Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Can You Self Test With Iodine?


BarbaQ

Recommended Posts

BarbaQ Rookie

My 23 month old son recently had a positive gluten stool test from enterolab, however, when we took it to our family doctor, she had never heard of such a test. It seems our medical world does not accept this result and we are waiting for an appointment (5 months) with a gastroenterologist. There seems to be a lot of doubt in the mainstream medical model regarding the accuracy and validity of this test. Unfortunately, this leaves us in limbo.

He has had facial eczema (or possibly DH), for the last 11 to 12 months. This is his only symptom. Really, he is too young to tell us anything. He basically has not slept consistently through the night and we suspect that it may be due to stomach upset. The eczema is only around his mouth. It does not go away even with cortisone. We have been gluten free for about 2 months. The doctor would like us to reintroduce gluten prior to the specialist appointment in January so that the blood work can be accurate. In the meantime, I was wondering if I could just test him myself with iodine? If the test is positive, then I may choose not to reintroduce the gluten, and instead request a skin biopsy.

Has anyone ever tried self testing with iodine? What is the procedure? Is it safe?

Any advice is apprecaited.

Thanks

Barb :unsure:


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



darlindeb25 Collaborator

I'm not sure why you would think testing for iodine deficiency would mean your child has celiac disease. I thought that test was for hypothyrodism. I don't know if it's a safe test for a child. You dab a 2" circle of iodine on soft skin, such as the inside of your leg, or your upper arm, and if the iodine is absorbed in less then an hour, then you are iodine deficient. Some doctors do not believe this is a true test though. Iodine always disappears quickly on me, but they say there is no problem with my thyroid, and I have double DQ1 genes, so some doctors do not believe I am celiac either.

I truly do not think this test will help you. Sorry.

BarbaQ Rookie

Hello again

My understanding is that testing with iodine causes a DH blister to form. This is done so that doctors can bring on a blister when looking to take a biopsy. If the blister forms, then more than likely, it is DH. Do I have this all wrong? :unsure:

Maybe I'm jumping the gun. I am assuming that the blood and small intestine biopsy will be negative given my son's young age (22 months) and this being his only symptom. (blisters on the face / eczema). I have read that it is more likely for people with DH to have negative blood and biopsy results.

Thanks. Any advice? Anyone ever try this?

Barb

Tara Lynn Newbie

I don't know about the iodine test, but I know it took more than 2 months of being gluten-free before my rash completely went away. I found that I was inadvertently eating things that were processed in contaminated facilities and had to eliminate those. I also had to get very nitpicky about avoiding possible cross-contamination on things like countertops and peanut butter jars. But after about 4 months, my rash (which I'd had for THIRTEEN years and which had also been misdiagnosed as eczema) finally disappeared. It has stayed gone as long as I stay off gluten.

ravenwoodglass Mentor
Hello again

My understanding is that testing with iodine causes a DH blister to form. This is done so that doctors can bring on a blister when looking to take a biopsy. If the blister forms, then more than likely, it is DH. Do I have this all wrong? :unsure:

Maybe I'm jumping the gun. I am assuming that the blood and small intestine biopsy will be negative given my son's young age (22 months) and this being his only symptom. (blisters on the face / eczema). I have read that it is more likely for people with DH to have negative blood and biopsy results.

Thanks. Any advice? Anyone ever try this?

Barb

Your right if he has DH. There are many skin problems associated with celiac that aren't. The fact that his skin issues have resolved is significant whether it is DH or another issue. You are right to be concerned about a false negative on a child his age. They are even more common than with adults.

The truest test for the need of the diet is the diet itself. I do understand your wanting a doctor verified diagnosis on a child as young as he is, it makes things easier in school. Did your doctor make note that his skin issues cleared? Could he also note that they came back when gluten was introduced? Some doctors will give a diagnosis of gluten intolerance with dietary response and that should be enough to satisfy 'proof' for schools and day care.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,075
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Amy1620
    Newest Member
    Amy1620
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Jmartes71
      EXACTLY! I was asked yesterday on my LAST video call with Standford and I stated exactly yes absolutely this is why I need the name! One, get proper care, two, not get worse.Im falling apart, stressed out, in pain and just opened email from Stanford stating I was rude ect.I want that video reviewed by higher ups and see if that women still has a job or not.Im saying this because I've been medically screwed and asking for help because bills don't pay itself. This could be malpratice siit but im not good at finding lawyers
    • AlwaysLearning
      We feel your pain. It took me 20+ years of regularly going to doctors desperate for answers only to be told there was nothing wrong with me … when I was 20 pounds underweight, suffering from severe nutritional deficiencies, and in a great deal of pain. I had to figure it out for myself. If you're in the U.S., not having an official diagnosis does mean you can't claim a tax deduction for the extra expense of gluten-free foods. But it can also be a good thing. Pre-existing conditions might be a reason why a health insurance company might reject your application or charge you more money. No official diagnosis means you don't have a pre-existing condition. I really hope you don't live in the U.S. and don't have these challenges. Do you need an official diagnosis for a specific reason? Else, I wouldn't worry about it. As long as you're diligent in remaining gluten free, your body should be healing as much as possible so there isn't much else you could do anyway. And there are plenty of us out here who never got that official diagnosis because we couldn't eat enough gluten to get tested. Now that the IL-2 test is available, I suppose I could take it, but I don't feel the need. Someone else not believing me really isn't my problem as long as I can stay in control of my own food.
    • AlwaysLearning
      If you're just starting out in being gluten free, I would expect it to take months before you learned enough about hidden sources of gluten before you stopped making major mistakes. Ice cream? Not safe unless they say it is gluten free. Spaghetti sauce? Not safe unless is says gluten-free. Natural ingredients? Who knows what's in there. You pretty much need to cook with whole ingredients yourself to avoid it completely. Most gluten-free products should be safe, but while you're in the hypersensitive phase right after going gluten free, you may notice that when something like a microwave meal seems to not be gluten-free … then you find out that it is produced in a shared facility where it can become contaminated. My reactions were much-more severe after going gluten free. The analogy that I use is that you had a whole army of soldiers waiting for some gluten to attack, and now that you took away their target, when the stragglers from the gluten army accidentally wander onto the battlefield, you still have your entire army going out and attacking them. Expect it to take two years before all of the training facilities that were producing your soldiers have fallen into disrepair and are no longer producing soldiers. But that is two years after you stop accidentally glutening yourself. Every time you do eat gluten, another training facility can be built and more soldiers will be waiting to attack. Good luck figuring things out.   
    • Russ H
      This treatment looks promising. Its aim is to provoke immune tolerance of gluten, possibly curing the disease. It passed the phase 2 trial with flying colours, and I came across a post on Reddit by one of the study volunteers. Apparently, the results were good enough that the company is applying for fast track approval.  Anokion Announces Positive Symptom Data from its Phase 2 Trial Evaluating KAN-101 for the Treatment of Celiac Disease https://www.reddit.com/r/Celiac/comments/1krx2wh/kan_101_trial_put_on_hold/
    • Scott Adams
      BTW, we've done other articles on this topic that I wanted to share here (not to condone smoking!):    
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.