Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Gliadin/transglutaminase Testing Significance


mmontequ

Recommended Posts

mmontequ Newbie

Hi all,

 

Last week I underwent extensive blood, urine, and skin testing for psychiatric purposes. I had previously been diagnosed by a psychologist with depression (dysthymia), generalized anxiety disorder, and ADHD inattentive type. When I saw a psychiatrist, he suggested that my illness may be due to food reaction. Today I got back my test results, some of which pertain to gluten intolerance.

 

Gliadin (deamidated) IGA: 7 units

<20 antibody not detected

 

Gliadin (deamidated) IGG: 3 units

<20 antibody not detected

 

Transglutaminase IGG: 3 U/ml

<6 no antibody detected

 

Transglutaminase IGG: 1 U/ml

<4 no antibody detected

 

(To me it seems if the antibody is not detected, then gluten intolerance/sensitivity shouldn't necessarily be the issue. Am I correct, or do I have it the other way around?)

 

I was also administered injections of diluted (not concentrated, not sure if that matters) gluten and wheat that produced no symptoms or immediate reaction, but gave a very mild delayed reaction after 24 hours. Milk and corn, by contrast, produced more noticeable reactions.

 

Still, the psychiatrist recommended immediately cutting all gluten out of my diet (along with dairy and corn, among some other dietary changes). I plan on taking his suggestion, but I have never had any of the common symptoms of gluten intolerance/sensitivity in the past to my knowledge. I am 22 years old.

 

Not asking for medical advice but possibly some anecdotal comparisons: do my gliadin and transglutaminase results seem to significantly suggest gluten intolerance/sensitivity? Other posters in this forum have used more stringent reference ranges, but even then, my results seem low. Even though this diagnosis is coming from a medical professional with much greater expertise on the matter than I have, it seems to rely on a reading of my results as >0 automatically equating to gluten intolerance/sensitivity. I study statistics, so I'm skeptical of using rejection ranges that liberally. Curious what you all think.

 

Thanks,

 

Matt


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



cyclinglady Grand Master

I am not a doctor, but your tests results indicate that you do NOT have celiac disease. There is no test for a gluten sensitivity or Non-Celiac Gluten Intolerance. But.....did your doctor order an IGA deficiency test? If you are IGA deficient, the celiac IGA tests will be invalid. The celiac panel usually catches most celiacs, but it is not infallible. I tested positive to just the DGP IGA and the rest were negative yet my biopsies revealed a Marsh Stage IIIB.

Usually eliminating foods you suspect are causing symptoms as a test can help determine if you do have a sensitivity. It can not hurt! Be sure to keep a journal of your diet and any reactions.

Ask about IGA test just to be sure.

I wish you well!

mmontequ Newbie

Not both of those transglutaminase tests were supposed to be IGG, the latter one should be IGA. (Not sure if that's the IGA test you refer to, but it was a typo on my part.) He said nothing about IGA deficiency.

 

I'm going to try cutting gluten out of my diet, but since the "symptoms" are entirely behavioral rather than physical (never had any stomach pain, skin rash, anemia, etc) it will be more difficult for me to discern if cutting gluten out is causing a change. I just feel like using trace units of gliadin as a basis to recommend the absolute avoidance of gluten seems like it could be a bit faulty.

 

Thanks for the feedback!

squirmingitch Veteran

Just to make you aware of the symptoms of celiac disease here is a link to the list -- it is LONG. You see, there is more to celiac disease than stomach pain, skin rash & anemia. In fact half of all diagnosed celiacs did NOT present with any GI issues. Don't feel bad that you did not know that because most doctors don't seem to be aware of it & that's why there are so many undiagnosed celiacs running around. 1 in 120 people is celiac yet 85% are undiagnosed & it's because there is this prevalent thinking that it's all about GI issues.

Open Original Shared Link

Also I will mention that there is such a thing as silent celiac where the patient has NO symptoms at all. It doesn't happen all that often but it does happen.

RMJ Mentor

Different labs use tests made by different manufacturers with different reference ranges. The units are arbitrary and different from lab to lab, they are not standardized units like milligrams. You should use the reference ranges that came with your results.

cyclinglady Grand Master

Okay, you made a typo, but I was not clear either. In any case, it appears that you tested negative for celiac disease. It was good that your doctor requested both sets of the TTg and DGP tests.

It might be worth it to pursue your doctor's advice. It certainly won't harm you!

My husband went gluten free per the advice of my allergist and his GP (wished now that he had gotten tested for celiac disease) and the first thing we noticed was a lack of snoring. You can not imagine how delighted I was! He snores whenever he gets glutened. It is one of his first symptoms.

I wish you well!

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,702
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Coach Chris
    Newest Member
    Coach Chris
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Gigi2025
      Hi Christiana, Many thanks for your response.  Interestingly, I too cannot eat wheat in France without feeling effects (much less than in the US, but won't indulge nonetheless).  I also understand children are screened for celiac in Italy prior to starting their education. Wise idea as it seems my grandson has the beginning symptoms (several celiacs in his dad's family), but parents continue to think he's just being difficult.  Argh.  There's a test I took that diagnosed gluten sensitivity in 2014 via Entero Labs, and am planning on having done again.  Truth be told, I'm hoping it's the bromine/additives/preservatives as I miss breads and pastas terribly when home here in the states!  Be well and here's to our guts healing ❤️
    • Wends
      Lol that’s so true! Hope you get clarity, it’s tough when there’s doubt. There’s so much known about celiac disease with all the scientific research that’s been done so far yet practically and clinically there’s also so much unknown, still. Out of curiosity what’s her dairy consumption like? Even compared to early years to now? Has that changed? Calcium is dependent in the mechanism of antigen presenting cells in the gut. High calcium foods with gluten grains can initiate inflammation greater.  This is why breakfast cereals and milk combo long term can be a ticking time bomb for genetically susceptible celiacs (not a scientific statement by any means but my current personal opinion based on reasoning at present). Milk and wheat are the top culprits for food sensitivity. Especially in childhood. There are also patient cases of antibodies normalising in celiac children who had milk protein intolerance/ delayed type allergy. Some asymptomatic. There were a couple of cases of suspected celiacs that turned out to have milk protein intolerance that normalised antibodies on a gluten containing diet. Then there were others that only normalised antibodies once gluten and milk was eliminated. Milk kept the antibodies positive. Celiac disease is complicated to say the least.
    • deanna1ynne
      And thank you for your encouragement. I am glad that her body is doing a good job fighting it. I also just want clarity for her moving forwards. She was only 6 for the last round of testing and she's 10 now, so I'm also hoping that makes a difference. It was weird during her last round of testing though, because right before her biopsy, we'd upped her gluten intake by giving her biscuits made from straight up vital wheat gluten, and her labs actually normalized slightly (lower ttg and her ema went negative). Bodies just do weird things sometimes! lol
    • deanna1ynne
      The first negative biopsy in 2021 just said "no pathological change" for all the samples, and the second one in 2022 said "Duodenal mucosa with mild reactive change (focal foveolar metaplasia) and preserved villous architecture." So I think Marsh score 0 in both cases, though it's not actually written in the pathology reports. I'm really hoping to get a clear positive result this time, just for her sake.  
    • Wends
      Hopefully the biopsy gives a conclusive and correct diagnosis for your daughter. Im in the UK and have been in the situation a few years ago of trying to rule celiac in or out after inconclusive results. Many symptoms pointing to it including the classic symptoms and weight loss and folate and iron deficiency. You have to play a waiting game. I also had the label of IBS and likely food allergy. Genetic test showed low risk for celiac but not no risk. It sounds like the Gastroenterologist is on it and hopefully will diagnose what it is correctly. Food hypersensitivity (allergy) can also cause similar symptoms and inflammation as well as mimicking IBS. Milk / dairy and wheat (cereal grains) being the biggest culprits. The “oesophagitis” and “gastritis” you mentioned can be caused by another gastrointestinal disorder called “eosinophilic gastrointestinal disorders”. These are named depending on which part of the gastrointestinal tract is affected. For example eosinophilic oesophagitis, eosinophilic gastritis, eosinophilic gastroenteritis, and more rare eosinophilic colitis. They are antigen (allergen) driven. When the blood test measuring anti-ttg antibodies is positive in absence of a positive ema test - which is more specific to celiac, this can also suggest food hypersensitivity (allergy). Usually delayed type allergy similar to celiac but not autoimmune if that makes sense. In this case the ttg antibodies are transient. Which happens. I’ve first hand experience. For info, evidence of villous atrophy too can be caused by food hypersensitivity. Not just by celiac disease. In Egid disorders the six food elimination diet, under a dietitian and gastroenterologist care, is the dietary protocol to figure out the culprit or culprits. Sometimes only two food elimination diet is used at first. The number one culprit is milk protein / dairy. Followed by wheat, eggs, soy, fish and seafood, and nuts. Most are only reactive to one food group or two. Most are only reactive to milk. Hope this is a helpful reply.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.