Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

SPinch03

Recommended Posts

SPinch03 Apprentice

ahhh as soon as I think I'm a step closer to knowing what is wrong I get thrown another curve ball!

So here is a little bit of info about me.. 27 year old female with Hashimoto's thyroiditis.  I've suddenly developed iron deficiency anemia.  After doing some research and seeing my doctor I learned that a lot of people with Hashimoto's can also have celiac disease so we ordered some celiac blood tests  TTG (IgG/IgA) both came back normal (however total IgA wasn't tested..)  DGP IgA negative, and DGP IgG positive (3.59 IV anything above .90 IV considered positive).  After getting my blood test results back I made an appointment with my GI doctor and had the endoscopy done yesterday..  I also work in the hospital laboratory so I know the pathologists and all so I called today and he said he didn't see any signs of celiac but wants to pass it around to the other pathologists to make sure, he did say I have gastritis tho with no signs of H. pylori...told me to come talk to him tomorrow but now I'm stressed out and confused!! :/  any advice?


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



nvsmom Community Regular

I would assume that you have celiac disease with a positive test over four times the normal, and a history of other autoimmune disease. The DGP IgG is 99-100% specific to celiac disease so a positive test is almost surely caused by celiac disease.  See this report, on page 12, for more info about the reliability of the tests. Open Original Shared Link There's info on the biopsies beginning on page 8.

 

It's not unusual for a celiac to be positive in one test yet negative in another, or positive in the blood tests with negative biopsies, or positive biopsies with negative blood tests.... That's why they run so many tests, they're more likely to catch the celiacs who would otherwise slip through the cracks.

 

Good luck with your appointment!

  • 3 weeks later...
queenieheather Newbie

ahhh as soon as I think I'm a step closer to knowing what is wrong I get thrown another curve ball!

So here is a little bit of info about me.. 27 year old female with Hashimoto's thyroiditis.  I've suddenly developed iron deficiency anemia.  After doing some research and seeing my doctor I learned that a lot of people with Hashimoto's can also have celiac disease so we ordered some celiac blood tests  TTG (IgG/IgA) both came back normal (however total IgA wasn't tested..)  DGP IgA negative, and DGP IgG positive (3.59 IV anything above .90 IV considered positive).  After getting my blood test results back I made an appointment with my GI doctor and had the endoscopy done yesterday..  I also work in the hospital laboratory so I know the pathologists and all so I called today and he said he didn't see any signs of celiac but wants to pass it around to the other pathologists to make sure, he did say I have gastritis tho with no signs of H. pylori...told me to come talk to him tomorrow but now I'm stressed out and confused!! :/  any advice?

Hi, I am 28 years old with hashimoto's disease. I was diagnosed 10 years ago with Hashi's. About 4 years ago I went gluten-free the day my mom was diagnosed with Celiac. My hashi's antibodies have gone away completely with a STRICT gluten-free diet. I never bothered with the run around of testing for it. I am now 100% sure I have it too. After I encounter an accidental gluten contaminant I now have horrible GI symptoms, fatigue, headaches...  It becomes so clear even without a doctor "officially" diagnosing me. Mine was so severe and went on so long that I no longer have any thyroid function. Try a gluten-free diet!! Do it ASAP and you may be able to save the thyroid function you have left!

  • 2 weeks later...
postepay Newbie

What is the best resorce where to look for a good medical center where to perform a test to seacrh for a gluten intollerancy ?

kareng Grand Master

What is the best resorce where to look for a good medical center where to perform a test to seacrh for a gluten intollerancy ?

 

 

This is a bit off topic here but - any doctor can do the blood test for Celiac.  If it is positive, they will send you to a GI doctor.

nora-n Rookie

spinch, you work in a lab, you can ask the pathologist to perform the immunohistochemistry tests. The biopsy can look completely normal (but yours are not normal there are signs of inflammation . You had increased number of IEL or those inflammation cells I mentioned ) Bit if the imunohistochemistry is positive for immune cells, then it is a definite celiac diagnosis. They are starting to do them on more and more biopsies over in Europe.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - Rogol72 replied to HAUS's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      8

      Sainsbury's Free From White Sliced Bread - Now Egg Free - Completely Ruined It

    2. - Scott Adams replied to HAUS's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      8

      Sainsbury's Free From White Sliced Bread - Now Egg Free - Completely Ruined It

    3. - Scott Adams replied to deanna1ynne's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      13

      Inconclusive results

    4. - deanna1ynne replied to deanna1ynne's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      13

      Inconclusive results


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,441
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Linda Boxdorfer
    Newest Member
    Linda Boxdorfer
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Rogol72
      @HAUS, I was at an event in the UK a few years back. I remember ringing the restaurant ahead to inquire about the gluten free options. All I wanted was a few gluten free sandwiches, which they provided and they were delicious. The gluten-free bread they used was Warbutons white bread and I remember mentioning it on this site before. No harm in trying it once. It's fortified with Calcium and Iron. https://www.warburtonsglutenfree.com/warbs_products/white-loaf/ The only other gluten-free bread that I've come across that is fortified is Schar with Iodized salt, nothing else.
    • Scott Adams
      In the U.S., most regular wheat breads are required to be enriched with certain B-vitamins and iron, but gluten-free breads are not required to be. Since many gluten-free products are not enriched, we usually encourage people with celiac disease to consider a multivitamin.  In the early 1900s, refined white flour replaced whole grains, and people began developing serious vitamin-deficiency diseases: Beriberi → caused by a lack of thiamin (vitamin B1) Pellagra → caused by a lack of niacin (vitamin B3) Anemia → linked to low iron and lack of folate By the 1930s–40s, these problems were common in the U.S., especially in poorer regions. Public-health officials responded by requiring wheat flour and the breads made from it to be “enriched” with thiamin, riboflavin, niacin, and iron. Folic acid was added later (1998) to prevent neural-tube birth defects. Why gluten-free bread isn’t required to be enriched? The U.S. enrichment standards were written specifically for wheat flour. Gluten-free breads use rice, tapioca, corn, sorghum, etc.—so they fall outside that rule—but they probably should be for the same reason wheat products are.
    • Scott Adams
      Keep in mind that there are drawbacks to a formal diagnosis, for example more expensive life and private health insurance, as well as possibly needing to disclose it on job applications. Normally I am in favor of the formal diagnosis process, but if you've already figured out that you can't tolerate gluten and will likely stay gluten-free anyway, I wanted to at least mention the possible negative sides of having a formal diagnosis. While I understand wanting a formal diagnosis, it sounds like she will likely remain gluten-free either way, even if she should test negative for celiac disease (Approximately 10x more people have non-celiac gluten sensitivity than have celiac disease, but there isn’t yet a test for NCGS. If her symptoms go away on a gluten-free diet, it would likely signal NCGS).        
    • JoJo0611
    • deanna1ynne
      Thank you all so much for your advice and thoughts. We ended up having another scope and more bloodwork last week. All serological markers continue to increase, and the doc who did the scope said there villous atrophy visible on the scope — but we just got the biopsy pathology report back, and all it says is, “Duodenal mucosa with patchy increased intraepithelial lymphocytes, preserved villous architecture, and patchy foveolar metaplasia,” which we are told is still inconclusive…  We will have her go gluten free again anyway, but how soon would you all test again, if at all? How valuable is an official dx in a situation like this?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.