Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Higher Ttg Than At Diagnosis


mattthom77

Recommended Posts

mattthom77 Newbie

It's been 4 months now since getting diagnosed and starting on the gluten-free diet.  When I first had the TTG blood test it came back as 33.  It's 4 months later, and I've still been having all the symptoms so I went back to the doctor and he did another TTG test and it came back 47.  He said that I've still been consuming gluten.  This shocked me because I have done so much reading and been very strict on my diet.  For the last month and a half I've not eaten out.  I've basically only eaten meats, vegetables, nuts, rice, and fruits.  My vitamins are all gluten-free, my toothpaste, shaving cream.  Two questions:  What does that 47 indicate?  And what hidden gluten could it possibly be?  Now I've tried to really up the bar on any possible cross-contamination, but the 47 seems high enough that I'm getting a gluten ingredient, not just some iota of cross-contamination on a rare occasion.  Is that true?  Also I was eating a lot of gluten-free processed products, and eating out when I first started on the gluten-free diet.  It seems like the 47 is high enough that I am still consuming gluten.  It seems like it wouldn't be so high if my stricter diet over the past month or two solved it.  I just want to feel better and get my life back as soon as possible.  Thanks for any help.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



GottaSki Mentor

It's been 4 months now since getting diagnosed and starting on the gluten-free diet.  When I first had the TTG blood test it came back as 33.  It's 4 months later, and I've still been having all the symptoms so I went back to the doctor and he did another TTG test and it came back 47.  He said that I've still been consuming gluten.  This shocked me because I have done so much reading and been very strict on my diet.  For the last month and a half I've not eaten out.  I've basically only eaten meats, vegetables, nuts, rice, and fruits.  My vitamins are all gluten-free, my toothpaste, shaving cream.  Two questions:  What does that 47 indicate?  And what hidden gluten could it possibly be?  Now I've tried to really up the bar on any possible cross-contamination, but the 47 seems high enough that I'm getting a gluten ingredient, not just some iota of cross-contamination on a rare occasion.  Is that true?  Also I was eating a lot of gluten-free processed products, and eating out when I first started on the gluten-free diet.  It seems like the 47 is high enough that I am still consuming gluten.  It seems like it wouldn't be so high if my stricter diet over the past month or two solved it.  I just want to feel better and get my life back as soon as possible.  Thanks for any help.

 

Welcome!

 

Did the doctor run any of the other Celiac Antibody Tests?

 

The Deamidated Gliadin Peptide (DGP) - both IgA and IgG are most sensitive...they are the first to rise with gluten ingestion and the first to fall when completely gluten-free.

 

If you are being as careful as stated above -- I would carry on and wait another three months to test again.

 

Is your kitchen gluten-free?  If you are in a shared kitchen do make sure you are aware of all the places gluten can hid.  Here is a link for great info:

 

https://www.celiac.com/forums/topic/91878-newbie-info-101/

cyclinglady Grand Master

I'm at a loss.  I hope someone else can help you. 

 

I've been gluten-free for over three months.  I only had abdominal symptoms that developed between my blood test and biopsy (yes, I ate a loaf of good bread a day, I kid you not!).  Those symptoms dissipated after six weeks.  Now, it's hard to tell if I get glutened which is dangerous since my initial  symptoms were only anemia and Hashimoto's Thyroiditis.   Having fractured a vertebrae (bone scan in two weeks), I'm worried that I'm not building bone despite all the supplements I'm taking.  Though I believe my anemia has been resolved, so that's a good sign.  So, I might very well be in the same boat as you!

nvsmom Community Regular

It can take a while for the antibodies to turn off. It is not instantaneous as soon as gluten is cut out of your diet. If your body have been making tTG antibodies for a while, it may continue to do so for months yet. Some of the antibodies are in response to damage in the gut, so until the damage is gone, you might still have them... I know that seems crazy since tTG makes more damage but as long as you aren't eating gluten, and revving up those antibodies to high levels, it will slowly come down in most cases.

 

My tTG levels are pretty close to yours, but I have been gluten-free for over a year. we have to be patient.

 

tTG levels can also be elevated by diabetes, chronic liver disease, crohn's or colitis, as well as hashimotos thyroiditis. If you have any of these problems (I have thyroiditis) it could cause your tTG levels to stay higher than most people's, or to be slower to come down.

 

Keep doing what you are doing. Recheck your lables everytime you eat something (even if it is already opened) and you might find something that has slipped past you.  I know I had a slip-up at 6months gluten-free because I didn't re-read a label, it happens.

 

Best wishes.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - Scott Adams replied to HAUS's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      7

      Sainsbury's Free From White Sliced Bread - Now Egg Free - Completely Ruined It

    2. - Scott Adams replied to deanna1ynne's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      13

      Inconclusive results

    3. - deanna1ynne replied to deanna1ynne's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      13

      Inconclusive results

    4. - cristiana replied to HAUS's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      7

      Sainsbury's Free From White Sliced Bread - Now Egg Free - Completely Ruined It


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,437
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    rednecksurfer
    Newest Member
    rednecksurfer
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
      In the U.S., most regular wheat breads are required to be enriched with certain B-vitamins and iron, but gluten-free breads are not required to be. Since many gluten-free products are not enriched, we usually encourage people with celiac disease to consider a multivitamin.  In the early 1900s, refined white flour replaced whole grains, and people began developing serious vitamin-deficiency diseases: Beriberi → caused by a lack of thiamin (vitamin B1) Pellagra → caused by a lack of niacin (vitamin B3) Anemia → linked to low iron and lack of folate By the 1930s–40s, these problems were common in the U.S., especially in poorer regions. Public-health officials responded by requiring wheat flour and the breads made from it to be “enriched” with thiamin, riboflavin, niacin, and iron. Folic acid was added later (1998) to prevent neural-tube birth defects. Why gluten-free bread isn’t required to be enriched? The U.S. enrichment standards were written specifically for wheat flour. Gluten-free breads use rice, tapioca, corn, sorghum, etc.—so they fall outside that rule—but they probably should be for the same reason wheat products are.
    • Scott Adams
      Keep in mind that there are drawbacks to a formal diagnosis, for example more expensive life and private health insurance, as well as possibly needing to disclose it on job applications. Normally I am in favor of the formal diagnosis process, but if you've already figured out that you can't tolerate gluten and will likely stay gluten-free anyway, I wanted to at least mention the possible negative sides of having a formal diagnosis. While I understand wanting a formal diagnosis, it sounds like she will likely remain gluten-free either way, even if she should test negative for celiac disease (Approximately 10x more people have non-celiac gluten sensitivity than have celiac disease, but there isn’t yet a test for NCGS. If her symptoms go away on a gluten-free diet, it would likely signal NCGS).        
    • JoJo0611
    • deanna1ynne
      Thank you all so much for your advice and thoughts. We ended up having another scope and more bloodwork last week. All serological markers continue to increase, and the doc who did the scope said there villous atrophy visible on the scope — but we just got the biopsy pathology report back, and all it says is, “Duodenal mucosa with patchy increased intraepithelial lymphocytes, preserved villous architecture, and patchy foveolar metaplasia,” which we are told is still inconclusive…  We will have her go gluten free again anyway, but how soon would you all test again, if at all? How valuable is an official dx in a situation like this?
    • cristiana
      Thanks for this Russ, and good to see that it is fortified. I spend too much time looking for M&S gluten-free Iced Spiced Buns to have ever noticed this! That's interesting, Scott.  Have manufacturers ever said why that should be the case?  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.