Jump to content

  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):

    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Group Letter to Dr. Fine

Gentleheart

By Gentleheart
in Doctors

Recommended Posts

Fiddle-Faddle Community Regular
Fiddle-Faddle
Posted

From Open Original Shared Link

HLA Typing and Celiac Disease

The three markers DR3, B8 and DQ2 are all associated with Celiac Disease. The reason for this is that the genes which code for B8, DR3 (also termed DRw17) and DQ2 are in linkage disequilibrium. They are part of a gene segment that is usually maintained as a gene block. This fact has posed a problem in the work to identify which molecules are actually involved in the development of Celiac Disease and which alleles are just associated with celiac disease because the genes coding for these molecules are usually linked with the predisposing genes. In other words: Which of B8, DR3 or DQ2 are actually involved in the development of Celiac Disease and which are just marker molecules?

Those Celiacs who are not DR3 positive very often are DR5/DR7 (DR5 is coded for by genes on the one chromosome and DR7 is coded for by genes on the other chromosome). Individuals who are DR3, almost always also are DQ2 (because the genes coding for DR3 and DQ2 are in linkage disequilibrium - they are in a conserved gene block). The names of the genes in this gene block that jointly code for DQ2 are DQA1*0501 (which codes for the alpha chain) and DQB1*02 (which codes for the beta chain). The DQA1*0501 gene also exists in a gene block that contains the gene coding for DR5, and the DQB1*02 gene exists in a gene block that contains the gene coding for DR7. Individuals who are DR5/DR7 may thus also possess the DQA1*0501 and DQB1*02 genes. In contrast to individuals who are DR3-DQ2 the DQ genes in DR5/DR7 individuals which code for DQ2 are located on two different chromosomes. This explains why DR5/DR7 individuals also have a predisposition to develop Celiac Disease and strongly indicates that it is DQ2 coded for by the DQA1*0501 and DQB1*02 genes that actually are involved in the development of Celiac Disease. About 95% of the Celiac population carry these particular genes.

In addition, another 4-5% of the Celiac population have genes that code for DR4 and DQ8 molecules (the genes coding for DR4 and DQ8 are maintained in block of genes). Probably it is the DQ8 molecule that mediates the disease predisposition in this subgroup of patients. Some very few Celiacs are neither DQ2 nor DQ8 implying that HLA typing is not a perfect predictor of risk for Celiac Disease.

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


  • Replies 152
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Judyin Philly Enthusiast
Judyin Philly
Posted

Alison..............omg.......... :blink:

I'm sure this makes sense to a lot of the scientist on the board.

Can someone summarize for the rest of us :o

JNBunnie1 Community Regular
JNBunnie1
Posted
Alison..............omg.......... :blink:

I'm sure this makes sense to a lot of the scientist on the board.

Can someone summarize for the rest of us :o

Yeah, I think my brain just fell out of my head.....

neesee Apprentice
neesee
Posted

Maybe this could help. Open Original Shared Link

neesee

Fiddle-Faddle Community Regular
Fiddle-Faddle
Posted
Alison..............omg.......... :blink:

I'm sure this makes sense to a lot of the scientist on the board.

Can someone summarize for the rest of us :o

Well, maybe I'm misreading it, but it looks like there are SEVERAL genetic markers clearly associated with celiac disease, not just 2.

Judyin Philly Enthusiast
Judyin Philly
Posted
Well, maybe I'm misreading it, but it looks like there are SEVERAL genetic markers clearly associated with celiac disease, not just 2.

Well that's clear enough :lol: thanks so my Alison.

The longer we stay on the forum the more we learn. :o:)

Judy

neesee Apprentice
neesee
Posted

DR5/DR7 combine to form 1 DQ2 gene. I don't see any other genes listed in the article. It says a very few celiacs don't have DQ2 or DQ8, but it doesn't list which genes they are.

neesee

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


Fiddle-Faddle Community Regular
Fiddle-Faddle
Posted

Thanks so much for the clarification, neesee! This passage was about genetic markers, not genes.

It did say that 4-5 % of the celiac population have neither DQ2 or DQ8 genes, and, as you pointed out, it did not say what genes OR genetic markers that population has.

The way I see it, what they are calling "the celiac population" is a tiny percentage of the people who actually have celiac, because these studies are on biopsy-diagnosed celiacs only, and the studies and doctors seem to agree that most celiacs are undiagnosed.

So it's certainly a possibility that a large number of undiagnosed celiacs may in fact have some totally different genes or genetic markers than those whose damaged villi are screamingly obvious (and whose doctors had the sense to notice).

Hopefully, someday, we'll all know more!

  • 5 weeks later...
sbj Rookie
sbj
Posted

I corresponded with the originator of this group letter and as of January 17th we have not yet heard from Dr. Fine. Our letter was sent certified and reached his office prior to the Christmas holiday. I want to again thank Gentleheart for her efforts. It was my opinion that the group that initially worked on this letter deserved an update - Gentleheart disagreed - so I'm sorry if I am stepping on toes but I believe in transparency and communication.

There might be a legitimate reason for Dr. Fine's delay in responding so let's not rush to judgment. I personally do not feel that we should send Dr. Fine a 'polite reminder' or contact him in any way as this just gives him the 'out' of claiming that he is simply too busy. Recall that 27 interested parties 'signed' this letter, including former patients, and that we used the name of this forum. I hope that Dr. Fine will respond soon and answer our sincere questions.

neesee Apprentice
neesee
Posted
I corresponded with the originator of this group letter and as of January 17th we have not yet heard from Dr. Fine. Our letter was sent certified and reached his office prior to the Christmas holiday. I want to again thank Gentleheart for her efforts. It was my opinion that the group that initially worked on this letter deserved an update - Gentleheart disagreed - so I'm sorry if I am stepping on toes but I believe in transparency and communication.

There might be a legitimate reason for Dr. Fine's delay in responding so let's not rush to judgment. I personally do not feel that we should send Dr. Fine a 'polite reminder' or contact him in any way as this just gives him the 'out' of claiming that he is simply too busy. Recall that 27 interested parties 'signed' this letter, including former patients, and that we used the name of this forum. I hope that Dr. Fine will respond soon and answer our sincere questions.

I was thinking about that letter today! Granted, I didn't sign it, but I am interested in what Dr. Fine has to say. So Gentleheart you are mistaken. The forum does deserve to have an update. Frankly, I'm not at all surprised by Dr. Fine's lack of response.

neesee

sbj Rookie
sbj
Posted

Just to be clear - Gentleheart wants to give Dr. Fine a few more weeks to reply to us before personally attempting to contact him in some fashion. After all of that and at that point I believe she intended on giving us an update. I believe everyone deserved an update right now - it's already been three weeks. I am hoping that Dr. Fine will respond to a certified later from his patients and a popular forum that regularly endorses his company.

Gentleheart has done a great job and I very much appreciate her efforts.

neesee Apprentice
neesee
Posted

I think Gentleheart wrote a fantastic letter. She is a true lady. I sincerely hope Dr. Fine responds for her sake. Such a dear person should not be ignored. If he doesn't respond, I think that says everything you need to know about him.

neesee

Gentleheart Enthusiast
Gentleheart
Posted
  • Author

Hello everyone,

It can be really difficult to wait sometimes. Those of us who have not yet figured out our own gluten sensitivity, have a particular interest in Dr. Fine's research and what he might have to say to us. So I fully understand our desire to be first on his "To Do List." But if there's anything I have had to learn on my own quest for health, it is patience. This confusing, ever-changing disease can try the most hardy of souls - 3 steps forward and 2 1/2 steps back for many of us, I'm afraid. :)

I sincerely apologize that I waited too long to give you an update. My honest thought was that I didn't have much to say except, "I haven't heard anything yet." But it would have been kind of me to have done that, nevertheless. I ask your forgiveness. It was certainly not my intent to be neglectful or elusive. I was giving Dr. Fine additional time because we chose to send this letter during the busy holiday season.

From the very beginning, it has been my personal goal in this group project of ours to achieve something positive and useful for everyone. Since I have so many of my own, it has never been my desire to dwell on any shortcomings Dr. Fine may or may not have. I would love it if Dr. Fine had fired a letter right back to all of us saying all the things we long to hear. But for what could be many legitimate reasons, he didn't.

The holiday season is usually a time for rest and relaxation. Perhaps he has been taking some time off. He could be traveling. Perhaps he has indeed been having a few momentary problems with his research and needs to be temporarily quiet until it is resolved. Since he knows that we plan to do our own form of "publishing" by sharing his response on this very influential forum, perhaps he is spending extra time formulating a wonderful letter for us. I do not claim to know anything about the intense work involved with a long term science research project of this magnitude. Maybe it is honestly grueling on a daily basis and leaves him very little time for reflection or personal correspondence. And we must not ignore the human side of this. Maybe he is just a bit of a procrastinator. Many brilliant people are.

I have personally chosen to believe that Dr. Fine is an honorable, talented man, with noble aspirations to benefit us all. It will sadden me greatly if this project ends up casting doubt on his integrity or his work. I will not back away from any truth. But I sincerely hope that the truth ends up being "great news."

I will promise to update you frequently. A wise person who knows Dr. Fine has suggested that I do eventually contact him personally. They have indicated that he is indeed a very nice man and there is likely a very good explanation. I want to give him every chance to turn this into a positive exercise and will try to do whatever I have to do to help that happen.

Would you prefer that I update you on this same thread or produce another?

Thank you for your patience with me! :)

lbd Rookie
lbd
Posted

Gentleheart,

I think your post is awesome. I was dismayed to see the posts regarding the lack of response automatically condemning Dr. Fine. He may be very busy as you said, or he may not feel that he is responsible for answering a letter out of the blue. I was confused by some of the statements that said he got a letter from his "patients" because as far as I know, Dr. Fine does not have patients - he provides a service to people. I used his service and don't feel like I am his patient because of it.

I hope you do get a response and it is positive. But for the life of me, I cannot fathom why some people are so vehement in their negative response to Dr. Fine. It's not like anyone has been forced to use his service. Yet, these same people will sing the praises of tests and doctors that use them that lead some people to believe they have no problems with gluten when, in fact, they may actually do. That, to me, is far more dangerous.

So, I praise your intelligent and polite method of contacting Dr. Fine and awaiting his response, and not drawing conclusions on no response. Good for you!

Lauire

Lisa Mentor
Lisa
Posted

We share a common denominator as we have come to this place, but we have arrived with varied different attitudes about the health care we have experiences. Many have had wonderful experiences and others, quite the opposite.

Some times we need to remember this when we post on a forum directed to everyone. I need to remind myself quite often. ;)

sbj Rookie
sbj
Posted
I was dismayed to see the posts regarding the lack of response automatically condemning Dr. Fine. He may be very busy as you said, or he may not feel that he is responsible for answering a letter out of the blue. I was confused by some of the statements that said he got a letter from his "patients" because as far as I know, Dr. Fine does not have patients - he provides a service to people.

Hi Laurie!

I thought I would respond because you seem confused by my post. I referred to customers of Dr. Fine's company as 'patients' because when I receive 'services' from my doctor they refer to me as a patient. I think you are correct, however, in that customers is more accurate in this case because, as we both know, Dr. Fine doesn't do any diagnosing. He simply charges for a lab test and then leaves it up to his customers to come here to interpret the results. I am confused by your contention that Dr. Fine perhaps feels he has no responsibility to answer a letter out of the blue. This was a certified letter from his customers with questions about the service he provided. I am also confused by your comment regarding multiple statements condemning Dr. Fine due to his lack of response. I am sure you are not referring to my posts because I did not condemn the good doctor.

I would think that anyone involved with this letter would say it is fair to use the doctor's response or non-response in an evaluation of his services. If we are not going to come to any conclusions based on his response or non-response, then there was no purpose to sending the letter in the first place.

Fiddle-Faddle Community Regular
Fiddle-Faddle
Posted
I would think that anyone involved with this letter would say it is fair to use the doctor's response or non-response in an evaluation of his services. If we are not going to come to any conclusions based on his response or non-response, then there was no purpose to sending the letter in the first place.

I was very involved with this letter, as I wrote the first draft (which Gentleheart vastly improved, for which we should all be grateful!), and I strongly disagree with you.

It is always foolish to make assumptions.

You know the old saying: Never ^SSUME--because you make an ^SS out of U and ME. :lol:

sbj Rookie
sbj
Posted
It is always foolish to make assumptions. You know the old saying: Never ^SSUME--because you make an ^SS out of U and ME. :lol:

Sorry, fidster - I did not mean to make an ^SS of U. :lol:

lbd Rookie
lbd
Posted

I think my reference was to the remarks that said a non-response by Dr. Fine automatically confirms his work cannot be defended. I disagree with that premise. It can mean that or many other things, like he is busy, or he doesn't care to answer, or he feels attacked, etc. The only thing it would prove is that he didn't answer the letter. :P

I hope he does answer positively so it can all be settled. But, for me, I have no qualms with his testing.

Laurie

Jestgar Rising Star
Jestgar
Posted
I think my reference was to the remarks that said a non-response by Dr. Fine automatically confirms his work cannot be defended. I disagree with that premise. It can mean that or many other things, like he is busy, or he doesn't care to answer, or he feels attacked, etc. The only thing it would prove is that he didn't answer the letter. :P

Exactly.

Send a similar letter to any other company and see what response you get.

Mtndog Collaborator
Mtndog
Posted

He could also be preparing a response. Such a well-written inquiry deserves a well-thought out response!

Fiddle-Faddle Community Regular
Fiddle-Faddle
Posted
Sorry, fidster - I did not mean to make an ^SS of U. :lol:

I love it!!!!! :lol:

neesee Apprentice
neesee
Posted
I think my reference was to the remarks that said a non-response by Dr. Fine automatically confirms his work cannot be defended.

Laurie

No....that's not what I said. I said if he doesn't respond that's all you need to know about him. You obviously mean nothing to him. Do you allow other people to treat you that way when you ask them a question? If you asked your own dr a question and you know he hears you but he ignores you and walks away, would you continue to see him? I seriously doubt it. Dr Fine is doing the equivalent if he doesn't respond soon.

You all practically worship this guy and I just plain don't get it.

neesee

caek-is-a-lie Explorer
caek-is-a-lie
Posted
You all practically worship this guy and I just plain don't get it.

I think he gives some people hope about their condition and/or treatment, particularly after he has made an effort to connect directly with the gluten-intolerant community through lectures and essays.

I've never been fond of the practice, myself, as I'm extremely jaded and I've known specialists in other fields that people worship that are actually manipulative and two-faced egomaniacs. But I do understand why some people put such hope in Dr. Fine's work. And, of course, he's probably a very nice man. I was not implying that he is 'just like all the rest', by any means.

I would like to respectfully submit that this incessant speculation about Dr. Fine is kind of creeping me out, but I check back here periodically because I am curious to see what his response is after all the discussion about this letter. It is unfortunate that it has taken so long. Have you confirmed that he actually received it?

neesee Apprentice
neesee
Posted
Have you confirmed that he actually received it?

I believe he was sent a registered letter. That means he had to sign for it.

I would love to be wrong about the guy. I hope he responds to Gentleheart soon. How can you mistreat someone who is as kind and trusting as she is? It's just wrong.

neesee

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):


  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,693
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748
    Amber Holman
    Newest Member
    Amber Holman
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):


  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Gigi2025
      How Come Gluten Didnt Bother Me In Italy

      By Gigi2025 · Posted

      Since 2015 we've spent extensive time in Italy and I've been able to eat their wheat products without incident. Initially, I was practically starving thinking foods in Sicily were not gluten-free.  An Italian friend who had lived in the US for over 20 years said she had celiac/gluten-free friends from the US who could eat Italian wheat products without problems. Hesitantly, I tried little by little without issues.  A few years later at a market, I asked a bread vendor if they had gluten-free loaves. Turns out she had lived in LA, said groups believe it's not the gluten that's causing our bodies harm, but potassium bromate; these groups have been trying to ban it.  Bromines and other halogens wreaks havoc to our endocrine system and, more specifically, our thyroids and immune systems. When bromines are ingested/absorbed into the body, it displaces iodine causing other health issues. Potassium bromate is a powerful oxidizing agent (dough 'conditioner') that chemically changes flour to enhance elasticity, bleaches the dough, and ages the flour much faster than open air.   Shortly thereafter while visiting friends in California, one family said they had gone gluten-free and the difference was incredible. The reason they choose this path was due them (a biologist/chemist/agriculturist scientist) having to write a portion of a paper about a certain product for the company he worked. Another company's scientist was directed to write the other portion. All was confidential, they weren't allowed to know the other company/employee.  After the research, they learned gluten was being removed from wheat, sent elsewhere, returned in large congealed blocks resembling tofu, and then added to wheat products. Potassium bromate has been banned for use in Europe, China, and other countries, but not in the US. Then we have the issues of shelf preservatives and stabilizers. What are we eating?  Why? We spend long periods of time in Italy and all has been good.  We just returned from an extended time in Greece;  no issues there either.  There is a man there we learned about on a travel show about Greece who walks the hills, picking herbs, pods, etc.  He is a very learned scholar, taught at the university level in Melbourne. It took a few days to locate him, but were finally successful. He too, is concerned about the additives and preservatives in American food (many of his customers are Americans, haven't been in the best of health, and have become healthier after visiting him). He suggested taking a food product from the US and the same product in Europe, and compare the different ingredients. Then ask why these things are being allowed in the US by the 'watch dog' of our foods and drugs. It would be amuzing if it weren't tragic. I'm presently looking for flour from Europe that I can make my own bread and pasta as the gluten-free bread is now $7.99 a (small) loaf.  BTW, studies are showing that many gluten-free individuals are becoming diabetic. My guess is because the gluten-free products are high in carbs. This is only my experience and opinion garnished by my personal research.  I hope it helps.  
    • knitty kitty
      Taking Probiotics but Still Getting Sick After Gluten – Advice?

      By knitty kitty · Posted

      Symptoms that get worse if you don't supplement is a sign of malabsorption, possibly due to Celiac disease. Blood tests for nutritional deficiencies are not very accurate, and should be done when you have been off of supplements for eight to twelve weeks, otherwise the vitamin supplements you've taken will be measured.  The blood circulation system is a transportation system.  It transports the vitamins you've absorbed around the body, but blood tests don't give an accurate picture of the vitamin and mineral stores inside organs and tissues where they are actually used.  You can have "normal" blood levels but still have deficiencies.  This is because the brain demands stored nutrients be put into the blood stream to supply important organs, like the brain and heart, while other organs do without.   If you are taking Thiamine Mononitrate in your supplements, you are probably low in thiamine.  Thiamine Mononitrate is used in many supplements because it won't break down sitting on a shelf.  This also means Thiamine Mononitrate is difficult for the body to utilize.  Only thirty percent of Thiamine Mononitrate on the label is absorbed and even less is able to be utilized by the body.  A different form of Thiamine called Benfotiamine has been shown to promote intestinal healing.   Talk to your doctor about doing a genetic test to look for Celiac markers.   I'm concerned that if you do a gluten challenge (10 grams of gluten per day for a minimum off two weeks) in your weakened state, the nutritional deficiencies will become worse and possibly life threatening.  
    • ElisaAllergiesgluten
      Allergy medication: cetirizine by the HealthA2Z is it gluten free?

      By ElisaAllergiesgluten · Posted

      Hello, good afternoon!   I apologize, I didn’t see a notification and I’m just reading this. Thank you so much for sharing your thoughts and the link. Yes you are absolutely right, even so trying to get a response from them has been extremely difficult. They don’t answer but I will your practice of “guilty until proven innocent.”   I like and have a sense of trust here in this website, everyone is honest and thoughts are raw. The mutual understanding is amazing!   thank you Scott!
    • Scott Adams
      Draft gluten-free ciders… can they be trusted ?

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      I'd go with a vodka tonic, but that's just me😉
    • Rejoicephd
      Draft gluten-free ciders… can they be trusted ?

      By Rejoicephd · Posted

      That and my nutritionist also said that drinking cider is one of the worst drink choices for me, given that I have candida overgrowth.  She said the combination of the alcohol and sugar would be very likely to worsen my candida problem.  She suggested that if I drink, I go for clear vodka, either neat or with a splash of cranberry.   So in summary, I am giving ciders a rest.  Whether it's a gluten risk or sugars and yeast overgrowth, its just not worth it.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.