Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Entero Lab Question


siglfritsch

Recommended Posts

siglfritsch Newbie

I'm assuming the Entero lab testing is for the celiac gene. If it comes back negative does that mean a person definitely does not have celiac but just gluten intolerance? How much does the testing cost and how is it done?


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



psawyer Proficient

While I am not familiar with the specifics, EnteroLab offers multiples tests, only one of which is genetic.

burdee Enthusiast

I'm assuming the Entero lab testing is for the celiac gene. If it comes back negative does that mean a person definitely does not have celiac but just gluten intolerance? How much does the testing cost and how is it done?

See Open Original Shared Link for info about their test prices. The gene test is a mouth swab kit which you do yourself and send back. The other tests are stool tests for gluten antibodies, casein antibodies, Ttg antibodies, malabsorption, soy antibodies, egg antibodies and yeast antibodies. All test for IgA antibody mediated reactions. I received my results in 3-4 weeks. You can also call or email E-lab with any questions you have. They are very helpful.

SUE

Skylark Collaborator

Second post in this thread has my professional opinion of Enterolab.

As for genetic testing, there are occasionally biopsy-positive celiacs without DQ2 or DQ8 but it's uncommon. Positive genetic results don't mean much, as 30% of the population is DQ2 or DQ8, yet only an estimated 1-2% are celiac.

ravenwoodglass Mentor

I'm assuming the Entero lab testing is for the celiac gene. If it comes back negative does that mean a person definitely does not have celiac but just gluten intolerance? How much does the testing cost and how is it done?

Enterolab tests for more than just the 2 generally accepted celiac associated genes. They also test for antibodies in the stool for gluten, casien, egg, soy and yeast as well as testing for fat malabsorption.

While some are skeptical of their testing I found them to be very helpful. It helped to explain why my arthritis went into remission on the diet. It turns out my celiac associated gene is DQ9. Gene testing before I was diagnosed celiac would have labeled me with RA (from my understanding and I am certainly no expert on genetics) and I would most likely be now dead as doctors would have labeled me with that.

Figured I should show at least one reference to how I came about that understanding-

Open Original Shared Link

"Recently, we have proposed that the combination of HLA-DQ and -DR alleles is responsible for the association of the HLA class II region with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). According to this model, some HLA-DQ alleles, namely DQ4, DQ7, DQ8, and DQ9, predispose carriers to severe RA"

The gene tests are not however diagnostic in themselves, no matter who does them. They are however a very valid piece of the puzzle. If you funds are limited IMHO you would be better off getting the stool testing done for the antibodies as that will give you more information if you can't afford both stool and gene testing.

Jestgar Rising Star

Just as a general statement, when gathering opinions on the internet, you should be highly suspicious of anyone who offers a "professional" opinion without proving their credentials, or citing credible, peer-reviewed journals to back their statements.

Skylark Collaborator

Just as a general statement, when gathering opinions on the internet, you should be highly suspicious of anyone who offers a "professional" opinion without proving their credentials, or citing credible, peer-reviewed journals to back their statements.

Are you addressing my post, or Enterolab? The burden of proof of the usefulness of anti-gliadin IgA and anti-tTA fecal antibodies rests with them, not me. Enterolab does not provide any references about fecal antibodies, and if they have sponsored any studies, they have not seen fit to share the results in the peer-reviewed literature or even on their website. They do not even tell prospective customers the sensitivity and specificity of their tests, which I personally find somewhat misleading.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



  • 2 weeks later...
greenpear Newbie

I'm assuming the Entero lab testing is for the celiac gene. If it comes back negative does that mean a person definitely does not have celiac but just gluten intolerance? How much does the testing cost and how is it done?

Stop don't use Entero Lab and spread the word. I thought I had a gluten intolerance and decided to go behind my doctor and used Entero Lab. The results came back and said of was gluten intolerant. I finally told my doctor what I did and she asked if I got any better. The answer was a big NO. So she redid the blood test and also did a small bowl biopsy which, as you know, is the gold standard for determining a gluten intolerance. I had NO damage in the small intestine therefore NO gluten intolerance. Entero Lab ripped me off. I eat lots of gluten these days and I having NO problems at all. (I actually had microscopic colitis and I'm fine now after taking asacol for 18 months) Please spread the word. Just find a good GI doctor and work with them.

burdee Enthusiast

Stop don't use Entero Lab and spread the word. I thought I had a gluten intolerance and decided to go behind my doctor and used Entero Lab. The results came back and said of was gluten intolerant. I finally told my doctor what I did and she asked if I got any better. The answer was a big NO. So she redid the blood test and also did a small bowl biopsy which, as you know, is the gold standard for determining a gluten intolerance. I had NO damage in the small intestine therefore NO gluten intolerance. Entero Lab ripped me off. I eat lots of gluten these days and I having NO problems at all. (I actually had microscopic colitis and I'm fine now after taking asacol for 18 months) Please spread the word. Just find a good GI doctor and work with them.

Gluten intolerance manifests in many ways OTHER than intestinal damage and gastrointestinal symptoms. Gluten intolerance does NOT always mean celiac disease. Celiac disease is the intestinal damage manifestion of gluten intolerance. So you can have gluten intolerance WITHOUT having intestinal damage. Read "Healthier Without Wheat" by Stephen Wangen, ND. That book describes all the ways gluten can harm the body, without causing symptoms of or damage related to celiac disease.

Elab didn't rip you off. Small bowel biopsy is the gold standard for determining CELIAC DISEASE, but not all forms of gluten intolerance. Colitis could also be caused by gastrointestinal bugs (parasites or bacteria). I had pseudomembraneous colitis caused by the clostridium difficile bacteria.

I'm glad you recovered from MC, but you may want to consider other physical (esp. nondigestive) symptoms, as you continue to eat gluten. If you develop any symptoms associated with autoimmune conditions or symptoms your doc can't explain, you may want to reconsider your gluten intolerance diagnosis.

Skylark Collaborator

Greenpear, I'm so sorry to hear you got ripped off. Have you reported this to any consumer organizations? You might try Quackwatch as well.

ENF Enthusiast

I've often wondered if any of Enterolab's gluten intolerance stool test customers ever received results from them that determined they were NOT gluten intolerant? If they have, I wonder what the percentage is. B)

jerseyangel Proficient

I've often wondered if any of Enterolab's gluten intolerance stool test customers ever received results from them that determined they were NOT gluten intolerant? If they have, I wonder what the percentage is. B)

I don't have any facts or figures for you, but from reading on here for the last 5 years or so, I do remember seeing a few people report negative stool testing from Enterolabs.

ravenwoodglass Mentor

I've often wondered if any of Enterolab's gluten intolerance stool test customers ever received results from them that determined they were NOT gluten intolerant? If they have, I wonder what the percentage is. B)

There have been people on the board who have reported having negative tests. In some cases it was when one in the family was diagnosed celiac and all were tested. Since most of the folks that go to Enterolab are having issues I don't personally find it unusual that many would show up gluten intolerant. People that feel great and don't have symptoms don't get tested. Gluten intolerance and celiac are very common and many have suffered for years being told by doctors that they have IBS and then the doctors don't test further. The number of IBS patients in this country is very high, big pharma makes a fortune off them. Just look at all the stomach meds lining the store shelves. Do all IBS patients have celiac or gluten intolerance, of course not. Do all folks with celiac or gluten intolerance not have any other issues, that is of course not also. Have many been helped by gluten intolerance being diagnosed, well just look through the board. Some of us were really let down by conventional and naturopathic medicine which simply threw meds at us to try and control symptoms. If Enterolab can help those folks I am all for it. If the diet followed strictly doesn't help then you continue to look for what the problem may be. Should Enterolab be someones first step to diagnosis? No, the first step IMHO should always be conventional medicine but when convential medicine doesn't help, as in my case, Enterolab could be a valid part of the diagnostic process. If I had known of Enterolab it would have saved me thousands of dollars and years of pain and permanent damage because conventional medicine took a look at my false negative blood tests and considered the matter closed.

frieze Community Regular

we must remember, as raven mentioned, that the persons availing themselves of Enterolab are a self selected group. In that group, it would stand to reason the + rate would be high.

ravenwoodglass Mentor

I would recommend that Enterolab not be part of solving your intestinal problems. Find a good GI doctor and stick with them. See my story below.

Stop don't use Entero Lab and spread the word. I thought I had a gluten intolerance and decided to go behind my doctor and used Entero Lab. The results came back and said I was gluten intolerant and to never consume any product with gluten. I finally told my doctor what I did and she asked if I got any better when I stopped gluten. The answer was a NO. So she redid the blood test and also did a small bowl biopsy which, as you know, is the gold standard for determining a gluten intolerance. I had NO damage in the small intestine therefore NO gluten intolerance. Entero Lab ripped me off. I eat lots of gluten these days and I having NO problems at all. (I actually had microscopic colitis and I'm fine now after taking asacol for 18 months) Please spread the word. Just find a good GI doctor and work with them.

We got your post the first time. Did you get any blood work or a biopsy before you went with Enterolab? Well if not you should have. I am sorry you feel the 'ripped you off' and glad you finally got smart about it and went to a GI doctor, which is what you should have done in the first place. By the way if you are gluten free or gluten light the blood and biopsy will be negative whether you are gluten intolerant or not. Enterolab can be very helpful for those of us who are false negative on testing with conventional GI doctors. Folks are always told here to see a GI doctor first if they can and if the gluten-free diet does not help they are told to keep looking for the cause. Enterolab does not diagnose anything they simply tell you if you are making antibodies to a substance. I am glad your feeling better and finally got yourself to where you should have gone in the first place, the doctor.

nora-n Rookie

greenpear, Enterolab did not rip you off, since the test actually was invented and developed to find microscopic colitis, which responds to gluten and gets better on a gluten free diet but some do need other medicines.

So it turned out you have microscopic colitis, and this is what the test was about....

He discovered the test also was useful to catch gluten intolerance before the villi were damaged, something like the early stages of celiac.

I got hashimotos some years ago , triggered by thyrodi antibodies triggered by gluten, and I have mostly neurological symptoms from gluten. The effects of gluten are much more severe in other parts of the body than the gut.

I am double DQ5, which is DQ1, and Hadjivassilou found that about 20% of his gluten ataxia patients were DQ1.

Laely, they found the antibody responsible for gluten ataxia, ttg-6 together with antigliadin which was known from before. The antibody involved in DH is ttg-3.

The antibody for ordinary celiacs is ttg-2.

Skylark Collaborator

That's the whole problem. Fecal anti-tTG is a marker for Crohns and inflammatory bowel disease as well as celiac. The specific marker for celiac is fecal anti-endomysial antibodies. It is irresponsible and dangerous to diagnose celiac without testing for anti-EMA or ruling out inflammatory bowel disease with other tests or a scope.

Open Original Shared Link

I have yet to see a cut-and-paste of an Enterolab report on this board that mentions the possibility of any disease other than gluten intolerance/celiac even with a positive anti-tTG result.

Fecal anti-gliadin IgA suffers from all the same problems as serum AGA and all the various other tests for food intolerances. It's not specific, especially as an isolated result. Enterolab recommends a lifetime gluten free diet and makes veiled threats about neurologic damage and osteoporosis based only on fecal AGA. Again, even if the test might be useful, I find the recommendations irresponsible and unsupported by peer-reviewed research.

ravenwoodglass Mentor

That's the whole problem. Fecal anti-tTG is a marker for Crohns and inflammatory bowel disease as well as celiac. The specific marker for celiac is fecal anti-endomysial antibodies. It is irresponsible and dangerous to diagnose celiac without testing for anti-EMA or ruling out inflammatory bowel disease with other tests or a scope.

Open Original Shared Link

I have yet to see a cut-and-paste of an Enterolab report on this board that mentions the possibility of any disease other than gluten intolerance/celiac even with a positive anti-tTG result.

Enterolab does not diagnose anything. They simply tell you whether your body is making antibodies.

They also state on their website that if problems continue after eliminating gluten the person should be checked for other issues like Chrons.

burdee Enthusiast

I've often wondered if any of Enterolab's gluten intolerance stool test customers ever received results from them that determined they were NOT gluten intolerant? If they have, I wonder what the percentage is. B)

I've been on this board since 2004. I can't remember many reports of negative tests, though I do recall a few. (You might want to do a board search.) If they get negative gluten intolerance results, they probably don't post on this board. Also people who are willing to pay out of pocket for Elab tests usually have severe enough symptoms or a history of symptoms and misdiagoses. Many of them have already stopped eating gluten, because they know that they react badly to gluten. So they don't want to eat gluten just to take a test which will confirm that they should not eat gluten. Nevertheless, they want a diagnosis from someone so they can tell their friends and family that they have gluten intolerance. They can use that diagnosis to fight off the family 'food pushers' who say "A little bit won't hurt you."

SUE

Skylark Collaborator

I've been trying so hard to leave the Enterolab thing alone, but it keeps coming up and every time people talk about it I'm angry at Dr. Fine all over again for misrepresenting and overinterpreting the test results he offers. I find the whole thing genuinely upsetting as I feel like I'm looking at a scam and I'm the kind of person who hates to see sick, desperate people manipulated out of hard-earned money. It's perfectly reasonable to measure the things he does. It has even helped some people on this board. Thing is, it's not reasonable to hide the sensitivity and particularly the specificity of the tests, or to not mention non-celiac diagnoses. You are buying a "pig in a poke" so to speak, and for a lot of money!

How is this not a diagnosis? "....follow a strict and permanent gluten free diet" is pretty unequivocal.

"Interpretation of Fecal Anti-gliadin IgA (Normal Range is less than 10 Units): Intestinal antigliadin IgA antibody was elevated, indicating that you have active dietary gluten sensitivity. For optimal health, resolution of symptoms (if you have them), and prevention of small intestinal damage and malnutrition, osteoporosis, and damage to other tissues (like nerves, brain, joints, muscles, thyroid, pancreas, other glands, skin, liver, spleen, among others), it is recommended that you follow a strict and permanent gluten free diet. As gluten sensitivity is a genetic syndrome, you may want to have your relatives screened as well."

I can't find a cut & paste of a positive anti-tTG result right now but I know I've seen them and they didn't mention inflammatory bowel disease.

I find the threatening tone of the gliadin IgA blurb pretty disturbing, to be honest. It's probably useful for manipulating skeptical family members into listening to people who already know they need to be gluten free but it's not ... fishing for words... good medicine ... correct ... honest? :blink:

Shouldn't it read more like "Your positive results suggest that you could be gluten sensitive. We recommend trying a gluten free diet to see whether your symptoms resolve. ??% of people with this test result feel dramatically better on a gluten free diet. If you find the diet is necessary to relieve your symptoms, you should follow it permanently to avoid malabsorption and damage."

Fooey. Now I'm all upset again. :(

ravenwoodglass Mentor

Shouldn't it read more like "Your positive results suggest that you could be gluten sensitive. We recommend trying a gluten free diet to see whether your symptoms resolve. ??% of people with this test result feel dramatically better on a gluten free diet. If you find the diet is necessary to relieve your symptoms, you should follow it permanently to avoid malabsorption and damage."

Fooey. Now I'm all upset again. :(

I do agree that your wording may be more appropriate. I don't agree that he is giving a diagnosis however of anything other than the antibody reaction.

One nice thing about this board is that all opinions are welcome.

Skylark Collaborator

If other folks don't read that as a diagnosis, I feel a little better.

ravenwoodglass Mentor

If other folks don't read that as a diagnosis, I feel a little better.

I am glad you feel better, you're to valuable a member to lose. :)

Skylark Collaborator

I am glad you feel better, you're to valuable a member to lose. :)

:wub: You are too kind.

I'm not going anywhere. Having some e-friends like you and the other folks on this board is so nice!

Lisa Mentor

I am glad you feel better, you're to valuable a member to lose. :)

agreed! :D

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - suek54 replied to suek54's topic in Dermatitis Herpetiformis
      5

      Awaiting dermatitis herpetiformis confirmation following biopsy

    2. - trents replied to catnapt's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      3

      how much gluten do I need to eat before blood tests?

    3. - catnapt replied to catnapt's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      3

      how much gluten do I need to eat before blood tests?

    4. - trents replied to catnapt's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      3

      how much gluten do I need to eat before blood tests?

    5. - catnapt posted a topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      3

      how much gluten do I need to eat before blood tests?

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      133,257
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    KariNoMoreGluten
    Newest Member
    KariNoMoreGluten
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.6k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):
  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • suek54
      Thank you all for your advice and the dermatitis herpetiformis article. The latter made me realise I had stopped taking my antihistamine, which I will restart today. The Dapsone has cleared the rash entirely but I still get quite a bit itching, absolutely nothing to see though. I know its notoriously hard to clear and its still relatively early days for me.  The iodine issue is very interesting. I do eat quite a bit of salt because I have Addison's disease and sodium retention is an issue. I also have autoimmune hypothyroidism, not sure how a low iodine diet would play into that? Because of my Addison's I am totally steroid dependent, I take steroids 4 x daily and cannot mount any defence against inflammation. I need to increase my meds for that. Now that I know what is wrong I can do just that if Im having a bad day. Life is very sweet, just so damn complicated sometimes! Hey ho, onwards. Thank you again for your advice.  
    • trents
      So, essentially all of the nutrition in the food we eat is absorbed through the villous lining of the small bowel. This is the section of the intestinal track that is damaged by celiac disease. This villous lining is composed of billions of finger-like projections that create a huge amount of surface area for absorbing nutrients. For the celiac person, when gluten is consumed, it triggers an autoimmune reaction in this area which, of course, generates inflammation. The antibodies connected with this inflammation is what the celiac blood tests are designed to detect but this inflammation, over time, wears down the finger-like projections of the villous lining. Of course, when this proceeds for an extended period of time, greatly reduces the absorption efficiency of the villous lining and often results in many and various nutrient deficiency-related health issues. Classic examples would be osteoporosis and iron deficiency. But there are many more. Low D3 levels is a well-known celiac-caused nutritional deficiency. So is low B12. All the B vitamins in fact. Magnesium, zinc, etc.  Celiac disease can also cause liver inflammation. You mention elevated ALP levels. Elevated liver enzymes over a period of 13 years was what led to my celiac diagnosis. Within three months of going gluten free my liver enzymes normalized. I had elevated AST and ALT. The development of sensitivities to other food proteins is very common in the celiac population. Most common cross reactive foods are dairy and oats but eggs, soy and corn are also relatively common offenders. Lactose intolerance is also common in the celiac population because of damage to the SB lining.  Eggs when they are scrambled or fried give me a gut ache. But when I poach them, they do not. The steam and heat of poaching causes a hydrolysis process that alters the protein in the egg. They don't bother me in baked goods either so I assume the same process is at work. I bought a plastic poacher on Amazon to make poaching very easy. All this to say that many of the issues you describe could be caused by celiac disease. 
    • catnapt
      thank you so much for your detailed and extremely helpful reply!! I can say with absolute certainty that the less gluten containing products I've eaten over the past several years, the better I've felt.   I wasn't avoiding gluten, I was avoiding refined grains (and most processed foods) as well as anything that made me feel bad when I ate it. It's the same reason I gave up dairy and eggs- they make me feel ill.  I do have a bit of a sugar addiction lol so a lot of times I wasn't sure if it was the refined grains that I was eating - or the sugar. So from time to time I might have a cookie or something but I've learned how to make wonderful cookies and golden brownies with BEANS!! and no refined sugar - I use date paste instead. Pizza made me so ill- but I thought it was probably the cheese. I gave up pizza and haven't missed it. the one time I tried a slice I felt so bad I knew I'd never touch it again. I stopped eating wheat pasta at least 3 yrs ago- just didn't feel well after eating it. I tried chick pea pasta and a few others and discovered I like the brown rice pasta. I still don't eat a lot of pasta but it's nice for a change when I want something easy. TBH over the years I've wondered sometimes if I might be gluten intolerant but really believed it was not possible for me to have celiac disease. NOW I need to know for sure- because I'm in the middle of a long process of trying to find out why I have a high parathyroid level (NOT the thyroid- but rather the 4 glands that control the calcium balance in your body) I have had a hard time getting my vit D level up, my serum calcium has run on the low side of normal for many years... and now I am losing calcium from my bones and excreting it in my urine (some sort of renal calcium leak) Also have a high ALP since 2014. And now rapidly worsening bone density.  I still do not have a firm diagnosis. Could be secondary HPT (but secondary to what? we need to know) It could be early primary HPT. I am spilling calcium in my urine but is that caused by the high parathyroid hormone or is it the reason my PTH is high>? there are multiple feedback loops for this condition.    so I will keep eating the bread and some wheat germ that does not seem to bother me too much (it hasn't got enough gluten to use just wheat germ)    but I'm curious- if you don't have a strong reaction to a product- like me and wheat germ- does that mean it's ok to eat or is it still causing harm even if you don't have any obvious symptoms? I guess what you are saying about silent celiac makes it likely that you can have no symptoms and still have the harm... but geez! you'd think they'd come up with a way to test for this that didn't require you to consume something that makes you sick! I worry about the complications I've been reading about- different kinds of cancers etc. also wondering- are there degrees of celiac disease?  is there any correlation between symptoms and the amnt of damage to your intestines? I also need a firm diagnosis because I have an identical twin sister ... so if I have celiac, she has it too- or at least the genetic make up for having it. I did have a VERY major stress to my body in 2014-2016 time frame .. lost 50lbs in a short period of time and had severe symptoms from acute protracted withdrawal off an SSRI drug (that I'd been given an unethically high dose of, by a dr who has since lost his license)  Going off the drug was a good thing and in many ways my health improved dramatically- just losing 50lbs was helpful but I also went  off almost a dozen different medications, totally changed my diet and have been doing pretty well except for the past 3-4 yrs when the symptoms related to the parathyroid issue cropped up. It is likely that I had low vit D for some time and that caused me a lot of symptoms. The endo now tells me that low vit D can be caused by celiac disease so I need to know for sure! thank you for all that great and useful information!!! 
    • trents
      Welcome, @catnapt! The most recent guidelines are the daily consumption of a minimum of 10g of gluten (about the amount found in 4-6 slices of wheat bread) for a minimum of two weeks. But if possible stretching that out even more would enhance the chances of getting valid test results. These guidelines are for those who have been eating gluten free for a significant amount of time. It's called the "gluten challenge".  Yes, you can develop celiac disease at any stage of life. There is a genetic component but also a stress trigger that is needed to activate the celiac genes. About 30-40% of the general population possesses the genetic potential to develop celiac disease but only about 1% of the general population actually develop celiac disease. For most with the potential, the triggering stress event doesn't happen. It can be many things but often it is a viral infection. Having said that, it is also the case that many, many people who eventually are diagnosed with celiac disease probably experienced the actual onset years before. Many celiacs are of the "silent" type, meaning that symptoms are largely missing or very minor and get overlooked until damage to the small bowel lining becomes advanced or they develop iron deficiency anemia or some other medical problem associated with celiac disease. Many, many are never diagnosed or are diagnosed later in life because they did not experience classic symptoms. And many physicians are only looking for classic symptoms. We now know that there are over 200 symptoms/medical problems associated with celiac disease but many docs are only looking for things like boating, gas, diarrhea. I certainly understand your concerns about not wanting to damage your body by taking on a gluten challenge. Your other option is to totally commit to gluten free eating and see if your symptoms improve. It can take two years or more for complete healing of the small bowel lining once going gluten free but usually people experience significant improvement well before then. If their is significant improvement in your symptoms when going seriously gluten free, then you likely have your answer. You would either have celiac disease or NCGS (Non Celiac Gluten Sensitivity).
    • catnapt
      after several years of issues with a para-gland issue, my endo has decided it's a good idea for me to be tested for celiac disease. I am 70 yrs old and stunned to learn that you can get celiac this late in life. I have just gradually stopped eating most foods that contain gluten over the past several years- they just make me feel ill- although I attributed it to other things like bread spiking blood sugar- or to the things I ate *with* the bread or crackers etc   I went to a party in Nov and ate a LOT of a vegan roast made with vital wheat gluten- as well as stuffing, rolls and pie crust... and OMG I was so sick! the pain, the bloating, the gas, the nausea... I didn't think it would ever end (but it did) and I was ready to go the ER but it finally subsided.   I mentioned this to my endo and now she wants me to be tested for celiac after 2 weeks of being on gluten foods. She has kind of flip flopped on how much gluten I should eat, telling me that if the symptoms are severe I can stop. I am eating 2-3 thin slices of bread per day (or english muffins) and wow- it does make me feel awful. But not as bad as when I ate that massive amnt of vital wheat gluten. so I will continue on if I have to... but what bothers me is - if it IS celiac, it seems stupid for lack of a better word, to intentionally cause more damage to my body... but I am also worried, on the other hand, that this is not a long enough challenge to make the blood work results valid.   can you give me any insight into this please?   thank you
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.