Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×

  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):

    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

? I Got Answered Wasn't What I Expected....

carecare

Recommended Posts

carecare Enthusiast
carecare
Posted

I sent a question to the University of Chicago Celiac Disease Center on facebook regarding the DGP being elevated and what they thought that would mean if a child came back with a negative biopsy. I wanted to know if other tests were negative but the Deaminated gliadin IgG was flagged as HIGH and positive if that would possibly mean more of a gluten intolerance rather than celiac. I did not receive the answer I was asking for...but their response was a little surprising:

"DGP of the IgG type may be "falsely" positive, meaning they can be slightly elevated in people who do not have celiac. So, the biopsy (done after being on a gluten-containing diet for at least 12 weeks) becomes of paramount importance."

That was a first that I've read that the IgG could be falsely positive. Also, my son was not just slightly elevated...as the results, which told me it did not go to an endpoint or something like that, but was flagged as in the high range.

So I responded back asking what slightly elevated means in their eyes...and if they'd anwser my original question of "if the biopsy is negative could that possibly mean a gluten intolerance."

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


mushroom Proficient
mushroom
Posted

Do they have lilttle elves sitting their choosing answers out of a standard book? That's what it sounds like.....

The Horticulturalist Apprentice
The Horticulturalist
Posted

I sent a question to the University of Chicago Celiac Disease Center on facebook regarding the DGP being elevated and what they thought that would mean if a child came back with a negative biopsy. I wanted to know if other tests were negative but the Deaminated gliadin IgG was flagged as HIGH and positive if that would possibly mean more of a gluten intolerance rather than celiac. I did not receive the answer I was asking for...but their response was a little surprising:

"DGP of the IgG type may be "falsely" positive, meaning they can be slightly elevated in people who do not have celiac. So, the biopsy (done after being on a gluten-containing diet for at least 12 weeks) becomes of paramount importance."

That was a first that I've read that the IgG could be falsely positive. Also, my son was not just slightly elevated...as the results, which told me it did not go to an endpoint or something like that, but was flagged as in the high range.

So I responded back asking what slightly elevated means in their eyes...and if they'd anwser my original question of "if the biopsy is negative could that possibly mean a gluten intolerance."

Don't have an answer really, just wondering it you had the Ttg and the EMA done as well for your son?

I take it from your post that your son did have a -ve biopsy and the postive bloods, or is this a hypothetical question?

I guess it's possible that the biopsy potentially missed any area of damage caused by celiac, do you know where the biopsies were taken and how many?

gfcolorado Newbie
gfcolorado
Posted

I have tried to do a lot of research also on the DGP test. I was diagnosed with Celiac 3 years ago. I just went for a follow-up and my TTG, DGP IGG and EMA were negative but my DGP IGA was positive. I asked numerous people (my GI, Rodney Ford, manufacturers of the test, an allergist) and everyone's answers were different. Several (my GI and test manufacturer) felt that it wasn't from a one time recent accidental gluten exposure but rather continued daily exposure.

I decided to have an endoscopy just so I know what is really happening and because I've never had a follow-up. I will get the results hopefully this week and will post and let you know. Please let me know if you find additional info. Thanks!

carecare Enthusiast
carecare
Posted
  • Author

My question was hypothetical because I was just curious. My son (just turned 12) and is getting an endoscopy in mid December. He did get a full celiac panel done...everything was negative except for the high DPG IgG. I'm happy to report that the doctor told me he would do 9+ biopsies of the small intestines because he is indeed looking for celiac...better than the 2 that the nurse originally told me. It's currently a loooong wait for that biopsy....he was gluten-free for almost 2 months and muscle pain free and canker sore free during that time...then the day after we started back on gluten so the biopsy would be accurate his symptoms came roaring back sooo much worse than before. He can't wait to become gluten-free for life once the biopsy is over with!

GFColorado...yes....report back and let us know how the biopsy turns out.

Oh...and funny...they couldn't answer my question right away because they said they would send it to their experts who answer these kinds of questions for them.

Skylark Collaborator
Skylark
Posted

In the few studies who have followed folks with positive TTG, GI symptoms, but negative biopsy, the people tend to become celiac by biopsy in a few years. DGP-IgG is considered as good if not better than TTG IgA. I'm glad he will be going gluten-free.

Open Original Shared Link

Di2011 Enthusiast
Di2011
Posted

I have tried to do a lot of research also on the DGP test. I was diagnosed with Celiac 3 years ago. I just went for a follow-up and my TTG, DGP IGG and EMA were negative but my DGP IGA was positive. I asked numerous people (my GI, Rodney Ford, manufacturers of the test, an allergist) and everyone's answers were different. Several (my GI and test manufacturer) felt that it wasn't from a one time recent accidental gluten exposure but rather continued daily exposure.

I decided to have an endoscopy just so I know what is really happening and because I've never had a follow-up. I will get the results hopefully this week and will post and let you know. Please let me know if you find additional info. Thanks!

Please let us know the result of the endoscopy.. lots of us will be interested

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


gfcolorado Newbie
gfcolorado
Posted

Please let us know the result of the endoscopy.. lots of us will be interested

I will post as soon as I find out. My doctor did 12 biopsies so it should give a good picture of what's going on. This forum has been so helpful and glad I can provide info to help others. I think it's such a new test that there aren't all the answers we want.

  • 3 weeks later...
carecare Enthusiast
carecare
Posted
  • Author

So either the University of Chicago Celiac people are flakes or they just misinterpreted my question. I asked about my son's deamidated IGg being strong positive and if they would think that would indicate more of an sensitivity/intolerance and not celiac if his biopsy was negative (which hasn't been done yet). I know I've read research saying it's very specific and highly indicative of celiac disease but curiosity got the better of me and I posted the question. The last response to me stated: "Elevated IgG (for tTG, I presume) are notoriously unspecific and should be simply disregarded."

Skylark Collaborator
Skylark
Posted

Wow. They don't read very carefully, do they?

  • 10 months later...
gfcolorado Newbie
gfcolorado
Posted

I will post as soon as I find out. My doctor did 12 biopsies so it should give a good picture of what's going on. This forum has been so helpful and glad I can provide info to help others. I think it's such a new test that there aren't all the answers we want.

I just realized I never wrote in with answers on my biopsy after testing positive for DGP IGA. It was negative. But, it's now a year later and I just did yearly bloodwork and my TTG IGA is still negative but DGP IGA is 31 (moderate to strong positive is 30+). I have no idea why this is. I have contacted several Celiac specialists in hopes of an answer.

vtphd Newbie
vtphd
Posted

I just realized I never wrote in with answers on my biopsy after testing positive for DGP IGA. It was negative. But, it's now a year later and I just did yearly bloodwork and my TTG IGA is still negative but DGP IGA is 31 (moderate to strong positive is 30+). I have no idea why this is. I have contacted several Celiac specialists in hopes of an answer.

GfColorado, I also only have a positive IGA but mine is 20.9 (only .9) into the "equivocal" range.

What have the other people you've consulted said? Both my GI and my PCP say it does not mean I have Celiac...but maybe intolerance. They also claim false positives happen....

Immunoglobulin A -- 229 (range 68-378)

Endomysial IgA- negative

tTG-IgG Ab -- 3.9 (range under 20 negative)

tTG-IgA Ab -- 8.9 (range under 20 negative)

Gliadin Peptide Ab IgG --7.0 (range under 20 negative)

Gliadin Peptide Ab IgA -- 20.9 (range under 20 negative, 20-25 equivocal, 25+ positive)

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):


  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,200
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748
    Elisa Stutsman
    Newest Member
    Elisa Stutsman
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):


  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Redanafs
      Diagnosis and further testing Celiac

      By Redanafs · Posted

      Hi everyone. Back in 2022 I had blood work drawn for iga ext gliadin. Since then I’ve developed worse stomach issues and all other health issues. My doctor just said cut out gluten. He did no further testing. Please see my test results attached. I just need some direction cause I feel so ill and the stomach pain is becoming worse. Can this test show indications for other gastrointestinal diseases?
    • Fayeb23
      Waiting Gastroenterology review

      By Fayeb23 · Posted

      Thank you. These were the results TTG ABS NUMERICAL: > 250.0 U/mL [< 14.99]  Really don’t understand the results!
    • Scott Adams
      Does Dailymed.nlm.nih.gov site have filters for gluten?

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      Clearly from what you've said the info on Dailymed is much more up to date than the other site, which hasn't been updated since 2017. The fact that some companies might be repackaging drugs does not mean the info on the ingredients is not correct.
    • RMJ
      Waiting Gastroenterology review

      By RMJ · Posted

      To evaluate the TTG antibody result we’d need to know the normal range for that lab.  Labs don’t all use the same units.  However, based on any normal ranges that I’ve seen and the listed result being greater than a number rather than a specific number, I’d say yes, that is high! Higher than the range where the test can give a quantitative result. You got good advice not to change your diet yet.  If you went gluten free your intestines would start to heal, confusing any further testing,
    • Bev in Milw
      Does Dailymed.nlm.nih.gov site have filters for gluten?

      By Bev in Milw · Posted

      Scott is correct….Thank you for catching that!      Direct link for info  of fillers.    http://www.glutenfreedrugs.com/Excipients.htm Link is on 2nd page  of www.glutenfreedrugs.com   Site was started by a pharmacist (or 2) maybe 15-20 yrs ago with LAST updated in  2017.  This makes it’s Drug List so old that it’s no longer relevant. Companies & contacts, along with suppliers &  sources would need to be referenced, same amount effort  as starting with current data on DailyMed      That being said, Excipient List is still be relevant since major changes to product labeling occurred prior ’17.           List is the dictionary that sources the ‘foreign-to-us’ terms used on pharmaceutical labels, terms we need to rule out gluten.    Note on DailyMed INFO— When you look for a specific drug on DailyMed, notice that nearly all of companies (brands/labels) are flagged as a ‘Repackager’… This would seem to suggest the actual ‘pills’ are being mass produced by a limited number of wholesaler suppliers (esp for older meds out of  patent protection.).      If so, multiple repackager-get  bulk shipments  from same supplier will all  be selling identical meds —same formula/fillers. Others repackager-could be switching suppliers  frequently based on cost, or runs both gluten-free & non- items on same lines.  No way to know  without contacting company.     While some I know have  searched pharmacies chasing a specific brand, long-term  solution is to find (or teach) pharmacy staff who’s willing help.    When I got 1st Rx ~8 years ago, I went to Walgreens & said I needed gluten-free.  Walked  out when pharmacist said  ‘How am I supposed  to know…’  (ar least he as honest… ). Walmart pharmacists down the block were ‘No problem!’—Once, they wouldn’t release my Rx, still waiting on gluten-free status from a new supplier. Re: Timeliness of DailyMed info?   A serendipitous conversation with cousin in Mi was unexpectedly reassuring.  She works in office of Perrigo, major products of OTC meds (was 1st to add gluten-free labels).  I TOTALLY lucked out when I asked about her job: “TODAY I trained a new full-time employee to make entries to Daily Med.’  Task had grown to hours a day, time she needed for tasks that couldn’t be delegated….We can only hope majorities of companies are as  conscientious!   For the Newbies…. SOLE  purpose of  fillers (possible gluten) in meds is to  hold the active ingredients together in a doseable form.  Drugs  given by injection or as IV are always gluten-free!  (Sometimes drs can do antibiotics w/ one-time injection rather than 7-10 days of  pills .) Liquid meds (typically for kids)—still read labels, but  could be an a simpler option for some products…
×
×
  • Create New...