Get email alerts Get Celiac.com E-mail Alerts  




Celiac.com Sponsor:
Celiac.com Sponsor:




Ads by Google:






   Get email alerts  Subscribe to FREE Celiac.com email alerts

Bad Medical Advice Many Years Ago--Any Way To Get Tested For Celiac Now?
0

9 posts in this topic

My apologies if this is a repeat topic--seems like it would have been asked before but I'm not seeing it.

 

About 12 years ago I saw a doctor who didn't really understand Celiac disease.  She advised me to get a blood test for a wheat allergy and when it came back negative, she suggested an elimination diet.  When I noticed how awful I felt when I added gluten back into my diet, she said, "Great!  Now you know what's wrong--stop eating gluten."  So I did.

 

You all probably see the problem with this plan--when I later learned about Celiac disease and how important it is to be tested for it so you can monitor your progress, I discovered that I could not be tested because I haven't been eating gluten for so many years.  I'm told that if I want to be tested, I'll need to eat gluten for three months. !@#$ no!   No way will I purposefully invite that kind of misery into my life for the sake of a diagnosis. So I've been going along eating gluten-free, never knowing if I have Celiac or not.  But still, I would like to know for sure for various reasons.  My family wants to know as well.

 

So my question: does anyone know of a way around this situation so I could get a real diagnosis?  I fear there isn't, at least not with current medical technology.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites


Ads by Google:

Sorry, but the only way i can think of is by doing the gluten challenge. There is a genetic test, but it by itself is not a diagnosis tool (it can help, but cannot stand alone) because about 30% of the population has the genetics for it.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That's what I figured.  I was just hoping for some miraculous new science I hadn't yet heard about.  Ah well.

Sorry, but the only way i can think of is by doing the gluten challenge. There is a genetic test, but it by itself is not a diagnosis tool (it can help, but cannot stand alone) because about 30% of the population has the genetics for it.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I actually don't see a problem with that beyond other medical professionals perhaps not believing that you have a gluten problem. How you feel is a huge part of monitoring. If you feel bad, and you have celiac disease and you suspect that trace gluten is still affecting you, blood or intestinal tests could easily show up positive without changing your diet from what it currently is at all.

Besides which, you can have non-celiac gluten sensitivity and still have no positive tests. Both diseases run in families with celiac disease, so all first degree relatives should definitely still get celiac disease testing and consider that they might have gluten intolerance if they are in poor health. There should be no need to put a name to something that obviously makes you feel ill to make someone believe you or cater to you. That's their issue, not yours.

 

I honestly don't know what important monitoring you mean, maybe I'm just missing something.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi kamarie,

 

I'm had a similar experience.
The doctor I had in 2010 told me to stay gluten free and didn't want me to get tested.

I didn't know much. Then in 2011 my health problems returned.

I've been doing the gluten challenge since november 2012 to do the tests.

 

..............................................................................................................................................................

Here is another test:

 

"Rectal biopsy is useful for people who did not get tested 

before starting a gluten free diet and then want to definitely

know if they really do have Celiac Disease."

source: http://glutenfreeworks.com/gluten-disorders/celiac-disease/diagnosis-and-testing/

 

also:  http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9260799

..................................................................................................................................................................

I didn't find a doctor in my city who knows how to do this test.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites




Cavernio, this page explains why I'm thinking about diagnoses:  http://celiaccentral.wordpress.com/2012/10/03/going-gluten-free-before-the-diagnosis-do-or-dont/

 

AFAIK, if you have Celiac disease, doctors are more aggressive about checking for nutritional deficiencies and conditions related to having a severely damaged intestinal tract.  One person told me that they will also monitor your IgE (something like that, I don't know all the terms very well yet) to make sure you aren't eating gluten you don't know about.  But I haven't talked to an actual MD about this, so I could be wrong.

 

For me personally, it would help me determine how strict I need to be.  Although a gluten-free diet helps a lot, it hasn't made me 100% better.  Is it because I'm not really 100% gluten-free and I only think I am, and I'm still sick because of cross-contamination?  Or is something else causing my remaining health issues?  If a doctor could test me and say, "Well, there's no evidence you've consumed any gluten at all for the past 6 months," then I'd know there are other issues to investigate.

 

All of this could be done without a diagnosis of Celiac, and I am definitely trying my best to coordinate it all myself and do my own experimenting, but it would be a lot easier if I had a diagnosis and a cooperative, knowledgeable doctor (I'm resisting going into a tirade about my awful experiences with gastroenterologists, lol)

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the links, Deanimated Marcus, that's the first I've heard of a rectal biopsy, which sounds really scary but I'm glad to have another option to research.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would just assume you have celiac, and when dealing with medical professionals with future health concerns, just tell them you have it and they will consider other avenues (autoimmune diseases) that they wouldn't otherwise.

 

I say, continue doing so well on the gluten-free diet and don't make yourself sick in order to determine if you are a celiac or have non-celiac gluten intolerance (NCGI). After so many years eating gluten free, there isn't any difference that I know of in the handling of the disease as long as you stay gluten-free.

 

Welcome to the board.  :)

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi kamarie,

I'm had a similar experience.

The doctor I had in 2010 told me to stay gluten free and didn't want me to get tested.

I didn't know much. Then in 2011 my health problems returned.

I've been doing the gluten challenge since november 2012 to do the tests.

..............................................................................................................................................................

Here is another test:

"Rectal biopsy is useful for people who did not get tested

before starting a gluten free diet and then want to definitely

know if they really do have Celiac Disease."

source: http://glutenfreeworks.com/gluten-disorders/celiac-disease/diagnosis-and-testing/

also: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9260799

..................................................................................................................................................................

I didn't find a doctor in my city who knows how to do this test.

Not sure how a rectal biopsy would help with Celiac as it manifests in the small intestine. I have never seen a Celiac center recommend such a thing.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
0

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      104,681
    • Total Posts
      921,724
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Ok, I can't seem to find my first lot of blood tests that were done for Celiac screening, they did include TTG I remember that much, and I am getting another copy of it but another test did come in today.  I don't know how different tests are done around the world and I don't get all the medical jargon but this is what it states, ******************************************************************************* HLA DR/DQ Genotyping for Coeliac Disease, Specimen type : EDTA blood Method : Detection of sequence-specific oligonucleotides (Gen-Probe). HLA-DR - 1, 13          DRB1 - 01, 13 HLA-DQ - 5,6        HLA-DQA1 - 5,6      HLA-DB1 - 05, 06 Interpretation : No genotype susceptibility for coeliac disease.  The DQ2 and DQ8 antigens associated with increased risk of coeliac disease were not identified in this patient.  In the absence of these antigens, coeliac disease is extremely unlikely.   *******************************************************************************   I have read the horror stories of blood tests and scope biopsies not be done right or flawed but here is what I do know as of now, At the moment the most non invasive test I can have done say negative.  I have double scopes (endoscopy and colonoscopy) booked for the 12th of October with results from biopsies expected a week or two after. Chances are they will show, a) signs of coeliac disease (even if the odds are low it can still happen), b) show signs of something else entirely and we will be busy dealing with the ramifications of that or c) it will show no signs of coeliac but I will still be suffering from gluten sensitivity (which is harder/impossible to measure clinically). My GP has told me that stress and anxiety can be a cause of all the symptoms I have been experiencing and suggests if the scopes show nothing that I may benefit from something to treat anxiety, i.e. antidepressants.  Not in a, "Oh we don't know what it is so have these," kind of way, he agrees with the thought that the scopes could indeed show coeliac, something else or even be negative. I did tell him that I could have a sensitivity and that even without benefit of clinical results, some people have gone on a gluten elimination diet for a period of time to see if they get any relief.  My question is this, if the scopes come up negative and I try eliminating gluten, how long would it be before I saw any results or improvements?  I have read enough here and elsewhere to know that everybody is different, some see results within days, some see results longer but are there any guidelines for how long a test like this should be undertaken for?  I have heard everything thing from two weeks to two months.  All of this is entirely moot at this point but I know that even if the results said clear, there would always be a little part of me that wonders if it could be a sensitivity that is the problem.  Any thoughts or advice greatly appreciated, and a thank you to all those who have taken the time to respond and offer advice and encouragement so far.        
    • We don't delete accounts but can delete any personal information and change your screen name if you would like. Just send me a personal message with three possible screen names. For the record you can edit most things in your account area with the exception of your screen name.
    • Thanks I never heard of that dye before, I guess I have to find more natural meat thanks for the suggestion. 
    • Yes, I only eat one meal a day. Sometimes salad or fries or whatever I can find. And thanks for the replies again.
    • A colonoscopy is not used to diagnose celiac disease.  An endoscopy is used to obtain biopsies in the small intestine.  
  • Upcoming Events

  • Blog Entries

  • Recent Status Updates

  • Who's Online (See full list)

  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      61,680
    • Most Online
      3,093

    Newest Member
    Misalina
    Joined