Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Confused By Sons Test Results Help!


catsintrbleagn

Recommended Posts

catsintrbleagn Newbie

I've suspected my 9 year old has celiac since self diagnosing myself last year. He abruptly stopped growing around the time he started solid foods as a baby and we ran all the tests and spent a ton of time at Children's hospital doing sweat tests and getting bone scans and nothing came up. He began to follow a growth curve again but now at 9 he is just going into a size 7. I decided to have him tested for celiac and they have come back negative. I just don't understand the numbers. Can someone explain? Thank you!

IgA 10

IgG 17

Anti tTransglutaminase 4


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



happygirl Collaborator

Can you give us a little bit more info? What is the reference range for the tests, and is there more info listed for the IgA and IgG tests?

Welcome to the board!

catsintrbleagn Newbie

Can you give us a little bit more info? What is the reference range for the tests, and is there more info listed for the IgA and IgG tests?

Welcome to the board!

Thank you! I'm so confused, this is why I didn't go into the medical profession! ;)

Anti endomysial, IgA Negative

Anti Gliadin, IgA 10 (low 0 High 19)

(<20 U negative, 20-30 U low positive, >30 U positive)

Anti Gliadin, IgG 17 (low 0 High 19)

(<20 U negative, 20-30 U low positive, >30 U positive)

Anti tTransglutaminase, IgA 4 (low 0 High 19)

(<20 U negative, 20-30 U low positive, >30 U positive)

Anti tTransglutaminase, IgG Negative

happygirl Collaborator

You are doing great!

So he had five tests done -

EMA IgA: negative

tTG IgA: negative

tTG IgG: negative

AGA IgA: negative

AGA IgG: negative

The only one that appears even *close* to positive is the AGA IgG. They didn't run the total IgA test, which is not a Celiac test, but helps evaluates if you make IgA antibodies. If you don't make IgA antibodies (IgA deficient), any IgA based tests decrease in accuracy. However, they did run two IgG based tests, which are negative (AGA IgG and tTG IgG) which is what they would run if he was IgA deficient.

Given the fact that you self diagnosed (meaning, you don't know if you have "classic" Celiac or a non-Celiac gluten sensitivity), you don't know if his is genetic. You could ask for the gene testing - the absence of the HLA DQ2 or HLA DQ8 gene in him significantly decreases the chance of your son having Celiac, as research shows that 95-98% of Celiacs have one/both genes. But, just having the gene does not mean that he has Celiac - 30-40% of the American population has the gene, but only 1 in 133 have Celiac.

Or, you could do a trial for him on the gluten free diet, and see if his symptoms respond.

Hope this helps.

catsintrbleagn Newbie

You are doing great!

So he had five tests done -

EMA IgA: negative

tTG IgA: negative

tTG IgG: negative

AGA IgA: negative

AGA IgG: negative

The only one that appears even *close* to positive is the AGA IgG. They didn't run the total IgA test, which is not a Celiac test, but helps evaluates if you make IgA antibodies. If you don't make IgA antibodies (IgA deficient), any IgA based tests decrease in accuracy. However, they did run two IgG based tests, which are negative (AGA IgG and tTG IgG) which is what they would run if he was IgA deficient.

Given the fact that you self diagnosed (meaning, you don't know if you have "classic" Celiac or a non-Celiac gluten sensitivity), you don't know if his is genetic. You could ask for the gene testing - the absence of the HLA DQ2 or HLA DQ8 gene in him significantly decreases the chance of your son having Celiac, as research shows that 95-98% of Celiacs have one/both genes. But, just having the gene does not mean that he has Celiac - 30-40% of the American population has the gene, but only 1 in 133 have Celiac.

Or, you could do a trial for him on the gluten free diet, and see if his symptoms respond.

Hope this helps.

Thank you! Since me and one of my daughters are already gluten free we'll just start him and see what happens. I appreciate your response :)

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - trents replied to Roses8721's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      8

      GI DX celiac despite neg serology and no biopsy

    2. - Roses8721 posted a topic in Post Diagnosis, Recovery & Treatment of Celiac Disease
      0

      gluten-free Oatmeal

    3. - Roses8721 replied to Roses8721's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      8

      GI DX celiac despite neg serology and no biopsy

    4. - Scott Adams replied to Ginger38's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      5

      Shingles - Could It Be Related to Gluten/ Celiac

    5. - Scott Adams replied to Xravith's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      3

      Challenges eating gluten before biopsy


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,473
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Kelly Hannon
    Newest Member
    Kelly Hannon
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):




  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):


  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      Certainly, it would b wise to have a gene test done if your physician is open to it as it would provide some more data to understand what's going on. But keep in mind that the genetic test for celiac disease cannot be used as to diagnose celiac disease, only to establish the potential to develop active celiac disease. About 40% of the general population possess one or both of the primary genes known to be associated with the development of active celiac disease but only about 1% of the population actually develop active celiac disease. So, the gene test is an effective "rule out" tool but not an effective diagnostic tool.
    • Roses8721
      Had Quaker gluten-free oatmeal last night and my stomach is a mess today. NO flu but def stomach stuff. Anyone else?
    • Roses8721
      So you would be good with the diagnosis and not worry to check genetics etc etc? Appreciate your words!
    • Scott Adams
      As recommended by @Flash1970, you may want to get this: https://www.amazon.com/Curist-Lidocaine-Maximum-Strength-Topical/dp/B09DN7GR14/
    • Scott Adams
      For those who will likely remain gluten-free for life anyway due to well-known symptoms they have when eating gluten, my general advice is to ignore any doctors who push to go through a gluten challenge to get a formal diagnosis--and this is especially true for those who have severe symptoms when they eat gluten. It can take months, or even years to recover from such a challenge, so why do this if you already know that gluten is the culprit and you won't be eating it anyway?  Approximately 10x more people have non-celiac gluten sensitivity than have celiac disease, but there isn’t yet a test for NCGS. If your symptoms go away on a gluten-free diet it would likely signal NCGS--but those in this group will usually have negative tests, or at best, elevated antibodies that don't reach the level of official positive. Unfortunately test results for celiac disease are not always definitive, and many errors can be made when doing an endoscopy for celiac disease, and they can happen in many ways, for example not collecting the samples in the right areas, not collecting enough samples, or not interpreting the results properly and giving a Marsh score.  Many biopsy results can also be borderline, where there may be certain damage that could be associated with celiac disease, but it just doesn't quite reach the level necessary to make a formal diagnosis. The same is true for blood test results. Over the last 10 years or so a new "Weak Positive" range has been created by many labs for antibody results, which can simply lead to confusion (some doctors apparently believe that this means the patient can decide if they want more testing or to go gluten-free). There is no "Weak Negative" category, for example. Many patients are not told to eat gluten daily, lots of it, for the 6-8 week period leading up to their blood test, nor asked whether or not they've been eating gluten. Some patients even report to their doctors that they've been gluten-free for weeks or months before their blood tests, yet their doctors incorrectly say nothing to them about how this can affect their test, and create false negative results. Many people are not routinely given a total IGA blood test when doing a blood screening, which can lead to false negative interpretations if the patient has low IGA. We've seen on this forum many times that some doctors who are not fully up on how interpret the blood test results can tell patients that the don't need to follow a gluten-free diet or get more testing because only 1 of the 2 or 3 tests done in their panel is positive (wrong!), and the other 1 or 2 tests are negative.  Dermatologists often don't know how to do a proper skin biopsy for dermatitis herpetiformis, and when they do it wrongly their patient will continue to suffer with terrible DH itching, and all the risks associated with celiac disease. For many, the DH rash is the only presentation of celiac disease. These patients may end up on strong prescriptions for life to control their itching which also may have many negative side effects, for example Dapsone. Unfortunately many people will continue to suffer needlessly and eat gluten due to these errors in performing or interpreting celiac disease tests, but luckily some will find out about non-celiac gluten sensitivity on their own and go gluten-free and recover from their symptoms. Consider yourself lucky if you've figured out that gluten is the source of your health issues, and you've gone gluten-free, because many people will never figure this out.    
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.