Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Going Gluten Free For Health Reasons, But No Underlying Gluten Issues?


come dance with me

Recommended Posts

come dance with me Enthusiast

It seems to be a common thing at the moment where people are deciding to remove gluten from the diet of the entire family because it's a "healthy" way of eating, when nobody in the family has any issues whatsoever.  No sensitivities to gluten, no intolerance, nobody has coeliac disease, they see it as just a healthier lifestyle.

 

Can anyone shed some light on that?  I wasn't sure where to put this, but just wanted to ask in here what people thought about others seeking out an entirely gluten free diet for themselves and their families without it causing any concern and without a family history of gluten problems?


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Adalaide Mentor

There are a lot of reasons to try a gluten free diet, many of them have nothing to do with celiac disease or a gluten sensitivity. It can be helpful with treating a variety of other health issues. The pizza crusts I prefer to buy were developed by a bakery in response to doctor pointing out that autistic children responded well to a gluten free diet. He felt that no child should go without delicious pizza, so he created an amazing crust that they could enjoy. I have an uncle with Crohn's, his wife has lupus and their son may be autistic (and whether or not he is, genetically speaking... he's screwed), gluten problem or not their family could benefit greatly from going gluten free.

 

Frankly, as long as people take it seriously I don't see the problem. The issue is when people treat it like a weight loss diet or some random fad. It is a diet designed specifically to address health issues. As much as I want to see the fad end, I think the attitude some people have that celiacs and gluten sensitive people own this diet needs to stop. It just creates a divide when we should be happy to welcome anyone who embraces being gluten free for their health into our community. And for the record, embraces meaning takes it seriously without cheating.

GF Lover Rising Star

Interesting question.

 

My brother is a health nut.  I say nut because he will eliminate anything with gluten, dairy, preservatives, gmo's, antibiotics and so on.  He exercises fanatically and takes large amounts of vitamins.  He chooses not to buy health insurance and believes he will never get seriously sick.  He is very healthy at the moment.  He has no autoimmune issues and no chronic conditions. 

 

That said, he will woof down a slice of pizza if placed in front, drinks beer if he wants too.  Is he a hypocrite?  Maybe, maybe not.  He makes his food choices for personal reasons, not for medical reasons.  When he eats a slice of pizza, is he cheating?  Not really because he has no medical obligation to the diet he chose. 

 

Colleen

mommida Enthusiast

I think when people have noticed the drastic improvement of a Celiac following a gluten free diet they are amazed.

 

Gluten is a more complex protein chain for human digestion.  Removing it from the diet and consuming more fruits and vegetables (gluten free people tend to start eating more fruits and vegetables ~ cause hey it's gluten free!) seems to improve health.

 

There is supporting evidence that it can *help* in many auto-immune illnesses, but not adding more stress to the gut to process.  I have seen a drastic improvement for a woman with MS.  (She was having problems affording medication and seemed to have no other options.  She started the diet and avoided sugars too.  She looked 15 years younger and was not limping! 

 

Not only that but when stories come out that things like beaver anal secretions are used as raspberry flavoring in foods!!?  Don't you think it's about time that people start thinking about what they are eating and start making some choices about what should not be acceptable to put in their bodies.  (*this ws on a morning radio show and I just don't even want to research this.  It's just too nasty.)  The more people that want to eat gluten free the better.  Just be polite when interacting with people in restaurants and such so you don't give other gluten free people bad reputations.

come dance with me Enthusiast

The more people claim to be gluten free, but then are inconsistent, the harder it is for people to have a true understanding of how strict a person has to be when they have coeliac disease, or a child with it.  Someone who sais they are gluten free, talks to waitstaff about the gluten free options, then order a drink that contains barley malt, will give the impression that it's ok to have a bit of gluten. 

Rucko Apprentice

You might want to read "Grain Brain" by Dr. David Perlmutter for some excellent reasons not to eat grains.  Here's a link to his recent interview in Toronto where he says it better than I can:

 

Open Original Shared Link

 

 

Also check out some of the Paleo books by Robb Wolf, Loren Cordain and Nora Gedgaudas for other reasons people are encouraged to try to eat more like our ancestors.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - Mmoc replied to Mmoc's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      2

      Blood tests low iGA 4 years later digestive issues

    2. - Aretaeus Cappadocia replied to Clear2me's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      6

      Gluten free nuts

    3. - trents replied to Larzipan's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      42

      Has anyone had terrible TMJ/ Jaw Pain from undiagnosed Celiac?

    4. - Scott Adams replied to Larzipan's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      42

      Has anyone had terrible TMJ/ Jaw Pain from undiagnosed Celiac?

    5. - Wheatwacked commented on Scott Adams's article in Latest Research
      6

      Study Estimates the Costs of Delayed Celiac Disease Diagnosis (+Video)


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,387
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    LizzieE
    Newest Member
    LizzieE
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Mmoc
      Thank you kindly for your response. I have since gotten the other type of bloods done and am awaiting results. 
    • Aretaeus Cappadocia
      I wanted to respond to your post as much for other people who read this later on (I'm not trying to contradict your experience or decisions) > Kirkland Signature Super Extra-Large Peanuts, 2.5 lbs, are labeled "gluten free" in the Calif Costcos I've been in. If they are selling non-gluten-free in your store, I suggest talking to customer service to see if they can get you the gluten-free version (they are tasty) > This past week I bought "Sliced Raw Almonds, Baking Nuts, 5 lbs Item 1495072 Best if used by Jun-10-26 W-261-6-L1A 12:47" at Costco. The package has the standard warning that it was made on machinery that <may> have processed wheat. Based on that alone, I would not eat these. However, I contacted customer service and asked them "are Costco's Sliced Almonds gluten free?" Within a day I got this response:  "This is [xyz] with the Costco Member Service Resolutions Team. I am happy to let you know we got a reply back from our Kirkland Signature team. Here is their response:  This item does not have a risk of cross contamination with gluten, barley or rye." Based on this, I will eat them. Based on experience, I believe they will be fine. Sometimes, for other products, the answer has been "they really do have cross-contamination risk" (eg, Kirkland Signature Dry Roasted Macadamia Nuts, Salted, 1.5 lbs Item 1195303). When they give me that answer I return them for cash. You might reasonably ask, "Why would Costco use that label if they actually are safe?" I can't speak for Costco but I've worked in Corporate America and I've seen this kind of thing first hand and up close. (1) This kind of regulatory label represents risk/cost to the company. What if they are mistaken? In one direction, the cost is loss of maybe 1% of sales (if celiacs don't buy when they would have). In the other direction, the risk is reputational damage and open-ended litigation (bad reviews and celiacs suing them). Expect them to play it safe. (2) There is a team tasked with getting each product out to market quickly and cheaply, and there is also a committee tasked with reviewing the packaging before it is released. If the team chooses the simplest, safest, pre-approved label, this becomes a quick check box. On the other hand, if they choose something else, it has to be carefully scrutinized through a long process. It's more efficient for the team to say there <could> be risk. (3) There is probably some plug and play in production. Some lots of the very same product could be made in a safe facility while others are made in an unsafe facility. Uniform packaging (saying there is risk) for all packages regardless of gluten risk is easier, cheaper, and safer (for Costco). Everything I wrote here is about my Costco experience, but the principles will be true at other vendors, particularly if they have extensive quality control infrastructure. The first hurdle of gluten-free diet is to remove/replace all the labeled gluten ingredients. The second, more difficult hurdle is to remove/replace all the hidden gluten. Each of us have to assess gray zones and make judgement calls knowing there is a penalty for being wrong. One penalty would be getting glutened but the other penalty could be eating an unnecessarily boring or malnourishing diet.
    • trents
      Thanks for the thoughtful reply and links, Wheatwacked. Definitely some food for thought. However, I would point out that your linked articles refer to gliadin in human breast milk, not cow's milk. And although it might seem reasonable to conclude it would work the same way in cows, that is not necessarily the case. Studies seem to indicate otherwise. Studies also indicate the amount of gliadin in human breast milk is miniscule and unlikely to cause reactions:  https://www.glutenfreewatchdog.org/news/gluten-peptides-in-human-breast-milk-implications-for-cows-milk/ I would also point out that Dr. Peter Osborne's doctorate is in chiropractic medicine, though he also has studied and, I believe, holds some sort of certifications in nutritional science. To put it plainly, he is considered by many qualified medical and nutritional professionals to be on the fringe of quackery. But he has a dedicated and rabid following, nonetheless.
    • Scott Adams
      I'd be very cautious about accepting these claims without robust evidence. The hypothesis requires a chain of biologically unlikely events: Gluten/gliadin survives the cow's rumen and entire digestive system intact. It is then absorbed whole into the cow's bloodstream. It bypasses the cow's immune system and liver. It is then secreted, still intact and immunogenic, into the milk. The cow's digestive system is designed to break down proteins, not transfer them whole into milk. This is not a recognized pathway in veterinary science. The provided backup shifts from cow's milk to human breastmilk, which is a classic bait-and-switch. While the transfer of food proteins in human breastmilk is a valid area of study, it doesn't validate the initial claim about commercial dairy. The use of a Dr. Osborne video is a major red flag. His entire platform is based on the idea that all grains are toxic, a view that far exceeds the established science on Celiac Disease and non-celiac gluten sensitivity. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence, and a YouTube video from a known ideological source is not that evidence."  
    • Wheatwacked
      Some backup to my statement about gluten and milk. Some background.  When my son was born in 1976 he was colicky from the beginning.  When he transitioned to formula it got really bad.  That's when we found the only pediactric gastroenterologist (in a population of 6 million that dealt with Celiac Disease (and he only had 14 patients with celiac disease), who dianosed by biopsy and started him on Nutramegen.  Recovery was quick. The portion of gluten that passes through to breastmilk is called gliadin. It is the component of gluten that causes celiac disease or gluten intolerance. What are the Effects of Gluten in Breastmilk? Gliaden, a component of gluten which is typically responsible for the intestinal reaction of gluten, DOES pass through breast milk.  This is because gliaden (as one of many food proteins) passes through the lining of your small intestine into your blood. Can gluten transmit through breast milk?  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.