Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

When To Introduce Gluten To Baby? Is It Still Recommended At 4-6mths And What Is That Study?


imagine22

Recommended Posts

imagine22 Contributor

I was diagnosed with celiac disease (blood & biopsy) when my DD1 was 9mths old and she was getting diarrhoea from something on and off... so we took her off gluten and she was fine then but we reintroduced gluten when she was 2yrs and she has no symptoms this time (she is now 2.5yrs ) (we will blood test her at some point whilst on gluten).

DD2 is now 4 months and i recall there was a study saying 4-6mths is the best time to introduce gluten to babies? is this still the most current advcie and can someone please direct me to the details of this study so i can look into who conducted it and how big it was etc.

Im inclined to hold off until DD2 is 2yrs (due to unknowns with wahat it does to the susceptible developing brain and the potential vitamin and mineral deficiencies which result from celiac) but I dont want to INCREASE her risk of celiac if there is a real advangtage to being introduced at 4-6mths.

thanks very much


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



AndreaB Contributor

There is an old thread about something like this from maybe 1 1/2 or so ago. I don't remember the study that was mentioned in that one, but if I remember correctly they recommend 9-12 months.

With the possibility of celiac though it certainly sounds like a good plan to hold off as long as you can. My baby broke out with eczema after he was 2 months old and after ELISA testing I went gluten light. He didn't clear totally up til I went gluten free. I waited until he was 8 months or so before I introduced him to oat cereal and he didn't do well with that. I never went to the multi grain cereal.

AndreaB Contributor

Open Original Shared Link

This talks about the gluten introduction.

cruelshoes Enthusiast
DD2 is now 4 months and i recall there was a study saying 4-6mths is the best time to introduce gluten to babies? is this still the most current advcie and can someone please direct me to the details of this study so i can look into who conducted it and how big it was etc.

Here is the study you are asking about. It is the latest one that I know of. It indicates that the proper time to introduce gluten into an infant's diet may be between 4 - 6 months of age. You can check the May 15 issus of the JAMA out of the library if you want to see the full text - Open Original Shared Link. It may be available online somewhere, but I don't know a link offhand. We introduced gluten to our youngest at 5 months after consulting extensively with our pediatrician. We kept it up until 9 months and then made out house gluten-free again. She is almost 2 now, and gets occasional gluten outside of the house. I'm sure you are going to get opinoins that run the gamut, but here is the study for your consideration.

Open Original Shared Link

The Findings

Fifty-one children (3.3%) developed evidence of celiac disease. Twenty five of these children had biopsy confirmed cases. Major findings included:

Children exposed to wheat, barley, or rye in the first three months of life had a five-fold increased risk of celiac disease autoimmunity compared to those exposed at 4-6 months. Children not exposed until their seventh month or later were also at increased risk, but only slightly.

Among the 41 children who were at the greatest risk according to their genetic markers, those exposed to wheat, barley, or rye in the first three months of life had nearly an eight-fold increased risk of celiac disease autoimmunity compared to those exposed at four to six months.

No protective effect of breastfeeding was observed.

These findings were consistent even when the researchers limited their analysis to only the 25 cases of biopsy-confirmed celiac disease.

How Does This Affect You?

These findings indicate not only that it may be unsafe for genetically predisposed children to receive gluten-containing foods when they are too young

Pattymom Newbie

I was at a CERP session for Lactation consultants 3 years ago where this topic was discussed. It seemed that is was better to introduce gluten while a child was still getting breastmilk b/c on the antobodies in the breastmilk to reduce or eliminate an immune response. What I asked and didn't get a good answer too at the time was the breastmilk eliminating a response or just masking and healing the damage or response as it happened.

I went gluten free when my dd was 2months old with stinky mucousy diarhea and rashes, we kept her off until she turned 2, fed it to her for a few months, she had no noticable symptoms, blood work was negative. At 3, she was slipping on the growth charts, by 3 1/2 totally off the charts, she has now been gluten free again since February and has gained weight and some height (though very slowly after an initial burst, so we still need to see the endocrinologist again)

It's a tough call to decide when to give something that could potentially harm a perfectlly healthy baby.

Patty

tweetykl Newbie

This is really interesting. I am not on these board because of celiac but because my son is allergic to wheat. I wonder how this affects children who are allergic to wheat. I just had my 2nd child and the allergist had me go off wheat, milk, fish, seafood, eggs, nuts, and tree nuts for the third trimester and the first 6 months of breastfeeding. I am then suppose to introduce foods slowly.

B'sgirl Explorer

The most recent information I read were the studies reported above about doing it between 4 and 6 months, but I think that doesn't work so well if you are not nursing. But in addition to that I read that if you really want to be safe wait until at least 12 months. Those studies just said between 4 and 6 is better than 7, but didn't mention older than that. My plan is for me to be off gluten while nursing my upcoming baby and not introduce it until she is at least a year old. Then take it really slowly. I am also going to delay immunizations until my kids are 2 because autoimmune diseases are too common in my family.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



dbmamaz Explorer

I was allergic to wheat and milk as an infant and had read to put off introducing allergen foods to kids with a high chance of food allergies until they were 1 year old. In fact, thats why they no longer make infant cereals with wheat in them - farina used to be a common first food for babies. I introduced all common allergy foods to my kids very carefully (1 bite the first day, 2 the next, then a bit more but watching for a week) and not until 8 mo, and delayed wheat and milk until 11 months (i wanted enuf time to test so I could do cake and ice cream for the first b-day!).

The studies about celiac are interesting . . .but of course, if you NEVER introduce gluten, the child wont develop full-blown celiac . . . since you have to have villi damage for that . . .they would just be gluten intollerant. Right?

Annaem Enthusiast

My gastro says regular children should be introduced at 8 months and since i am celiac my little one should wait till at least a year old. At 2 years old they can do the celiac test to check. Before that they can't. So i have made the personal decision to wait till my baby is 2 years old.

Lizz7711 Apprentice

I would really advise against introducing gluten at 4-6 mnths! First of all...in general you're supposed to wait til 6 months for any solid foods. But more importantly, every recommendation i've seen (and i'm studying maternal nutrition right now) says to wait till 12 months to introduce any of the common food allergens such as wheat, nuts, eggs, soy etc.

If a baby has inherited gluten sensitivity...giving it earlier is not going to help in any way.

Regarding the comment below...I think the definition of "celiac" will change in the coming years to include those without any villi damage as they are beginning to finally understand the scope of gluten sensitivity. "full blown celiac" is no more damaging than "full blown gluten sensitivity" that has caused other autoimmune diseases not affecting the digestive tract.

Liz

I was allergic to wheat and milk as an infant and had read to put off introducing allergen foods to kids with a high chance of food allergies until they were 1 year old. In fact, thats why they no longer make infant cereals with wheat in them - farina used to be a common first food for babies. I introduced all common allergy foods to my kids very carefully (1 bite the first day, 2 the next, then a bit more but watching for a week) and not until 8 mo, and delayed wheat and milk until 11 months (i wanted enuf time to test so I could do cake and ice cream for the first b-day!).

The studies about celiac are interesting . . .but of course, if you NEVER introduce gluten, the child wont develop full-blown celiac . . . since you have to have villi damage for that . . .they would just be gluten intollerant. Right?

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - cristiana replied to Dizzyma's topic in Post Diagnosis, Recovery & Treatment of Celiac Disease
      2

      Newly diagnosed mam to coeliac 11 year old

    2. - trents replied to Dizzyma's topic in Post Diagnosis, Recovery & Treatment of Celiac Disease
      2

      Newly diagnosed mam to coeliac 11 year old

    3. - Dizzyma posted a topic in Post Diagnosis, Recovery & Treatment of Celiac Disease
      2

      Newly diagnosed mam to coeliac 11 year old

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,921
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Rusty49
    Newest Member
    Rusty49
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):
  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • cristiana
      Hi @Dizzyma I note what @trents has commented about you possibly posting from the UK.  Just to let you know that am a coeliac based in the UK, so if that is the case, do let me know if can help you with any questions on the NHS provision for coeliacs.    If you are indeed based in the UK, and coeliac disease is confirmed, I would thoroughly recommend you join Coeliac UK, as they provide a printed food and drink guide and also a phone app which you can take shopping with you so you can find out if a product is gluten free or not. But one thing I would like to say to you, no matter where you live, is you mention that your daughter is anxious.  I was always a bit of a nervous, anxious child but before my diagnosis in mid-life my anxiety levels were through the roof.   My anxiety got steadily better when I followed the gluten-free diet and vitamin and mineral deficiencies were addressed.  Anxiety is very common at diagnosis, you may well find that her anxiety will improve once your daughter follows a strict gluten-free diet. Cristiana 
    • trents
      Welcome to the celic.com community @Dizzyma! I'm assuming you are in the U.K. since you speak of your daughter's celiac disease blood tests as "her bloods".  Has her physician officially diagnosed her has having celiac disease on the results of her blood tests alone? Normally, if the ttg-iga blood test results are positive, a follow-up endoscopy with biopsy of the small bowel lining to check for damage would be ordered to confirm the results of "the bloods". However if the ttg-iga test score is 10x normal or greater, some physicians, particularly in the U.K., will dispense with the endoscopy/biopsy. If there is to be an endoscopy/biopsy, your daughter should not yet begin the gluten free diet as doing so would allow healing of the small bowel lining to commence which may result in a biopsy finding having results that conflict with the blood work. Do you know if an endoscopy/biopsy is planned? Celiac disease can have onset at any stage of life, from infancy to old age. It has a genetic base but the genes remain dormant until and unless triggered by some stress event. The stress event can be many things but it is often a viral infection. About 40% of the general population have the genetic potential to develop celiac disease but only about 1% actually develop celiac disease. So, for most, the genes remain dormant.  Celiac disease is by nature an autoimmune disorder. That is to say, gluten ingestion triggers an immune response that causes the body to attack its own tissues. In this case, the attack happens in he lining of the small bowel, at least classically, though we now know there are other body systems that can sometimes be affected. So, for a person with celiac disease, when they ingest gluten, the body sends attacking cells to battle the gluten which causes inflammation as the gluten is being absorbed into the cells that make up the lining of the small bowel. This causes damage to the cells and over time, wears them down. This lining is composed of billions of tiny finger-like projections and which creates a tremendous surface area for absorbing nutrients from the food we eat. This area of the intestinal track is where all of our nutrition is absorbed. As these finger-like projections get worn down by the constant inflammation from continued gluten consumption before diagnosis (or after diagnosis in the case of those who are noncompliant) the efficiency of nutrient absorption from what we eat can be drastically reduced. This is why iron deficiency anemia and other nutrient deficiency related medical problems are so common in the celiac population. So, to answer your question about the wisdom of allowing your daughter to consume gluten on a limited basis to retain some tolerance to it, that would not be a sound approach because it would prevent healing of the lining of her small bowel. It would keep the fires of inflammation smoldering. The only wise course is strict adherence to a gluten free diet, once all tests to confirm celiac disease are complete.
    • Dizzyma
      Hi all, I have so many questions and feel like google is giving me very different information. Hoping I may get some more definite answers here. ok, my daughter has been diagnosed as a coeliac as her bloods show anti TTG antibodies are over 128. We have started her  on a full gluten free diet. my concerns are that she wasn’t actually physically sick on her regular diet, she had tummy issues and skin sores. My fear is that she will build up a complete intolerance to gluten and become physically sick if she has gluten. Is there anything to be said for keeping a small bit of gluten in the diet to stop her from developing a total intolerance?  also, she would be an anxious type of person, is it possible that stress is the reason she has become coeliac? I read that diagnosis later in childhood could be following a sickness or stress. How can she have been fine for the first 10 years and then become coeliac? sorry, I’m just very confused and really want to do right by her. I know a coeliac and she has a terrible time after she gets gluttened so just want to make sure going down a total gluten free road is the right choice. thank you for any help or advise xx 
    • xxnonamexx
      very interesting thanks for the info  
    • Florence Lillian
      More cookie recipes ...thanks so much for the heads-up Scott.  One can never have too many.  Cheers, Florence.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.