Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Did You Have + Ttg?


Meg123

  

9 members have voted

You do not have permission to vote in this poll, or see the poll results. Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.

Recommended Posts

Meg123 Explorer

As per usual, I'm going crazy waiting for my results. this time the results are for the biopsy. I might get them next week.

I should have put this poll on here 8 weeks ago, but it didn't occur to me then. I've been reading other research etc, but this would have been a great place to start.

Ok, so I'm trying to establish the likelyhood of getting a positive biopsy after having positive ttg.

I've read some articles that say, once you have enough ttg in your blood for a + result, then it must be so high in your intestine that there should already be the damage.....

So, if you had +ttg, was your biopsy + or - ?

THANK YOU.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



WinterSong Community Regular

My entire Celiac panel levels were extremely high. My doctor actually had me stop eating gluten the week before my biopsy (at the time I didn't know any better to say no and wait). After my endoscopy he told me that I showed all of the internal signs of Celiac, and my biopsy came back positive.

Just try to relax as much as you can. And even if it does comes back negative (as there are many false negatives), remember - your blood test was positive. Biopsy or not, welcome to the Celiac club. :)

Meg123 Explorer

My entire Celiac panel levels were extremely high. My doctor actually had me stop eating gluten the week before my biopsy (at the time I didn't know any better to say no and wait). After my endoscopy he told me that I showed all of the internal signs of Celiac, and my biopsy came back positive.

Just try to relax as much as you can. And even if it does comes back negative (as there are many false negatives), remember - your blood test was positive. Biopsy or not, welcome to the Celiac club. :)

Thank you for the lovely welcome :)

See everything else on my panel was negative, and my ttg wasn't overly high, but definately positive. It was borderline 18 months ago, and is obviously increasing. I just have to be patient a teeny bit longer :rolleyes:

looking forward to seeing the results on this poll.....

sa1937 Community Regular

I was highly positive on my celiac panel and my biopsy was also positive.

Greenling Newbie

I did an elimination diet (which was gluten-free as well) for four weeks before my blood tests were drawn and my tTG was still off the charts. I have no idea how high it must have been.... Needless to say, the biopsy (done a week later) was positive as well.

Good luck!

Roda Rising Star

Both positive here. My 6 year old had a positive ttg last Nov. but we didn't do a biopsy on him.

Mummyto3 Contributor

So far we've just had a positive ttg of 128. I've googled everywhere to find anyone who had this and then went on to have a positive biopsy and managed to find two people, one child and one adult with exact same ttg and both had positive biopsies. Will post on here once we get results but biopsy date still not through.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Skylark Collaborator

There was a study on people with positive TTG and GI symptoms but negative biopsy. They had all the metabolic markers of the people with celiac disease, rather than looking like the people who were controls. In other words, there is some strong evidence that if you have TTG and other conditions like Crohn's ad RA have been ruled out, you are celiac.

adab8ca Enthusiast

I had very high TTG (>200) some gliadin antibodies and no GI symptoms that are considered "typical" (no D or C but nausea and LOTS of unexplained weight loss)...

My biopsy showed total villous atrophy and the doc said he actually saw damage with the naked eye.

My celiac diagnosis was a total fluke as the neuro was trying to rule out stuff and ran every test he could think of (since I had terrible small fiber neuropathy)

October3 Explorer

I'm answering for my 6 yr old son. His tTG was not super high, but was "moderately elevated" at 48. tTG went down to 21 or so without going gluten-free, and his biopsy was negative. No GI symptoms except malabsorption issues (anemia, etc). So as of this point we don't have a diagnosis.

busymomof5 Newbie

My Ttg was only 4 (weak positive range was 4-10). My biopsy was definitely positive.

October3 Explorer

There was a study on people with positive TTG and GI symptoms but negative biopsy. They had all the metabolic markers of the people with celiac disease, rather than looking like the people who were controls. In other words, there is some strong evidence that if you have TTG and other conditions like Crohn's ad RA have been ruled out, you are celiac.

Can you tell me where I might find this study? I would love to read it since it seems to be very relevent to our situation.

Skylark Collaborator

Can you tell me where I might find this study? I would love to read it since it seems to be very relevent to our situation.

I'm sorry. I usually include references but I was so tired and brainfogged when I posted that, I didn't have the energy or wherewithal to look it up. I come here for company sometimes when I feel really bad.

This is a pretty good article that explains the research and its implications for people with positive blood tests. Basically, because people with positive bloodwork and negative biopsy have the same metabolic markers as celiacs with full villous atrophy, they recommend gluten-free if you're positive on tTG or EMA.

Open Original Shared Link

Here is the Pubmed link to the original abstract.

Open Original Shared Link

In the paper it explains the potential celiacs as: "Patients with potential celiac disease were all positive for anti-tissue transglutaminase antibodies (tTGA); all but one were also EmA positive; histological examination revealed an apparently normal mucosa (Marsh 0) in 9 subjects, just an increase in intraepithelial lymphocytes (Marsh 1) in 12 and increased intraepithelial lymphocytes coupled with crypt hyperplasia (Marsh 2) in 8 patients."

quandary Newbie

Both positive here. My 6 year old had a positive ttg last Nov. but we didn't do a biopsy on him.

My son has had, what the endocrine calls, a 'trace elevation' of his TTG over the past several years (and he has type 1 diabetes, his sister & dad have type 1, his sister has celiac, his DQ8 gene positive, and gluten sensitivity was indicated by Dr. Fine's stool sample testing done many years ago)....but no endoscopy. He started a gluten free diet about 3 1/2 months ago. We're wondering whether to continue it or not. What happened when your son, after 4 1/2 months gluten free, was challenged with gluten - did he have symptoms? What other blood-work/symptoms did he originally exhibit that made you choose gluten free for him? Thanks!!

October3 Explorer

I'm sorry. I usually include references but I was so tired and brainfogged when I posted that, I didn't have the energy or wherewithal to look it up. I come here for company sometimes when I feel really bad.

This is a pretty good article that explains the research and its implications for people with positive blood tests. Basically, because people with positive bloodwork and negative biopsy have the same metabolic markers as celiacs with full villous atrophy, they recommend gluten-free if you're positive on tTG or EMA.

Open Original Shared Link

Here is the Pubmed link to the original abstract.

Open Original Shared Link

In the paper it explains the potential celiacs as: "Patients with potential celiac disease were all positive for anti-tissue transglutaminase antibodies (tTGA); all but one were also EmA positive; histological examination revealed an apparently normal mucosa (Marsh 0) in 9 subjects, just an increase in intraepithelial lymphocytes (Marsh 1) in 12 and increased intraepithelial lymphocytes coupled with crypt hyperplasia (Marsh 2) in 8 patients."

Thanks very much for the links. Looks like maybe the next step is to request an EmA. I also need to find his path report and re-read it - can't remember if there was an increase in intraepithelial lymphocytes.

Skylark Collaborator

Thanks very much for the links. Looks like maybe the next step is to request an EmA. I also need to find his path report and re-read it - can't remember if there was an increase in intraepithelial lymphocytes.

Looking over the path report makes a lot of sense.

EMA is an old test where they see if the antibodies react with monkey esophagus. The main antibody that reacts has since been shown to be TTG. I don't know that EMA would really give you new information since you already know he has the autoimmunity.

What you might find more valuable is the newer anti deamidated gliadin peptide (DGP) antibody test. It's more sensitive than EMA or TTG and specific for celiac. As with any celiac test, your son has to be on a full gluten diet to be likely to get a positive result.

  • 2 weeks later...
Roda Rising Star

My son has had, what the endocrine calls, a 'trace elevation' of his TTG over the past several years (and he has type 1 diabetes, his sister & dad have type 1, his sister has celiac, his DQ8 gene positive, and gluten sensitivity was indicated by Dr. Fine's stool sample testing done many years ago)....but no endoscopy. He started a gluten free diet about 3 1/2 months ago. We're wondering whether to continue it or not. What happened when your son, after 4 1/2 months gluten free, was challenged with gluten - did he have symptoms? What other blood-work/symptoms did he originally exhibit that made you choose gluten free for him? Thanks!!

Sorry it took so long to reply, I have been on vacation. I had him tested about a month after I was diagnosed and his blood work was negative and he was showing no other signs. Appx. June 2010 he started having (his language mind you he was 5 at the time) puke burps and tummy aches. The stomach aches occured at random times and would be anywhere from severe (he would lay down and not play and I would have to rub his tummy) to mild where he would mention it and then go off and play again. On the few occasions I helped him in the bathroom after a BM I noticed fat floating in the toilet. He was also having an increase in rhinosinusitis. I took him to a new allergist to be retested (negative on skin testing at 14 months old and again at 3.5yrs) suspecting maybe some food allergies. I also requested his celiac panel be redone. The only thing to show positive was his Iga ttg. With that positive test, his symptoms and my celiac diagnosis we opted out of biopsy and went gluten free. Later my husband regretted that decision, but I was unwilling to put him back on gluten for 3 months at that point. After the 4.5 months of gluten free we did do a gluten challange. It only lasted three days because my husband could't stand what it was doing to him. Within 12 hours he complained of a belly ache. The next day it was still bothering him (he wouldn't admit to it though because he was having fun eating pizza and donuts) and moped around on the couch and wanted me to rub his tummy. He also began having sever mood swings. One minute he was fine the next crying over nothing. He started having temper tantrums again. He also became constipated for about 5 days, usually goes everyday like clockwork, and I had to give him something so he could go. I think it is pretty clear from the challange he shouldn't have any gluten. He has been glutened twice unintentionally since then and same thing happened.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - Mmoc replied to Mmoc's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      2

      Blood tests low iGA 4 years later digestive issues

    2. - Aretaeus Cappadocia replied to Clear2me's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      6

      Gluten free nuts

    3. - trents replied to Larzipan's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      42

      Has anyone had terrible TMJ/ Jaw Pain from undiagnosed Celiac?

    4. - Scott Adams replied to Larzipan's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      42

      Has anyone had terrible TMJ/ Jaw Pain from undiagnosed Celiac?

    5. - Wheatwacked commented on Scott Adams's article in Latest Research
      6

      Study Estimates the Costs of Delayed Celiac Disease Diagnosis (+Video)


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,387
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    LizzieE
    Newest Member
    LizzieE
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Who's Online (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Mmoc
      Thank you kindly for your response. I have since gotten the other type of bloods done and am awaiting results. 
    • Aretaeus Cappadocia
      I wanted to respond to your post as much for other people who read this later on (I'm not trying to contradict your experience or decisions) > Kirkland Signature Super Extra-Large Peanuts, 2.5 lbs, are labeled "gluten free" in the Calif Costcos I've been in. If they are selling non-gluten-free in your store, I suggest talking to customer service to see if they can get you the gluten-free version (they are tasty) > This past week I bought "Sliced Raw Almonds, Baking Nuts, 5 lbs Item 1495072 Best if used by Jun-10-26 W-261-6-L1A 12:47" at Costco. The package has the standard warning that it was made on machinery that <may> have processed wheat. Based on that alone, I would not eat these. However, I contacted customer service and asked them "are Costco's Sliced Almonds gluten free?" Within a day I got this response:  "This is [xyz] with the Costco Member Service Resolutions Team. I am happy to let you know we got a reply back from our Kirkland Signature team. Here is their response:  This item does not have a risk of cross contamination with gluten, barley or rye." Based on this, I will eat them. Based on experience, I believe they will be fine. Sometimes, for other products, the answer has been "they really do have cross-contamination risk" (eg, Kirkland Signature Dry Roasted Macadamia Nuts, Salted, 1.5 lbs Item 1195303). When they give me that answer I return them for cash. You might reasonably ask, "Why would Costco use that label if they actually are safe?" I can't speak for Costco but I've worked in Corporate America and I've seen this kind of thing first hand and up close. (1) This kind of regulatory label represents risk/cost to the company. What if they are mistaken? In one direction, the cost is loss of maybe 1% of sales (if celiacs don't buy when they would have). In the other direction, the risk is reputational damage and open-ended litigation (bad reviews and celiacs suing them). Expect them to play it safe. (2) There is a team tasked with getting each product out to market quickly and cheaply, and there is also a committee tasked with reviewing the packaging before it is released. If the team chooses the simplest, safest, pre-approved label, this becomes a quick check box. On the other hand, if they choose something else, it has to be carefully scrutinized through a long process. It's more efficient for the team to say there <could> be risk. (3) There is probably some plug and play in production. Some lots of the very same product could be made in a safe facility while others are made in an unsafe facility. Uniform packaging (saying there is risk) for all packages regardless of gluten risk is easier, cheaper, and safer (for Costco). Everything I wrote here is about my Costco experience, but the principles will be true at other vendors, particularly if they have extensive quality control infrastructure. The first hurdle of gluten-free diet is to remove/replace all the labeled gluten ingredients. The second, more difficult hurdle is to remove/replace all the hidden gluten. Each of us have to assess gray zones and make judgement calls knowing there is a penalty for being wrong. One penalty would be getting glutened but the other penalty could be eating an unnecessarily boring or malnourishing diet.
    • trents
      Thanks for the thoughtful reply and links, Wheatwacked. Definitely some food for thought. However, I would point out that your linked articles refer to gliadin in human breast milk, not cow's milk. And although it might seem reasonable to conclude it would work the same way in cows, that is not necessarily the case. Studies seem to indicate otherwise. Studies also indicate the amount of gliadin in human breast milk is miniscule and unlikely to cause reactions:  https://www.glutenfreewatchdog.org/news/gluten-peptides-in-human-breast-milk-implications-for-cows-milk/ I would also point out that Dr. Peter Osborne's doctorate is in chiropractic medicine, though he also has studied and, I believe, holds some sort of certifications in nutritional science. To put it plainly, he is considered by many qualified medical and nutritional professionals to be on the fringe of quackery. But he has a dedicated and rabid following, nonetheless.
    • Scott Adams
      I'd be very cautious about accepting these claims without robust evidence. The hypothesis requires a chain of biologically unlikely events: Gluten/gliadin survives the cow's rumen and entire digestive system intact. It is then absorbed whole into the cow's bloodstream. It bypasses the cow's immune system and liver. It is then secreted, still intact and immunogenic, into the milk. The cow's digestive system is designed to break down proteins, not transfer them whole into milk. This is not a recognized pathway in veterinary science. The provided backup shifts from cow's milk to human breastmilk, which is a classic bait-and-switch. While the transfer of food proteins in human breastmilk is a valid area of study, it doesn't validate the initial claim about commercial dairy. The use of a Dr. Osborne video is a major red flag. His entire platform is based on the idea that all grains are toxic, a view that far exceeds the established science on Celiac Disease and non-celiac gluten sensitivity. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence, and a YouTube video from a known ideological source is not that evidence."  
    • Wheatwacked
      Some backup to my statement about gluten and milk. Some background.  When my son was born in 1976 he was colicky from the beginning.  When he transitioned to formula it got really bad.  That's when we found the only pediactric gastroenterologist (in a population of 6 million that dealt with Celiac Disease (and he only had 14 patients with celiac disease), who dianosed by biopsy and started him on Nutramegen.  Recovery was quick. The portion of gluten that passes through to breastmilk is called gliadin. It is the component of gluten that causes celiac disease or gluten intolerance. What are the Effects of Gluten in Breastmilk? Gliaden, a component of gluten which is typically responsible for the intestinal reaction of gluten, DOES pass through breast milk.  This is because gliaden (as one of many food proteins) passes through the lining of your small intestine into your blood. Can gluten transmit through breast milk?  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.