Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Endoscopy - How Many Tissue Samples Needed?


trying4faith

Recommended Posts

trying4faith Apprentice

Hi all,

I have been told your blood work shows elevated gliadin, you may have a wheat allergy, but don't appear to be celiac disease.

Then three months later, your bloodwork is normal (after 2.5 weeks gluten-free) so you don't have celiac (all 5 titers done).

And -

Your endoscopy was inconclusive. Gastritis, elevated leukocytes, and possible early onset of celiac disease. The doctor only removed three samples of the duodenum. I've read more are required.

Since I've been gluten-free for two months now (everything eaten is either fresh or labeled gluten-free) and am still having the same symptoms intermittently, maybe it isn't celiac disease?

Can someone tell me two things:

1. Can being off gluten for 2.5 weeks throw off the blood test?

2. How many tissue samples are required for an accurate test? Any medically documented literature out there to back that up?

Thanks.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Carriefaith Enthusiast
Since I've been gluten-free for two months now (everything eaten is either fresh or labeled gluten-free) and am still having the same symptoms intermittently, maybe it isn't celiac disease?

I am kind of confused from your post... So you had an inconclusive biopsy and a + blood test?

If you are still having symptoms, you may need more time to heal... Some people need 1-2 years to feel better! and I'm in that category!

1. Can being off gluten for 2.5 weeks throw off the blood test?

2. How many tissue samples are required for an accurate test? Any medically documented literature out there to back that up?

Being off gluten may give a false-negative result on a blood test. The blood tests look at the antibodies in your blood that are produced from injesting gluten, so essentially... if you're not eating gluten, those antibodies won't be there.

I'm not a doctor and haven't seen medical literature but I think that more biopsys would give the doctor a better chance of finding celiac since the damage can be patchy. I think 3-5 would be good enough... but no less than that.

cy7878 Newbie

6 pieces is usually what is recommended in looking for celiac disease.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,201
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Judy Wysocki
    Newest Member
    Judy Wysocki
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Xravith
      I'm very confused... My blood test came out negative, I checked all antibodies. I suppose my Total IgA levels are normal (132 mg/dl), so the test should be reliable. Still, I'm not relieved as I can't tolerate even a single biscuit. I need to talk to my doctor about whether a duodenal biopsy is necessary. But it is really possible to have intestinal damage despite having a seronegative results? I have really strong symptoms, and I don't want to keep skipping university lectures or being bedridden at home.
    • Scott Adams
      They may want to also eliminate other possible causes for your symptoms/issues and are doing additional tests.  Here is info about blood tests for celiac disease--if positive an endoscopy where biopsies of your intestinal villi are taken to confirm is the typical follow up.    
    • Scott Adams
      In the Europe the new protocol for making a celiac disease diagnosis in children is if their tTg-IgA (tissue transglutaminase IgA) levels are 10 times or above the positive level for celiac disease--and you are above that level. According to the latest research, if the blood test results are at certain high levels that range between 5-10 times the reference range for a positive celiac disease diagnosis, it may not be necessary to confirm the results using an endoscopy/biopsy: Blood Test Alone Can Diagnose Celiac Disease in Most Children and Adults TGA-IgA at or Above Five Times Normal Limit in Kids Indicates Celiac Disease in Nearly All Cases No More Biopsies to Diagnose Celiac Disease in Children! May I ask why you've had so many past tTg-IgA tests done, and many of them seem to have been done 3 times during short time intervals?    
    • trents
      @JettaGirl, "Coeliac" is the British spelling of "celiac". Same disease. 
    • JettaGirl
      This may sound ridiculous but is this supposed to say Celiacs? I looked up Coeliacs because you never know, there’s a lot of diseases related to a disease that they come up with similar names for. It’s probably meant to say Celiacs but I just wanted to confirm.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.