Jump to content

  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):

    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Omg Doctors Are Frustrating!

cindylou7

By cindylou7
in Dermatitis Herpetiformis

Recommended Posts

cindylou7 Apprentice
cindylou7
Posted

So I had a biopsy last month. Very excited because it looked like the beginning of an "active" blister plus the surrounding skin. The results came back inconclusive with the suspicion of it being arthropod in nature. He actually suggested that i check my bed for bedbugs! I scheduled an appointment with the dermatologist who did the pathology report and discover that he only did a visual examination and not immunoflorecent test. WHAT!?!? That was what the doctor I had seen was supposed to order! Now I am preparing myself for another false negative because I have been gluten-free and he took a skin sample from an area where I often have breakouts but none active right now. :angry:

Anybody want to lay odds on the results here?

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


pricklypear1971 Community Regular
pricklypear1971
Posted

Not really.

All you can do is try.

Yes, it's frustrating.

Did that doctor day he was ordering a DH test? He lied to you?

squirmingitch Veteran
squirmingitch
Posted

And once again incompetency strikes.

That's a perfect example of why there are so many self dx'd especially with dh. We are supposed to continue eating gluten & damaging our villi & bearing the burning, stinging, itching, pain of dh for YEARS trying to get someone to get all their P's & Q's right.

I'm so sorry Cindylou. I know how badly you really wanted that official dx. By the time we've gone through battles with all the incompetent doctors we at some point realize we know far more about dh than they do. And we self diagnose & are content with our self diagnosis.

cindylou7 Apprentice
cindylou7
Posted
  • Author

Thanks squirming and prickly! I just cannot believe the doctors. I actually asked the dermatologist today about the validity of the biopsy since I was gluten-free and didnt have any active DH and he said no the likelihood of a false negative was slim! If I had antibodies they should still be there. He also said the odds of DH being celiac were limited as well. He said there are a large population of DH patients that are not celiac. Again?!?!

squirmingitch Veteran
squirmingitch
Posted

It's just all in our heads right doc?

rosetapper23 Explorer
rosetapper23
Posted

That doctor is a complete idiot! DH is considered a clear diagnosis of celiac. What school of medicine did he graduate from?!

itchy Rookie
itchy
Posted

I would consider reporting this guy to the org that oversees physicians where you live. Being careful of libel, of course.

Unfortunately many of us have encountered physicians who aren't much better.

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


jmb002 Newbie
jmb002
Posted

Oh my goodness....I just posted a thread "Does this look like DH to you?" because I had the EXACT same thing happen to me. I have had two biopsies from the same dang doctor and both times it came back arthropod (or scabies...YUCK) or drug reaction. Both times WRONG! I do NOT nor have I ever had scabies and no one in my house has had them either!!! My dermatologist took biopsies only from the most active parts of the lesions, so of course the biopsies were inaccurate. Not to mention he has put me on two rounds of steroids, so now I have to wait to have accurate tests done because my immune system is suppressed but I am STILL FREAKING ITCHING!!!! It makes me want to scream! In a month absolutely miserable and it feels like the doctors are not listening.

Since I posted on this forum and have gathered some information, I have made an appointment with a second dermatologist and am going to that appointment armed with piles of papers showing exactly where to biopsy, what my symptoms are, what symptoms are commonly seen in DH, my biopsy results from the other doctor, etcetera. Hopefully this will help me start out on the right foot and get this figured out sooner rather than later!! Good luck! I hope you find relief!

Jenn

cindylou7 Apprentice
cindylou7
Posted
  • Author

Thank you all for your support and encouragement! I have learned more from this forum than from any doctor that I've spoken to or any article I've read. There are so many people here who have a wealth of knowledge about DH.

squirmingitch Veteran
squirmingitch
Posted

We know because we live with it. Too bad we can't sentence doctors to a year of living with it. They'd learn how to listen to their patients real quick!

squirmingitch Veteran
squirmingitch
Posted

Thanks squirming and prickly! I just cannot believe the doctors. I actually asked the dermatologist today about the validity of the biopsy since I was gluten-free and didnt have any active DH and he said no the likelihood of a false negative was slim! If I had antibodies they should still be there. He also said the odds of DH being celiac were limited as well. He said there are a large population of DH patients that are not celiac. Again?!?!

Cindylou --- you need to put this one in the "Stupid stuff doctors say" thread:

https://www.celiac.com/forums/topic/89599-we-need-to-start-a-thread-on-stupid-stuff-doctors-say/page__st__165

pricklypear1971 Community Regular
pricklypear1971
Posted

Thanks squirming and prickly! I just cannot believe the doctors. I actually asked the dermatologist today about the validity of the biopsy since I was gluten-free and didnt have any active DH and he said no the likelihood of a false negative was slim! If I had antibodies they should still be there. He also said the odds of DH being celiac were limited as well. He said there are a large population of DH patients that are not celiac. Again?!?!

1) you really don't see as much mention of a gluten-free diet affecting gluten antibodies in skin in the U.S. literature. But if you don't have "active" DH how did he take a biopsy? How did he determine WHERE to take it?

2) I've read apx. 40% of DH patients test positive on blood work. Also, that DH patients are less likely to be GI biopsy positive. I've also read that newer blood tests, or specific tests are better to catch DH patients. I've also read that DH patients almost always have GI damage, but it can be patchier. But generally, not ALL of that info is contained in the same article.

Then, you get this weird statement "DH is strongly associated with Celiac".

Huh?

I am assuming this is because we don't always test + on blood and biopsy. I also see this more in sources outside the U. S., in the states, a DH dx is a Celiac dx.

cindylou7 Apprentice
cindylou7
Posted
  • Author

1) you really don't see as much mention of a gluten-free diet affecting gluten antibodies in skin in the U.S. literature. But if you don't have "active" DH how did he take a biopsy? How did he determine WHERE to take it?

2) I've read apx. 40% of DH patients test positive on blood work. Also, that DH patients are less likely to be GI biopsy positive. I've also read that newer blood tests, or specific tests are better to catch DH patients. I've also read that DH patients almost always have GI damage, but it can be patchier. But generally, not ALL of that info is contained in the same article.

Then, you get this weird statement "DH is strongly associated with Celiac".

Huh?

I am assuming this is because we don't always test + on blood and biopsy. I also see this more in sources outside the U. S., in the states, a DH dx is a Celiac dx.

He said that the antibodies should be still present in the skin. My last good outbreak was in July. He took a small sample (about two mm) near the last scarred area. Everything that I've read suggested any testing was more accurate while ingesting gluten.

I have significant GI symptoms but bloodwork came back neg after a nearly three week challenge. My GI problems are what had me suspecting DH. I posted a few pics on the picture thread. They look like the herpes sores people get on their mouth but mine are on my arm,etc. Both derms that I've seen said it looks like it could be DH.

I believe DH is celiac. But he described it as a small percentage of people with celiac have DH and many with DH are not celiac. I cant find any literature that talks about DH that doesn't connect it to celiac.

The first dr took the sample correctly. It just did not get examined correctly by the lab pathologist who is the dr that took the second biopsy.

I'll let you know next week!

  • 4 weeks later...
Karin7 Newbie
Karin7
Posted

Believe me I understand your frustration completely. I have watched Doctors bumble around and make situations worse for long enough that I no longer go to them. (unless I were to break a bone) and have been very pleased with the results of Naturopathy. Naturopaths believe most illnesses and diseases can be cured with food, herbal remedies and exercise. Doctors these days are only trained to stuff us full of toxifying drugs. We have to take charge of our own health, all the best to you on your journey!

So I had a biopsy last month. Very excited because it looked like the beginning of an "active" blister plus the surrounding skin. The results came back inconclusive with the suspicion of it being arthropod in nature. He actually suggested that i check my bed for bedbugs! I scheduled an appointment with the dermatologist who did the pathology report and discover that he only did a visual examination and not immunoflorecent test. WHAT!?!? That was what the doctor I had seen was supposed to order! Now I am preparing myself for another false negative because I have been gluten-free and he took a skin sample from an area where I often have breakouts but none active right now. :angry:

Anybody want to lay odds on the results here?

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):


  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,683
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748
    Jean Tonkin
    Newest Member
    Jean Tonkin
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):


  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
      Draft gluten-free ciders… can they be trusted ?

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      I'd go with a vodka tonic, but that's just me😉
    • Rejoicephd
      Draft gluten-free ciders… can they be trusted ?

      By Rejoicephd · Posted

      That and my nutritionist also said that drinking cider is one of the worst drink choices for me, given that I have candida overgrowth.  She said the combination of the alcohol and sugar would be very likely to worsen my candida problem.  She suggested that if I drink, I go for clear vodka, either neat or with a splash of cranberry.   So in summary, I am giving ciders a rest.  Whether it's a gluten risk or sugars and yeast overgrowth, its just not worth it.
    • Inkie
      Tea Bags and Gluten

      By Inkie · Posted

      Thank you for the information ill will definitely bring it into practice .
    • Scott Adams
      Tea Bags and Gluten

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      While plain, pure tea leaves (black, green, or white) are naturally gluten-free, the issue often lies not with the tea itself but with other ingredients or processing. Many flavored teas use barley malt or other gluten-containing grains as a flavoring agent, which would be clearly listed on the ingredient label. Cross-contamination is another possibility, either in the facility where the tea is processed or, surprisingly, from the tea bag material itself—some tea bags are sealed with a wheat-based glue. Furthermore, it's important to consider that your reaction could be to other substances in tea, such as high levels of tannins, which can be hard on the stomach, or to natural histamines or other compounds that can cause a non-celiac immune response. The best way to investigate is to carefully read labels for hidden ingredients, try switching to a certified gluten-free tea brand that uses whole leaf or pyramid-style bags, and see if the reaction persists.
    • Scott Adams
      Inconclusive results

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      This is a challenging and confusing situation. The combination of a positive EMA—which is a highly specific marker rarely yielding false positives—alongside strongly elevated TTG on two separate occasions, years apart, is profoundly suggestive of celiac disease, even in the absence of biopsy damage. This pattern strongly aligns with what is known as "potential celiac disease," where the immune system is clearly activated, but intestinal damage has not yet become visible under the microscope. Your concern about the long-term risk of continued gluten consumption is valid, especially given your family's experience with the consequences of delayed diagnosis. Since your daughter is now at an age where her buy-in is essential for a gluten-free lifestyle, obtaining a definitive answer is crucial for her long-term adherence and health. Given that she is asymptomatic yet serologically positive, a third biopsy now, after a proper 12-week challenge, offers the best chance to capture any microscopic damage that may have developed, providing the concrete evidence needed to justify the dietary change. This isn't about wanting her to have celiac; it's about wanting to prevent the insidious damage that can occur while waiting for symptoms to appear, and ultimately giving her the unambiguous "why" she needs to accept and commit to the necessary treatment. This article might be helpful. It breaks down each type of test, and what a positive results means in terms of the probability that you might have celiac disease. One test that always needs to be done is the IgA Levels/Deficiency Test (often called "Total IGA") because some people are naturally IGA deficient, and if this is the case, then certain blood tests for celiac disease might be false-negative, and other types of tests need to be done to make an accurate diagnosis. The article includes the "Mayo Clinic Protocol," which is the best overall protocol for results to be ~98% accurate.    
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.