Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

1 Year Old Too Young For Endoscopy?


nanderson85

Recommended Posts

nanderson85 Newbie

Hi There, 

I am new here and my DS just had blood work done and it came back positive for Celiac. My husband's sister as well as his cousin have Celiac so I wasn't surprised when the doctor wanted to check him but I am surprised that it came back positive because he does not have any symptoms, that I can tell/know of. I know he is one so he can't tell me how he feels but he isn't upset after eating and poops fairly normally, despite being a bit constipated after switching to cow's milk. I am really wondering if anyone knows how accurate the blood work is in someone his age and also if anyone else has gone through an endoscopy with a child this age. He has been eating solid good since he was 6 months - so about 8 months now - is it too early to see anything in a scope or could there already be damage? I tried researching online, but I only get more confused reading everything and there isn't too much that relates to children his age. Any advice/thoughts are welcome and appreciated! 

Jgapv0RSMvXvprO5G1rYkXG1nWNcniZL_lg.webp


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



nvsmom Community Regular

Welcome to the board.

 

The tests for celiac disease almost always indicate celiac disease.  The rate of false positives is very low, generally below 5%, and those weak positives (often the tTG IgA) are caused by something else like a serious infection, thyroiditis, diabetes, crohns, colitis, and chronic liver disease.  With a family history of celiac disease and no symptoms indicating other diseases, it is celiac disease.

 

This report (pages 10-12) discusses the various tests as well as  a chart (page 12) on the specificity of the disease - specificity means how often a positive is caused by the specific disease (celiac disease).  As you can see, the tests are pretty specific to celiac disease.  If he had more than one positive test, then celiac disease is pretty much a sure thing.  :(  Open Original Shared Link

 

The scope may show damage in him.  In adults, a celiac only needs to eat gluten in the 2-4 weeks prior to the endoscopy to have measurable damage in a biopsy. As long as your son is still consuming gluten, there is a good chance it will be found. Do ensure that at least 6 samples are taken if you choose to have the procedure done; the intestines have a surface area that is the same as a tennis court so if damage is patchy, it can be easy to miss.  

 

If the scope does come back negative, please remember that the scope misses up to 1 in 5 celiacs.  He has already had positive tests so you know he is a celiac no matter what the tests say.

 

Symptoms of celiac disease can be mild.  I was constipated as soon as solids were introduced into my diet.  I started getting stomachaches when I was school aged - it was nothing debilitating but I did lay down and squirm with the pain.  As the years passed my symptoms became more severe but no one figured it out because I was tall and active with C.  Kudos to you for finding this so early and helping him recover.  You'll be saving him years of pain and poor health.

 

This is an interesting article about the usefulness of watching for symptoms in diagnosing celiac disease in kids. Open Original Shared Link

 

Don't forget to retest his siblings and dad every couple of years for life if they continue to eat gluten, sooner if they show symptoms.  Celiac can manifest at any time in life.

 

Best wishes.

nanderson85 Newbie

Thank you for your reply and insight! I feel fortunate that Celiac is something that has been talked about in our family for a few years now so I am familiar with the basics...I know I still have so much to learn though and that worries me a bit. I want to do what is best and right for my son. I also do feel fortunate that it was caught so early, hopefully avoiding a lot of pain for him. We have an appointment with a GI specialist in early November so hopefully they will be able to give me even more insight. I am sure I will be back again with more questions! Thanks again  :)

nvsmom Community Regular

I'm happy to try to help.  :)  Good luck with the GI.  I hope he's a good one and knowledgeable in celiac disease.  Let us know how it goes.

  • 2 weeks later...
calabaza78 Newbie

Just popping in to say that my daughter was diagnosed via blood tests and EGD biopsy at 1 (technically, 21 months.) The report that was written on her biopsy indicated that the specimens did show intestinal damage characteristic of celiac.  

SMRI Collaborator

As far as procedures go, the endoscope is pretty "easy". It's light sedation, quick procedure and usually they will feel 100% shortly after waking up.  I'd do the scope if your dr says just because I know other people who've had issues with getting accommodations and whatnot in school if they are not "biopsy confirmed" Celiac----why, I don't know.  

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,685
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    tdouglas2901
    Newest Member
    tdouglas2901
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
      I'd go with a vodka tonic, but that's just me😉
    • Rejoicephd
      That and my nutritionist also said that drinking cider is one of the worst drink choices for me, given that I have candida overgrowth.  She said the combination of the alcohol and sugar would be very likely to worsen my candida problem.  She suggested that if I drink, I go for clear vodka, either neat or with a splash of cranberry.   So in summary, I am giving ciders a rest.  Whether it's a gluten risk or sugars and yeast overgrowth, its just not worth it.
    • Inkie
      Thank you for the information ill will definitely bring it into practice .
    • Scott Adams
      While plain, pure tea leaves (black, green, or white) are naturally gluten-free, the issue often lies not with the tea itself but with other ingredients or processing. Many flavored teas use barley malt or other gluten-containing grains as a flavoring agent, which would be clearly listed on the ingredient label. Cross-contamination is another possibility, either in the facility where the tea is processed or, surprisingly, from the tea bag material itself—some tea bags are sealed with a wheat-based glue. Furthermore, it's important to consider that your reaction could be to other substances in tea, such as high levels of tannins, which can be hard on the stomach, or to natural histamines or other compounds that can cause a non-celiac immune response. The best way to investigate is to carefully read labels for hidden ingredients, try switching to a certified gluten-free tea brand that uses whole leaf or pyramid-style bags, and see if the reaction persists.
    • Scott Adams
      This is a challenging and confusing situation. The combination of a positive EMA—which is a highly specific marker rarely yielding false positives—alongside strongly elevated TTG on two separate occasions, years apart, is profoundly suggestive of celiac disease, even in the absence of biopsy damage. This pattern strongly aligns with what is known as "potential celiac disease," where the immune system is clearly activated, but intestinal damage has not yet become visible under the microscope. Your concern about the long-term risk of continued gluten consumption is valid, especially given your family's experience with the consequences of delayed diagnosis. Since your daughter is now at an age where her buy-in is essential for a gluten-free lifestyle, obtaining a definitive answer is crucial for her long-term adherence and health. Given that she is asymptomatic yet serologically positive, a third biopsy now, after a proper 12-week challenge, offers the best chance to capture any microscopic damage that may have developed, providing the concrete evidence needed to justify the dietary change. This isn't about wanting her to have celiac; it's about wanting to prevent the insidious damage that can occur while waiting for symptoms to appear, and ultimately giving her the unambiguous "why" she needs to accept and commit to the necessary treatment. This article might be helpful. It breaks down each type of test, and what a positive results means in terms of the probability that you might have celiac disease. One test that always needs to be done is the IgA Levels/Deficiency Test (often called "Total IGA") because some people are naturally IGA deficient, and if this is the case, then certain blood tests for celiac disease might be false-negative, and other types of tests need to be done to make an accurate diagnosis. The article includes the "Mayo Clinic Protocol," which is the best overall protocol for results to be ~98% accurate.    
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.