Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Gluten Free Labeling


Lisa

Recommended Posts

Lisa Mentor

This was posted by the Administration, with other recent articles. I thought this was informative enough to stand on it's own:

https://www.celiac.com/articles/22804/1/What-You-Need-to-Know-About-False-Gluten-Free-Labeling-/Page1.html


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Skylark Collaborator

I was very upset by that article. The person who wrote it seems to think we have a labeling law in effect as of last September. :( I also found the article generally confusing.

Lisa Mentor

I was very upset by that article. The person who wrote it seems to think we have a labeling law in effect as of last September. :( I also found the article generally confusing.

Although somewhat non-specific (well okay, very non-specific), it does show how a variety of manufactures can be as uninformed as some of us as gluten free consumers, in purchasing products.

I will have to review it again. Not sure I picked up on the authors assumption that the FDA Laws were in place.

Skylark Collaborator

It's in the "What Does Gluten Free Mean?" section.

"According to the FDA, as of September 2011, gluten-free labeled products should (a) not include ingredients from gluten or gluten derivatives and (B ) maintain a status of less than 20ppm of gluten for all gluten-free labeled products."

Lisa Mentor

Additional information on the PROPOSED Legislation:

Open Original Shared Link

Lisa Mentor

It's in the "What Does Gluten Free Mean?" section.

"According to the FDA, as of September 2011, gluten-free labeled products should (a) not include ingredients from gluten or gluten derivatives and (B ) maintain a status of less than 20ppm of gluten for all gluten-free labeled products."

Yes, I noticed that the Proposed was omitted, in my review.

Skylark Collaborator

I'm not sure she understands how the proposed laws will work either.

"Example:

A barbecue sauce has gluten as an ingredient and states "gluten free*" on their product label. At the bottom of the label the product states: "*tested below 20ppm for gluten." Though the end product might test as non-detectable, the product still contains gluten and should not be labeled gluten free."

This would be legally labeled gluten-free under the proposed laws. It would be nice if such a food could not be labeled gluten-free but that's what we'll be dealing with if the 20 ppm proposal passes. Some people on the board can even tolerate foods like this. Rice Dream is an example.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Lisa Mentor

I prefer to read "no gluten ingredients", rather than "gluten free". I find it more informative.

It tells me I need to weight my options, rather than just automatically grab it off the shelf. B)

Skylark Collaborator

Personally, I love the GFCO mark. Nothing like independent certification to make me feel safe! :) After Tricia Thompson's study where she found all that gluten in soy flour I'm a little scared of "no gluten ingredients".

Unfortunately I'm not sure "naturally gluten-free" or "no gluten ingredients" was even legal under that old FDA proposal. Making it illegal to test and label anything but oats scares me half to death. I willingly pay extra for some of the Bob's Red Mill products like gluten-free xanthan gum and gluten-free cornstarch that have been tested and made in their dedicated facility.

kareng Grand Master

Sorry, Lisa, I have to disagree.

When I read it the first time, I didn't get past the part where she claims we have an actual law that went into effect in Sept. Even if it had been passed in Sept - which it was not- they would have to give companies a chance to implement it (change box labelling, etc). I don't know anything about her but I don't think she is very reliable. It is possible its a typo but, a reputable "expert" would have caught it when she re-read.

Lisa Mentor

Personally, I love the GFCO mark.

YES! The ultimate, at this time.

Lisa Mentor

Sorry, Lisa, I have to disagree.

When I read it the first time, I didn't get past the part where she claims we have an actual law that went into effect in Sept. Even if it had been passed in Sept - which it was not- they would have to give companies a chance to implement it (change box labelling, etc). I don't know anything about her but I don't think she is very reliable. It is possible its a typo but, a reputable "expert" would have caught it when she re-read.

There is nothing to disagree with. I know nothing of her credibility, but rather I found interesting the scenarios of possibilities, with unregulated "gluten free" criteria by producers or manufacturers.

mushroom Proficient

iI'm afraid I read the article and just went, "Huh??" :blink:

Lisa Mentor

iI'm afraid I read the article and just went, "Huh??" :blink:

Well then, pay it no mind. ;)

mushroom Proficient

Well then, pay it no mind. ;)

That's eggsactly what I'm doing. :P

psawyer Proficient

Canadian resident sticking his oar in the water. B)

There is a legal definition of gluten-free here. It (intentionally) does not address the possibility of contamination. But no product containing any ingredient derived from wheat, rye, barley or oats may be labeled or represented as "gluten-free."

An incremental improvement is coming shortly, when rye and barley will be added to the "priority allergens" that must be disclosed. Canada already includes sesame seeds and sulfites beyond the FDA/FALCPA list. Mustard seed is also being added.

The nature of cross-contamination is such that there can never be an iron-clad guarantee. Contamination can occur at any point along the supply line, not just at the final assembly plant. Even if the plant is ostensibly gluten-free, a person entering may carry crumbs into it. Not just employees enter--the UPS guy who brought that package came from the McDonalds drive-thru, eating a Big Mac. :o

mushroom Proficient

That is exactly the reason why I tend to ignore the subject (read, puts her head in the sand). It helps to have a gluten free label because it means someone is aware of the issue and is trying. You will find varying degrees of opinion on practically every product as to whether or not they have succeeded (in doing what, I am not quite sure :P ) So it all really comes down to trusting your own judgment. I frequently buy products that are not labelled gluten free after studying the ingredients. I have never had any problems with them. I have had problems with Amy's. Others have problems with Rice Dream....

Excuse me while I put my head back in the sand :blink:

FernW Rookie

I finally finished the article. Melanie Weir the author is part of my Celiac Support Group and I go to her store frequently. She is really nice and is quite knowledgeable but I admit this article was confusing and tooooo long. All I know is that I will continue on being careful real labled call mfg's and if I have any question come back here and ask, you people are great.

RiceGuy Collaborator

Personally, I love the GFCO mark. Nothing like independent certification to make me feel safe! :) After Tricia Thompson's study where she found all that gluten in soy flour I'm a little scared of "no gluten ingredients".

Unfortunately I'm not sure "naturally gluten-free" or "no gluten ingredients" was even legal under that old FDA proposal. Making it illegal to test and label anything but oats scares me half to death. I willingly pay extra for some of the Bob's Red Mill products like gluten-free xanthan gum and gluten-free cornstarch that have been tested and made in their dedicated facility.

Just so you know, Bob's Red Mill doesn't make the cornstarch they sell, nor the baking powder in which it is also included. I've never asked them about their xanthan gum, but I suspect they don't make that either.

What I'd like to see is the actual batch test results, printed on each package. This is not a big deal to implement at all, and it wouldn't be a burden to manufacturers. They already put dates and batch/lot numbers, so their systems are capable of batch-specific info being printed on the packages. It's just a matter of disclosure, which many companies do not want to do. Just as they don't want to label GMOs, because they feel it will "scare" consumers away.

Such batch-specific info would help identify particular facilities with and without CC issues, and when the company switches an ingredient source to one with a notably higher or lower level of CC. Yes, this would turn off those of us who need to be more careful (which we'll do anyway, but currently only after getting glutened and subsequently posting about it on the forum for the whole world to see), but it would also reward companies who manage things better. Again, they simply don't want to tell the consumer, hence all the runaround, doublespeak, and legalese when asked or when a law requires any such statements.

It's about as bad as the fact that companies are allowed to withhold ingredients entirely, such as in the case of the filling in Oreo cookies, or certain cola drinks. They call it a "secret formula".

And it would really be fantastic if grain producers would use dedicated equipment and facilities for each grain. This would not only be great for the gluten-free consumer, but for anyone with allergies to one grain but not another, be it a gluten grain or not. For example, someone with a corn allergy who can eat wheat, or a wheat allergy but can eat barley, and so forth.

psawyer Proficient

It's about as bad as the fact that companies are allowed to withhold ingredients entirely, such as in the case of the filling in Oreo cookies, or certain cola drinks. They call it a "secret formula".

Not true! Every ingredient in packaged food must be accounted for in the ingredient list. There are some vague terms permitted, such as "natural flavor," but wheat cannot be hidden in any of them.

Skylark Collaborator

Just so you know, Bob's Red Mill doesn't make the cornstarch they sell, nor the baking powder in which it is also included. I've never asked them about their xanthan gum, but I suspect they don't make that either.

Fooey. Their website is a little deceptive then. "All of our products marked with our gluten free symbol are produced in a dedicated facility and batch tested for gluten content."

I guess it would be common sense that they aren't making some of that stuff. Duh. I sure hope they're testing. <_< Otherwise I'm wasting money.

Scott Adams Grand Master

Or just read the part where it says:

"Though many companies try to follow the FDA's current gluten-free recommendation, mistakes are often made. "

as it clearly refers to it as "FDA's current gluten-free recommendation."

Take care,

Scott

RiceGuy Collaborator

Not true! Every ingredient in packaged food must be accounted for in the ingredient list. There are some vague terms permitted, such as "natural flavor," but wheat cannot be hidden in any of them.

Sorry, my bad. It's not called a secret formula, it's called a Trade Secret, and it IS permitted. Perhaps the top 8 allergens have to be declared, but the FDA does allow companies to withhold ingredients from product labels in certain cases.

Open Original Shared Link

Open Original Shared Link

RiceGuy Collaborator

Fooey. Their website is a little deceptive then. "All of our products marked with our gluten free symbol are produced in a dedicated facility and batch tested for gluten content."

I guess it would be common sense that they aren't making some of that stuff. Duh. I sure hope they're testing. <_< Otherwise I'm wasting money.

Well, the cornstarch and baking powder might be produced in a dedicated facility, and batch tested. Just not Bob's facilities, though I'd guess they repackage it in a dedicated gluten-free facility, and therefor subsequently test it.

psawyer Proficient

Sorry, my bad. It's not called a secret formula, it's called a Trade Secret, and it IS permitted. Perhaps the top 8 allergens have to be declared, but the FDA does allow companies to withhold ingredients from product labels in certain cases.

Open Original Shared Link

Open Original Shared Link

The ingredients are not "withheld." They are listed as "flavor." The exact makeup of the flavor is what is trade-secret. But there are limits on what can be labeled as "flavor."

Neither of those sites is provided by the FDA.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,963
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    AlissaW
    Newest Member
    AlissaW
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
      If black seed oil is working for his Afib, stick to it, but if not, I can say that ablation therapy is no big deal--my mother was out of the procedure in about 1 hour and went home that evening, and had zero negative effects from the treatment. PS - I would recommend that your husband get an Apple watch to monitor his Afib--there is an app and it will take readings 24/7 and give reports on how much of the time he's in it. Actual data like this should be what should guide his treatment.
    • Jacki Espo
      This happened to me as well. What’s weirder is that within a couple hours of taking paxlovid it subsided. I thought maybe I got glutened but after reading your post not so sure. 
    • Mari
      Hi Tiffany. Thank you for writing your dituation and  circumstancesin such detail and so well writte, too. I particularly noticed what you wrote about brain for and feeling like your brain is swelling and I know from my own experiences that's how it feel and your brain really does swell and you get migraines.    Way back when I was in my 20s I read a book by 2 MD allergist and they described their patient who came in complaining that her brain, inside her cranium, was swelling  and it happened when she smelled a certain chemical she used in her home. She kept coming back and insisting her brain actually swelled in her head. The Drs couldn't explain this problem so they, with her permission, performed an operation where they made a small opening through her cranium, exposed her to the chemical then watched as she brain did swell into the opening. The DRs were amazed but then were able to advise her to avoid chemicals that made her brain swell. I remember that because I occasionally had brain fog then but it was not a serious problem. I also realized that I was becoming more sensitive to chemicals I used in my work in medical laboratories. By my mid forties the brain fog and chemicals forced me to leave my  profession and move to a rural area with little pollution. I did not have migraines. I was told a little later that I had a more porous blood brain barrier than other people. Chemicals in the air would go up into my sinused and leak through the blood brain barrier into my brain. We have 2 arteries  in our neck that carry blood with the nutrients and oxygen into the brain. To remove the fluids and used blood from the brain there are only capillaries and no large veins to carry it away so all those fluids ooze out much more slowly than they came in and since the small capillaries can't take care of extra fluid it results in swelling in the face, especially around the eyes. My blood flow into my brain is different from most other people as I have an arterial ischema, adefectiveartery on one side.   I have to go forward about 20 or more years when I learned that I had glaucoma, an eye problem that causes blindness and more years until I learned I had celiac disease.  The eye Dr described my glaucoma as a very slow loss of vision that I wouldn't  notice until had noticeable loss of sight.  I could have my eye pressure checked regularly or it would be best to have the cataracts removed from both eyes. I kept putting off the surgery then just overnight lost most of the vision in my left eye. I thought at the I had been exposed to some chemical and found out a little later the person who livedbehind me was using some chemicals to build kayaks in a shed behind my house. I did not realize the signifance  of this until I started having appointments with a Dr. in a new building. New buildings give me brain fog, loss of balance and other problems I know about this time I experienced visual disturbances very similar to those experienced by people with migraines. I looked further online and read that people with glaucoma can suffer rapid loss of sight if they have silent migraines (no headache). The remedy for migraines is to identify and avoid the triggers. I already know most of my triggers - aromatic chemicals, some cleaning materials, gasoline and exhaust and mold toxins. I am very careful about using cleaning agents using mostly borax and baking powder. Anything that has any fragrance or smell I avoid. There is one brand of dishwashing detergent that I can use and several brands of  scouring powder. I hope you find some of this helpful and useful. I have not seen any evidence that Celiac Disease is involved with migraines or glaucoma. Please come back if you have questions or if what I wrote doesn't make senseto you. We sometimes haveto learn by experience and finding out why we have some problems. Take care.       The report did not mention migraines. 
    • Mari
      Hi Jmartes71 That is so much like my story! You probably know where Laytonville is and that's where I was living just before my 60th birthday when the new Dr. suggested I could have Celiacs. I didn't go on a gluten challange diet before having the Celiac panel blood test drawn. The results came back as equivical as one antibody level was very high but another, tissue transaminasewas normal. Itdid show I was  allergic to cows milk and I think hot peppers. I immediately went gluten free but did not go in for an endoscopy. I found an online lab online that would do the test to show if I had a main celiac gene (enterolab.com). The report came back that I had inherited a main celiac gene, DQ8, from one parent and a D!6 from the other parent. That combination is knows to sym[tons of celiac worse than just inheriting one main celiac gene. With my version of celiac disease I was mostly constipated but after going gluten-free I would have diarrhea the few times I was glutened either by cross contamination or eating some food containing gluten. I have stayed gluten-free for almost 20 years now and knew within a few days that it was right for me although my recovery has been slow.   When I go to see a  medical provide and tell them I have celiacs they don't believe me. The same when I tell them that I carry a main celiac gene, the DQ8. It is only when I tell them that I get diarrhea after eating gluten that they realize that I might have celiac disease. Then they will order th Vitamin B12 and D3 that I need to monitor as my B12 levels can go down very fast if I'm not taking enough of it. Medical providers haven't been much help in my recovery. They are not well trained in this problem. I really hope this helps ypu. Take care.      
    • knitty kitty
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.