Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Enterolab Testing


cdog7

Recommended Posts

cdog7 Contributor

I'm so fed up with the whole idea of how celiac is diagnosed (especially after going through 3 doctors that had no clue about it), so now I'm considering the Enterolab test. I can't stand that I would otherwise have to damage my body on purpose, maybe for years just to get a dx, even when I have all the symptoms and a celiac mother. It's maddening!

Here's my question


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



confusedks Enthusiast
I'm so fed up with the whole idea of how celiac is diagnosed (especially after going through 3 doctors that had no clue about it), so now I'm considering the Enterolab test. I can't stand that I would otherwise have to damage my body on purpose, maybe for years just to get a dx, even when I have all the symptoms and a celiac mother. It's maddening!

Here's my question

Guest Lore

Just a work of caution:

I have a friend going through medical school at UCLA who did some research on the enterolab testing for me because I too am curious about getting an accurate test result (for once) and he said that although in theory it makes sense, the doctor who has patented the idea for enterolab testing has never published any of his findings for the public to acknowledge. Although this may not be a factor on whether or not his information is credible, it is something to take into consideration that other people cannot study his official results. Apparently, there was one scholarly journal a few years ago that did a minor study on it and claimed it only worked a small percentage of the time, however, they only had 6 patients try it out. Either way you look at it, the data is not publically available to support the idea. However, it sounds like it could be blossoming soon. The choice is yours, but please consider what sources you're relying on before jumping on board. Good luck!

confused Community Regular

I think it is a good place to start at. Of ocurse if it shows u are highly gluten intolerant and you take away gluten and in an yr, you are still feeling good, then you need to look deeper in what is causing you to feel the way that you do. You could intolerant due to candida, metals, mold, lyme or parasites just to name a few.

i tested threw them and blood test and was positive for both, but i wasnt 100 percent after giving up gluten and casein, so then i had to give up soy. I felt good for awhile then i found out i also had candida and i am now on that diet and feeling awesome.

paula

aikiducky Apprentice

Enterolab doesn't give a celiac diagnosis. Basically what they claim is that anybody who tests positive for gluten intolerance on their test would feel better cutting out gluten. If you already cut out gluten and feel better, you already know that. :)

Pauliina

jenrn Apprentice

I did the enterolab testing for two reasons after I tested negative on the traditional celiac tests. I wanted to see if I had the genes to see if I could basically rule out celiac forever (although I do know there are some people who have celiac without having the two identified genes). I also wanted to do the tests in case they do become accepted by the medical community down the road. Then I will already have the results. I am really happy I did the enterolab tests because it did identify me as gluten sensitive and also showed that I carry two copies of the DQ2 gene. That was enough for me to go gluten free and the results have been amazing for me.

Jen

danandbetty1 Newbie
Just a work of caution:

I have a friend going through medical school at UCLA who did some research on the enterolab testing for me because I too am curious about getting an accurate test result (for once) and he said that although in theory it makes sense, the doctor who has patented the idea for enterolab testing has never published any of his findings for the public to acknowledge. Although this may not be a factor on whether or not his information is credible, it is something to take into consideration that other people cannot study his official results. Apparently, there was one scholarly journal a few years ago that did a minor study on it and claimed it only worked a small percentage of the time, however, they only had 6 patients try it out. Either way you look at it, the data is not publically available to support the idea. However, it sounds like it could be blossoming soon. The choice is yours, but please consider what sources you're relying on before jumping on board. Good luck!

To me I feel better on the diet so i stay on it. If you read all the questions they ask you to see if you may have it and you say yes, you do. To me the test just confirms you answered the questions correctly. The diet is hard when you are traveling or are in a hurry. You have to change your life to fit the diet. If you feel good on the diet stay on it. Other wise get tested to maybe comfirm you have it. Dan


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Ginsou Explorer

My blood tests for celiac were negative. If I hadn't had the Enterolab tests done, I never would have known that I also have the double genes, and also have a casein and soy problem. I had stopped gluten on my own, and still was in a lot of pain and ended up in the emergency room with no insurance coverage. All their tests were also normal. I had replaced much of my gluten products with soy products, which was making me even sicker. Without those Enterolab tests, I never would have know what the real problem was. The gastro doctor that I will be seeing in August (I have medical coverage then) not only believes in Enterolab, he encourages his patients to have the tests done when the conventional blood tests are negative.

Gwen B Rookie
My blood tests for celiac were negative. If I hadn't had the Enterolab tests done, I never would have known that I also have the double genes, and also have a casein and soy problem. I had stopped gluten on my own, and still was in a lot of pain and ended up in the emergency room with no insurance coverage. All their tests were also normal. I had replaced much of my gluten products with soy products, which was making me even sicker. Without those Enterolab tests, I never would have know what the real problem was. The gastro doctor that I will be seeing in August (I have medical coverage then) not only believes in Enterolab, he encourages his patients to have the tests done when the conventional blood tests are negative.

This is a good to know. I have just received my results back from Enterolab confirming my sensitivity to gluten, the fat malabsorption test also explains my mild anemia. I have been gluten-free, CF, SF, and can't tolerate Tapioca flour either. These things I worked out for myself because my dr didn't think there was much likelyhood of the disease and would not test me further, since my symptoms when glutened are not terrible, just not pleasant and I was so very tired all the time before now.

However, the numbers will enable me to talk to my family who don't always believe in clearing their crumbs up, and forget not to 'double dip' spoons etc. I also now know that since I carry both gluten sensitive genes that both my kids will need to be aware of possible symptoms and I have more than good reason now to ask the Dr. to test them also for celiac. I also now know that I have inherited these genes from both my parents. My mother already knows she is celiac and has been gluten-free for two years but my father who has 'stomach upsets' several times a year and intermittant lactose intolerance could benefit from testing.

I hope that as more us present information about celiac/gluten intolerance the doctors will get informed and not dismiss the cumalative evidence demonstrating that gluten intolerance is not such a rare thing and avoidance of gluten can prevent other ailments other than villous atrophy.

home-based-mom Contributor
Apparently, there was one scholarly journal a few years ago that did a minor study on it and claimed it only worked a small percentage of the time, however, they only had 6 patients try it out.

Just curious ~ what did they compare it to to claim that it only worked a small percentage of the time? The conventional blood test that is so often a false negative? The scope that is so often a false negative? What made them decide it only worked a small percentage of the time? Inquiring minds want to know! :rolleyes:

jayhawkmom Enthusiast

I've had the blood tests and the biopsy. Both were inconclusive, but both suggested that "something" was going on, even if the doctors could not quite put a name to it. I went on the gluten free diet, and have had a terrific dietary response.

I went ahead and did the gene testing for my own benefit, so I could determine whether or not my genes might play into a part of the puzzle, at some point. And, I've discovered that I have a Celiac gene and a gluten intolerance gene. So, being on a gluten-free diet is highly beneficial for me, regardless.

I wish Dr. Fine would publish so that the skeptics would be able to stop being skeptical. =)

Mom23boys Contributor

I have been going to drs since I was 11 to try and figure out what was wrong with me (I turn 42 this year). Hubby (and his siblings) has had this odd rash all his life and has seen drs but with no real info. They all just want to start giving us an arsenal of pills and not really spending the time to find out what is wrong. If we go to a new dr, they just want to reinvent the wheel. Not a one of them have even been remotely close to what is going on.

Last year we took my oldest to a special needs person who is also certified in nutrition. She suggested a gluten-free trial for him. She also said we looked like we needed it too. I don't know what we look like that cued her in but we did it. Research brought us to that lab. We liked the fact that we could order it and bypass a dr's order. We also liked the fact that we did not have to go back on gluten.

The results we have received the better info from this test than we have from drs. It may not be 100% yes or 100% no but it is much more info than we have had. I know we are on the right track now and it is not in our head as one dr suggested. We have confirmed hubby's genes and his Mom is going to be tested. (She will probably go traditional medical route) I know my two little kids have taken off on a growth binge since we have been 100% gluten-free (just a few weeks). Their chiropractor commented at last visit. Hubby's rash is less severe. Even my skin issues have cleared up. My dyslexic kid has gone on a reading binge. I could go on. For whatever reason gluten has been holding us back.

jayhawkmom Enthusiast

I also wanted to add... you do not have to have a diagnosis of Celiac to have the ability to follow a gluten free diet in a hospital setting.

If you are admitted, for whatever reason, simply tell them that you are gluten free. You'll have to examine your food options and scrutinize every little thing to make sure it IS gluten free, but they can't deny you gluten free meals simply because you don't have an official diagnosis.

Diabetics don't have to "prove" they have diabetes, people who need low or no salt menus don't have to prove they have a disease or condition that warrants it. Same with Celiac. Consider a vegetarian... diet is usually choice. Hospitals don't force them to eat meat.

My daughter was hospitalized last summer, we weren't required to have anything in writing or anything for them to follow the diet with her. Granted, she didn't have a lot of choices, but there definitely were gluten-free options for her.

=)

I HTH!

Mom23boys Contributor
I also wanted to add... you do not have to have a diagnosis of Celiac to have the ability to follow a gluten free diet in a hospital setting.

The hospital food was the only good thing about the hospital I had my first 2 babies in. They made an "issue" specific meal fit for royalty. The chef was the only person there who got it!

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - Wheatwacked replied to GlutenFreeChef's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      12

      Blood Test for Celiac wheat type matters?

    2. - trents replied to JudyLou's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      1

      Seeking advice on potential gluten challenge

    3. - JudyLou posted a topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      1

      Seeking advice on potential gluten challenge

    4. - marzian commented on Scott Adams's article in Diagnosis, Testing & Treatment
      5

      A Future Beyond the Gluten-Free Diet? Scientists Test a New Cell Therapy for Celiac Disease (+Video)

    5. - Jmartes71 posted a topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      0

      Medications

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      133,145
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Marsu
    Newest Member
    Marsu
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):
  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Wheatwacked
      no argument. Never take the pills sold for Nuclear events, except in a nuclear event when instructed to by authorities.  Some of these go up to 130 milligrams per pill. 5000 times the strength of the dietary supplement.  130 times the safe upper limit.  130 mg = 130,000 mcg. Dietary supplements like Lugol's Solution and Liquid Iodine are 50 micrograms per drop.  It takes 20 drops to reach the safe upper limit. In the US the Safe upper limit is 1100 mcg.  In Europe 600 mcg and in Japan 3000 mcg ( 3 mg).
    • trents
      Welcome to the celiac.com community, @JudyLou! There are a couple of things you might consider to help you in your decision that would not require you to do a gluten challenge. The first, that is if you have not had this test run already, is to request a "total IGA" test to be run. One of the reasons that celiac blood antibody tests can be negative, apart from not having celiac disease, that is, is because of IGA deficiency. If a person is IGA deficient, they will not respond accurately to the celiac disease blood antibody tests (such as the commonly run TTG-IGA). The total IGA test is designed to check for IGA deficiency. The total IGA test is not a celiac antibody test so I wouldn't think that a gluten challenge is necessary. The second is to have genetic testing done to determine if you have the genetic potential to develop celiac disease. About 30-40% of  the general population have the genetic potential but only about 1% actually develop celiac disease. So, genetic testing cannot be used to diagnose celiac disease but it can be used to rule it out. Those who don't have the genetic potential but still have reaction to gluten would not be diagnosed with celiac disease but with NCGS (Non Celiac Gluten Sensitivity).  Another possibility is that you do have celiac disease but are in remission. We do see this but often it doesn't last.
    • JudyLou
      Hi there, I’m debating whether to consider a gluten challenge and I’m hoping someone here can help with that decision (so far, none of the doctors have been helpful). I have a history of breaking out in a horrible, burning/itchy somewhat blistering rash about every 8 years. This started when I was in my early 30’s and at that point it started at the ankles and went about to my knees. Every time I had the rash it would cover more of my body, so my arms and part of my torso were impacted as well, and it was always symmetrical. First I was told it was an allergic reaction to a bug bite. Next I was told it was eczema (after a biopsy of the lesion - not the skin near the lesion) and given a steroid injection (didn’t help). I took myself off of gluten about 3 weeks before seeing an allergist, just to see if it would help (it didn’t in that time period). He thought the rash looked like dermatitis herpetiformis and told me to eat some bread the night before my blood tests, which I did, and the tests came back negative. I’ve since learned from this forum that I needed to be eating gluten daily for at least a month in order to get an accurate test result. I’m grateful to the allergist as he found that 5 mg of doxepin daily will eliminate the rash within about 10 days (previously it lasted for months whether I was eating gluten or not). I have been gluten free for about 25 years as a precaution and recommendation from my doctor, and the pattern of breaking out every 8 years or so remains the same except once I broke out after just one year (was not glutened as far as I know), and now it’s been over 9 years. What’s confusing to me, is that there have been 3 times in the past 2 years when I’ve accidentally eaten gluten, and I haven’t had any reaction at all. Once someone made pancakes (they said they were gluten-free, they were not) and I ate several. I need to decide whether to do a gluten challenge and get another blood test. If I do, are these tests really accurate? I’m also concerned that I could damage my gut in that process if I do have celiac disease. My brother and cousin both had lymphoma so that’s a concern regarding a challenge as well, though there is a lot of cancer in various forms in my family so there may be no gluten connection there. Sorry for the ramble, I’m just doubting the need to remain gluten free if I don’t have any reaction to eating it and haven’t had a positive test (other than testing positive for one of the genes, though it sounds like that’s pretty common). I’d appreciate any thoughts or advice! 
    • Jmartes71
      Hello, just popped in my head to ask this question about medications and celiac? I have always had refurse reaction to meds since I can remember  of what little meds my body is able to tolerate. I was taking gabapentin 300mg for a week,  in past I believe 150? Any ways it amps me up not able to sleep, though very tired.However I did notice it helped with my bloating sibo belly.I hate that my body is that sensitive and medical doesn't seem to take seriously. Im STILL healing with my skin, eye, and now ms or meningioma ( will know in April  which)and dealing with this limbo nightmare. I did write my name, address ect on the reclamation but im not tech savvy and not sure if went through properly. I called my city representative in Stanislaus County and asked if theres a physical paper i can sign for proclamation for celiac and she had no clue about what I was saying, so I just said I'll go back on website. 
    • Scott Adams
      I'm not saying that some celiacs won't need it, but it should be done under a doctor's supervision because it can cause lots of problems in some people.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.