Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com!
    eNewsletter
    Donate

If You Have Negative Blood Tests, But Respond To Being gluten-free...


MitziG

Recommended Posts

MitziG Enthusiast

My kids and I were all dx with Celiac after biopsies in April. None of us presented with "classic" symptoms at the time, though I had a childhood that fit the bill plainly. I was reading the biopsy reports today and something caught my attention:

MY report (the GI dx me before the biopsy was rcv'd, based solely on the appearance of my guts. He said it was obvious I had this for a long time, and that damage was severe. But note what the report says>>>

"Prominent villous defect, elongated crypts, surface epithelium contains MODERATE numbers of lymphocytes,, lamina propria contains numerous heteramorphous chronic inflammatory cells, mostly plasma cells and eosinophils"

My blood work was BARELY positive...TTG of 6, with >4 being positive

Now...my DAUGHTER'S bloodwork was more certain- ttg of 26, same values

HER endoscopy looked normal, but the biopsy revealed:

"slight increase in inflammatory cells, slightly elongated crypts, severe villous defect with severe increase in number of intrepithelial lymphocytes"

So...I know the theory has been passed around the board here that silent celiacs may have been fighting gluten so long that the immune system can no longer muster a response. Wondering if part of that "suppressed response" would be indicated by less lymphocyte activity? and thus a lower Ttg? I am not well-versed in the science aspect of all this, or the terminology...but it just seemed interesting to me that my serious visual damage showed only moderate lymphocytes, and a weak positive blood test, while my daughter's less severe damage indicated an immune system hard at work and a much higher TTg?

Just a theory that could maybe explain the negative serology of so many people on here who very clearly have a problem with gluten. Maybe their bodies are just too sick to even MAKE antibodies?

What do you think?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Kathy59 Rookie

Most of it is too in depth for me to explain, all I know is my blood work was negative for Celiac; I had an endecsopy (sp) prior to blood work and nothing was found (but not sure even looking for) at time was sent due to B12 deficiency, but they were not looking for Celiac....treated for active mono, EBV, Chronic Fatigue Syndrome, some improvement, but still had chronic Poops...LOL! Gene test for Celiac and there it was full blown. I would just say if gluten-free lifestyle works then do it. I once had a dr tell me...test results are only has good as the test ordered!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
beebs Enthusiast

That is a very interesting theory - I am no help because I haven't had the biopsy - but I have had completely negative bloods, but my reactions are so severe that they are considered life threatening. I have always wondered how that is possible - how can I test negative when if I eat gluten I get intussusception and am rushed to emergency. It just doesn't make any sense to me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
SarahJimMarcy Apprentice

My blood test was negative. I went gluten free with my daughter and within two days felt better. Months later, the doctor, in all his wisdom, thought I should go back on gluten for two months so they could do an endoscopy. I wouldn't do it. They did the genetic test which came back positive. The genetic test is just a blood draw and it was covered by insurance. Could consider going that route.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
pricklypear1971 Community Regular

I had stomach issues when I was a kid. Ulcers at 9, stomach aches at 18 (and more ulcers). Weird stomach cramping/D in my mid 20's. Abdominal pain in late 20's (suspected endometriosis).

After my son was born - nada, except I'd get stomach "bugs" easily and mysteriously eat something "bad" once in a while. But, my thyroid tanked. Got thyroid meds.

Thyroid meds worked for the most part for about 5 years. Then I broke out in that dang rash.

I think the escalating symptoms (and lack of stomach issues - or D turning to chronic C) was my body giving up on one method of attack (GI) and turning to something else (skin, neuro).

So, yes, I think Celiac evolves and changes over time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
MitziG Enthusiast

My blood test was negative. I went gluten free with my daughter and within two days felt better. Months later, the doctor, in all his wisdom, thought I should go back on gluten for two months so they could do an endoscopy. I wouldn't do it. They did the genetic test which came back positive. The genetic test is just a blood draw and it was covered by insurance. Could consider going that route.

Good for you! I wouldn't do it either! You shouldn't have to have a test verify that something makes you sick! I wish more doctors would just dx based on symptoms when blood tests and/or biopsies don't always show the true picture. Though in my case, I am grateful for the tests, because I had no idea gluten was a problem for any of us. I had some stomach issues from time to time, but like the above poster, always chalked it up to "eating something that didnt agree with me." My reaction was definitely never something that I would have connected to gluten. Now, after having been off gluten almost 10 months, I have a very obvious reaction to it, very quickly, so I guess that means my immune system is recovering anyway!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
UKGail Rookie

I know of one celiac specialist who also thinks that long-standing celiac disease may result in sero-negativity.

You might also find the following link about sero-negative celiac disease useful. It is not completely disheartening. There are some doctors who are thinking about this issue.

Open Original Shared Link

Prickly - my journey is pretty similar to yours except I don't get DH, but had other things too. I agree with your feelings about the development of Celiac, that it gets worse, and presents in new ways if ignored for too long.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



pricklypear1971 Community Regular

I know of one celiac specialist who also thinks that long-standing celiac disease may result in sero-negativity.

You might also find the following link about sero-negative celiac disease useful. It is not completely disheartening. There are some doctors who are thinking about this issue.

Open Original Shared Link

Prickly - my journey is pretty similar to yours except I don't get DH, but had other things too. I agree with your feelings about the development of Celiac, that it gets worse, and presents in new ways if ignored for too long.

Great link.

I've said it before and I'll scream it from the rooftops...the problems are the tests.

I have an easier time accepting this since I have thyroid disease, which is notorious for bad tests.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
BrittLoves2Run Apprentice

Most of it is too in depth for me to explain, all I know is my blood work was negative for Celiac; I had an endecsopy (sp) prior to blood work and nothing was found (but not sure even looking for) at time was sent due to B12 deficiency, but they were not looking for Celiac....treated for active mono, EBV, Chronic Fatigue Syndrome, some improvement, but still had chronic Poops...LOL! Gene test for Celiac and there it was full blown. I would just say if gluten-free lifestyle works then do it. I once had a dr tell me...test results are only has good as the test ordered!

I'm jumping in late.. but what does the Gene test...for lack of better words "show" or "prove" that are different from the Celiac panel? I'm a newbie and I really don't know!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Metoo Enthusiast

I'm jumping in late.. but what does the Gene test...for lack of better words "show" or "prove" that are different from the Celiac panel? I'm a newbie and I really don't know!

A gene test would show that you carried genetic markers that show that are at an increased risk for having celiac. Unfortunately it does not prove whether you do or don't have celiac.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
stanleymonkey Explorer

my daughter was positive genes, negative blood, and WAS doing great diet wise, so was given a tentative diagnosis of celiac and or nerve damage to her bowel.

I have negative blood, vintage been wait g gluten lite as I don't eat gluten around my daughter bandage noticed I feel enter so has my husband

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      121,088
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Aventine
    Newest Member
    Aventine
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      120.3k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      Welcome to the community forum, @Anmol! There are a number of blood antibody tests that can be administered when diagnosing celiac disease and it is normal that not all of them will be positive. Three out of four that were run for you were positive. It looks pretty conclusive that you have celiac disease. Many physicians will only run the tTG-IGA test so I applaud your doctor for being so thorough. Note, the Immunoglobulin A is not a test for celiac disease per se but a measure of total IGA antibody levels in your blood. If this number is low it can cause false negatives in the individual IGA-based celiac antibody tests. There are many celiacs who are asymptomatic when consuming gluten, at least until damage to the villous lining of the small bowel progresses to a certain critical point. I was one of them. We call them "silent" celiacs".  Unfortunately, being asymptomatic does not equate to no damage being done to the villous lining of the small bowel. No, the fact that your wife is asymptomatic should not be viewed as a license to not practice strict gluten free eating. She is damaging her health by doing so and the continuing high antibody test scores are proof of that. The antibodies are produced by inflammation in the small bowel lining and over time this inflammation destroys the villous lining. Continuing to disregard this will catch up to her. While it may be true that a little gluten does less harm to the villous lining than a lot, why would you even want to tolerate any harm at all to it? Being a "silent" celiac is both a blessing and a curse. It's a blessing in the sense of being able to endure some cross contamination in social settings without embarrassing repercussions. It's a curse in that it slows down the learning curve of avoiding foods where gluten is not an obvious ingredient, yet still may be doing damage to the villous lining of the small bowel. GliadinX is helpful to many celiacs in avoiding illness from cross contamination when eating out but it is not effective when consuming larger amounts of gluten. It was never intended for that purpose. Eating out is the number one sabotager of gluten free eating. You have no control of how food is prepared and handled in restaurant kitchens.  
    • knitty kitty
      Forgot one... https://www.hormonesmatter.com/eosinophilic-esophagitis-sugar-thiamine-sensitive/
    • trents
      Welcome to the forum community, @ekelsay! Yes, your tTG-IGA score is strongly positive for celiac disease. There are other antibody tests that can be run when diagnosing celiac disease but the tTG-IGA is the most popular with physicians because it combines good sensitivity with good specificity, and it is a relatively inexpensive test to perform. The onset of celiac disease can happen at any stage of life and the size of the score is not necessarily an indicator of the progress of the disease. It is likely that you you experienced onset well before you became aware of symptoms. It often takes 10 years or more to get a diagnosis of celiac disease after the first appearance of symptoms. In my case, the first indicator was mildly elevated liver enzymes that resulted in a rejection of my blood donation by the Red Cross at age 37. There was no GI discomfort at that point, at least none that I noticed. Over time, other lab values began to get out of norm, including decreased iron levels. My PCP was at a complete loss to explain any of this. I finally scheduled an appointment with a GI doc because the liver enzymes concerned me and he tested me right away for celiac disease. I was positive and within three months of gluten free eating my liver enzymes were back to normal. That took 13 years since the rejection of my blood donation by the Red Cross. And my story is typical. Toward the end of that period I had developed some occasional diarrhea and oily stool but no major GI distress. Many celiacs do not have classic GI symptoms and are "silent" celiacs. There are around 200 symptoms that have been associated with celiac disease and many or most of them do not involve conscious GI distress. Via an autoimmune process, gluten ingestion triggers inflammation in the villous lining of the small bowel which damages it over time and inhibits the ability of this organ to absorb the vitamins and minerals in the food we ingest. So, that explains why those with celiac disease often suffer iron deficiency anemia, osteoporosis and a host of other vitamin and mineral deficiency related medical issues. The villous lining of the small bowel is where essentially all of our nutrition is absorbed. So, yes, anemia is one of the classic symptoms of celiac disease. One very important thing you need to be aware of is that your PCP may refer you to a GI doc for an endoscopy/biopsy of the small bowel lining to confirm the results of the blood antibody testing. So, you must not begin gluten free eating until that is done or at least you know they are going to diagnose you with celiac disease without it. If you start gluten free eating now there will be healing in the villous lining that will begin to take place which may compromise the results of the biopsy.
    • Anmol
      Hello all- my wife was recently diagnosed with Celiac below are her blood results. We are still absorbing this.  I wanted to seek clarity on few things:  1. Her symptoms aren't extreme. She was asked to go on gluten free diet a couple years ago but she did not completely cut off gluten. Partly because she wasn't seeing extreme symptoms. Only bloating and mild diarrhea after a meal full of gluten.  Does this mean that she is asymptomatic but enormous harm is done with every gram of gluten.? in other words is amount gluten directly correlated with harm on the intestines? or few mg of gluten can be really harmful to the villi  2. Why is she asymptomatic?  3. Is Gliadin X safe to take and effective for Cross -contamination or while going out to eat?  4. Since she is asymptomatic, can we sometimes indulge in a gluten diet? ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Deamidated Gliadin, IgG - 64 (0-19) units tTG IgA -  >100 (0-3) U/ml tTG IgG - 4   (0-5) Why is this in normal range? Endomysial Antibody - Positive  Immunoglobulin A - 352 (87-352) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Thanks for help in advance, really appreciate! 
    • Tanner L
      Constantly! I don't want everything to cost as much as a KIND bar, as great as they are.  Happy most of the info is available to us to make smart decisions for our health, just need to do a little more research. 
×
×
  • Create New...