Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Family Sues Mcdonald's Over Undisclosed Ingredient


Respira

Recommended Posts

Respira Apprentice

It seems we can't even trust the information on websites

Open Original Shared Link

FORT WORTH, Texas -- A North Texas family is suing McDonald's after it says the company lied about a product ingredient, NBC 5 reported.

The french fries that have made McDonald's famous are at the center of this lawsuit. The lawsuit filed in Tarrant County Thursday claims McDonald's used an ingredient that caused a customer to suffer an allergic reaction, and the victim accuses the restaurant of lying about the ingredient.

The family said they spent time looking for places with a gluten-free menu for their son and when they checked McDonald's Web site it listed the french fries and several other menu items as gluten-free.

Clay Jenkins, the family's attorney, said he believes McDonald's wasn't telling the truth.

"Their Web sites said, 'our products contain no gluten, it is safe for your children to eat this.' They touted their products as being gluten free, when in fact they had gluten, and the children suffered as a result of that," Jenkins said.

Jenkins said McDonald's later corrected its Web site, but not before three others listed in the lawsuit became sick.

Jenkins claims the parents took extra care to avoid an allergic reaction, and McDonald's didn't take enough precautions to prevent one.

"For people who are allergic, who actually go to you and inquire


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



jennyj Collaborator

Some companies just do not get it. We did not choose to have allergies or intolerances and we don't want to be a pain in the butt when we ask questions about their products , we just do not want to get sick. You would think that they could be honest about their foods. I called a resturaunt once to see if they could accomodate my special dietary needs and they told me no but at least they were honest. Keep us updated on the case please.

Lisa Mentor

This is not good news for the Celiac Community.

If this law suit trend continues, you can look forward to no more gluten free menus in restaurants, no more gluten free labels on products and no more advancements in gluten free products. Look forward to more CYA statements that will leave you with doubt about what is consumable and what is not.

The fear of the almighty law suit will rob us of all the inroads we have made over the past several years.

McDonald's currently lists their fries as "containing gluten", WHICH HAS BEEN TESTED AS UNDETECTABLE AND SAFE FOR CELIACS TO CONSUME , as a CYA statement. It has often been recommended on this site, that consuming McD's fries is a personal choice.

:(

Morrisun Newbie
This is not good news for the Celiac Community.

If this law suit trend continues, you can look forward to no more gluten free menus in restaurants, no more gluten free labels on products and no more advancements in gluten free products. Look forward to more CYA statements that will leave you with doubt about what is consumable and what is not.

The fear of the almighty law suite will rob us of all the inroads we have made over the past several years.

McDonald's currently lists their fries as "containing gluten", WHICH HAS BEEN TESTED AS UNDETECTABLE AND SAFE FOR CELIACS TO CONSUME , as a CYA statement. It has often been recommended on this site, that consuming McD's fries is a personal choice.

:(

I totally agree with you. I think as Celiacs, we need to bear the responsibility of choosing whether to risk eating out or not. There are so many variables that are totally out of our control when we eat out.

Lisa Mentor
I totally agree with you. I think as Celiacs, we need to bear the responsibility of choosing whether to risk eating out or not. There are so many variables that are totally out of our control when we eat out.

I also agree. Whenever I eat out in a restaurant, I take 100% responsibility for my health, what I choose to order and what I put in my mouth. The risk is mine.

Tim-n-VA Contributor

The five comments on that article on the website listed pretty much sums up the varying views on this one.

jkmunchkin Rising Star
This is not good news for the Celiac Community.

If this law suit trend continues, you can look forward to no more gluten free menus in restaurants, no more gluten free labels on products and no more advancements in gluten free products. Look forward to more CYA statements that will leave you with doubt about what is consumable and what is not.

The fear of the almighty law suite will rob us of all the inroads we have made over the past several years.

McDonald's currently lists their fries as "containing gluten", WHICH HAS BEEN TESTED AS UNDETECTABLE AND SAFE FOR CELIACS TO CONSUME , as a CYA statement. It has often been recommended on this site, that consuming McD's fries is a personal choice.

:(

I also agree. Whenever I eat out in a restaurant, I take 100% responsibility for my health, what I choose to order and what I put in my mouth. The risk is mine.

Absolutely!!! It's sad that some people are just so money hungry and will do anything to make a buck.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Lisa Mentor

Ooops....Forgot to say thank you Respira for this information.

dbmamaz Explorer

Look, from reading this board, it looks like the only foods which can be guarenteed to be 100% gluten-free are those which are grown, transported and processed in facilities which do not handle gluten. I agree that suing companies for CC makes it impossible for them to make any effort to support allergy-free eating. You cannot expect McDonalds to eliminate Cc or stop serving anything containing any possible allergen.

I agree, this only means more CYA statements and the only winners will be the lawyers.

tarnalberry Community Regular

I think we're likely dealing with a CC issue here, and to sue over that is ridiculous. If you are a celiac who knows that you have extreme reactions to even the most trace amounts of gluten, you have no space in your life for CC - and any place that has gluten in it has the possibility of CC. If you were extraordinarily allergic to peanuts (to the point where being in the same room with them causes an anaphylactic reaction), would you choose to dine at thai restaurants? You *know* that cuisine regularly uses peanuts (finely chopped, no less), giving a good chance that someone near you would have them. It wouldn't be the restaurant's fault that they serve peanuts.

home-based-mom Contributor

It has been posted elsewhere that restaurants have a responsibility to serve safe food. They also have a responsibility to inform people of all ingredients in the food they serve, so people can make an informed decision about whether or not to eat the food served by the restaurant.

If I am reading this right, what McDonald's website says now is not what it said when the family checked. If I am reading this right, the family did look, and believed what was on the website. If the information was wrong, and the family ate there based on the information on the website, then McDonald's is at least partly responsible for whatever happened as a result of eating food the family was possibly mislead into believing was safe but apparently was not.

If the lawsuit is only asking for medical bills, attorney fees and mandated accurate information, then maybe it can serve as a good wake-up call to the restaurant industry about their responsibilities to their customers. If "other damages" turns out to be a few million dollars, then there is greed involved, and shame on the family. The lawsuit will indeed do more harm than good.

From what I understand about the fast-food industry, the goal is to squeeze as much profit out of as little labor and overhead as possible. Automation is their friend and special needs gum up the assembly line.

From my perspective, getting them to give us completely accurate information 100% of the time so we can make our own informed decisions is the only way we can both live in a world obsessed with things we cannot eat and still be responsible for making safe and healthy choices for ourselves.

It's a shame if companies are allowed to post inaccurate information without consequence. It leaves us to wonder who is being truthful and who is not. Which company is "on the ball" and which company can't be bothered. Which company makes customer safety a priority and which company assigns this sort of thing to somebody who is already over-burdened with responsibilities due to downsizing.

Hopefully the end result will be that the industry as a whole takes more seriously that processed foods cannot be tolerated by a growing number of people, and the industry needs to provide everyone with accurate and up-to-date information. If I am reading the gist of the lawsuit right, that is all the family was initially looking for.

dbmamaz Explorer
Hopefully the end result will be that the industry as a whole takes more seriously that processed foods cannot be tolerated by a growing number of people, and the industry needs to provide everyone with accurate and up-to-date information. If I am reading the gist of the lawsuit right, that is all the family was initially looking for.

While that is what the lawyer implies, that doesnt mean it accureatly explains what happenned. While it may be that a filler wasnt included on an ingredient list, or a 'natural flavor' contained a gluten ingredient which McD's didnt catch, I suspect what really happenned was CC, but the lawyer is accusing McD's of lying about ingredients, because you cant sue for CC. I could be wrong, but thats what lawyers do, exagerate to the point of dishonesty to try to convince a judge and some jurors to give a big award, the majority of which will go to . . .the lawyer.

Lisa Mentor

"From my perspective, getting them to give us completely accurate information 100% of the time so we can make our own informed decisions is the only way we can both live in a world obsessed with things we cannot eat and still be responsible for making safe and healthy choices for ourselves."

.............

Sure, Sandi, that would be great in a perfect world. But the risk is still ours.

It is similar to recommending a certain gluten free product here on this site. We can recommend and give our testimony regarding a product, but in the end it is our responsibility to make sure what we consume is safe for us and our family. In this case, it's an educated choice.

If, indeed those fries were gluten free as listed previously on their website ( and I believe that they are/were) the child got sick from cross contamination. That is our risk to assume when eating out. This as well, is an educated choice.

This is my personal belief. ;)

tarnalberry Community Regular
If I am reading this right, what McDonald's website says now is not what it said when the family checked. If I am reading this right, the family did look, and believed what was on the website. If the information was wrong, and the family ate there based on the information on the website, then McDonald's is at least partly responsible for whatever happened as a result of eating food the family was possibly mislead into believing was safe but apparently was not.

The ingredient in question has been tested as being gluten-free. Of course, as with any laboratory test, there is a limit to how small a quantity can be detected, but that quantity is lower than what has been studied as being triggering to celiacs. We all know that plenty of people suspect/know that they react to less than that, but we have to be intelligent about the fact that anything we don't prepare ourselves from scratch has a risk. "Trust" is rather relative here, and there is NO SUCH THING as truly, 100%, trusting a restaurant.

home-based-mom Contributor

Everyone makes good points. The responsibility is ultimately our own, and my personal rule of thumb is, when it doubt, don't.

The news article (never unbiased, imho) doesn't tell us how long since the child had been diagnosed. Who cares? The longer since diagnosis, the longer the family would have had to learn who to trust and who not to trust. The longer they would have had to do more research about things like cc, etc. The longer they would have had to stumble upon this board, where now they can only lurk and not comment (at least about THAT!) because of the lawsuit. Heck, maybe they are lurking even now! :ph34r:

But I digress. Yes, it is the attorney's job to slant all opinions in favor of his client. If he is good enough, he can win almost any case, even if maybe he shouldn't.

Would I have sued in a similar situation? No. The information doesn't appear to be deliberately wrong or misleading. There appears to be no sign of callous neglect. No one died, or suffered life-ling impairement from this one incident. The error has been corrected.

Unfortunately, we do live in a law-suit happy environment, and the family chose this route. Personally I think the goal of having the company post accurate information could have been accomplished better by first contacting them. If that didn't work, write a letter to the local newspaper and/or an internal industry publication. Call a local TV station - negative publicity can go a long ways towards getting something done and need not involve even one lawyer. Legal action should be the last resort, not the first one.

Would I chance eating the fries. I don't think so! :blink::P

buffettbride Enthusiast

The fundamental problem I have with a lawsuit like this, is I fear it will lead to all restaurants not providing allergen-friendly listings and complete lack of accomodation for people with food "disabilities." There is nothing that requires restaurants to provide such dining options and I'm certain there is no way to guarantee a particular dining experience will be safe. It is ALWAYS a risk to eat out no matter how safe the menu looks or how safe you think the people serving you will be.

However, that said, if a restaurant chooses to provide allergen (intolerance)-friendly options, then they better know it is more than just the ingredients that require precaution.

That said, no way in h-e-double hockey stix would I let my daughter have McFries or ANYTHING from that gluten disaster waiting to happen.

Morrisun Newbie
"Trust" is rather relative here, and there is NO SUCH THING as truly, 100%, trusting a restaurant.

That's so true and it goes for everyone, not just people with Celiac.

phakephur Apprentice

I love how these parents are so concerned about their children's diet/health and then they take them to McDonald's.

kbtoyssni Contributor
I love how these parents are so concerned about their children's diet/health and then they take them to McDonald's.

Good point! Let's look at the big picture here, folks! :lol:

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - cristiana replied to Scatterbrain's topic in Sports and Fitness
      5

      Feel like I’m starting over

    2. - knitty kitty replied to Jmartes71's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      8

      My only proof

    3. - Wheatwacked replied to Jmartes71's topic in Coping with Celiac Disease
      8

      Related issues

    4. - NanceK replied to Jmartes71's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      8

      My only proof

    5. - Wheatwacked replied to Scatterbrain's topic in Sports and Fitness
      5

      Feel like I’m starting over


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,295
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    LaniH
    Newest Member
    LaniH
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • cristiana
      Hi @Scatterbrain Thank you for your reply.   Some of these things could be weaknesses, also triggered by stress, which perhaps have come about as the result of long-term deficiencies which can take a long time to correct.   Some could be completely unrelated. If it is of help, I'll tell you some of the things that started in the first year or two, following my diagnosis - I pinned everything on coeliac disease, but it turns out I wasn't always right!  Dizziness, lightheaded - I was eventually diagnosed with cervical dizziness (worth googling, could be your issue too, also if you have neck pain?)  A few months after diagnosis I put my neck out slightly carrying my seven-year-old above my head, and never assigned any relevance to it as the pain at the time was severe but so short-lived that I'd forgotten the connection. Jaw pain - stress. Tinnitus - I think stress, but perhaps exacerbated by iron/vitamin deficiencies. Painful ribs and sacroiliac joints - no idea, bloating made the pain worse. It got really bad but then got better. Irregular heart rate - could be a coincidence but my sister (not a coeliac) and I both developed this temporarily after our second Astra Zeneca covid jabs.   Subsequent Pfizer jabs didn't affect us. Brain fog - a big thing for people with certain autoimmune issues but in my case I think possibly worse when my iron or B12 are low, but I have no proof of this. Insomnia - stress, menopause. So basically, it isn't always gluten.  It might be worth having your vitamins and mineral levels checked, and if you have deficiencies speak to your Dr about how better to address them?    
    • knitty kitty
      @NanceK, I do have Hypersensitivity Type Four reaction to Sulfa drugs, a sulfa allergy.  Benfotiamine and other forms of Thiamine do not bother me at all.  There's sulfur in all kinds of Thiamine, yet our bodies must have it as an essential nutrient to make life sustaining enzymes.  The sulfur in thiamine is in a ring which does not trigger sulfa allergy like sulfites in a chain found in pharmaceuticals.  Doctors are not given sufficient education in nutrition (nor chemistry in this case).  I studied Nutrition before earning a degree in Microbiology.  I wanted to know what vitamins were doing inside the body.   Thiamine is safe and nontoxic even in high doses.   Not feeling well after starting Benfotiamine is normal.  It's called the "thiamine paradox" and is equivalent to an engine backfiring if it's not been cranked up for a while.  Mine went away in about three days.  I took a B Complex, magnesium and added molybdenum for a few weeks. It's important to add a B Complex with all eight essential B vitamins. Supplementing just one B vitamin can cause lows in some of the others and result in feeling worse, too.  Celiac Disease causes malabsorption of all the B vitamins, not just thiamine.  You need all eight.  Thiamine forms including Benfotiamine interact with each of the other B vitamins in some way.  It's important to add a magnesium glycinate or chelate supplement as well.  Forms of Thiamine including Benfotiamine need magnesium to make those life sustaining enzymes.  (Don't use magnesium oxide.  It's not absorbed well.  It pulls water into the intestines and is used to relieve constipation.)   Molybdenum is a trace mineral that helps the body utilize forms of Thiamine.   Molybdenum supplements are available over the counter.  It's not unusual to be low in molybdenum if low in thiamine.   I do hope you will add the necessary supplements and try Benfotiamine again. Science-y Explanation of Thiamine Paradox: https://hormonesmatter.com/paradoxical-reactions-with-ttfd-the-glutathione-connection/#google_vignette
    • Wheatwacked
      Your goal is not to be a good puppet, there is no gain in that. You might want to restart the ones that helped.  It sounds more like you are suffering from malnutrition.  Gluten free foods are not fortified with things like Thiamine (B1), vitamin D, Iodine, B1,2,3,5,6 and 12 as non-gluten free products are required to be. There is a Catch-22 here.  Malnutrition can cause SIBO, and SIBO can worsen malnutrition. Another possibility is side effects from any medication that are taking.  I was on Metformin 3 months before it turned me into a zombi.  I had crippling side effects from most of the BP meds tried on me, and Losartan has many of the side effects on me from my pre gluten free days. Because you have been gluten free, you can test and talk until you are blue in the face but all of your tests will be negative.  Without gluten, you will not create the antigen against gluten, no antigens to gluten, so no small intestine damage from the antigens.  You will need to do a gluten challange to test positive if you need an official diagnosis, and even then, no guaranty: 10 g of gluten per day for 6 weeks! Then a full panel of Celiac tests and biopsy. At a minimum consider vitamin D, Liquid Iodine (unless you have dermatitis herpetiformis and iodine exasperates the rash), and Liquid Geritol. Push for vitamin D testing and a consult with a nutritionist experienced with Celiack Disease.  Most blood tests don't indicate nutritional deficiencies.  Your thyroid tests can be perfect, yet not indicate iodine deficiency for example.  Thiamine   test fine, but not pick up on beriberi.  Vegans are often B12 deficient because meat, fish, poultry, eggs, and dairy are the primary souces of B12. Here is what I take daily.  10,000 IU vitamin D3 750 mg g a b a [   ] 200 mg CoQ10 [   ] 100 mg DHEA [   ] 250 mg thiamine B1 [   ] 100 mg of B2 [   ] 500 mg B5 pantothenic acid [   ] 100 mg B6 [   ] 1000 micrograms B12 n [   ] 500 mg vitamin c [   ] 500 mg taurine [   ] 200 mg selenium   
    • NanceK
      Hi…Just a note that if you have an allergy to sulfa it’s best not to take Benfotiamine. I bought a bottle and tried one without looking into it first and didn’t feel well.  I checked with my pharmacist and he said not to take it with a known sulfa allergy. I was really bummed because I thought it would help my energy level, but I was thankful I was given this info before taking more of it. 
    • Wheatwacked
      Hello @Scatterbrain, Are you getting enough vitamins and minerals.  Gluten free food is not fortified so you may be starting to run low on B vitamins and vitamin D.   By the way you should get your mom checked for celiac disease.  You got it from your mom or dad.  Some studies show that following a gluten-free diet can stabilize or improve symptoms of dementia.  I know that for the 63 years I was eating gluten I got dumber and dumber until I started GFD and vitamin replenishment and it began to reverse.  Thiamine can get used up in a week or two.  Symptoms can come and go with daily diet.  Symptoms of beriberi due to Thiamine deficiency.   Difficulty walking. Loss of feeling (sensation) in hands and feet. Loss of muscle function or paralysis of the lower legs. Mental confusion. Pain. Speech difficulties. Strange eye movements (nystagmus) Tingling. Any change in medications? Last March I had corotid artery surgery (90 % blockage), and I started taking Losartan for blood pressure, added to the Clonidine I was taking already.  I was not recovering well and many of my pre gluten free symptoms were back  I was getting worse.  At first I thought it was caused a reaction to the anesthesia from the surgery, but that should have improved after two weeks.  Doctor thought I was just being a wimp. After three months I talked to my doctor about a break from the Losartan to see if it was causing it. It had not made any difference in my bp.  Except for clonindine, all of the previous bp meds tried had not worked to lower bp and had crippling side effects. One, I could not stand up straight; one wobbly knees, another spayed feet.  Inguinal hernia from the Lisinopril cough.  Had I contiued on those, I was destined for a wheelchair or walker. She said the symptoms were not from Losartan so I continued taking it.  Two weeks later I did not have the strength in hips and thighs to get up from sitting on the floor (Help, I can't get up😨).  I stopped AMA (not recommended).  Without the Losartan, a) bp did not change, after the 72 hour withdrawal from Losartanon, on clonidine only and b) symptoms started going away.  Improvement started in 72 hours.  After six weeks they were gone and I am getting better.  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.