Jump to content

  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):

    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

New To Forum & In A Bit Of Shock...questions!

kgoody813

Recommended Posts

kgoody813 Newbie
kgoody813
Posted

I'm 36 and at age 19, I was diagnosed simultaneously with two autoimmune disorders - Ulcerative Colitis and a blood-related one called ITP (Idiopathic Thrombocytopenic Purpura). My GI issues have been very well controlled by medications, which over time, have included Prednisone.

About a month ago, I started having reflux symptoms - sore throat, regurgitation, feeling badly after eating acidic foods. I had a regular check up with my GI doctor scheduled anyway, so he put me on Protonix, which did not help much after two weeks. He then suggested an endoscopy to, presumably, diagnose reflux and switch to something like Nexium.

The results of the stomach biopsies they did were thankfully benign, but the nurse just called and said that the biopsies "indicate possible Celiac Disease, and a follow up blood test is necessary." I am reeling as I know that this will be incredibly life changing (but also life saving) if the diagnosis is confirmed.

My question is - has anyone ever had the testing in reverse? Being that the endoscopy was first and then the blood work will confirm? Or are they just breaking it to me gently? - It would seem, from my initial reading, that the biopsy would be the gold standard of confirming the disease. Is there a case out there where Celiac was suspected from endoscopy, but then ruled out with blood work?

I appreciate your input in advance... I have two small children and modifying only my diet is, indeed, going to be life changing for EVERYONE.

Thank you!

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


sa1937 Community Regular
sa1937
Posted

From what I've learned, the biopsy would trump the blood test (however, I did have the blood test first and then the biopsy). And a number of people on this forum have had negative blood tests but positive biopsies. And some have been negative for both but still found eating gluten-free solved a lot of other problems for them. And some have just gone gluten-free on their own without either.

While the gluten-free diet is certainly life-changing, it is doable, and who knows...it may solve some of your other issues, too. Wishing you the best.

scouter99 Newbie
scouter99
Posted

Well, my doctor started me with the diet FIRST and feels that if that helps me there is no need to do the rest... so certainly there are a lot of ways to figure this out!

mushroom Proficient
mushroom
Posted

I believe I have read that there are other medical conditions that can cause the same kind of damage to the small intestine as celiac disease, and perhaps he is wanting to rule in celiac and rule out something else.

mommida Enthusiast
mommida
Posted

Did the pathology report include testing for eosinophils?

Did the doctor give you any pictures from the scope?

Skylark Collaborator
Skylark
Posted

I believe I have read that there are other medical conditions that can cause the same kind of damage to the small intestine as celiac disease, and perhaps he is wanting to rule in celiac and rule out something else.

Only Marsh 1, where they see lymphocytic infiltration but normal villous architecture. Marsh 2 or 3 is specific to celiac.

With Marsh 1, blood tests are a good idea, then try the diet.

kgoody813 Newbie
kgoody813
Posted
  • Author

I so appreciate all of your input.

To answer your questions, I do have pictures from the endoscopy and his commentary immediately afterwards that other than mild irritation in the esophagus, due to presumable silent reflux, everything looked normal, including the duodenum. I do not have any other biopsy results. I should've asked more questions when the nurse called me today, but I was half shocked and half in denial ~ I thought, this is so out there for me. I don't have ANY discomfort of any kind whatsoever.

What do Marsh 1, Marsh 2 and Marsh 3 refer to? I get my blood work done at an independent lab in the morning. They faxed the order there, so I'm not sure what's ordered. I do get CBCs w/Diff quite frequently, related to my blood disorder and the eosinophils are normal.

What numbers will be elevated and will confirm Celiac?

Thanks again. Please tell me all you know about the diagnostic process...

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


psawyer Proficient
psawyer
Posted

What do Marsh 1, Marsh 2 and Marsh 3 refer to?

The Marsh scale measures the degree of damage to the villi. It ranges from 1 to 4 (well, zero means no damage). Marsh 4 describes total destruction of the villi--that is where I was in July of 2000.

SaraKat Contributor
SaraKat
Posted

I had blood test first (levels were very high) and then endoscopy to confirm.

mommida Enthusiast
mommida
Posted

To be clear eosinophils have nothing to do with Celiac.

lorid888 Newbie
lorid888
Posted

I'm 36 and at age 19, I was diagnosed simultaneously with two autoimmune disorders - Ulcerative Colitis and a blood-related one called ITP (Idiopathic Thrombocytopenic Purpura). My GI issues have been very well controlled by medications, which over time, have included Prednisone.

About a month ago, I started having reflux symptoms - sore throat, regurgitation, feeling badly after eating acidic foods. I had a regular check up with my GI doctor scheduled anyway, so he put me on Protonix, which did not help much after two weeks. He then suggested an endoscopy to, presumably, diagnose reflux and switch to something like Nexium.

The results of the stomach biopsies they did were thankfully benign, but the nurse just called and said that the biopsies "indicate possible Celiac Disease, and a follow up blood test is necessary." I am reeling as I know that this will be incredibly life changing (but also life saving) if the diagnosis is confirmed.

My question is - has anyone ever had the testing in reverse? Being that the endoscopy was first and then the blood work will confirm? Or are they just breaking it to me gently? - It would seem, from my initial reading, that the biopsy would be the gold standard of confirming the disease. Is there a case out there where Celiac was suspected from endoscopy, but then ruled out with blood work?

I appreciate your input in advance... I have two small children and modifying only my diet is, indeed, going to be life changing for EVERYONE.

Thank you!

I just had the same thing happen. I had 3 biopsies that tested positive, but they wanted to do a blood test to confim. It seems to me, the biopsy would be proof positive. Wondering myself...

Skylark Collaborator
Skylark
Posted

I just had the same thing happen. I had 3 biopsies that tested positive, but they wanted to do a blood test to confim. It seems to me, the biopsy would be proof positive. Wondering myself...

Damage on biopsy and a positive response to the diet is plenty of proof. They want to rule out other problems but you are very likely celiac.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):


  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,213
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748
    MogwaiStripe
    Newest Member
    MogwaiStripe
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):


  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      Taking Probiotics but Still Getting Sick After Gluten – Advice?

      By trents · Posted

      NCGS does not cause damage to the small bowel villi so, if indeed you were not skimping on gluten when you had the antibody blood testing done, it is likely you have celiac disease.
    • Scott Adams
      Taking Probiotics but Still Getting Sick After Gluten – Advice?

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      I will assume you did the gluten challenge properly and were eating a lot of gluten daily for 6-8 weeks before your test, but if not, that could be the issue. You can still have celiac disease with negative blood test results, although it's not as common:  Clinical and genetic profile of patients with seronegative coeliac disease: the natural history and response to gluten-free diet: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5606118/  Seronegative Celiac Disease - A Challenging Case: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9441776/  Enteropathies with villous atrophy but negative coeliac serology in adults: current issues: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34764141/  Approximately 10x more people have non-celiac gluten sensitivity than have celiac disease, but there isn’t yet a test for NCGS. If your symptoms go away on a gluten-free diet it would likely signal NCGS.
    • Xravith
      Taking Probiotics but Still Getting Sick After Gluten – Advice?

      By Xravith · Posted

      I'm very confused... My blood test came out negative, I checked all antibodies. I suppose my Total IgA levels are normal (132 mg/dl), so the test should be reliable. Still, I'm not relieved as I can't tolerate even a single biscuit. I need to talk to my doctor about whether a duodenal biopsy is necessary. But it is really possible to have intestinal damage despite having a seronegative results? I have really strong symptoms, and I don't want to keep skipping university lectures or being bedridden at home.
    • Scott Adams
      CT with contrast.

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      They may want to also eliminate other possible causes for your symptoms/issues and are doing additional tests.  Here is info about blood tests for celiac disease--if positive an endoscopy where biopsies of your intestinal villi are taken to confirm is the typical follow up.    
    • Scott Adams
      New labs are now very elevated

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      In the Europe the new protocol for making a celiac disease diagnosis in children is if their tTg-IgA (tissue transglutaminase IgA) levels are 10 times or above the positive level for celiac disease--and you are above that level. According to the latest research, if the blood test results are at certain high levels that range between 5-10 times the reference range for a positive celiac disease diagnosis, it may not be necessary to confirm the results using an endoscopy/biopsy: Blood Test Alone Can Diagnose Celiac Disease in Most Children and Adults TGA-IgA at or Above Five Times Normal Limit in Kids Indicates Celiac Disease in Nearly All Cases No More Biopsies to Diagnose Celiac Disease in Children! May I ask why you've had so many past tTg-IgA tests done, and many of them seem to have been done 3 times during short time intervals?    
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.