Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Labs Completely Different From 2 Different Labs? One + One -


StephanieL

Recommended Posts

StephanieL Enthusiast

Has anyone had this happen?

 

We had one test 2 weeks ago with <10 tTG  (<20 is negative)

 

ONE WEEK LATER- different lab  tTG of 25 (<20 is negative)

 

 

Nothing changed. Nothing unusual. Nothing new. 

 

:blink:

 

 

 

 


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



nvsmom Community Regular

I have had that happen only with TSH testing, and the doctors always (and in my case, wrongly) went with the normal result. They don't seem to believe in "best 2 out of 3". LOL

No wait, I once had my tTG IgA tested about a month apart and the results differed by almost 20 points. At the time I had been gluten-free for close to a year, but the results were both in the positive range.

Your body is not static and tests do not always correlate to what is happening in the body. Definitely confusing.

What is the doctor saying?

StephanieL Enthusiast

No one has a clue as far as they are telling me.  

 

This is for my DS- 

 

I feel like I can't trust these labs anymore. These labs and poor growth sent us to major Celiac player. As I said- 2 weeks apart but processed at different labs with totally differing results?  It's making me completely crazy. I have had iron test for donating blood where one finger is low then the other is okay so I do understand fluctuations but for one to be <10 (non detectable) and the other positive?  

GottaSki Mentor

Did he have any other celiac antibody test?

The DGPs should be included with initial along with follow up blood work.

IrishHeart Veteran

Lab results may vary from lab to lab. The interpretation of results will also vary in ranges.

 

You should always have blood tests drawn from the SAME lab.

 

This is my celiac doc's opinion.  I agree. I have seen some things fluctuate erratically in just a few weeks,.(all wrong, therefore)

 

For example, It can also be changed if you are fasting. (this is not relevant to the test you mean right now, of course)

 

No one seems to know this, but labs will vary on glucose readings and the  TSH for thyroid, etc, if you have eaten or not.

SMRI Collaborator

If they get the right side of the slide vs the left side of the slide and how the smear was done, the results can vary.  That is why there is often such a huge range of "normal" for blood work.  Also, your blood contents are not static, maybe that one pump just didn't have the same amount in it?  Also, how good is the person doing the tests.  In my repeat TgA test, varied but 5 parts, same lab, two days apart???  Yes, you have more of a range, but how much gluten was he eating in that two week span, etc, etc, etc.  Maybe you can sit down with the lab tech at your dr's office and see how they run the samples and talk to them why they vary so much from reading to reading.

StephanieL Enthusiast

There was no gluten ingested in the week and a half. We were told to go to Mayos lab by one of the top Celiac Dr's in the world. We aren't talking the difference between a few points. At MINIMUM we're talking 15 points different. Now I'm pretty up on things and that margin of error seems unusually hight to me when the specificity of the test is so high. I can't talk to the tech who did the test. They don't give that information out to people.

Any of you have documentation supporting the ideas that specifically with the tTG, there is that wide a margin of error? I'm more than happy to entertain those ideas if there is something to back it up.

None of his blood work has been fasting.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



GottaSki Mentor

There was no gluten ingested in the week and a half. We were told to go to Mayos lab by one of the top Celiac Dr's in the world. We aren't talking the difference between a few points. At MINIMUM we're talking 15 points different. Now I'm pretty up on things and that margin of error seems unusually hight to me when the specificity of the test is so high. I can't talk to the tech who did the test. They don't give that information out to people.

Any of you have documentation supporting the ideas that specifically with the tTG, there is that wide a margin of error? I'm more than happy to entertain those ideas if there is something to back it up.

None of his blood work has been fasting.

Here is the problem..in my opinion. Many of us encounter lab inconsistencies, but we are not actively publishing our results. The results that are published with regard to celiac are performed in controlled settings of the best celiac centers in the world.

In your situation, I would push for a third and if you have only run tTG....I would add the balance of the celiac antibody panel.

Again...all my opinion based on years of reading published journals and trying to match that information to my family's testing experience along with the many members here whom post their less than textbook results.

SMRI Collaborator

There was no gluten ingested in the week and a half. We were told to go to Mayos lab by one of the top Celiac Dr's in the world. We aren't talking the difference between a few points. At MINIMUM we're talking 15 points different. Now I'm pretty up on things and that margin of error seems unusually hight to me when the specificity of the test is so high. I can't talk to the tech who did the test. They don't give that information out to people.

Any of you have documentation supporting the ideas that specifically with the tTG, there is that wide a margin of error? I'm more than happy to entertain those ideas if there is something to back it up.

None of his blood work has been fasting.

 

Lab tests in general have a wide range of normal. It's not my "idea", it just is what it is. Look at the ranges for past blood work.   Also, looking at my own lab results from Mayo <20 is negative, but positive is >30 for the IgG, so, even if the numbers above differ, interpretive data is the same...it's not a positive.   My results  

Open Original Shared Link

June 20, 2014

66.5 ic_note.gif
 
 
Open Original Shared Link

<20.0 (Negative) U

Interpretation: Positive (>30.0)

 

This is my IgA total, the wide range of normal shown:  

Open Original Shared Link

June 20, 2014

205 mg/dL
 
 
Open Original Shared Link

61 - 356 mg/dL  

 

Open Original Shared Link

June 20, 2014

23.5 ic_note.gif
 
 
Open Original Shared Link

<20.0 (Negative) U

Interpretation: Weak Positive (20.0-30.0)

This is a weak positive--but since all of my other results came back positive, including biopsy and genetic testing, it doesn't really matter......but, if that is the ONLY test you are looking it, it's going to cause confusion.

 

 

There is also the question of the quality of the person conducting the lab and the actual sample itself.  Again, talk to a lab tech somewhere, they will explain it to you.  What do the doctors say?

GottaSki Mentor

Lab tests in general have a wide range of normal. It's not my "idea", it just is what it is. Look at the ranges for past blood work. Also, looking at my own lab results from Mayo <20 is negative, but positive is >30 for the IgG, so, even if the numbers above differ, interpretive data is the same...it's not a positive. My results

Open Original Shared Link

June 20, 2014

66.5 U ic_note.gif

Open Original Shared Link

<20.0 (Negative) U

Interpretation: Positive (>30.0)

This is my IgA total, the wide range of normal shown:

Open Original Shared Link

June 20, 2014

205 mg/dL

Open Original Shared Link

61 - 356 mg/dL

Open Original Shared Link

June 20, 2014

23.5 U ic_note.gif

Open Original Shared Link

<20.0 (Negative) U

Interpretation: Weak Positive (20.0-30.0)

This is a weak positive--but since all of my other results came back positive, including biopsy and genetic testing, it doesn't really matter......

There is also the question of the quality of the person conducting the lab and the actual sample itself. Again, talk to a lab tech somewhere, they will explain it to you. What do the doctors say?

I don't understand your point.

Yes, lab ranges differ and there are wide ranges of normal.

SMRI Collaborator

I don't understand your point.

Yes, lab ranges differ and there are wide ranges of normal.

The OP wanted me to back up the info that there is a wide range of normal in labs and results do differ from lab to lab....and the interpretive data of her 2 tests is the same, not positive.

StephanieL Enthusiast

There is a range of normal. Sure. But how do 2 tests 10 days apart show negative results and positive results.  

SMRI Collaborator

Again..differences in lab quality, sample quality, technician quality, etc, etc, and if the second lab was the Mayo lab, it is not positive...

StephanieL Enthusiast

It would be a weak positive at Mayo but that was the local (also known around the country).  Which it shouldn't be after 4 years gluten-free. Which is why we went to the top Doc and all that jazz.

beth01 Enthusiast

If you took a blood sample to Lab A and they run a platelet count 20 times they should get roughly the same answer 20 times, give or take a few points.  You could then take the same sample to Lab B and they have a different analyzer that uses just a little different methodology in determining a plt count and run the sample through 20 times, you should still be getting roughly the same answer but it won't necessarily be the same answer the first lab gave you. Same with any other analyte.

 

There are also a lot of variables, sample quality( if the person drawing your blood had a hard time, that can effect the quality), quantity can be an issue, sometimes there are bubbles on the top of the sample that the analyzer aspirates giving false results, or sometimes a specimen is mislabeled.  It happens.

 

Are you talking a IgA tTg?  Mine was run at Mayo and my reference range is <4 is considered negative.

 

I would worry more if it was the same lab giving you varying results.  Always have them done if possible at the same lab.

StephanieL Enthusiast

But if lab A and lab B are using the same test for the same thing- shouldn't the results be similar? Perhaps a few points off but a compleat negative vs. a positive?

Also I realize in a perfect world all the labs would be done at the same place but the reality is that Dr's change, insurance changes, labs covered change and that's life. There are standards for labs I assume so that if it's the same test and the same method the results should be similar.

How many people are walking around thinking they have positives from one lab and they really aren't?

SMRI Collaborator

But if lab A and lab B are using the same test for the same thing- shouldn't the results be similar? Perhaps a few points off but a compleat negative vs. a positive?

Also I realize in a perfect world all the labs would be done at the same place but the reality is that Dr's change, insurance changes, labs covered change and that's life. There are standards for labs I assume so that if it's the same test and the same method the results should be similar.

How many people are walking around thinking they have positives from one lab and they really aren't?

 

A lot of lab testing is subjective though--they look at a slide and count how many whatever's they see--so if they have a sample that isn't a very good sample--they don't see everything, thus the wide range of normal. Then, your blood isn't equally saturated with the enzymes or whatever so, if they have a sample that is on the lower end of that, like your first test I suspect, the numbers are going to vary.  There are reasons they do more than one test to confirm and if the numbers are borderline like your numbers, it would be prudent to do more testing.  Have you had the full panel run and if so, what were those numbers?  How about a biopsy, what did that say?  Genetic testing??  If your numbers came back at 120, probably don't need more testing for a firm positive, but when neither of your lab results are a firm positive, then you move on to the next round.  You are trying to make the lab test and exact test/numbers and they just are not.  So, now it's time to move on and either do more testing or look for another cause.

RMJ Mentor

I used to develop tests for antibodies. They are not perfect. Run the same sample twice and the numerical results will be off by a bit. If a different person runs the test, or it is run on a different day, the results will be further off. I looked at information on the FDA website for one manufacturer of celiac DGP tests. When two different tests manufactured by the same company were compared, 217 out of 228 samples gave the same result (both positive or both negative). So 11 of 228 samples were positive on one test and negative on the other.

beth01 Enthusiast

Lab A and Lab B are testing for the same antibody but not necessarily using the same testing equipment.  It would be like saying traveling 800 miles by car is the same as traveling 800 miles by plane because you are in a vehicle, not taking into account the mode of transportation or time.  I really can't explain why the lab results are varying so much, I just know what can happen in labs to cause a large variance. Some is human error and some is specimen quality.  Unfortunately not 100% of lab tests can be correct 100% of the time.

RMJ Mentor

How many people are walking around thinking they have positives from one lab and they really aren't?

Several percent of the people tested. That is what it means to have a specificity of 96 or 97%. It is not accurate 100% of the time.

GottaSki Mentor

How many people are walking around thinking they have positives from one lab and they really aren't?

I worry more about the incorrect negative....while getting a positive in error is very disconcerting, at least a person with celiac disease would know to investigate more....while the person with many non-specific symptoms would cross celiac disease as a possibility : (

Have you decided to retest?

Also, maybe I missed...did he have positive or even high normal DGP..either IgA or IgG?

Hang in there!!!

SMRI Collaborator

I worry more about the incorrect negative....while getting a positive in error is very disconcerting, at least a person with celiac disease would know to investigate more....while the person with many non-specific symptoms would cross celiac disease as a possibility : (

Have you decided to retest?

Also, maybe I missed...did he have positive or even high normal DGP..either IgA or IgG?

Hang in there!!!

 

Neither test is a conclusive positive though so I don't know that the "negative" test is incorrect really.  

StephanieL Enthusiast

One Dr. wants a minimum 4-8 week challenge with scope at the end.

 

One said with an initial (4 +years ago) tTG of 122 with it falling to 78 after 6 months and continuing to fall that it is Celiac and even without a + biopsy we can be sure it's Celiac and to carry on.

 

No one can give me information on the variation in the tests.

GottaSki Mentor

One Dr. wants a minimum 4-8 week challenge with scope at the end.

 

One said with an initial (4 +years ago) tTG of 122 with it falling to 78 after 6 months and continuing to fall that it is Celiac and even without a + biopsy we can be sure it's Celiac and to carry on.

 

No one can give me information on the variation in the tests.

If symptoms are continuing gluten-free...I'd vote for endoscopy WITHOUT challenge. I had four annual endos until celiac biopsies finally improved. If he doesn't have symptoms I would simply carry on and wait for his next annual antibody panel.

Hang in there!

StephanieL Enthusiast

Except for the continued elevation in the tTG's and the fact that he's skin over bones, he's great.  

 

We are leaning towards do nothing now. There are logistics to doing a challenge.  

 

Lisa, I said this exact thing to them. I feel like a challenge has us jumping from A to C completely missing any information from step B ( which is kid 4+ years on gluten-free diet).  They don't seem to see this as an issue. 

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - Scott Adams replied to Jmartes71's topic in Dermatitis Herpetiformis
      1

      Natural remedies

    2. - Scott Adams replied to miguel54b's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      1

      Gluten and short-term memory.

    3. - Scott Adams replied to Suze046's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      1

      Reintroduction of Gluten

    4. - Scott Adams replied to Rejoicephd's topic in Coping with Celiac Disease
      2

      Draft gluten-free ciders… can they be trusted ?

    5. - Scott Adams replied to Mykidzz3's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      1

      High Cost of Gluten-Free Foods


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,369
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Nick H.
    Newest Member
    Nick H.
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
      While it's always important to approach internal use of essential oils with caution and ideally under the guidance of a qualified professional, your experience highlights the potential of complementary approaches when traditional medicine falls short. Many in the community are also interested in the intersection of natural wellness and gluten-free living, particularly for managing systemic inflammation and its various symptoms, so sharing your story is valuable. Your observation that it may also be helping with bloating is fascinating, as that could point to an overall reduction in inflammation. Thank you for sharing what is working for you!
    • Scott Adams
      It's interesting how a single, clear moment—like struggling during a game—can suddenly connect all the dots and reveal the hidden impact of gluten exposure. Your experience with short-term memory fog is a very real and documented symptom for many individuals with gluten sensitivity, often occurring alongside the other issues you mentioned like mood disturbances, sleep disruption, and digestive irregularity. It's a frustrating and often invisible effect that can make you feel unlike yourself, so that moment of clarity, though born from a tough dominoes match, is actually a powerful piece of self-knowledge. Identifying a specific culprit like that steak strip is a huge win, as it arms you with the information needed to avoid similar pitfalls in the future and protect your cognitive clarity. You are definitely not alone in experiencing this particular set of neurological and physical symptoms; it's a strong reminder of gluten's profound impact on the entire body, not just the digestive system. Supplementation may help you as well.  The most common nutrient deficiencies associated with celiac disease that may lead to testing for the condition include iron, vitamin D, folate (vitamin B9), vitamin B12, calcium, zinc, and magnesium.  Unfortunately many doctors, including my own doctor at the time, don't do extensive follow up testing for a broad range of nutrient deficiencies, nor recommend that those just diagnosed with celiac disease take a broad spectrum vitamin/mineral supplement, which would greatly benefit most, if not all, newly diagnosed celiacs. Because of this it took me decades to overcome a few long-standing issues I had that were associated with gluten ataxia, for example numbness and tingling in my feet, and muscle knots--especially in my shoulders an neck. Only long term extensive supplementation has helped me to resolve these issues.      
    • Scott Adams
      Approximately 10x more people have non-celiac gluten sensitivity than have celiac disease, but there isn’t yet a test for NCGS. If your symptoms go away on a gluten-free diet it would likely signal NCGS. What you're describing is a very common and frustrating experience when reintroducing gluten after a period of avoidance, and your timeline is perfectly consistent with a non-celiac gluten sensitivity. While a celiac reaction can be more immediate, a sensitivity reaction is often delayed, sometimes taking several days to manifest as your body's inflammatory response builds up; the fact that your symptoms returned a few days after reintroduction is a strong indicator that gluten is indeed the culprit, not a coincidence. Your doctor's advice to reintroduce it was necessary to confirm the diagnosis, as the initial negative celiac test and subsequent improvement on a gluten-free diet pointed strongly towards sensitivity. Many in this community have gone through this exact same process of elimination and challenging, and it's wise to reintroduce gently as you did. Given your clear reaction, the best course of action is likely to resume a strict gluten-free diet, as managing a sensitivity is the primary way to control those debilitating symptoms and allow your body to heal fully.
    • Scott Adams
      Your suspicion is almost certainly correct, and you are wise to be cautious. Draft cider is a very common and often overlooked source of cross-contact because the same tap lines are frequently used for both beer and cider; unless a bar has a dedicated line for gluten-free beverages, which is rare, the cider will run through tubing that has previously contained gluten-containing beer, contaminating your drink. The fact that you didn't react at a clean brewery suggests they may have had more meticulous practices or separate lines, but this is the exception, not the rule. Many in the community have had identical experiences, leading them to strictly avoid draft cider and opt for bottled or canned versions, which are poured directly from their sealed container and bypass the contaminated tap system entirely. Switching to bottles or cans is the safest strategy, and your plan to do so is a smart move to protect your health. PS - here are some articles on the topic:    
    • Scott Adams
      Your post really highlights the financial and emotional struggle so many families face. You are not alone in feeling frustrated by the high cost of gluten-free specialty items and the frustrating waste when your daughter can't tolerate them. A great place to start is by focusing on naturally gluten-free whole foods that are often more affordable and less processed, like rice, potatoes, beans, lentils, corn, eggs, and frozen fruits and vegetables—these are nutritional powerhouses that can form the basis of her meals. For the specialty items like bread and pasta, see if your local stores carry smaller, single-serving packages or allow returns if a product causes a reaction, as some companies understand this challenge. Regarding vitamins, that is an excellent next step; please ask her doctor to prescribe a high-quality gluten-free multivitamin, as insurance will often cover prescribed vitamins, making them much more affordable. Finally, connecting with a local celiac support group online can be a treasure trove of location-specific advice for finding the best and most affordable products in your area, saving you both time and money on the trial-and-error process. 
×
×
  • Create New...