Jump to content

  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):

    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

New To Forum & In A Bit Of Shock...questions!

kgoody813

Recommended Posts

kgoody813 Newbie
kgoody813
Posted

I'm 36 and at age 19, I was diagnosed simultaneously with two autoimmune disorders - Ulcerative Colitis and a blood-related one called ITP (Idiopathic Thrombocytopenic Purpura). My GI issues have been very well controlled by medications, which over time, have included Prednisone.

About a month ago, I started having reflux symptoms - sore throat, regurgitation, feeling badly after eating acidic foods. I had a regular check up with my GI doctor scheduled anyway, so he put me on Protonix, which did not help much after two weeks. He then suggested an endoscopy to, presumably, diagnose reflux and switch to something like Nexium.

The results of the stomach biopsies they did were thankfully benign, but the nurse just called and said that the biopsies "indicate possible Celiac Disease, and a follow up blood test is necessary." I am reeling as I know that this will be incredibly life changing (but also life saving) if the diagnosis is confirmed.

My question is - has anyone ever had the testing in reverse? Being that the endoscopy was first and then the blood work will confirm? Or are they just breaking it to me gently? - It would seem, from my initial reading, that the biopsy would be the gold standard of confirming the disease. Is there a case out there where Celiac was suspected from endoscopy, but then ruled out with blood work?

I appreciate your input in advance... I have two small children and modifying only my diet is, indeed, going to be life changing for EVERYONE.

Thank you!

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


sa1937 Community Regular
sa1937
Posted

From what I've learned, the biopsy would trump the blood test (however, I did have the blood test first and then the biopsy). And a number of people on this forum have had negative blood tests but positive biopsies. And some have been negative for both but still found eating gluten-free solved a lot of other problems for them. And some have just gone gluten-free on their own without either.

While the gluten-free diet is certainly life-changing, it is doable, and who knows...it may solve some of your other issues, too. Wishing you the best.

scouter99 Newbie
scouter99
Posted

Well, my doctor started me with the diet FIRST and feels that if that helps me there is no need to do the rest... so certainly there are a lot of ways to figure this out!

mushroom Proficient
mushroom
Posted

I believe I have read that there are other medical conditions that can cause the same kind of damage to the small intestine as celiac disease, and perhaps he is wanting to rule in celiac and rule out something else.

mommida Enthusiast
mommida
Posted

Did the pathology report include testing for eosinophils?

Did the doctor give you any pictures from the scope?

Skylark Collaborator
Skylark
Posted

I believe I have read that there are other medical conditions that can cause the same kind of damage to the small intestine as celiac disease, and perhaps he is wanting to rule in celiac and rule out something else.

Only Marsh 1, where they see lymphocytic infiltration but normal villous architecture. Marsh 2 or 3 is specific to celiac.

With Marsh 1, blood tests are a good idea, then try the diet.

kgoody813 Newbie
kgoody813
Posted
  • Author

I so appreciate all of your input.

To answer your questions, I do have pictures from the endoscopy and his commentary immediately afterwards that other than mild irritation in the esophagus, due to presumable silent reflux, everything looked normal, including the duodenum. I do not have any other biopsy results. I should've asked more questions when the nurse called me today, but I was half shocked and half in denial ~ I thought, this is so out there for me. I don't have ANY discomfort of any kind whatsoever.

What do Marsh 1, Marsh 2 and Marsh 3 refer to? I get my blood work done at an independent lab in the morning. They faxed the order there, so I'm not sure what's ordered. I do get CBCs w/Diff quite frequently, related to my blood disorder and the eosinophils are normal.

What numbers will be elevated and will confirm Celiac?

Thanks again. Please tell me all you know about the diagnostic process...

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


psawyer Proficient
psawyer
Posted

What do Marsh 1, Marsh 2 and Marsh 3 refer to?

The Marsh scale measures the degree of damage to the villi. It ranges from 1 to 4 (well, zero means no damage). Marsh 4 describes total destruction of the villi--that is where I was in July of 2000.

SaraKat Contributor
SaraKat
Posted

I had blood test first (levels were very high) and then endoscopy to confirm.

mommida Enthusiast
mommida
Posted

To be clear eosinophils have nothing to do with Celiac.

lorid888 Newbie
lorid888
Posted

I'm 36 and at age 19, I was diagnosed simultaneously with two autoimmune disorders - Ulcerative Colitis and a blood-related one called ITP (Idiopathic Thrombocytopenic Purpura). My GI issues have been very well controlled by medications, which over time, have included Prednisone.

About a month ago, I started having reflux symptoms - sore throat, regurgitation, feeling badly after eating acidic foods. I had a regular check up with my GI doctor scheduled anyway, so he put me on Protonix, which did not help much after two weeks. He then suggested an endoscopy to, presumably, diagnose reflux and switch to something like Nexium.

The results of the stomach biopsies they did were thankfully benign, but the nurse just called and said that the biopsies "indicate possible Celiac Disease, and a follow up blood test is necessary." I am reeling as I know that this will be incredibly life changing (but also life saving) if the diagnosis is confirmed.

My question is - has anyone ever had the testing in reverse? Being that the endoscopy was first and then the blood work will confirm? Or are they just breaking it to me gently? - It would seem, from my initial reading, that the biopsy would be the gold standard of confirming the disease. Is there a case out there where Celiac was suspected from endoscopy, but then ruled out with blood work?

I appreciate your input in advance... I have two small children and modifying only my diet is, indeed, going to be life changing for EVERYONE.

Thank you!

I just had the same thing happen. I had 3 biopsies that tested positive, but they wanted to do a blood test to confim. It seems to me, the biopsy would be proof positive. Wondering myself...

Skylark Collaborator
Skylark
Posted

I just had the same thing happen. I had 3 biopsies that tested positive, but they wanted to do a blood test to confim. It seems to me, the biopsy would be proof positive. Wondering myself...

Damage on biopsy and a positive response to the diet is plenty of proof. They want to rule out other problems but you are very likely celiac.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):



    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):



  • Recent Activity

    1. trents
      - trents replied to Atl222's topic in Post Diagnosis, Recovery & Treatment of Celiac Disease
      1

      Increased intraepithelial lymphocytes after 10 yrs gluten-free

      Welcome to the celiac.com community, @Atl222! Yes, your increased lymphocytes could be in response to oats or it could possibly be cross contamination from gluten that is getting into your diet from some unexpected source but not enough to damage the villi. And I'm certain that increased lymphocytes can be caused by other things besides celiac disease...
    2. Scott Adams
      - Scott Adams replied to Aretaeus Cappadocia's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      1

      Brown Rice Vinegar (organic) from Eden Foods is likely gluten free

      This is a solid, well-reasoned approach. You’re right that “koji” by itself doesn’t indicate gluten status, and the risk really does come down to which grain is used to culture it. The fact that you directly contacted Eden Foods and received a clear statement that their koji is made from rice only, with no wheat or barley, is meaningful due diligence—especia...
    3. Scott Adams
      - Scott Adams replied to wellthatsfun's topic in Post Diagnosis, Recovery & Treatment of Celiac Disease
      1

      nothing has changed

      Seven months can still be early in celiac healing, especially if you were mostly asymptomatic to begin with—symptoms like low iron, vitamin D deficiency, nail changes, and hair issues often take much longer to improve because the gut needs time to recover before absorption normalizes. A tTG-IgA of 69 is not “low” in terms of immune activity, and it can t...
    4. Scott Adams
      - Scott Adams commented on knitty kitty's blog entry in Thiamine Thiamine Thiamine
      1

      About Celiac Remission

      This idea comes up often, but it’s important to separate theory from what’s actually supported by evidence. In celiac disease, the immune system does not “forget” gluten in a permanent or reliable way, even after long periods of avoidance, and the celiac genes do not turn off. While antibody levels (like tTG IgA) can normalize on a strict gluten-free diet an...
    5. Scott Adams
      - Scott Adams replied to TheDHhurts's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      2

      need help understanding testing result for Naked Nutrition Creatine please

      Gluten testing is normally reported in ppm (parts per million), which is equivalent to mg/kg, not micrograms by itself. A result of <0.025 mcg only becomes meaningful if you know the sample size tested (for example, mcg per gram or per kg). If that value represents <0.025 mcg per gram, that would equal <25 ppm, which is above the gluten-free threshold...
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):

  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      133,190
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748
    Atl222
    Newest Member
    Atl222
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.6k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):

  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      Increased intraepithelial lymphocytes after 10 yrs gluten-free

      By trents · Posted

      Welcome to the celiac.com community, @Atl222! Yes, your increased lymphocytes could be in response to oats or it could possibly be cross contamination from gluten that is getting into your diet from some unexpected source but not enough to damage the villi. And I'm certain that increased lymphocytes can be caused by other things besides celiac disease or gluten/oats exposure. See attachment. But you might try eliminating oats to start with and possibly dairy for a few months and then seek another endoscopy/biopsy to see if there was a reduction in lymphocyte counts. 
    • Scott Adams
      Brown Rice Vinegar (organic) from Eden Foods is likely gluten free

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      This is a solid, well-reasoned approach. You’re right that “koji” by itself doesn’t indicate gluten status, and the risk really does come down to which grain is used to culture it. The fact that you directly contacted Eden Foods and received a clear statement that their koji is made from rice only, with no wheat or barley, is meaningful due diligence—especially since Eden has a long-standing reputation for transparency. While the lack of gluten labeling can understandably give pause, manufacturer confirmation like this is often what people rely on for traditionally fermented products. As always, trusting your body after trying it is reasonable, but based on the information you gathered, your conclusion makes sense.
    • Scott Adams
      nothing has changed

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      Seven months can still be early in celiac healing, especially if you were mostly asymptomatic to begin with—symptoms like low iron, vitamin D deficiency, nail changes, and hair issues often take much longer to improve because the gut needs time to recover before absorption normalizes. A tTG-IgA of 69 is not “low” in terms of immune activity, and it can take 12–24 months (sometimes longer) for antibodies and the intestinal lining to fully heal, particularly in teens and young adults. Eating gluten again to “test” things isn’t recommended and won’t give you clear answers—it’s far more likely to cause harm than clarity. Weight not changing is also very common in celiac and doesn’t rule anything out. Please know that your frustration and sadness matter; this adjustment is hard, and feeling stuck can really affect mental health. You deserve support, and if you can, reaching out to a GI dietitian or mental health professional familiar with chronic illness could really help you through this phase. This study indicates that a majority of celiacs don't recover until 5 years after diagnosis and starting a gluten-free diet: Mucosal recovery and mortality in adults with celiac disease after treatment with a gluten-free diet However, it's also possible that what the study really shows is the difficulty in maintaining a 100% gluten-free diet. I suspect that if you looked closely at the diets of those who did not recover within 2 years might be that their diets were not 100% gluten-free. Perhaps they ate out more often, or didn't understand all of the hidden ingredients where gluten can hide. Either way, it shows how difficult recovery from celiac disease can be for most people. According to this study: This article explores other causes of flattened villi:    
    • Scott Adams
      need help understanding testing result for Naked Nutrition Creatine please

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      Gluten testing is normally reported in ppm (parts per million), which is equivalent to mg/kg, not micrograms by itself. A result of <0.025 mcg only becomes meaningful if you know the sample size tested (for example, mcg per gram or per kg). If that value represents <0.025 mcg per gram, that would equal <25 ppm, which is above the gluten-free threshold; if it’s <0.025 mcg per kilogram, it would be extremely low and well within GF limits. Without the denominator, the result is incomplete. It’s reasonable to follow up with the company and ask them to confirm the result in ppm using a validated method (like ELISA R5)—that’s the standard used to assess gluten safety.
    • Scott Adams
      Medications

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      Medication sensitivity is very real for many people with celiac and other autoimmune conditions, and it’s frustrating when that’s brushed off. Even when a medication is technically gluten-free, fillers, dose changes, or how your nervous system reacts—especially with things like gabapentin—can cause paradoxical effects like feeling wired but exhausted. The fact that it helped bloating suggests it may be affecting gut–nerve signaling, which makes sense in the context of SIBO, but that doesn’t mean the side effects should be ignored. You’re carrying a heavy load right now with ongoing skin, eye, and neurological uncertainty, and living in that kind of limbo is exhausting on its own. It’s understandable to feel overwhelmed and discouraged when systems and providers don’t meet you where you are—your experience is valid, and continuing to advocate for yourself, even when it’s hard, really does matter. You can search this site for prescriptions medications, but will need to know the manufacturer/maker if there is more than one, especially if you use a generic version of the medication: To see the ingredients you will need to click on the correct version of the medication and maker in the results, then scroll down to "Ingredients and Appearance" and click it, and then look at "Inactive Ingredients," as any gluten ingredients would likely appear there, rather than in the Active Ingredients area. https://dailymed.nlm.nih.gov/dailymed/   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.