Jump to content

  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):

    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Understanding My Blood Test Results

tempus fugit

Recommended Posts

tempus fugit Newbie
tempus fugit
Posted

I'm having trouble understanding my blood tests results.

It reads:

Celiac Disease Comp Panel:

Tissue Transglutam AB IGA, Result 44H

Endomysial AB (IGA)Positive H

Endomysial Titer 1:40 H

It's all Greek to me.

I had an endoscopy that came back negative. However they failed to inform me to continue to eat gluten before the test. I had stopped eating gluten 3 weeks prior to test.

My question is. Am I positive for celiac?

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


mushroom Proficient
mushroom
Posted

Although you don't give the lab ranges for the blood tests, each test you list is marked "H" or "high", meaning that it was positive. Yes, I would say you have celiac disease. Three weeks could be sufficient time for healing to take place and negate the biopsy results.

JoshB Apprentice
JoshB
Posted

---------------------------------------

*Tissue Transglutam AB IGA, Result 44H

TtG-IgA is the normal go-to test they use. Ranges vary between labs, so it's hard to say how positive you are. This is a machine run test. They have a slide prepared with human tissue trans glutaminase then they drop your blood on and add a fluorescing dye that only sticks to reacting antibodies. The machine then reads how bright the fluorescence is and spits out a number based on that. You normally want to see "0", though and I think we can assume that "H" means "High". AB refers to abbreviated, which either means that your doc ordered the cheap version or they stopped at the cheap version because you already tested positive. Some labs are being a little more intelligent these days and are following up with TtG-IgG or total serum IgA only in the case that TtG-IgA didn't test positive. This was unnecessary in your case as you already tested positive in the more specific version.

-----------------------------------

*Endomysial AB (IGA)Positive H

Sort of the same as above except that this test can be more sensitive. It's more expensive though because it involves manually preparing slides and staining samples and then counting "hits" with a microscope. Again you're positive.

-----------------------------------

*Endomysial Titer 1:40 H

Here rather than counting fluorescing dots on a microscope, they add the dye to diluted samples of your blood and keep diluting until it stop reacting. They kept seeing a positive result until your blood had been diluted forty to one.

------------------------------------------------

------------------------------------------------

So you're positive on blood tests, which are both more specific and more sensitive than biopsy. Assuming that the biopsy was done well, I think that probably means that you were just starting to develop issues. That's actually really good news as far as your health goes. The bad news, unfortunately, is that you need to eat gluten free from now on to make sure you don't actually start developing serious damage.

I'm not a doctor so take all that with a grain of salt, and while the TtG tests are very good, they are not absolutely perfect. More rarely (very, very rarely; this is almost certainly not you!), you can test positive because of auto-immune damage to your liver. So if your doctor has reason to suspect that you are dealing with something other than celiac disease then you should cooperate with him to make sure you're not dealing with some other issue.

Skylark Collaborator
Skylark
Posted

I'm having trouble understanding my blood tests results.

It reads:

Celiac Disease Comp Panel:

Tissue Transglutam AB IGA, Result 44H

Endomysial AB (IGA)Positive H

Endomysial Titer 1:40 H

It's all Greek to me.

I had an endoscopy that came back negative. However they failed to inform me to continue to eat gluten before the test. I had stopped eating gluten 3 weeks prior to test.

My question is. Am I positive for celiac?

Yes, you have what is called latent celiac disease. Positive endomysial antibody and TTG together is a very, very strong celiac bloodwork result. They are both autoimmune antibodies, and they are aimed at your intestinal villi.

People with bloodwork like yours and a negative biopsy have participated in studies. First, they have metabolic markers of celiac disease that are the same as people with positive biopsies. Second, if they keep eating gluten, the biopsy turns positive within a year or two. You are in the "latent" period, between where the antibodies appear and the intestinal damage gets bad enough to consistently show up on biopsy. It is time to go gluten-free for life, before severe damage starts.

@JoshB, TTG can rarely appear in other conditions, but anti-EMA is specific for celiac disease. The combination of the two leaves no doubt even for us non-doctors.

tempus fugit Newbie
tempus fugit
Posted
  • Author

Thank you all so much for the help in deciphering the hieroglyphics that are my lab results.

You have all given great insight to what will now be a life change and not just a change in diet.

Onward!

pain*in*my*gut Apprentice
pain*in*my*gut
Posted

Thank you all so much for the help in deciphering the hieroglyphics that are my lab results.

You have all given great insight to what will now be a life change and not just a change in diet.

Onward!

Yep, those are positive all the way....you are one of us. Jump in the pool...the water is nice and warm (and gluten-free)! :P

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):


  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,902
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748
    Patty6133
    Newest Member
    Patty6133
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):


  • Who's Online (See full list)

  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      New (possible) celiac diagnosis

      By trents · Posted

      Welcome to the forum, @Judy M! Yes, he definitely needs to continue eating gluten until the day of the endoscopy. Not sure why the GI doc advised otherwise but it was a bum steer.  Celiac disease has a genetic component but also an "epigenetic" component. Let me explain. There are two main genes that have been identified as providing the "potential" to develop "active" celiac disease. We know them as HLA-DQ 2.5 (aka, HLA-DQ 2) and HLA-DQ8. Without one or both of these genes it is highly unlikely that a person will develop celiac disease at some point in their life. About 40% of the general population carry one or both of these two genes but only about 1% of the population develops active celiac disease. Thus, possessing the genetic potential for celiac disease is far less than deterministic. Most who have the potential never develop the disease. In order for the potential to develop celiac disease to turn into active celiac disease, some triggering stress event or events must "turn on" the latent genes. This triggering stress event can be a viral infection, some other medical event, or even prolonged psychological/emotional trauma. This part of the equation is difficult to quantify but this is the epigenetic dimension of the disease. Epigenetics has to do with the influence that environmental factors and things not coded into the DNA itself have to do in "turning on" susceptible genes. And this is why celiac disease can develop at any stage of life. Celiac disease is an autoimmune condition (not a food allergy) that causes inflammation in the lining of the small bowel. The ingestion of gluten causes the body to attack the cells of this lining which, over time, damages and destroys them, impairing the body's ability to absorb nutrients since this is the part of the intestinal track responsible for nutrient absorption and also causing numerous other food sensitivities such as dairy/lactose intolerance. There is another gluten-related disorder known as NCGS (Non Celiac Gluten Sensitivity or just, "gluten sensitivity") that is not autoimmune in nature and which does not damage the small bowel lining. However, NCGS shares many of the same symptoms with celiac disease such as gas, bloating, and diarrhea. It is also much more common than celiac disease. There is no test for NCGS so, because they share common symptoms, celiac disease must first be ruled out through formal testing for celiac disease. This is where your husband is right now. It should also be said that some experts believe NCGS can transition into celiac disease. I hope this helps.
    • Judy M
      New (possible) celiac diagnosis

      By Judy M · Posted

      My husband has had lactose intolerance for his entire life (he's 68 yo).  So, he's used to gastro issues. But for the past year he's been experiencing bouts of diarrhea that last for hours.  He finally went to his gastroenterologist ... several blood tests ruled out other maladies, but his celiac results are suspect.  He is scheduled for an endoscopy and colonoscopy in 2 weeks.  He was told to eat "gluten free" until the tests!!!  I, and he know nothing about this "diet" much less how to navigate his in daily life!! The more I read, the more my head is spinning.  So I guess I have 2 questions.  First, I read on this website that prior to testing, eat gluten so as not to compromise the testing!  Is that true? His primary care doctor told him to eat gluten free prior to testing!  I'm so confused.  Second, I read that celiac disease is genetic or caused by other ways such as surgery.  No family history but Gall bladder removal 7 years ago, maybe?  But how in God's name does something like this crop up and now is so awful he can't go a day without worrying.  He still works in Manhattan and considers himself lucky if he gets there without incident!  Advice from those who know would be appreciated!!!!!!!!!!!!
    • Scott Adams
      Patiently Waiting to See Results

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      You've done an excellent job of meticulously tracking the rash's unpredictable behavior, from its symmetrical spread and stubborn scabbing to the potential triggers you've identified, like the asthma medication and dietary changes. It's particularly telling that the rash seems to flare with wheat consumption, even though your initial blood test was negative—as you've noted, being off wheat before a test can sometimes lead to a false negative, and your description of the other symptoms—joint pain, brain fog, stomach issues—is very compelling. The symmetry of the rash is a crucial detail that often points toward an internal cause, such as an autoimmune response or a systemic reaction, rather than just an external irritant like a plant or mites. I hope your doctor tomorrow takes the time to listen carefully to all of this evidence you've gathered and works with you to find some real answers and effective relief. Don't be discouraged if the rash fluctuates; your detailed history is the most valuable tool you have for getting an accurate diagnosis.
    • Scott Adams
      Gluten free beer ?

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      In this case the beer is excellent, but for those who are super sensitive it is likely better to go the full gluten-free beer route. Lakefront Brewery (another sponsor!) has good gluten-free beer made without any gluten ingredients.
    • trents
      Patiently Waiting to See Results

      By trents · Posted

      Welcome to the forum, @catsrlife! Celiac disease can be diagnosed without committing to a full-blown "gluten challenge" if you get a skin biopsy done during an active outbreak of dermatitis herpetiformis, assuming that is what is causing the rash. There is no other known cause for dermatitis herpetiformis so it is definitive for celiac disease. You would need to find a dermatologist who is familiar with doing the biopsy correctly, however. The samples need to be taken next to the pustules, not on them . . . a mistake many dermatologists make when biopsying for dermatitis herpetiformis. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.