes, a positive EMA is very strong evidence of celiac disease but not foolproof. In the UK, a tTG-IGA score that is 10x normal or greater will often result in foregoing the endoscopy/biopsy. Weaker positives on the tTG-IGA still trigger the endoscopy/biopsy. That protocol is being considered in the US but is not yet in place.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.