Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×

  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):

    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com!
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Anyone Tried The Otc Test Kit For Celiac Disease

linen53

Recommended Posts

linen53 Rookie
linen53
Posted

I was reading in the Gluten Free Living Magazine about celiac disease tests and was surprised that Canada offers an over-the-counter celiac disease test. It tests for IgA antibodies in the tested blood (yes, you will have to prick your finger). The article also stated the FDA has not approved an over-the-counter celiac test in the United States.

So I went online and found the company, based in Canada that offers the test kit. You can find it at: Open Original Shared Link under Shop by Brands sub-tab (right side of the page on the blue bar).

The kit cost $61.74 in US dollars including shipping(about $75 with free shipping in Canadian dollars).

 

Anyone have any information about this?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


MycasMommy Enthusiast
MycasMommy
Posted

I was reading in the Gluten Free Living Magazine about celiac disease tests and was surprised that Canada offers an over-the-counter celiac disease test. It tests for IgA antibodies in the tested blood (yes, you will have to prick your finger). The article also stated the FDA has not approved an over-the-counter celiac test in the United States.

So I went online and found the company, based in Canada that offers the test kit. You can find it at: Open Original Shared Link under Shop by Brands sub-tab (right side of the page on the blue bar).

The kit cost $61.74 in US dollars including shipping(about $75 with free shipping in Canadian dollars).

 

Anyone have any information about this?

 

"If a patient uses the home self-testing kit for celiac disease and has a positive test result, the following steps are recommended:

  1. A serologic laboratory test, immunoglobulin A (IgA) tissue transglutaminase antibody or IgA endomysial antibody, is required. Total serum IgA should also be measured.
  2. If the serologic test result is positive, the patient should be referred for an endoscopic small intestinal biopsy to confirm the diagnosis as soon as possible.
  3. It is strongly recommended that the patient continue to consume a normal (gluten-containing) diet and not start a gluten-free or gluten-reduced diet before the biopsy is performed. A trial of a gluten-free diet before biopsy has the potential to promote intestinal mucosal healing, leading to difficulty in pathologic interpretation of the biopsy and additional delay in confirming the diagnosis.
  4. Once celiac disease is confirmed using a biopsy, the patient should see a registered dietitian with expertise on gluten-free diets. The patient should be encouraged to join a support group like the Canadian Celiac Association (Open Original Shared Link)."

 

 

From the US National Library of Medicine : Open Original Shared Link

Link to comment
Share on other sites
nvsmom Community Regular
nvsmom
Posted

I did the home Biocard test a few years ago.  I suspected celiac disease but hated going to doctors so I was just sticking my head in the sand and ignoring the situation.  A friend discovered the Biocard tests were on sale at a local (Alberta, Canada) health / whole food store so she pushed me to buy one.  

 

I increased my gluten intake for about two weeks and then did the skin prick.  I was not able to get a big drop of blood so I did not fill the tiny test vial with blood.  Nevertheless, I did get a very faint positive line after about 10 minutes, but I had no second line at the recommended wait time.  I remember putting the tester down with a "huh", and then reading for a few more minutes.  I rechecked it and then when quickly to a lamp to make sure I was actually seeing a double line.  LOL

 

The testers look a lot like a pregnancy home test.  There is a box where two lines can appear.  The first is for total serum IgA.  It is a control test to ensure you have enough IgA for an accurate test.  The second line indicates high levels of tTG igA (tissue transglutaminase) which means your body is attacking its intestines.  That second line was a very weak positive.  Interesting enough, when I tested the tTG IgA through my doctor's office to confirm (after a month of increased gluten intake) my tTG IgA was very high at >200 when 0-20 was the normal range - not weakly positive at all.

 

I did meet another woman in my city who tried the home test.  Her result was also weakly positive but when she went to the doctor her retest was negative so they decided it must not be celiac disease.  About a month later she discovered that she had lyme disease which was probably causing her symptoms.  A weak positive tTG IgA can be caused by (5% of the time) liver disease, diabetes, thyroiditis, crohn's, colitis, or a serious infection; I've always wondered if her weak positive was caused by Lyme.

 

Anyway, I found it to be a helpful option and fairly accurate.  Just remember that the tTG IgA can miss as many as 25% of all celiacs so it is best to have multiple tests run (DGP IgA, DGP IgG, EMA IgA, tTG IgG) to make sure a negative result is accurate.

 

Best wishes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
linen53 Rookie
linen53
  • Author
Posted

nvsmom, I'm wondering why you increased your gluten for a couple of weeks before taking the test.  The test is for genes not antibodies.  I'm confused.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
nvsmom Community Regular
nvsmom
Posted

The test I took was not for genes - we might be talking about different tests. You link didn't work for me so I just assumed it was for the Biocard test which I know is available in Canada (since I used it).  The Biocard test I did was for anti-tissue transglutaminse (tTG IgA) which is positive when the body attacks the small intestine.  It also showed if levels of immunoglobulin A (IgA) was norma; this is the part of the immune system active in the mucosal linings like in the mouth and intestines.

 

I increased my gluten intake because I did not each much bread prior to that, but in hindsight, I was actually eating enough gluten without the increase.  I also increased it because the test instructions said to do so.  

 

You are correct, there is no need to increase your gluten intake for genetic testing.

 

I'm sorry.  I guess I should have clarified which test it was before I answered!  LOL  This is the test I did: Open Original Shared Link

 

I've never had genetic testing done, but since I've had positive blood tests I would never bother with them.  To be honest, I'm not a fan of genetic tests.  Less than 1% of the world has celiac disease but 30% of all people have the genes that celiacs have (DQ 2 or DQ8).  A positive result will just tell you if you are in the higher risk group or not, it can't tell you if you have celiac disease.  It even appears that a very small minority of celiacs may not even have those genes, but that is not a widely accepted belief in the medical community.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
linen53 Rookie
linen53
  • Author
Posted

According to what you said your test was a cheek swab.  The test I am talking about is a blood test.  Thank you so much for answering me.  I have more information now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
nvsmom Community Regular
nvsmom
Posted

According to what you said your test was a cheek swab.  The test I am talking about is a blood test.  Thank you so much for answering me.  I have more information now.

 

No, mine was a blood test. I pricked my hand and the blood went into a tiny tiny vial - almost like a diabetics blood glucose test.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


linen53 Rookie
linen53
  • Author
Posted

Okay, thanks for the clarification.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):


  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      121,088
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748
    Aventine
    Newest Member
    Aventine
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      120.3k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):


  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Anmol
      Recently Diagnosed Celiac- Need advice

      By Anmol · Posted

      Thanks this is helpful. Couple of follow -ups- that critical point till it stays silent is age dependent or dependent on continuing to eat gluten. In other words if she is on gluten-free diet can she stay on silent celiac disease forever?    what are the most cost effective yet efficient test to track the inflammation/antibodies and see if gluten-free is working . 
    • trents
      Recently Diagnosed Celiac- Need advice

      By trents · Posted

      Welcome to the community forum, @Anmol! There are a number of blood antibody tests that can be administered when diagnosing celiac disease and it is normal that not all of them will be positive. Three out of four that were run for you were positive. It looks pretty conclusive that you have celiac disease. Many physicians will only run the tTG-IGA test so I applaud your doctor for being so thorough. Note, the Immunoglobulin A is not a test for celiac disease per se but a measure of total IGA antibody levels in your blood. If this number is low it can cause false negatives in the individual IGA-based celiac antibody tests. There are many celiacs who are asymptomatic when consuming gluten, at least until damage to the villous lining of the small bowel progresses to a certain critical point. I was one of them. We call them "silent" celiacs".  Unfortunately, being asymptomatic does not equate to no damage being done to the villous lining of the small bowel. No, the fact that your wife is asymptomatic should not be viewed as a license to not practice strict gluten free eating. She is damaging her health by doing so and the continuing high antibody test scores are proof of that. The antibodies are produced by inflammation in the small bowel lining and over time this inflammation destroys the villous lining. Continuing to disregard this will catch up to her. While it may be true that a little gluten does less harm to the villous lining than a lot, why would you even want to tolerate any harm at all to it? Being a "silent" celiac is both a blessing and a curse. It's a blessing in the sense of being able to endure some cross contamination in social settings without embarrassing repercussions. It's a curse in that it slows down the learning curve of avoiding foods where gluten is not an obvious ingredient, yet still may be doing damage to the villous lining of the small bowel. GliadinX is helpful to many celiacs in avoiding illness from cross contamination when eating out but it is not effective when consuming larger amounts of gluten. It was never intended for that purpose. Eating out is the number one sabotager of gluten free eating. You have no control of how food is prepared and handled in restaurant kitchens.  
    • knitty kitty
      14 year old with Celiac & EOE still suffering...

      By knitty kitty · Posted

      Forgot one... https://www.hormonesmatter.com/eosinophilic-esophagitis-sugar-thiamine-sensitive/
    • trents
      50 YO Male Recently Diagnosed with Celiac Disease

      By trents · Posted

      Welcome to the forum community, @ekelsay! Yes, your tTG-IGA score is strongly positive for celiac disease. There are other antibody tests that can be run when diagnosing celiac disease but the tTG-IGA is the most popular with physicians because it combines good sensitivity with good specificity, and it is a relatively inexpensive test to perform. The onset of celiac disease can happen at any stage of life and the size of the score is not necessarily an indicator of the progress of the disease. It is likely that you you experienced onset well before you became aware of symptoms. It often takes 10 years or more to get a diagnosis of celiac disease after the first appearance of symptoms. In my case, the first indicator was mildly elevated liver enzymes that resulted in a rejection of my blood donation by the Red Cross at age 37. There was no GI discomfort at that point, at least none that I noticed. Over time, other lab values began to get out of norm, including decreased iron levels. My PCP was at a complete loss to explain any of this. I finally scheduled an appointment with a GI doc because the liver enzymes concerned me and he tested me right away for celiac disease. I was positive and within three months of gluten free eating my liver enzymes were back to normal. That took 13 years since the rejection of my blood donation by the Red Cross. And my story is typical. Toward the end of that period I had developed some occasional diarrhea and oily stool but no major GI distress. Many celiacs do not have classic GI symptoms and are "silent" celiacs. There are around 200 symptoms that have been associated with celiac disease and many or most of them do not involve conscious GI distress. Via an autoimmune process, gluten ingestion triggers inflammation in the villous lining of the small bowel which damages it over time and inhibits the ability of this organ to absorb the vitamins and minerals in the food we ingest. So, that explains why those with celiac disease often suffer iron deficiency anemia, osteoporosis and a host of other vitamin and mineral deficiency related medical issues. The villous lining of the small bowel is where essentially all of our nutrition is absorbed. So, yes, anemia is one of the classic symptoms of celiac disease. One very important thing you need to be aware of is that your PCP may refer you to a GI doc for an endoscopy/biopsy of the small bowel lining to confirm the results of the blood antibody testing. So, you must not begin gluten free eating until that is done or at least you know they are going to diagnose you with celiac disease without it. If you start gluten free eating now there will be healing in the villous lining that will begin to take place which may compromise the results of the biopsy.
    • Anmol
      Recently Diagnosed Celiac- Need advice

      By Anmol · Posted

      Hello all- my wife was recently diagnosed with Celiac below are her blood results. We are still absorbing this.  I wanted to seek clarity on few things:  1. Her symptoms aren't extreme. She was asked to go on gluten free diet a couple years ago but she did not completely cut off gluten. Partly because she wasn't seeing extreme symptoms. Only bloating and mild diarrhea after a meal full of gluten.  Does this mean that she is asymptomatic but enormous harm is done with every gram of gluten.? in other words is amount gluten directly correlated with harm on the intestines? or few mg of gluten can be really harmful to the villi  2. Why is she asymptomatic?  3. Is Gliadin X safe to take and effective for Cross -contamination or while going out to eat?  4. Since she is asymptomatic, can we sometimes indulge in a gluten diet? ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Deamidated Gliadin, IgG - 64 (0-19) units tTG IgA -  >100 (0-3) U/ml tTG IgG - 4   (0-5) Why is this in normal range? Endomysial Antibody - Positive  Immunoglobulin A - 352 (87-352) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Thanks for help in advance, really appreciate! 
×
×
  • Create New...