Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Lactaid Becoming Less Effective?


Sweetfudge

Recommended Posts

Sweetfudge Community Regular

i've been using lactaid fast act pretty regularly over the last couple months and wonder if i could build up an immunity to it or something? i feel like it's not working as well as it used to :( anyone have any thoughts?


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



tarnalberry Community Regular

you can't build up an immunity - it's the enzyme that breaks up the milk sugar, so it's doing the work that your own enzymes would do if you produced those enzymes. but you may find that you need to increase the dosage if your body is producing less and less of your own enzyme (which can happen naturally in people as they age or in lactose-intolerant populations, which is most of them, regardless of your use of lactaid). or, it could be a developing issue with casein. one interesting note is that the body will produce less lactase when it needs less, so if it's exposed to less milk products, it will produce less of it (hence, you can have induced lactose intolerance, but it generally goes away fairly quickly once dairy is reintroduced regularly).

debmidge Rising Star

I am severely lactose intolerant....I am from a "lactose-intolerant" population.

I have been using Lactaid since it first came out 20 years ago. When it first came out it was a liquid and you dropped the enzyme into the milk carton, shook it up and waited 24 hrs for the enzyme to work. I wish they made both the drops and the pills as the drops were excellent to put into canned milk or heavy cream; lactose free canned milk or heavy cream products are still unavailable.

Anyway, I find the pills to be "pot-shot" - will work Ok, then sometimes barely work. Many foods require more than the amount of pills shown on the label.

There are some foods which no amount of Lactaid will help 100% - like cream soups, cream sauces, natural ice creams, whipped cream desserts, cheesecakes, macaroni & cheese, cream cheese and dips, yogurt, cottage cheese, items such as Cozy Shack puddings, anything with calcium lactate in it (that's why I avoid foods fortified with calcium), "pink" sauces, Risotta, egg nog, canned milk.

I've learned that the "harder" the cheese, the less lactose is in it: for example: grated cheese has lower lactose than cottage cheese.

I was found to have lactose intolerance when I was 21 (I am now 51) and as a teen and young adult I always ate dairy, drank milk regularly, etc. and I continued doing so until I was doubled over in pain every day on a regular basis.

My experience has been that despite using the theory that "that the body will produce less lactase when it needs less, so if it's exposed to less milk products, it will produce less of it (hence, you can have induced lactose intolerance, but it generally goes away fairly quickly once dairy is reintroduced regularly" as described by tarnalberry, did not work.

Unknowingly, I still kept it up as I didn't know what the gastro problem was (thought I had IBS/colitis). I still lived at home and one day my Mom and I were talking about it (she confronted me as she thought I was pregnant due to these symptoms!) and she mentioned that it could be diary, which I stopped having then and found relief. I used to drink a half pint of milk every day with my lunch - even at age 21 when I was working. My co-workers used to make fun of me - but I didn't want osteoporosis.

Yes, I reintroduced dairy numerous times using the above theory and it didn't work; over the past 30 years I tried to break the lactaid cycle using this theory and was always disappointed (and full of gas and diarrhea).

I would recommend trying to go back to diary llike tarnalberry pointed out because everyone is different and just because it didn't work out for me won't mean that it won't reverse itself for you (especially since your lactose intolerance may be temporary due to celiac). My experience is not the "be all" and "end all" but for me it's obviously permanent. But I have to say that my heritage (Italian) is known for being lactose intolerant, however they cook a lot of foods with dairy/cheese in it and I am the only child out of 4 which has this problem - my Italian parents and grandparents didn't have lactose intolerance (the other side is Scott/German/English/Irish). Go figure....

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - Rogol72 replied to HAUS's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      8

      Sainsbury's Free From White Sliced Bread - Now Egg Free - Completely Ruined It

    2. - Scott Adams replied to HAUS's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      8

      Sainsbury's Free From White Sliced Bread - Now Egg Free - Completely Ruined It

    3. - Scott Adams replied to deanna1ynne's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      13

      Inconclusive results

    4. - deanna1ynne replied to deanna1ynne's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      13

      Inconclusive results


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,441
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Linda Boxdorfer
    Newest Member
    Linda Boxdorfer
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Rogol72
      @HAUS, I was at an event in the UK a few years back. I remember ringing the restaurant ahead to inquire about the gluten free options. All I wanted was a few gluten free sandwiches, which they provided and they were delicious. The gluten-free bread they used was Warbutons white bread and I remember mentioning it on this site before. No harm in trying it once. It's fortified with Calcium and Iron. https://www.warburtonsglutenfree.com/warbs_products/white-loaf/ The only other gluten-free bread that I've come across that is fortified is Schar with Iodized salt, nothing else.
    • Scott Adams
      In the U.S., most regular wheat breads are required to be enriched with certain B-vitamins and iron, but gluten-free breads are not required to be. Since many gluten-free products are not enriched, we usually encourage people with celiac disease to consider a multivitamin.  In the early 1900s, refined white flour replaced whole grains, and people began developing serious vitamin-deficiency diseases: Beriberi → caused by a lack of thiamin (vitamin B1) Pellagra → caused by a lack of niacin (vitamin B3) Anemia → linked to low iron and lack of folate By the 1930s–40s, these problems were common in the U.S., especially in poorer regions. Public-health officials responded by requiring wheat flour and the breads made from it to be “enriched” with thiamin, riboflavin, niacin, and iron. Folic acid was added later (1998) to prevent neural-tube birth defects. Why gluten-free bread isn’t required to be enriched? The U.S. enrichment standards were written specifically for wheat flour. Gluten-free breads use rice, tapioca, corn, sorghum, etc.—so they fall outside that rule—but they probably should be for the same reason wheat products are.
    • Scott Adams
      Keep in mind that there are drawbacks to a formal diagnosis, for example more expensive life and private health insurance, as well as possibly needing to disclose it on job applications. Normally I am in favor of the formal diagnosis process, but if you've already figured out that you can't tolerate gluten and will likely stay gluten-free anyway, I wanted to at least mention the possible negative sides of having a formal diagnosis. While I understand wanting a formal diagnosis, it sounds like she will likely remain gluten-free either way, even if she should test negative for celiac disease (Approximately 10x more people have non-celiac gluten sensitivity than have celiac disease, but there isn’t yet a test for NCGS. If her symptoms go away on a gluten-free diet, it would likely signal NCGS).        
    • JoJo0611
    • deanna1ynne
      Thank you all so much for your advice and thoughts. We ended up having another scope and more bloodwork last week. All serological markers continue to increase, and the doc who did the scope said there villous atrophy visible on the scope — but we just got the biopsy pathology report back, and all it says is, “Duodenal mucosa with patchy increased intraepithelial lymphocytes, preserved villous architecture, and patchy foveolar metaplasia,” which we are told is still inconclusive…  We will have her go gluten free again anyway, but how soon would you all test again, if at all? How valuable is an official dx in a situation like this?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.