Jump to content

  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):

    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Newbie In Los Angeles

Emily8608

Recommended Posts

Emily8608 Newbie
Emily8608
Posted

Hello everyone, 

 

I've been lurking for a few weeks but waited until my blood test came back to join. I have quite a few of the standard symptoms and more of the vague ones, but I won't bother going in to those now. I'm more looking for confirmation of my blood work and advice for the LA area. First, my results (for what it's worth I have not seen a doctor about any of this yet, instead I chose to get the tests done at a lab and pay out of pocket in case I was crazy and wrong then I wouldn't have to deal with an MD charging me to tell me that):

 

tTg AB, IGA 9, normal listed as <4

IgA 163, normal 81-463

Endomysial antibody screen (IGA) with reflex to titer was positive, normal is negative

Endomysial antibody titer 1:5, normal is <1:5

 

I'm a nurse, which is both helpful and harmful at times. I know that with blood work there is a lot of variation with how "abnormal" a particular test is. As in some tests are very abnormal when the numbers are off by just a few, while others are not concerning until they are off by a few hundred. Because of this knowledge and trouble finding more specific info online, I can't figure out if my results are REALLY positive or a weak positive. Any interpretation here would be helpful.

 

Second question, does anyone live in the Los Angeles area and have advice on doctors? It looks like UCLA has a Celiac Clinic but I don't know much more about it. I'm new to the area and since I'm taking a job at USC starting next month I don't have insurance details all figured out as to who I can see and who I can't. I'm sure docs at USC will be covered, but as far as I can tell they don't have celiac specialists per se. If anyone has a GI in town that they really like I would love to hear about them. 

 

Thanks in advance!

 

Emily

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


GottaSki Mentor
GottaSki
Posted

Welcome Emily!

 

With celiac antibody tests there really is no difference between "weak positive" and positive.  Many labs still list the results in degrees, but positive is simply positive.  I had mild positives on each test in the celiac panel with complete villious atrophy and I've seen folks with huge antibody numbers that had much more mild intestinal damage....we are simply all different.

 

I suggest you do make your GI appointment with the UCLA Celiac Center -- finding a gastroenterologist with real celiac knowledge and experience is important.

 

I knew the former Director of UCLA's center, Dr. Gregory Harmon, but the last person I referred there found he has left practice to concentrate on teaching/research.  Would think his replacement would still be a very good choice.

 

Minimally, you will want to have more blood work to complete the celiac antibody panel along with nutrient testing.

 

Good Luck :)

nvsmom Community Regular
nvsmom
Posted

I agree that a positive is a positive. Think of it like pregnancy testing - for some people those double lines are very faint, but they still mean the same thing..

 

And I would not call your tTG IgA result a weak positive. You are about triple the normal upper limit; a non-celiac would have a result of 1, not 9. KWIM?

 

The deaminated gliadin peptide tests (both IgA and IgG) and the tTG IgG tests would be good ones to request. Are you going to pursue the biopsy?  Two positive celiac tests is really quite definitive, and I think you could accept celiac disease as a true diagnosis already.  Then again I'm biased, I went gluten-free based on a positive tTG IgA and EMA IgA (skipped the biopsy) and I feel much better.

 

Don't go gluten-free until your testing is done - you probably already know that.  :)

 

Good luck.

Fenrir Community Regular
Fenrir
Posted

From what I read the test is like a pregancy test, positive or negative. You are producing antibodies that you shouldn't be at all, so that indicates something is going wrong. However, small number of people with a weak positive result will have another autoimmune disease that might cause a false positive but that is a pretty small number.

 

My test results were almost exactly the same as yours but I'm not diagnosied with Celiac yet. I just had my biopsies done yesterday, so I will find out by the end of the week.

 

In any case, you should get the EGD with biopsies done to confirm it.

 

My tTG IGA was 8 (normal 0-3).

NoGlutenCooties Contributor
NoGlutenCooties
Posted

Hi Emily and Welcome!

 

Just wanted to add that my ttg iga was 13, on a scale that considered anything over 11 as positive.  My biopsy showed moderate to severe villi damage.  So don't be fooled... positive is positive.  Welcome to the one club you never really wanted to join!

Fenrir Community Regular
Fenrir
Posted

Just and FYI, got my biopsies back this afternoon and I have Celiac. 

 

So, like people said, positive is positive. Mine was classified as "weak" positive and I most definitely had Celiac per the biopsy.

cyclinglady Grand Master
cyclinglady
Posted

Aw.... Welcome to the club! Here's to a speedy recovery!

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


Emily8608 Newbie
Emily8608
Posted
  • Author

Thank you all for the quick follow up! I definitely intend to get the biopsy done as I don't think that my family or I can manage the lifestyle change without an official diagnosis. There's also no chance of me going gluten-free before the biopsy as I am currently eating my way through what I'm calling my "Gluten Bucket List" of things I won't be able to eat afterwards. Being vegan we already eat lots of naturally gluten free foods, but there are of course plenty of things that I'm disappointed to give up and so I'm eating them now. I'm paying for it with increased symptoms now, but I think this is better than finding out about celiac and having to give up gluten cold-turkey.  I'm blessed with an incredibly supportive boyfriend who has already gone through the house figuring out what we need to get rid of and is finding substitutes for my favorite things. I think he got more excited about the selection of gluten-free/vegan frozen pizzas he found at Whole Foods today than I did. : )

 

Fenrir, sorry about your official diagnosis, but I hope you start feeling better soon! Sounds like we will be newbies together. 

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):


  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,683
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748
    Jean Tonkin
    Newest Member
    Jean Tonkin
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):


  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
      Draft gluten-free ciders… can they be trusted ?

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      I'd go with a vodka tonic, but that's just me😉
    • Rejoicephd
      Draft gluten-free ciders… can they be trusted ?

      By Rejoicephd · Posted

      That and my nutritionist also said that drinking cider is one of the worst drink choices for me, given that I have candida overgrowth.  She said the combination of the alcohol and sugar would be very likely to worsen my candida problem.  She suggested that if I drink, I go for clear vodka, either neat or with a splash of cranberry.   So in summary, I am giving ciders a rest.  Whether it's a gluten risk or sugars and yeast overgrowth, its just not worth it.
    • Inkie
      Tea Bags and Gluten

      By Inkie · Posted

      Thank you for the information ill will definitely bring it into practice .
    • Scott Adams
      Tea Bags and Gluten

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      While plain, pure tea leaves (black, green, or white) are naturally gluten-free, the issue often lies not with the tea itself but with other ingredients or processing. Many flavored teas use barley malt or other gluten-containing grains as a flavoring agent, which would be clearly listed on the ingredient label. Cross-contamination is another possibility, either in the facility where the tea is processed or, surprisingly, from the tea bag material itself—some tea bags are sealed with a wheat-based glue. Furthermore, it's important to consider that your reaction could be to other substances in tea, such as high levels of tannins, which can be hard on the stomach, or to natural histamines or other compounds that can cause a non-celiac immune response. The best way to investigate is to carefully read labels for hidden ingredients, try switching to a certified gluten-free tea brand that uses whole leaf or pyramid-style bags, and see if the reaction persists.
    • Scott Adams
      Inconclusive results

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      This is a challenging and confusing situation. The combination of a positive EMA—which is a highly specific marker rarely yielding false positives—alongside strongly elevated TTG on two separate occasions, years apart, is profoundly suggestive of celiac disease, even in the absence of biopsy damage. This pattern strongly aligns with what is known as "potential celiac disease," where the immune system is clearly activated, but intestinal damage has not yet become visible under the microscope. Your concern about the long-term risk of continued gluten consumption is valid, especially given your family's experience with the consequences of delayed diagnosis. Since your daughter is now at an age where her buy-in is essential for a gluten-free lifestyle, obtaining a definitive answer is crucial for her long-term adherence and health. Given that she is asymptomatic yet serologically positive, a third biopsy now, after a proper 12-week challenge, offers the best chance to capture any microscopic damage that may have developed, providing the concrete evidence needed to justify the dietary change. This isn't about wanting her to have celiac; it's about wanting to prevent the insidious damage that can occur while waiting for symptoms to appear, and ultimately giving her the unambiguous "why" she needs to accept and commit to the necessary treatment. This article might be helpful. It breaks down each type of test, and what a positive results means in terms of the probability that you might have celiac disease. One test that always needs to be done is the IgA Levels/Deficiency Test (often called "Total IGA") because some people are naturally IGA deficient, and if this is the case, then certain blood tests for celiac disease might be false-negative, and other types of tests need to be done to make an accurate diagnosis. The article includes the "Mayo Clinic Protocol," which is the best overall protocol for results to be ~98% accurate.    
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.