Jump to content

  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):

    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

A Word About Neg Biopseis...

VydorScope

Recommended Posts

VydorScope Proficient
VydorScope
Posted

This post may sound picky, but in the day and age we live in, everyone realy kind of needs to understand this. A bisopy for celiac disease can never be negative, and can never disprove celiac disease. Let me explain...

Do you have some dice? Pick up one, assuming its a fiar 6 sided die, role it couple of times. Your goal is to get as many 1 or 2's as you can. Roll it say 5 times. I got 4,3,6,3,5 . In 5 rolls I did not score a single 1 or a 2. If I roll enough times I should evenutally get a 1 or a 2, but theres no mathmaticly way to define enough, with precison. Took me THREE sets of 5 rolls to get my first 1 or 2, it was a one actully. So what does that have to do with celiac disease? Easy...

When they do a bisopy for celiac disease they take a random part of your small intestin and check it to see if there is evidence. Most docs will take 4 or 5 samples. If say 1/3rd of your instenice is damaged, then finding damage is the same as rolling a 1 or a 2 on a 6 sided die. The more rolls you make, the better your chances of getting a 1 or a 2, but you literly could roll a million times and never get a 1 or a 2, or you might roll 5 1's in a row. In my example, it would take THREE endoscopy's to diag celiac disease successfully.

You see, the english term "negative" in this use REALY means "not postive". That sounds picky, but its an important fact.

So what does that mean for any of us? Just this, the biopsy is only conclusive IF IT IS POSTIVE. Anything else is not conclusive, just merely non-postive.

NOTE: I am not a doctor, nor do I play one on the internet, but one of my degrees is in statisitics, so I do have a better then average understanding of testing methodogly, but claim no medical expertise of any kind.

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


kvogt Rookie
kvogt
Posted

I read an article recently, on this site I believe, of a study that discussed the better locations to take the biopsy. Presumeably, the odds of a correct diagnose will be improved by a more intelligent selection of the sample.

VydorScope Proficient
VydorScope
Posted
  • Author
I read an article recently, on this site I believe, of a study that discussed the better locations to take the biopsy. Presumeably, the odds of a correct diagnose will be improved by a more intelligent selection of the sample.

yes, the mroe experence docotr would tend to have better odds... but that does not change the point I was making, just effects the odds a little.

steve-o Apprentice
steve-o
Posted

I was sooooo mad when I got the pathology report from my biopsy, and I saw that the doctor only took one tissue sample. Big surprise....I was "negative" for celiac sprue.

You don't need to be a rocket scientist to understand sampling error. I asked the doc why he only took one sample, and he basically threw down the "I'm the doctor, don't question me" card.

To add insult to injury, I wound up having to pay almost $500 out of pocket for my endoscopy, because of my insurance deductible.

Anyhow, sorry for the rant....

I've read some articles that say the Jejunum is the part of the small intestine which is most often damaged...yet doctors always take tissue samples from the duodenum (mainly because a jejunal biopsy is more difficult to obtain).

VydorScope Proficient
VydorScope
Posted
  • Author
You don't need to be a rocket scientist to understand sampling error. I asked the doc why he only took one sample, and he basically threw down the "I'm the doctor, don't question me" card.

Thats the reason for this post, in my experence most ppl will not question the doctor. Sounds like your doctor is not used to being questioned... and thats fairly true of most doctors. I am hoping my little dice illustration will help ppl realize what thier so called "negative" biposy realy means. Even if it jsut gets ppl askign questions of thier doctor that be great. :)

LKelly8 Rookie
LKelly8
Posted

I lucked out, my doc took six biopsies and one came back positive for mild atrophy. It's like playing lotto, you may get one or two numbers or none at all.

Besides, it's an autoimmune disease! They change; they flare up then die back down, go silent, go into remission - then jump back to life again. I don't know how doctors think they can diagnose celiac based solely on intestinal damage. It'd be like waiting till there was significant joint damage to diagnose rheumatoid arthritis.

<_<

mytummyhurts Contributor
mytummyhurts
Posted
To add insult to injury, I wound up having to pay almost $500 out of pocket for my endoscopy, because of my insurance deductible.

That would make me so mad! Their not like businesses either where you can threaten them with something. I had to pay $600 for mine, but at least they found the damage so I don't feel like it was for nothing. My sister went into the doctor specifically to have the blood test done for celiac and they ran the wrong tests. Now she doesn't have insurance but she can't really force them to pay for the tests, because they don't care. It's not like they need her business.

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


gf4life Enthusiast
gf4life
Posted

Vincent, I agree with your statistical analysis of the endoscopy. Statistically you are going to get a false negative more often than a true negative or a positive.

I am one of those who's doctor only took 3 samples in the duodenum and of course it came back negative. There is a way to look at the tissue sample on a cellular level to see if the intraepithelial lymphocytes are elevated, which would indicate the early changes of celiac disease, but very few doctors (or labs) do this. I questioned my doctor on my results, and she basically refuses to believe I have celiac disease. My first GI did NO testing, just told me I had IBS when I was 16. When I went searching for aq diagnosis of celiac disease the GI I went to told me I "couldn't possibly have that", because I was overweight. When he finally did the endoscopy he didn't take ANY samples. Oh well. My insurance didn't like having to pay twice, but they had to since the first doctor wasn't looking for celiac disease, and the second one was, but not hard enough...

God bless,

Mariann

jaxonweb Newbie
jaxonweb
Posted

I am sceduled to have an endoscopy in September because my doctor thinks I have celiac disease. If the results come back negative, how can I know for sure? Blood test? Try gluten free diet?

Carriefaith Enthusiast
Carriefaith
Posted

jaxonweb, I would ask for them to take 5+ biopsies. They should hopefully find damage with that many if you have celiac disease. You could also ask for the celiac blood test panel... Just make sure you are eating gluten before your tests or you could get false negative results.

Guest nini
Guest nini
Posted

In my opinion, how you respond to the gluten free diet is one of the best indicators around. There are Dr.s willing to dx based solely on positive dietary response.

celiac3270 Collaborator
celiac3270
Posted
I am sceduled to have an endoscopy in September because my doctor thinks I have celiac disease. If the results come back negative, how can I know for sure? Blood test? Try gluten free diet?

September? Why so far away? Some blood tests can pretty much 100% tell you--and in that case it's likely that the biopsies just msised the damaged locations. A positive reaction to the gluten-free diet won't tell you that you have it, but it means that you probably have some problem with it, be it celiac, an allergy, or something else.

jaxonweb Newbie
jaxonweb
Posted

Unfortunately, September 2 was the earliest appointment they had available. He wants to do the endoscopy because if positive it will show how bad the damage is (supposedly bad cases can become cancerous), or if negative he can see what else might be the problem.

He felt strongly that it would be celiac disease. I was recently diagnosed with hypothyroidism and have many of the symptoms (bowel symptoms, fatigue, abdominal pain, etc).

KaitiUSA Enthusiast
KaitiUSA
Posted
Unfortunately, September 2 was the earliest appointment they had available. He wants to do the endoscopy because if positive it will show how bad the damage is (supposedly bad cases can become cancerous), or if negative he can see what else might be the problem.

He felt strongly that it would be celiac disease. I was recently diagnosed with hypothyroidism and have many of the symptoms (bowel symptoms, fatigue, abdominal pain, etc).

If it comes back negative you can't rule out celiac though so it still may be a problem. Some blood tests are very accurate with a slim to none chance of being wrong. I have heard of false negatives in some tests but you don't hear much about false positives. They detected those levels because there is some problem that indicates celiac.

It is true if it goes untreated for a long time and there is alot of damage there are increased chances of cancer.

Thyroid disorders also are highly connected with celiac.

mjbonsais Rookie
mjbonsais
Posted
Vincent, I agree with your statistical analysis of the endoscopy. Statistically you are going to get a false negative more often than a true negative or a positive.

I am one of those who's doctor only took 3 samples in the duodenum and of course it came back negative. There is a way to look at the tissue sample on a cellular level to see if the intraepithelial lymphocytes are elevated, which would indicate the early changes of celiac disease, but very few doctors (or labs) do this. I questioned my doctor on my results, and she basically refuses to believe I have celiac disease. My first GI did NO testing, just told me I had IBS when I was 16. When I went searching for aq diagnosis of celiac disease the GI I went to told me I "couldn't possibly have that", because I was overweight. When he finally did the endoscopy he didn't take ANY samples. Oh well. My insurance didn't like having to pay twice, but they had to since the first doctor wasn't looking for celiac disease, and the second one was, but not hard enough...

God bless,

Mariann

When I went searching for aq diagnosis of celiac disease the GI I went to told me I "couldn't possibly have that", because I was overweight.

:rolleyes:

Good grief as Charlie Brown would say! There are many individuals who are celiac and overweight because their bodies cannot metabolize the fat properly. Shame on that doctor for even suggesting that one.

Guess that's why I feel Enterolab testing is not only less invasive but will tell if you are predisposed to the main gene(s) of celiac sprue or gluten sensitivity.

Mary JO

VydorScope Proficient
VydorScope
Posted
  • Author
Unfortunately, September 2 was the earliest appointment they had available. He wants to do the endoscopy because if positive it will show how bad the damage is (supposedly bad cases can become cancerous), or if negative he can see what else might be the problem.

He felt strongly that it would be celiac disease. I was recently diagnosed with hypothyroidism and have many of the symptoms (bowel symptoms, fatigue, abdominal pain, etc).

Have you had any of the blood screenings?

gf4life Enthusiast
gf4life
Posted
There are many individuals who are celiac and overweight because their bodies cannot metabolize the fat properly. Shame on that doctor for even suggesting that one.

I know! :rolleyes: I even took in documentation of overweight Celiac being quite common (in the form of medical journal articles) and he blew me off. In fact other than that first visit and the endoscopy (in which he didn't even take one tissue sample <_< ) I never saw the doctor again. I always saw the physicians assistant after that. I stopped going to that office when she tried to tell me that you can't test for Celiac with an endoscopic exam it has to be a colonoscopy! I told her she had it backwards and she didn't believe me. I think she was thinking Crohn's Disease and I was talking Celiac...During the first visit when the doctor told me I couldn't have celiac disease because I was overweight, he also told me that Celiac was going to be the last thing he tested me for and he would ONLY test me for it if I was negative for everything else. I was livid! He wouldn't even run the blood tests.

God bless,

Mariann

VydorScope Proficient
VydorScope
Posted
  • Author
I know! :rolleyes: I even took in documentation of overweight Celiac being quite common (in the form of medical journal articles) and he blew me off. In fact other than that first visit and the endoscopy (in which he didn't even take one tissue sample <_< ) I never saw the doctor again. I always saw the physicians assistant after that. I stopped going to that office when she tried to tell me that you can't test for Celiac with an endoscopic exam it has to be a colonoscopy! I told her she had it backwards and she didn't believe me. I think she was thinking Crohn's Disease and I was talking Celiac...During the first visit when the doctor told me I couldn't have celiac disease because I was overweight, he also told me that Celiac was going to be the last thing he tested me for and he would ONLY test me for it if I was negative for everything else. I was livid! He wouldn't even run the blood tests.

God bless,

Mariann

No offense, but why the heck did you not walk out and find a new doc?

gf4life Enthusiast
gf4life
Posted

I did. And my next one was only slightly better. She at least did the biopsy and took samples, but she was determined NOT to find Celiac. She (the new Doc) still thinks IBS is my problem. She won't diagnose celiac disease unless there is complete damage to the intestines and no villi left. I won't go back to her either.

After the problems I am having with the GI docs. my primary care physician (who supports my being on the diet) said he would refer me to Stanford if I want to, since they know more about Celiac. But I would have to go back on gluten for additional testing and that is NEVER going to happen. I have an HMO and have to go to the doctors on my referral list. Financially, paying out of pocket for the doctor of my choice is not an option.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):


  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,549
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748
    Blough
    Newest Member
    Blough
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):


  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
      Taken Seriously

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      Your post demonstrates the profound frustration and isolation that so many in the Celiac community feel, and I want to thank you for channeling that experience into advocacy. The medical gaslighting you endured for decades is an unacceptable and, sadly, a common story, and the fact that you now have to "school" your own GI specialist speaks volumes about the critical lack of consistent and updated education. Your idea to make Celiac Disease a reportable condition to public health authorities is a compelling and strategic one. This single action would force the system to formally acknowledge the prevalence and seriousness of the disease, creating a concrete dataset that could drive better research funding, shape medical school curricula, and validate the patient experience in a way that individual stories alone often cannot. It is an uphill battle, but contacting representatives, as you have done with Adam Gray, is exactly how change begins. By framing it as a public health necessity—a matter of patient safety and protection from misdiagnosis and neglect—you are building a powerful case. Your voice and your perseverance, forged through thirty years of struggle, are exactly what this community needs to ensure that no one else has to fight so hard just to be believed and properly cared for.
    • Scott Adams
      Looking for a gluten-free roomie in Denver CO

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      I had no idea there is a "Louisville" in Colorado!😉 I thought it was a typo because I always think of the Kentucky city--but good luck!
    • Scott Adams
      Allergy medication: cetirizine by the HealthA2Z is it gluten free?

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      Navigating medication safety with Celiac disease can be incredibly stressful, especially when dealing with asthma and severe allergies on top of it. While I don't have personal experience with the HealthA2Z brand of cetirizine, your caution is absolutely warranted. The inactive ingredients in pills, known as excipients, are often where gluten can be hidden, and since the FDA does not require gluten-free labeling for prescription or over-the-counter drugs, the manufacturer's word is essential. The fact that you cannot get a clear answer from Allegiant Health is a significant red flag; a company that is confident its product is gluten-free will typically have a customer service protocol to answer that exact question. In situations like this, the safest course of action is to consider this product "guilty until proven innocent" and avoid it. A better alternative would be to ask your pharmacist or doctor to help you identify a major national brand of cetirizine (like Zyrtec) whose manufacturer has a verified, publicly stated gluten-free policy for that specific medication. It's not worth the risk to your health when reliable, verifiable options are almost certainly available to you. You can search this site for USA prescriptions medications, but will need to know the manufacturer/maker if there is more than one, especially if you use a generic version of the medication: To see the ingredients you will need to click on the correct version of the medication and maker in the results, then scroll down to "Ingredients and Appearance" and click it, and then look at "Inactive Ingredients," as any gluten ingredients would likely appear there, rather than in the Active Ingredients area. https://dailymed.nlm.nih.gov/dailymed/   
    • Scott Adams
      Protein or fat?

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      What you're describing is indeed familiar to many in the Celiac community, especially in the early stages of healing. When the intestinal villi are damaged from Celiac disease, they struggle to properly digest and absorb fats, a condition known as bile acid malabsorption. This can cause exactly the kind of cramping and spasms you're seeing, as undigested fats can irritate the sensitive gut lining. It is highly plausible that her reactions to dairy and eggs are linked to their higher fat content rather than the proteins, especially since she tolerates lean chicken breast. The great news is that for many, this does improve with time. As her gut continues to heal on a strict gluten-free diet, her ability to produce the necessary enzymes and bile to break down fats should gradually return, allowing her to slowly tolerate a wider variety of foods. It's a slow process of healing, but your careful approach of focusing on low-fat, nutrient-dense foods like seeds and avocado is providing her system the best possible environment to recover. Many people with celiac disease, especially those who are in the 0-2 year range of their recovery, have additional food intolerance issues which could be temporary. To figure this out you may need to keep a food diary and do an elimination diet over a few months. Some common food intolerance issues are dairy/casein, eggs, corn, oats, and soy. The good news is that after your gut heals (for most people who are 100% gluten-free this will take several months to two years) you may be able to slowly add some these items back into your diet after the damaged villi heal. This article may be helpful: Thank you for sharing your story—it's a valuable insight for other parents navigating similar challenges.
    • Beverage
      Diagnosed celiac for 1-2 months ago and everything makes me bloated.

      By Beverage · Posted

      I had a very rough month after diagnosis. No exaggeration, lost so much inflammatory weight, I looked like a bag of bones, underneath i had been literally starving to death. I did start feeling noticeably better after a month of very strict control of my kitchen and home. What are you eating for breakfast and lunch? I ignored my doc and ate oats, yes they were gluten free, but some brands are at the higher end of gluten free. Lots of celics can eat Bob's Red Mill gluten-free oats, but not me. I can now eat them, but they have to be grown and processed according to the "purity protocol" methods. I mail order them, Montana Gluten-Free brand. A food and symptoms and activities log can be helpful in tracking down issues. You might be totally aware, but I have to mention about the risk of airborne gluten. As the doc that diagnosed me warned . . Remember eyes, ears, nose, and mouth all lead to your stomach and intestines.  Are you getting any cross contamination? Airborne gluten? Any pets eating gluten (they eat it, lick themselves, you pet them...)? Any house remodeling? We live in an older home, always fixing something. I've gotten glutened from the dust from cutting into plaster walls, possibly also plywood (glues). The suggestions by many here on vitamin supplements also really helped me. I had some lingering allergies and asthma, which are now 99% gone. I was taking Albuterol inhaler every hour just to breathe, but thiamine in form of benfotiamine kicked that down to 1-2 times a day within a few days of starting it. Also, since cutting out inflammatory seed oils (canola, sunflower, grapeseed, etc) and cooking with real olive oil, avocado oil, ghee, and coconut oil, I have noticed even greater improvement overall and haven't used the inhaler in months! It takes time to weed out everything in your life that contains gluten, and it takes awhile to heal and rebuild your health. At first it's mentally exhausting, overwhelming, even obsessive, but it gets better and second nature.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.