Jump to content

  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):

    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Your Takes On Diagnosis

heather Goble

Recommended Posts

heather Goble Rookie
heather Goble
Posted

Hi,

I have just recently had blood tests and biopsy, both came back negative. When I went to the doctor today for the biopsy results I actually met with the phsyicians assistant (who didn't do the biopsy, but read me the results). After hearing my symptoms he said he was very surprised the tests came back negative. I told him that I was off of gluten for a month and a half before testing and only went back on for a couple of weeks for the test (the dr said I only needed to eat gluten for 3 days prior to testing). The physicians assistant that I saw today said he wasn't sure if that would skew the results or not, but told me to just assume I have celiac due to my symptoms. Not really a diagnosis and a long story to explain to everyone that inquires. I guess I'm a little frustrated. Any advice ( I have been gluten free since the day is the biopsy, I just can't eat it) I'm just uneasy of the somewhat diagnosis.

Thanks!

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


Dr. B Newbie
Dr. B
Posted

Signs of a gluten intolerance are not always found in the intestines via a biopsy. Other organs can be affected.

Open Original Shared Link

Open Original Shared Link

Open Original Shared Link

Proteins from other foods, which leak through the intestines, might be causing your discomfort.

Open Original Shared Link

Open Original Shared Link

Open Original Shared Link

Many people in situations such as yours eat the paleolithic diet (no grain diet) for awhile (several months) and then might re-introduce proteins, one at a time, to see if the proteins from that particular food causes them discomfort. Also, once the candida is gone, and the holes in the intestines are healed up/closed up, one can tolerate other proteins better because they don't leak through the intestines anymore.

ravenwoodglass Mentor
ravenwoodglass
Posted

Go ahead and stick with the diet being aware it can take a bit of time to heal. Not all of us have candida issues and even if you do that doesn't mean you would be able to add gluten back in if you are gluten intolerant or celiac. Going with a whole food diet is the quickest way to heal as there is less risk of cross contamination that way.

JonnyD Rookie
JonnyD
Posted

I had very positive bloodwork as well as family history so I went Gluten-Free right away. I had a biopsy done a month later but never had any gluten before. My GI said it could take 6 months to a year to fully recover so he wasn't too concerned. My biopsy show some moderate signs but not slam dunk atrophy. It's been almost three months Gluten-Free and I'd never go back on gluten. If Gluten-Free agrees with you, stick with it.

heather Goble Rookie
heather Goble
Posted
  • Author

Just wondering how seriously to take the "your results are negative, but assume you have celiac" the doctor said he couldn't believe they came back negative due to the symptoms I have. I guess I was just looking for a yes or no answer and am afraid family and others won't take the "assume that you have it" as a real diagnosis. I'm tired of explaining it already....

Dr. B Newbie
Dr. B
Posted

I think the best test is "go gluten free and see if you feel better". If you do, then you tested positive for gluten intolerance. Just tell "family" that you tested positive. Are they going to want to see the actual test results?

Chemical tests are not always accurate. You know how you feel better than anyone else. I would never put my health in the hands of a medical doctor, or believe 100% in their tests.

Cara in Boston Enthusiast
Cara in Boston
Posted

I had a similar situation. After my son tested positive, I had the blood test done and it came back very positive. I went gluten-free (but only for about 2 weeks) before seeing the GI. He did more blood tests and endoscopy (said the short time gluten-free shouldn't make a difference). Everything came back negative. Went on gluten challenge (3 months) but only did it 1/2 way. At 6 weeks he tested me again (blood only) and it was still negative. By this time my son has been diagnosed with a biopsy and since I have all the symptoms I saw no reason to continue.

My doctor is certain I don't have celiac disease but diagnosed me with gluten intolernace. Whatever. Treatment is the same so I don't really care. I'm pretty sure I have celiac disease. Why else would the original blood test be so positive?

Cara

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


ked85 Newbie
ked85
Posted

I also tested negative with a very deep family history of celiac and intolerance. The doctor wanted to put me on IBS pills and I said NO. I immediately went on a gluten free diet after the nurse told me that it did not test for intolerance and I already feel a difference after a week and a half. Also, people claim there's a false negative rate of about 20% (not sure how accurate that is), but it just goes to show - do what makes you feel good. If removing gluten works for you, maybe try the diet and then reintroduce it to your system at a later date and see how your body reacts. That's what I plan to do.

Dr. B Newbie
Dr. B
Posted

I think the high gluten content in grains now-a-days makes grains an undesirable food for human consumption. I have read that tens of thousands of years ago that wheat berries were plump and juicy, and contained very little gluten. Today

ked85 Newbie
ked85
Posted

So, reintroducing gluten to your diet in the future may not be the healthiest way to go.

Those are very good (and educational) points. Thank you for that information! Definitely want to do some more research out of curiosity now.

heather Goble Rookie
heather Goble
Posted
  • Author

Thanks everyone for the helpful info. I have pretty bad reactions when I eat even a small amount. Usually get a really itchy rash which lasts for about a day, headache, fatigue, and terrible joint pain (which lasts for several days). All of which I have had before going gluten free, but now much worse. I know I can't eat it, so I don't.

sb2178 Enthusiast
sb2178
Posted

That rash could be biopsied for a definitive diagnosis. Check out the DH board for details on the testing as it's finicky.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):


  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,746
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748
    Hughesy
    Newest Member
    Hughesy
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):


  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Theresa2407
      How Come Gluten Didnt Bother Me In Italy

      By Theresa2407 · Posted

      Maybe you have a low  intolerance to Wheat.   Rye, Barley and Malt are the gluten in Celiac disease.  It has always been stated Wheat and Gluten, not just a Wheat intolerance.  Barley will keep me in bed for (2) weeks.  Gut, Migrains, Brain fog, Diahrea.  It is miserable.  And when I was a toddler the doctor would give me a malt medicine because I always had Anemia and did not grow.  Boy was he off.  But at that time the US didn't know anyone about Celiac.  This was the 1940s and 50s.  I had my first episode at 9 months and did not get a diagnosis until I was 50.  My immune system was so shot before being diagnoised, so now I live with the consequences of it. I was so upset when Manufacturers didn't want to label their products so they added barley to the product.  It was mostly the cereal industry.  3 of my favorite cereals were excluded because of this. Malt gives me a bad Gut reaction.
    • Gigi2025
      How Come Gluten Didnt Bother Me In Italy

      By Gigi2025 · Posted

      Thanks much Scott.  Well said, and heeded.   I don't have Celiac, which is fortunate.
    • Scott Adams
      Possible celiac - need advice

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      Do you have the results of your endoscopy? Did you do a celiac disease blood panel before that?  Here is more info about how to do a gluten challenge for a celiac disease blood panel, or for an endoscopy: and this recent study recommends 4-6 slices of wheat bread per day:    
    • Scott Adams
      Celiac or not??

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      It is odd that your Tissue Transglutaminase (TTG) IgA level has bounced from the "inconclusive" range (7.9, 9.8) down to a negative level (5.3), only to climb back up near the positive threshold. This inconsistency, coupled with your ongoing symptoms of malabsorption and specific nutrient deficiencies, is a strong clinical indicator that warrants a more thorough investigation than a simple "satisfactory" sign-off. A negative blood test does not definitively rule out celiac disease, especially with such variable numbers and a classic symptomatic picture. You are absolutely right to seek a second opinion and push for a referral to a gastroenterologist. A biopsy remains the gold standard for a reason, and advocating for one is the most direct path to getting the answers you need to finally address the root cause of your suffering. Here is more info about how to do a gluten challenge for a celiac disease blood panel, or for an endoscopy: and this recent study recommends 4-6 slices of wheat bread per day:    
    • Scott Adams
      How Come Gluten Didnt Bother Me In Italy

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      There is a distinction between gluten itself and the other chemicals and processing methods involved in modern food production. Your experience in Italy and Greece, contrasted with your reactions in the U.S., provides powerful anecdotal evidence that the problem, for some people, may not be the wheat, but the additives like potassium bromate and the industrial processing it undergoes here. The point about bromines displacing iodine and disrupting thyroid function is a significant one, explaining a potential biological mechanism for why such additives could cause systemic health issues that mimic gluten sensitivity. It's both alarming and insightful to consider that the very "watchdog" agencies meant to protect us are allowing practices banned in many other developed countries. Seeking out European flour and your caution about the high-carb, potentially diabeticgenic nature of many gluten-free products are excellent practical takeaways from your research, but I just want to mention--if you have celiac disease you need to avoid all wheat, including all wheat and gluten in Europe.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.