Jump to content

  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):

    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

New And Saying "hi"

knitwit

By knitwit
in Dermatitis Herpetiformis

Recommended Posts

knitwit Newbie
knitwit
Posted

I wasn't going to post until after I have a diagnosis, but I've been reading the forums now for days and feel the need to say "hi."

 

Short story, I've had eczema my entire life (I'm over 50 now) and have basically learned to live with it.  Until a few weeks ago when I happened to google "rash on buttocks" and it led me to DH.  Add that to the odd rash on my arms (last winter) and the rash on my legs that I thought were bug bites (last summer) and it just all seemed to click.

 

I was at my GP two days later and she said I had an "uncommon" rash on my buttocks and sent me to the dermatologist for a biopsy.  I saw him two days ago, and he said "your rash looks like a common case of DH."  He did do a biopsy, so now I wait.

 

So now I wait, it's a bit odd and nerve wracking.  All the photos and my experiences tell me this is exactly what I've had all my life.  One dermatologist did test me for celiac using a blood test about 7 years ago when she said my rash looked like a celiac rash.  I was happy when it was negative.  Now I know that doesn't mean I actually was/am negative.

 

I'm feeling a bit conflicted right now, I almost rather have an actual positive diagnosis than just a wishy washy one.  

 

 

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


mamaw Community Regular
mamaw
Posted

If  you  get  dx'd  with  DH  you  must  remain gluten-free  for life ----- no need  to do  any other testing! 

LauraTX Rising Star
LauraTX
Posted
Welcome to the forum!  If it comes back that is is DH, we are glad to help you transition to a gluten-free diet.  Check out the newbie thread under our coping section, so you can arm yourself with some info before a transition is needed.  Let us know! :)
knitwit Newbie
knitwit
Posted
  • Author

Thank you both.  I have been doing tons of reading on this site and others.  It's pretty much a case of knowing/accepting that this probably is DH, and wondering what the biopsy will say.  I have learned so much already, the support I see here is wonderful.

squirmingitch Veteran
squirmingitch
Posted

The huge question is...... did the derm take the biopsy from CLEAR skin ADJACENT to an active lesion? If not, then you will surely come up negative. So many derms do not know how to correctly do a biospy for dh and take the biopsy directly ON a lesion.

 

Let us know what the biopsy says. 

indianaharlegirl Newbie
indianaharlegirl
Posted

Hi I just entered this world about a month ago. You can read my first few posts. I am not diagnosed and waiting for my apt with the Celiac Center at Univ of Chicago bc none of my doctors here seem to "get it" and they wanted to give me 4 creams and said it was eczema, wouldn't do the biopsy on these huge lesions and wouldn't order the whole blood test panel. I got the impression the derm was mad bc I knew a lot about what I thought was going on and I told her I didn't agree with her and that there is no "typical DH" and I literally have ever other symptom of Celiac. I also developed a horrible rash on FEB 5 and realized I had had this rash before and thought it was from shaving my legs or bug bites. The outbreak on FEB 5 was horrible and I ended up in the ER on iv steroids just to be able to breath bc I was just so anxious and dehydrated bc I couldn't eat without feeling sick either. I researched all night and found that I had ever symptom of Celiac and had for years down to being a very colicky baby prone to skin rashes !

 

Over the past month I have found that most drs don't know more than the 5 min they spent on this in med school and bc there is no pharmaceutical company behind it funding research they will probably remain uneducated. Thankfully the Celiac Center is less than an hour from my house and I can get there. I only took the steroids for two days until the itching calmed down. I hadn't been feeling good for a good 10 years and for a year had been really exhausted sleeping 12 hours a day and still tired. Right now I am still on gluten bc I don't have a dx and know the tests will be possibly false positive if I stop the gluten.  I did stop it for a week and was starting to feel better and the rash was going away but when I went back to it it has come back but not that bad.

 

All my friends and family don't understand why I want a dx and at first I didn't think I cared either but with as bad as I feel so sick and nauseated and dehydrated even tho I am drinking bottle after bottles of water I need to know it is celiac or at least not something else. I am anemic, low potassium and Vit D and my white count is high.  I have read all the literature and if you get a positive skin biopsy I wouldn't get the endo bc DH is only present if you are celiac.......Hang in there. I have bought several books on the gluten free diet and it doesn't seem that bad and some of the food has been really good. I am a lawyer and I mention this just bc I am a trained researcher esp about medical issues bc I do personal injury and worker's comp and like you after I started looking at this rash and thinking about all my health issues I have ever had the dx of Celiac just made sense. I am struggling bc right now I am just so tired and can't focus and worried about supporting my kids but I pray God takes care of me and you too and all of us !!

 

Crystal
 

cahill Collaborator
cahill
Posted

Hi , welcome to the forums.  :) 

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


knitwit Newbie
knitwit
Posted
  • Author

The biopsy came back negative for DH but shows eczema.  Whatever....

 

I eat low-carb for my blood sugar, so not much wheat/gluten in the first place.  I kind of expected it to be negative.

 

I think it's wrong though.  I have a follow up appointment later in April, and I'm just going to eat my low carb diet, keep gluten to a minimum, but not panic over it (since I do not have a positive diagnosis.)  It will be interesting to see how things go.

 

It's very frustrating, no one wants such a horrible diagnois, but we all want answers.

 

Thanks for the support, I'll probably be "fading" away at this point.

ravenwoodglass Mentor
ravenwoodglass
Posted

You might want to try being gluten free for at least a couple months rather than gluten light. If your rash is DH gluten light will not help as the antibodies will stay active. False negative are quite possible in testing for DH and you can't go by 7 year old negative tests to conclude that you are not celiac. 

You could consider going back on a regular gluten diet for 3 or 4 months and having the celiac panel done again but if you main issue is skin related you could still get a false negative. 

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):



    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):



  • Recent Activity

    1. trents
      - trents replied to Roses8721's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      8

      GI DX celiac despite neg serology and no biopsy

      Certainly, it would b wise to have a gene test done if your physician is open to it as it would provide some more data to understand what's going on. But keep in mind that the genetic test for celiac disease cannot be used as to diagnose celiac disease, only to establish the potential to develop active celiac disease. About 40% of the general population possess...
    2. Roses8721
      - Roses8721 posted a topic in Post Diagnosis, Recovery & Treatment of Celiac Disease
      0

      gluten-free Oatmeal

      Had Quaker gluten-free oatmeal last night and my stomach is a mess today. NO flu but def stomach stuff. Anyone else?
    3. Roses8721
      - Roses8721 replied to Roses8721's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      8

      GI DX celiac despite neg serology and no biopsy

      So you would be good with the diagnosis and not worry to check genetics etc etc? Appreciate your words!
    4. Scott Adams
      - Scott Adams replied to Ginger38's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      5

      Shingles - Could It Be Related to Gluten/ Celiac

      As recommended by @Flash1970, you may want to get this: https://www.amazon.com/Curist-Lidocaine-Maximum-Strength-Topical/dp/B09DN7GR14/
    5. Scott Adams
      - Scott Adams replied to Xravith's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      3

      Challenges eating gluten before biopsy

      For those who will likely remain gluten-free for life anyway due to well-known symptoms they have when eating gluten, my general advice is to ignore any doctors who push to go through a gluten challenge to get a formal diagnosis--and this is especially true for those who have severe symptoms when they eat gluten. It can take months, or even years to recover...
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):


  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,474
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748
    Silk tha Shocker
    Newest Member
    Silk tha Shocker
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):



  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):

  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      GI DX celiac despite neg serology and no biopsy

      By trents · Posted

      Certainly, it would b wise to have a gene test done if your physician is open to it as it would provide some more data to understand what's going on. But keep in mind that the genetic test for celiac disease cannot be used as to diagnose celiac disease, only to establish the potential to develop active celiac disease. About 40% of the general population possess one or both of the primary genes known to be associated with the development of active celiac disease but only about 1% of the population actually develop active celiac disease. So, the gene test is an effective "rule out" tool but not an effective diagnostic tool.
    • Roses8721
      gluten-free Oatmeal

      By Roses8721 · Posted

      Had Quaker gluten-free oatmeal last night and my stomach is a mess today. NO flu but def stomach stuff. Anyone else?
    • Roses8721
      GI DX celiac despite neg serology and no biopsy

      By Roses8721 · Posted

      So you would be good with the diagnosis and not worry to check genetics etc etc? Appreciate your words!
    • Scott Adams
      Shingles - Could It Be Related to Gluten/ Celiac

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      As recommended by @Flash1970, you may want to get this: https://www.amazon.com/Curist-Lidocaine-Maximum-Strength-Topical/dp/B09DN7GR14/
    • Scott Adams
      Challenges eating gluten before biopsy

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      For those who will likely remain gluten-free for life anyway due to well-known symptoms they have when eating gluten, my general advice is to ignore any doctors who push to go through a gluten challenge to get a formal diagnosis--and this is especially true for those who have severe symptoms when they eat gluten. It can take months, or even years to recover from such a challenge, so why do this if you already know that gluten is the culprit and you won't be eating it anyway?  Approximately 10x more people have non-celiac gluten sensitivity than have celiac disease, but there isn’t yet a test for NCGS. If your symptoms go away on a gluten-free diet it would likely signal NCGS--but those in this group will usually have negative tests, or at best, elevated antibodies that don't reach the level of official positive. Unfortunately test results for celiac disease are not always definitive, and many errors can be made when doing an endoscopy for celiac disease, and they can happen in many ways, for example not collecting the samples in the right areas, not collecting enough samples, or not interpreting the results properly and giving a Marsh score.  Many biopsy results can also be borderline, where there may be certain damage that could be associated with celiac disease, but it just doesn't quite reach the level necessary to make a formal diagnosis. The same is true for blood test results. Over the last 10 years or so a new "Weak Positive" range has been created by many labs for antibody results, which can simply lead to confusion (some doctors apparently believe that this means the patient can decide if they want more testing or to go gluten-free). There is no "Weak Negative" category, for example. Many patients are not told to eat gluten daily, lots of it, for the 6-8 week period leading up to their blood test, nor asked whether or not they've been eating gluten. Some patients even report to their doctors that they've been gluten-free for weeks or months before their blood tests, yet their doctors incorrectly say nothing to them about how this can affect their test, and create false negative results. Many people are not routinely given a total IGA blood test when doing a blood screening, which can lead to false negative interpretations if the patient has low IGA. We've seen on this forum many times that some doctors who are not fully up on how interpret the blood test results can tell patients that the don't need to follow a gluten-free diet or get more testing because only 1 of the 2 or 3 tests done in their panel is positive (wrong!), and the other 1 or 2 tests are negative.  Dermatologists often don't know how to do a proper skin biopsy for dermatitis herpetiformis, and when they do it wrongly their patient will continue to suffer with terrible DH itching, and all the risks associated with celiac disease. For many, the DH rash is the only presentation of celiac disease. These patients may end up on strong prescriptions for life to control their itching which also may have many negative side effects, for example Dapsone. Unfortunately many people will continue to suffer needlessly and eat gluten due to these errors in performing or interpreting celiac disease tests, but luckily some will find out about non-celiac gluten sensitivity on their own and go gluten-free and recover from their symptoms. Consider yourself lucky if you've figured out that gluten is the source of your health issues, and you've gone gluten-free, because many people will never figure this out.    
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.