Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):
  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Any Thoughts On These Results? Did They Include Everything?


greenchick22

Recommended Posts

greenchick22 Rookie

I posted several days ago about my negative results and they came today.  I would love someone to explain them to me!

 

Celiac Panel 10

 

 

Test                        Result                             Flag                  Acceptable

 

TTG AB IGA              1.5 U/ml                          N                        <20

 

Gliadin Peptide AB IGG         10.1 U/ml            N                        <20

 

Gliadin Peptide AB IGA     2.1                          N                        <20

 

TTG AB IGG             10.6                                N                         <20

 

IGA                            106                                N                        69-380

 

Endomysial Screen - Negative

 

*There is a note at the bottom that in the case of negative results and still suspected Celiac, the total IGA should be measured to test for deficiency.  Could I possibly have that?  How does one know whether to pursue that?

 

Thanks so much!

 


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



nvsmom Community Regular

That looks like a really comprehensive panel. The tTG's, DGP's and EMA tests are all for detecting intestinal damage (high levels cause it) and are the best tests for detecting celiac. 

 

I think the IgA listed on the lab was the total (serum) IgA. Immunoglobulin A is low in about 5% of celiacs so that is why they run it. If your IgA levels are normal, then you make adequate IgA for the actual celiac tests to be accurate. Yours is normal, albeit a bit on the low side, so your celiac tests (DGP, tTG, EMA) should be accurate.

 

The only tets not run was the anti-gliadin antibodies (AGA IgA and AGA IgG). It is an older test that is thought by some to show gliadin sensitivity in both celiacs and non-celiac gluten sensitive (NCGS) individuals. It does not have a perfect sensitivity though and can miss some people.

 

To me, it looks like you probably don't have celiac disease, but you could still have a gluten sensitivity that can produce all the same nasty symptoms as celiac disease does, minus the intestinal damage.

 

Are you planning on going gluten-free? Best wishes.

GottaSki Mentor

I posted several days ago about my negative results and they came today.  I would love someone to explain them to me!

 

Celiac Panel 10

 

 

Test                        Result                             Flag                  Acceptable

 

TTG AB IGA              1.5 U/ml                          N                        <20

 

Gliadin Peptide AB IGG         10.1 U/ml            N                        <20

 

Gliadin Peptide AB IGA     2.1                          N                        <20

 

TTG AB IGG             10.6                                N                         <20

 

IGA                            106                                N                        69-380

 

Endomysial Screen - Negative

 

*There is a note at the bottom that in the case of negative results and still suspected Celiac, the total IGA should be measured to test for deficiency.  Could I possibly have that?  How does one know whether to pursue that?

 

Thanks so much!

 

Had you removed gluten or eaten gluten light before the blood was drawn?

 

The tests are indeed all negative, but the one interesting item is your Total Serum IgA -- while it is not officially LOW - it is on the low end of normal which is common among myself, my children and grands....Only myself and my eldest child had tested marginally positive antibody tests with decades of unexplained illness.  Our endoscopic biopsies were all severe with complete villous atrophy.

 

If you or your doctors suspect Celiac Disease -- I would encourage either endoscopy and/or complete removal of gluten for three months (six is better) to monitor symptoms.  Do not remove until all testing is complete.  Once testing is complete -- elimination of gluten is the only test for Non Celiac Gluten Sensitivity (NCGS).

 

Good Luck to you :)

greenchick22 Rookie

Thank you so much!  I was eating normally at the time.

 

Had you removed gluten or eaten gluten light before the blood was drawn?

 

The tests are indeed all negative, but the one interesting item is your Total Serum IgA -- while it is not officially LOW - it is on the low end of normal which is common among myself, my children and grands....Only myself and my eldest child had tested marginally positive antibody tests with decades of unexplained illness.  Our endoscopic biopsies were all severe with complete villous atrophy.

 

If you or your doctors suspect Celiac Disease -- I would encourage either endoscopy and/or complete removal of gluten for three months (six is better) to monitor symptoms.  Do not remove until all testing is complete.  Once testing is complete -- elimination of gluten is the only test for Non Celiac Gluten Sensitivity (NCGS).

 

Good Luck to you :)

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      133,351
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Bea71
    Newest Member
    Bea71
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.6k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):
  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • par18
      Thanks for the reply. 
    • Scott Adams
      What you’re describing is actually very common, and unfortunately the timing of the biopsy likely explains the confusion. Yes, it is absolutely possible for the small intestine to heal enough in three months on a strict gluten-free diet to produce a normal or near-normal biopsy, especially when damage was mild to begin with. In contrast, celiac antibodies can stay elevated for many months or even years after gluten removal, so persistently high antibody levels alongside the celiac genes and clear nutrient deficiencies strongly point to celiac disease, even if you don’t feel symptoms. Many people with celiac are asymptomatic but still develop iron and vitamin deficiencies and silent intestinal damage. The lack of immediate symptoms makes it harder emotionally, but it doesn’t mean gluten isn’t harming you. Most specialists would consider this a case of celiac disease with a false-negative biopsy due to early healing rather than “something else,” and staying consistently gluten-free is what protects you long-term—even when your body doesn’t protest right away.
    • Scott Adams
      Yes, I meant if you had celiac disease but went gluten-free before screening, your results would end up false-negative. As @trents mentioned, this can also happen when a total IGA test isn't done.
    • Seaperky
      I found at Disney springs and Disney they have specialist that when told about dietary restrictions they come and talk to you ,explain cross contamination measures tsken and work with you on choices. Its the one place I dont worry once I've explained I have celiac disease.  Thier gluten free options are awesome.
    • Churley
      Have you tried Pure Encapsulations supplements? This is a brand my doctor recommends for me. I have no issues with this brand.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.