Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

What Do I Do?


Kfrog

Recommended Posts

Kfrog Rookie

Hi! I'm so glad to find this place. My mother (who has Celiac) mentioned it might be good to get some advice here. Thanks in advance! I really hope this is the right place to ask, please let me know if I'm being rude or should post elsewhere! :)

 

For the last three years I've had:

Bloating

Extreme gassiness

Diarrhea (often three to four times a day)

Abdominal soreness

Abdominal pain

Bloody diarrhea

Bone/joint pain

 

I went to a Celiac center due to my mom having Celiac and they originally were like "Oh, IBS" but once they realize I was my mom's daughter, they did a bunch of bloodwork. I don't have the tests handy, but they indicated Chron's disease and I remember that CRP was ridiculously high.

 

I underwent an endoscopy and colonoscopy. I got a call saying the biopsies were all negative and that I should maybe try a gluten free diet if I wanted to, and otherwise to assume I "just" had IBS. I accepted this and continued to try to manage my symptoms.

 

My doctor sent me to a rheumatologist based on some weird "ANA" results. The doctor was quite mean and only wanted to prescribe psychiatric medications, despite no psychiatric issues other than being a bit depressed that my bum is constantly chapped! (Literally I walked in, he looked at some test results, and was like "you probably need psych meds" and started to write out a script for Prozac. I stood up and left and filed a complaint.)

 

In the last six months, the pain got a lot worse. I went to the ER twice based on horrific stomach pain that had me think I had a colon blockage or something. Diarrhea three or four times a day, sometimes bloody, generally miserable stomach pains. I asked my old doctor to send me a copy of my biopsies. Quite clearly in the pathology report it states "indicative of mild/beginning celiac disease."

 

Since I currently don't have good insurance coverage, I went rogue and am three months into a completely gluten free, dairy free, caesin free, diet. I feel a lot better and am down to maybe one or two episodes of diarrhea a week. 

 

My insurance coverage starts soon and I'm not sure what to do. Are there more tests I should ask for? Do I want to/have to go through the biopsies again? If so, I'll have to start eating gluten again and I really don't feel like being that miserable again. Does this sound like celiac to you? What would you do if you were me?

 


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



BlessedMommy Rising Star

Sounds like celiac to me, especially with the positive biopsy. What did your bloodwork say?

 

I don't see why you'd have to go back to eating gluten again, though, especially since:

 

A) Your biopsy was positive

B) You experienced symptom resolution with the gluten-free diet

C) Celiac runs in your family

mamaw Community Regular

My opinion  is  if  you are  happy  with  the  better  health  you are  starting  to have  &  can  live  with  the pathology  report  then I would  never  subject  my body to ever eating gluten again.. And  then  lets  not forget  that  your  parent  has celiac as well....for  me  those  two  would  seal it for  me..... the  biopsies  could  be  negative  just  because  they  didn't  hit  a  spot that  may have  shown  damage or  maybe  they  only took one  biopsy,   

In the  end  the decision  is  yours  to make......everyone  is  different  some  just  feel better  &  don't  care  about  a  piece  of  paper stating  "celiac"   others  need  to  have  that  documentation  to  feel  the  necessity  of the  gluten-free  lifestyle....

BlessedMommy Rising Star

That is bewildering that the doctor would state that the biopsy was negative, when your biopsy found evidence of celiac. If it were me, I would take that copy of the pathology report and take it to a doctor (a new one if need be), get that diagnosis and keep eating gluten free for life.

 

It seems like the "negative biopsy" could have been a communication error.

nvsmom Community Regular

I'm glad you are feeling better in spite of the mediacl advice you received. That's a crying shame that they did not share the correct results of your biopsy with you! :angry:

 

It sounds like celiac disease to me too.  I think you did the right thing going gluten-free when you did.  If you decide to do more testing, you'll need to resume eating gluten (equivalent of 1-2 slices of bread per day) for 2-4 weeks for the biopsy, and 8-12 weeks for the blood tests. The longer the better.  :(

 

If you get the blood tests done, these are the ones to ask for:

  • tTG IgA and tTG IgG (most common tests)
  • DGP IgA and DGP IgG (newer tests which areoften better for diagnosing "early" celiac disease)
  • EMA IgA (detects more advanced celiac disease, and is rarely positive if the tTG IgA is negative)
  • AGA IgA and AGA IgG (older and less reliable tests)
  • total serum IgA (a control  test)

This report has more info on the tsets on pages 8-12: Open Original Shared Link

 

Good luck with whatever you decide to do.  :)

FruitEnthusiast Enthusiast

Another thing to consider is that you don't have to be Celiac to have damage internally and severe symptoms. I'm Non-Celiac Gluten Intolerant, as far as I know, my blood test was negative, and I'm still recovering two years later. If you felt better after removing gluten I would consider that the best test of all.

 

By the way, I had two doctors say my symptoms were "psychosomatic" before I went to one that thought gluten could be the problem. I understand how insulting and frustrating that can be. Sorry it happened to you too. Many of us here have experienced that same thing.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      130,703
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Bobbie Jean
    Newest Member
    Bobbie Jean
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.3k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Grahamsnaturalworld
      Where can I find a gastro in adelaide who can diagnose refractory celiac disease have seen 3 so far and don't understand the most obvious question, why my celiac symptoms did not resolve on a gluten free diet the symptoms just got worse as it is attacking my nervous system. 
    • ShariW
      I recently traveled to Spain and Portugal. I was with a tour group, they knew I needed to be gluten-free and made sure the kitchens preparing the group meals were aware. But just in case, I took Gliadin-X with me and took it for every evening meal - and most other meals. The one time I got glutened was from lunch early in the trip - had to be from cross-contamination. I had not taken Gliadin-X before that meal, which made for a pretty miserable day. Learned my lesson... 😞 
    • Hummer01
      Hi trents, thanks for the response.  The 2nd opinion doctor said that if my CRP is still elevated at that time, he would advise me to look at Crohns/UC or another autoimmune issue. The colonoscopy I had this year seemed to rule those 2 out for now so he still believed celiac may explain it. No previous doctors have suggested any explanation for it even after calling to tell me it was a concerning result.  I guess it feels tough knowing I have positive blood testing, permissive genetics, and visible duodenum changes... and somehow it's NCGS instead of celiac. I'm still surprised the biopsies came back negative when the doctor was so sure they would be positive.
    • trents
      "He also said that my CRP should return to a normal level at this time if the culprit was inflammation in the small intestine due to celiac." But with if the elevated CRP levels are caused by some other inflammatory process going on in your body? "She also said that my positive EMA isn't valuable because it has "a high false positive rate." Totally wrong! This is a highly accurate test for celiac disease, that requires specialized expertise to perform and interpret, and it is more expensive than other blood tests. It is generally used as a last test to confirm celiac disease after a positive tTG-IgA test. The sensitivity of a test refers to its ability to correctly identify individuals with the condition. For the EMA-IgA blood test, the sensitivity is generally very high, ranging from 90% to 98%. This means that the test can accurately detect celiac disease in a significant percentage of people who have the condition. The specificity of a test refers to its ability to correctly identify individuals without the condition. For the EMA-IgA blood test, the specificity is also high, typically around 95% to 100%. This indicates that the test can effectively rule out celiac disease in individuals who do not have the condition. Taken from the following article: Looking at the whole picture, I am wondering if you are transitioning from NCGS to celiac disease. Some experts in the gluten disorder field believe NCGS can be a precursor to celiac disease.
    • Hummer01
      Hi all, just wanted to post an update.  I have been gluten free for about 1.5 months now and seeing improvement already in the bathroom.  Recently I had a visit with another GI doctor for a 2nd opinion. He said that while my blood tests and scope are not a "slam dunk" for celiac, he believes it's more likely than not that I have it. His advice was to stay with a celiac-level gluten free diet (no CC) for 6-12 months then retest to make sure TTG-IGA is still negative. He also said that my CRP should return to a normal level at this time if the culprit was inflammation in the small intestine due to celiac.  Today I had a follow up with the original GI that performed the scope. She is confident it is NCGS and says I can still have gluten sometimes. When I asked about the visible duodenum damage, she said it is just "irritation" from gluten because the biopsies were negative. She also said that my positive EMA isn't valuable because it has "a high false positive rate."  I guess I'm having trouble reconciling the totally different advice from these 2 GI's. I want to believe the new doctor more at this point because what he said just makes more sense to me, and he gave an actionable timeline for possible next steps. Feeling lost and disappointed at this point and wanted to write it down here in case anyone has input. Thank you.   
×
×
  • Create New...