Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Celiac Suspected But Not Proven


Serge

Recommended Posts

Serge Newbie

Hi all,

I am new on this forum. I have been reading quite a bit, but since each case is unique I have decided to start my own topic.

I hope to get some good advises on what I should do next in order to determine if I have Celiac disease, or some idea of what else (if not Celiac) I could have.

My medical history goes as follows:

1. 2006: severe ulcer in my month for which the cause was not found. Ulcers ultimately disappear and came back every six month or so during times of high stress

2. Dec 2008: my sexual performance was not very good so I went to see the doctor. A blood test revealed:

- Red blood cell 3.4

- Haemoglobin 12.6

- Haematocrit (PCV) 36.5

- Mean cell volume 108.1

- Mean cell Hb 37.3

- RDW (Red cell distribution width) 20.5

=> Anemia

As well as B12 deficiency and Iron deficiency (can't find the number right now)

3. I go convinced that I had pernicious anemia until a doctor told me that it was most likely celiac disease. I started taking Iron and B12 vitamins. The new blood test (Feb 2010):

- Gastric Parietal cell antibody : positive

- Intrinsic factor antibody: negative

- B12 : 155 pmol/l slightly too low

- Iron 7.6 umol/l too low but serum ferritin indicates adequate iron stores

- Tissue transglutaminasse IgG <20 U/mL (normal)

- Tissue transglutaminasse IgG 36 U/mL (moderate, i.e. positively too high)

- Endomyseal antibody : negative

The doctor said that the results were mixed and that I should do a biopsy.

4. I went on gluten free diet (I was in Australia, so very easy as all food is labeled) and continued to take the vitamins. By April 2009 I felt like a new men (i.e. great, much stronger). I though that the diet was responsible but it might well only have been due to the vitamins.

5. Before the biopsy, the doctor asked me to eat wheat normally for 1 month and then I did the biopsy in May 2009

- Duodenal biopsies: Within normal limits (which means everything normal I think)

- Gastric biopsies: Moderate Chronic Gastritis with Intestinal Metaplasia, but no activity or helicobacter pylori was seen. There was no dysplasia or malignancy seen either.

- Iron and B12 at that time were good (I had been taking vitamins for 4 month)

The doctor said that the test were no concluant and that I should eat more wheat (or for a longer period) and redo a biopsy. This is an advise that I did not follow.

6. October 2010: DNA test

- I am positive on both DQ2 and DQ8

7 For the next year and a half, I did what I though was gluten free diet and stopped taking the vitamins. I wanted to see whether I was doing great without the vitamins also.

During that 1.5 year, I stopped the diet and ate wheat for 3 month, which did not make me feel very bad directly, but maybe a little after the 3 month (i am not sure).

8. In February 2011 I did a new blood test to see how it was progressing:

- Iron was fine

- B12 was 65 pmol/L !!!! That is a third of the minimum required. I can feel it in day to day life (no joke).

9. Then I realized that my diet had not been strict enough. I live in Singapore and a lot of products don't have proper ingredient list. All restaurant put soy sauce in everything. Then I decided to do a much stricter diet. It has been 3 weeks now at I am fairly confident that I have not had wheat.

However, the gastritis is still there (I can feel it) and my b12 is still very low.

A. How long does the gastritis takes to disappear once on a gluten free diet?

B. I am starting to doubt highly that I have celiac disease. Any idea of what else I could have?

PS: the reason why I refuse to take vitamins nowadays is because if I do, I can't see that I am sick anymore.

PS2: if I suddenly each an entire bread today, I doubt I will be sick tomorrow. I tried before.

All help much appreciated....

Best,

Serge


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



ravenwoodglass Mentor

You did have a positive blood test, that is significant as false negatives are common but not false positives. It would have been best for you not to have gone gluten free until after your biopsy was done as a month back on gluten may not have been long enough. Sometimes the proof is in our response to gluten and for you it appears that it has nasty effects on at least your B12 levels and the gastrititis and possibly in other areas that you are not realizing. Do go back to taking the sublingual B12, that will not effect any celiac testing. If you really feel you need to have a definate diagnosis then go back to eating lots of gluten for 3 months and then get retested being aware that you could still have a false negative.

RiceGuy Collaborator

I agree with what ravenwoodglass said. Many don't have very noticeable symptoms. I didn't for the most part, and it wasn't until the symptoms I had got really bad, that it seemed possibly related to wheat/gluten. But by far, most of the symptoms I experienced were very unusual, even for Celiac. I did not seek an "official" diagnosis. Going on a gluten-free diet revealed the answer I needed, though it took six months before I noticed much of any change at all.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,202
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    PatBurnham
    Newest Member
    PatBurnham
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      NCGS does not cause damage to the small bowel villi so, if indeed you were not skimping on gluten when you had the antibody blood testing done, it is likely you have celiac disease.
    • Scott Adams
      I will assume you did the gluten challenge properly and were eating a lot of gluten daily for 6-8 weeks before your test, but if not, that could be the issue. You can still have celiac disease with negative blood test results, although it's not as common:  Clinical and genetic profile of patients with seronegative coeliac disease: the natural history and response to gluten-free diet: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5606118/  Seronegative Celiac Disease - A Challenging Case: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9441776/  Enteropathies with villous atrophy but negative coeliac serology in adults: current issues: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34764141/  Approximately 10x more people have non-celiac gluten sensitivity than have celiac disease, but there isn’t yet a test for NCGS. If your symptoms go away on a gluten-free diet it would likely signal NCGS.
    • Xravith
      I'm very confused... My blood test came out negative, I checked all antibodies. I suppose my Total IgA levels are normal (132 mg/dl), so the test should be reliable. Still, I'm not relieved as I can't tolerate even a single biscuit. I need to talk to my doctor about whether a duodenal biopsy is necessary. But it is really possible to have intestinal damage despite having a seronegative results? I have really strong symptoms, and I don't want to keep skipping university lectures or being bedridden at home.
    • Scott Adams
      They may want to also eliminate other possible causes for your symptoms/issues and are doing additional tests.  Here is info about blood tests for celiac disease--if positive an endoscopy where biopsies of your intestinal villi are taken to confirm is the typical follow up.    
    • Scott Adams
      In the Europe the new protocol for making a celiac disease diagnosis in children is if their tTg-IgA (tissue transglutaminase IgA) levels are 10 times or above the positive level for celiac disease--and you are above that level. According to the latest research, if the blood test results are at certain high levels that range between 5-10 times the reference range for a positive celiac disease diagnosis, it may not be necessary to confirm the results using an endoscopy/biopsy: Blood Test Alone Can Diagnose Celiac Disease in Most Children and Adults TGA-IgA at or Above Five Times Normal Limit in Kids Indicates Celiac Disease in Nearly All Cases No More Biopsies to Diagnose Celiac Disease in Children! May I ask why you've had so many past tTg-IgA tests done, and many of them seem to have been done 3 times during short time intervals?    
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.