Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×

  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):

    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Gluten Challenge -Is 3 Weeks Enough?

Reffinej

Recommended Posts

Reffinej Newbie
Reffinej
Posted

As of Friday I am officially doing a gluten challenge. Doc said 2 slices of bread, or equivalent, daily for 3 weeks then do the blood test.
I don't want to get a false negative, if I do have celiac disease, but don't want to have gluten in my diet longer than necessary. Conflicting info out there!

Open Original Shared Link

Open Original Shared Link

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


nvsmom Community Regular
nvsmom
Posted

If you have been eating a normal diet up until now, then you probably do not even need to do that.  Most people eat the equivalent of 1-2 slices of bread (in the form of noodles, muffins, crackers, gravy, breaded meats, baked desserts) per day.

 

If you have been gluten-free, it is better to eat gluten for 8-12 weeks, with 12 weeks being better.  Some tests, like the tTG IgA, tTG IgG, and EMA IgA will be slower to increase, and to decrease.  After going gluten-free, it can take some celiacs a good year for their tTG tests to get back to normal.  The DGP tests (deaminated gliadin peptides) will change a bit faster, but possibly not within 3 weeks... probably not.

 

If you were having the endoscopic biopsy done, 3 weeks would be about right.

 

Good luck!

Reffinej Newbie
Reffinej
Posted
  • Author

Ok,thanks. So I've been as gluten free as I thought I needed to be for health (thyroid antibodies) for 18 months, but without being strict about cross contamination. I had bloods done a few months back and had a high DGP-IgA result hence this journey. 
 

nvsmom Community Regular
nvsmom
Posted

You are most likely a celiac then.  The DGP IgA is pretty specific to celiac disease; around 95% of people with a positive test have celiac disease.  The fact that you were eating gluten-light and made a positive result - that's pretty meaningful.   :(

 

I would try to drag your gluten challenge out to at LEAST 6 weeks if possible.  If you make it too short you run the risk of getting false negative results, and then the doctors might discount that positive test (a mistake 99% of the time).

 

This report has some good info on the tests: Open Original Shared Link

 

Enjoy a guiness and a donut for me... not together though.  ;)

cyclinglady Grand Master
cyclinglady
Posted

I agree that you need to be consuming gluten longer to get accurate test results since you have been gluten free.   Four weeks is enough for just the endoscopy.  8 to 12 weeks for another blood panel (University of Chicago celiac website).  

 

My GI doc ran the complete panel.  I tested positive on just the DPG-iga test.  The others were negative.  Yet, my intestinal biopsies showed moderate to severe damage (Marsh Stage IIIB).  My result was weird per my doctors.  But I am glad the entire panel was ran!  

 

Seems like you have celiac disease!  Plus, you have Hashi's like me!  

 

Welcome to the club!  

Reffinej Newbie
Reffinej
Posted
  • Author

Haha. not sure it's a club I want to be in! Oh well. 
I thought the DGP-IgA was pretty specific, my GP thought not (I like him so was disappointed we didn't seem to agree)....anyway, I guess I can just eat it for longer and do the test when I'm ready. But I am already feeling a bit dodgy from all the gluten. Although, I have to admit that I've enjoyed a couple of croissants- they're pretty much the one thing I miss. (Well, marmite on real bread is nice too)

 

RMJ Mentor
RMJ
Posted

Figure 2 in this paper shows the time course for antibody level increases during a gluten challenge. They didn't test at 3 weeks, but the values went up nicely sometime between 3 and 4 weeks. This was a small study, only about 20 patients, but this is a paper that people refer to for determining the length of a gluten challenge.

Open Original Shared Link

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


cyclinglady Grand Master
cyclinglady
Posted

After my DPG-iga came back positive, I knew in my heart that I had celiac disease.  I had seven weeks in between my blood test results and endoscopy (work contraints), so I loaded up on even more gluten (I was eating gluten prior to my blood tests).  I ate a loaf of sourdough a day, I kid you not!  Plus, I ate every cookie, cupcake, dessert, I could get.  Not the whole package (I shared), but enough to get that last taste!  

 

By the time my endoscopy came, I developed intestinal symptoms.  I do not recommend over eating gluten on a challenge!  Well.....maybe!

Reffinej Newbie
Reffinej
Posted
  • Author

Yeah, I'm not feeling great already. I did indulge a wee bit over the weekend (we were away from home, too) but quickly learnt that a) gluten challenge does not equate to an eat-all-rubbish-you-usually-avoid challenge, and gluten, I think, really doesn't agree with me...and I'm starting to look back at much of the sickness I experienced in years gone by and wonder  if gluten played a bigger part that I realised.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):


  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      129,874
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748
    CSam
    Newest Member
    CSam
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.3k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):


  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • ehb
      Refractory Celiac disease - what to do

      By ehb · Posted

      @knitty kitty thank you I am exploring these options, I really appreciate all the suggestions and info. I am only slightly below the normal range for folate, zinc and copper. And in the low end of the normal range for B12, ferritin, and vitamin A. I’m good for carotene magnesium and iron, but I’ve been taking 400 mg magnesium daily 
    • Alibu
      Waiting on biopsy after positive bloodwork, but also not really believing this is real

      By Alibu · Posted

      I just had my endoscopy the other day and the doctor took 12 samples because he said if we're going to find something we're going to find it today LOL. But when he got down there, he said everything looked good. So I have it in my head again that it's going to be negative because everyone I've heard of who had a positive biopsy had their endoscopies where the doctor was like yep, I can see the damage. My tissues all look great apparently. So if they come back negative, I'm not sure where to go from here. Could it still be a non-celiac gluten sensitivity even with my blood work? I thought NCGS didn't show up on blood tests. Is it possible that the biopsy still comes back positive even if everything looked healthy on endoscope? I had it done at a big hospital in the state, so I would think they'd have the kind of equipment where they'd be able to see it well. I even have pictures in my report and they don't seem to have the damage that others have seen.
    • trents
      Virus, celiac disease or both?

      By trents · Posted

      That's just it. When they are doing an EGD, even with biopsy, if they aren't thinking about celiac disease they may miss it. They should take several samples from both the duodenum and the duodenum bulb. Damage can be patchy and easily missed if sampling isn't through. And patch damage may explain lack of dramatic symptoms. Let me assure you that we frequently have posters on this forum who were silent celiacs for years and were diagnosed incidentally with celiac disease when their docs were checking for other things. They developed other medical problems such as anemia or vitamin and mineral deficiencies, neurological deficits, Hashimodo's thyroid, osteoporois, etc. - non GI symptoms - but their docs recognized those problems as often connected to celiac disease and had them checked for celiac disease, both blood antibody testing and biopsy, and found damage. A couple of years ago the Mayo Clinic did a large study involving over 300 people. They started with those officially diagnosed with celiac disease and also tested their first degree relatives. They found that almost 50% of  the first degree relatives tested positive for celiac disease and many or most were totally caught by surprise because they were largely asymptomatic. Their diagnosis was confirmed by biopsy. I really don't have anything more to say. You have some decisions to make.
    • knitty kitty
      Supplements for those Diagnosed with Celiac Disease

      By knitty kitty · Posted

      Blood tests are affected by what you've had to eat in the previous day or two and any vitamin supplements you've taken in the past month or two.   If you have been taking vitamins before the time of the blood test, the vitamins supplements could mask a deficiency.  So get the tests before supplementing, or allow eight to twelve weeks for the supplements to wear off.    The thing with blood tests is that they measure what is in the blood, not what is stored inside organs and tissues where vitamins are actually utilized, and may miss subclinical deficiencies.  In times of shortages, the brain can order cells to release their stored vitamins into the blood stream in order to keep important organs like the brain and heart functioning.   Overall, getting blood tests for deficiencies is a good idea if it's available to you.  If you're deficient in any of the B vitamins, take a B Complex with all the B's in it.  The eight B vitamins work with one another like an orchestra.  Supplementing just one can throw the others off.  
    • Shining My Light
      Virus, celiac disease or both?

      By Shining My Light · Posted

      Thank you @trents! This is all sound advice. In 2022 I did have a biopsy done with the EGD: SPECIMEN: (A) DUODENUM, BIOPSY (B) GASTRIC BIOPSY(C) GASTRIC POLYP, BIOPSY(D) ESOPHAGUS BIOPSY (E) ESOPHAGUS BIOPSY This would have been when the candida was found.  If I understand right it’s the duodenum they take a biopsy of. Nothing was mentioned about Villous atrophy however they were not looking for that particularly.    Something that stumps me is the correlation between symptoms and damage. One seems to equal the other. I have yet to see damage with “silent celiac”. Not saying it doesn’t exist.  Also super curious on other symptoms that would improve based on a gluten free diet. Obviously silent celiac wouldn’t have an improvement in GI symptoms but that is all I have read any data for. No one saying things like my anxiety went away or my headaches and joint pain are gone.    I see why it would be a “gluten challenge” since eating 4-6 slices of bread daily is a challenge to do. 😳 I would replace that with cake 🍰😉 
×
×
  • Create New...