Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Celiac Testing


Sam81

Recommended Posts

Sam81 Apprentice

I was just wondering if any one knows if a colonoscopy can confirm/disprove celiac DH (dermatitis herpetiformis)??


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



psawyer Proficient

Yes, I do, and no, it cannot. The intestinal damage caused by celiac disease is in the small intestine, not the colon.

kareng Grand Master

No. DH is a skin problem. A Dermatologist biopsies next to the "pimple" & it is sent to the pathologist for a microscopic look.

An endoscopy is used to diagnosis the small intestine damage from Celiac. Multiple Biopsies are taken of the small intestine & looked at microscopically. A colonoscopy is the large intestine so your confused doctor is looking in the wrong places.

Sam81 Apprentice

Ok, thank you. Mr Dr is convinced I do not have celiac - despite ticking all boxes bar 1. I'm in the UK and have heard of a test you can by over the counter - "Biocard Celiac Test - Gluten Sensitivity test kit". Has anyone bought and tried this? Does it work and does it hold any weight with Dr's??

It really isn't that I want to have Celiac but it's the age old NEED to have an answer to all my discomfort and a piece of paper to hand to people to say - "Look - I'm not imagining it!"

I'm 30 on Monday and feel more like 70. Ridiculous.

pgrovetom Rookie

I was just wondering if any one knows if a colonoscopy can confirm/disprove celiac DH (dermatitis herpetiformis)??

Yes a Colonoscopy can confirm Celiac if the doctor doing it does a biopsy of the intestines after reaching the end of the colon. When I had my Colonoscopy, the GI doc did a Celiac biopsy since he was already in there and could get the biopsy from my lower intestines... If the GI doc only examines the colon as per a normal colonoscopy, no it does no good. Since an endoscopy is easier than a colonoscopy, they usually do the biopsy from the topside. I had both.

In any case, biopsies are better at confirming than ruling out Celiac. The doctor takes a sample of the intestinal lining for later examination under a microscope. If they see the damage from Celiac, its a sure thing. If they don't, it either means you don't have Celiac or they took the biopsy from a healthy area or the Gluten had yet to damage the intestinal lining. In general, ruling things out is a risky game. If something like Celiac is "ruled out" and in error, it will be a long time before they eventually run into something that suggests "un-ruling it out".

This is a very common problem in medicine and is due to cost control. When studies are done in medicine, they actually follow a proper scientific and statistically proper approach by using careful controls, large populations and double blind technique in order not to come to a conclusion in error. Regular medicine abandons this very appropriate method in favor of saving money at the expense of proper diagnosis.

If you are planning to have a colonoscopy, ask your GI doc if they can take a Celiac biopsy from the lower intestine just above the colon. If you already had it and they didn't do that biopsy, it means nothing with regard to Celiac.

psawyer Proficient

It would be better to do an endoscopy of the duodenum (upper part of the small intestine) at the same time as the colonoscopy. There is no extra prep required. I had that done when I was diagnosed. The colonoscopy will not detect celiac, but should be done to screen for other conditions which may exist.

ravenwoodglass Mentor

Yes a Colonoscopy can confirm Celiac if the doctor doing it does a biopsy of the intestines after reaching the end of the colon. When I had my Colonoscopy, the GI doc did a Celiac biopsy since he was already in there and could get the biopsy from my lower intestines... If the GI doc only examines the colon as per a normal colonoscopy, no it does no good. Since an endoscopy is easier than a colonoscopy, they usually do the biopsy from the topside. I had both.

In any case, biopsies are better at confirming than ruling out Celiac. The doctor takes a sample of the intestinal lining for later examination under a microscope. If they see the damage from Celiac, its a sure thing. If they don't, it either means you don't have Celiac or they took the biopsy from a healthy area or the Gluten had yet to damage the intestinal lining. In general, ruling things out is a risky game. If something like Celiac is "ruled out" and in error, it will be a long time before they eventually run into something that suggests "un-ruling it out".

This is a very common problem in medicine and is due to cost control. When studies are done in medicine, they actually follow a proper scientific and statistically proper approach by using careful controls, large populations and double blind technique in order not to come to a conclusion in error. Regular medicine abandons this very appropriate method in favor of saving money at the expense of proper diagnosis.

If you are planning to have a colonoscopy, ask your GI doc if they can take a Celiac biopsy from the lower intestine just above the colon. If you already had it and they didn't do that biopsy, it means nothing with regard to Celiac.

I have never heard of a doctor doing a biopsy of the small intestine with a colonoscopy. Since you say you had both scopes done at the same time I suspect the biopsies were taken during the endo not the colonoscopy.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,696
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Jades Journey
    Newest Member
    Jades Journey
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • RDLiberty
      So, I've been using a gluten free labeled toothpaste since being diagnosed with celiac. No big deal, the toothpaste seems to work. Question is, I just realized it contains hydrated silica.  Now, I've heard that silicon dioxide can cause issues in some people with celiac (was that ever confirmed though?), so to be safe, I cut it out of my diet entirely. But, as I understand it, hydrated silica is related to silicon dioxide. Is that something to worry about, or is the hydrated form not known to cause issues like the silicon dioxide form?  I've never seen it in food, but nearly every toothpaste I look at contains hydrated silica?  Issue or not?  Any scientific research (Not opinion pieces, not health bloggers, you get my gist), but actual science, that says it's an issue? I have a hard time believing 99% of what I read on random internet searches.    Thanks so much, Renee. 
    • Gigi2025
      Since 2015 we've spent extensive time in Italy and I've been able to eat their wheat products without incident. Initially, I was practically starving thinking foods in Sicily were not gluten-free.  An Italian friend who had lived in the US for over 20 years said she had celiac/gluten-free friends from the US who could eat Italian wheat products without problems. Hesitantly, I tried little by little without issues.  A few years later at a market, I asked a bread vendor if they had gluten-free loaves. Turns out she had lived in LA, said groups believe it's not the gluten that's causing our bodies harm, but potassium bromate; these groups have been trying to ban it.  Bromines and other halogens wreaks havoc to our endocrine system and, more specifically, our thyroids and immune systems. When bromines are ingested/absorbed into the body, it displaces iodine causing other health issues. Potassium bromate is a powerful oxidizing agent (dough 'conditioner') that chemically changes flour to enhance elasticity, bleaches the dough, and ages the flour much faster than open air.   Shortly thereafter while visiting friends in California, one family said they had gone gluten-free and the difference was incredible. The reason they choose this path was due them (a biologist/chemist/agriculturist scientist) having to write a portion of a paper about a certain product for the company he worked. Another company's scientist was directed to write the other portion. All was confidential, they weren't allowed to know the other company/employee.  After the research, they learned gluten was being removed from wheat, sent elsewhere, returned in large congealed blocks resembling tofu, and then added to wheat products. Potassium bromate has been banned for use in Europe, China, and other countries, but not in the US. Then we have the issues of shelf preservatives and stabilizers. What are we eating?  Why? We spend long periods of time in Italy and all has been good.  We just returned from an extended time in Greece;  no issues there either.  There is a man there we learned about on a travel show about Greece who walks the hills, picking herbs, pods, etc.  He is a very learned scholar, taught at the university level in Melbourne. It took a few days to locate him, but were finally successful. He too, is concerned about the additives and preservatives in American food (many of his customers are Americans, haven't been in the best of health, and have become healthier after visiting him). He suggested taking a food product from the US and the same product in Europe, and compare the different ingredients. Then ask why these things are being allowed in the US by the 'watch dog' of our foods and drugs. It would be amuzing if it weren't tragic. I'm presently looking for flour from Europe that I can make my own bread and pasta as the gluten-free bread is now $7.99 a (small) loaf.  BTW, studies are showing that many gluten-free individuals are becoming diabetic. My guess is because the gluten-free products are high in carbs. This is only my experience and opinion garnished by my personal research.  I hope it helps.  
    • knitty kitty
      Symptoms that get worse if you don't supplement is a sign of malabsorption, possibly due to Celiac disease. Blood tests for nutritional deficiencies are not very accurate, and should be done when you have been off of supplements for eight to twelve weeks, otherwise the vitamin supplements you've taken will be measured.  The blood circulation system is a transportation system.  It transports the vitamins you've absorbed around the body, but blood tests don't give an accurate picture of the vitamin and mineral stores inside organs and tissues where they are actually used.  You can have "normal" blood levels but still have deficiencies.  This is because the brain demands stored nutrients be put into the blood stream to supply important organs, like the brain and heart, while other organs do without.   If you are taking Thiamine Mononitrate in your supplements, you are probably low in thiamine.  Thiamine Mononitrate is used in many supplements because it won't break down sitting on a shelf.  This also means Thiamine Mononitrate is difficult for the body to utilize.  Only thirty percent of Thiamine Mononitrate on the label is absorbed and even less is able to be utilized by the body.  A different form of Thiamine called Benfotiamine has been shown to promote intestinal healing.   Talk to your doctor about doing a genetic test to look for Celiac markers.   I'm concerned that if you do a gluten challenge (10 grams of gluten per day for a minimum off two weeks) in your weakened state, the nutritional deficiencies will become worse and possibly life threatening.  
    • ElisaAllergiesgluten
      Hello, good afternoon!   I apologize, I didn’t see a notification and I’m just reading this. Thank you so much for sharing your thoughts and the link. Yes you are absolutely right, even so trying to get a response from them has been extremely difficult. They don’t answer but I will your practice of “guilty until proven innocent.”   I like and have a sense of trust here in this website, everyone is honest and thoughts are raw. The mutual understanding is amazing!   thank you Scott!
    • Scott Adams
      I'd go with a vodka tonic, but that's just me😉
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.