Jump to content

  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):

    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Positive Blood Work, Negative Biopsy?

Bttrfly62

Recommended Posts

Bttrfly62 Rookie
Bttrfly62
Posted

Has anyone ever had positive blood work (tTG and Gliadin Deamidated ABS), but had a negative biopsy? I went in for an endoscopy yesterday and when I woke up, he said everything looked really good and there wasn't any visible damage. Obviously I have to wait for the results in a week or so, but it made me wonder if it was possible that it would come back negative because no damage (or possibly not enough damage?) was done at this point? Thanks in advance! 

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


ravenwoodglass Mentor
ravenwoodglass
Posted

There are folks that have had negative biopsies even with positive blood work. Sometimes damage is patchy and it can be missed. With positive blood work you do need the diet no matter what the biopsy results turn out to be. Since you have postive blood work and have had your biopsy you can go ahead and start the diet you don't need to wait for the results.

You may even find you get some relief from your symptoms before the biopsy is even back.

cyclinglady Grand Master
cyclinglady
Posted

Visually, my GI thought I looked fine, but my biopsies showed a Marsh Stage IIIB (moderate to severe damage). Based on member comments, this seems to be the norm. After all the villi are pretty small! Remember, too that the small intestinal tract when stretched out is about the size of a tennis court. There are many damaged areas that could be missed. Let's hope your GI took the recommended six biopsy samples!

So, start that gluten-free diet. Chances are you have celiac disease!

Bttrfly62 Rookie
Bttrfly62
Posted
  • Author

I specifically asked how many he was taking (because of this page!) and he said 6- i know more than 6 is better, but at least he hit the minimum! Does the medical profession disregard the possibility of Celiac without a positive biopsy? Just seems like a flawed "gold standard" if it can't be 100% accurate! Seems to me that the biopsy should show SOME damage, or I will be very confused... malabsorption of meds was actually why I ended up in the GI world to begin with... would seem odd if enough damage was done to prevent proper absorption, but not to confirm a diagnosis? But stranger things have happened! Thanks for the responses! 

cyclinglady Grand Master
cyclinglady
Posted

The diagnostic process is flawed and the leading researchers know it, but the technology just is not there. I wish it were easier and consistent!

Waiting is hard when it involves lab tests. However, there is the option of going gluten free. Yep. It can be done. My husband did just that 14 years ago per the poor advice of his GP and my allergist. It worked! Symptoms resolved! He will say that I have had it easier in terms of medical support (friends and family too) but he refuses to do a challenge. Who can blame him?

So, there is always the option of going gluten-free and healing!

Bttrfly62 Rookie
Bttrfly62
Posted
  • Author

Once I take the plunge, I'm not going back- that seems like an awful thing to do to yourself and for no real gain. 6 months is a very, very, long time when you feel terrible! Especially after you've figured out what the problem is and have fixed it! 

captaincrab55 Collaborator
captaincrab55
Posted

Were you eating gluten before the biopsy?     You could have DH.

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


Bttrfly62 Rookie
Bttrfly62
Posted
  • Author

Yep, no change in my daily gluten consumption- which is substantial! Dh? Dermatitis Herpetiformis? I don't have a rash. Honestly, my actual symptoms seem much milder than many others, the most bothersome of which overlap a great deal with my poorly controlled Hashimoto's. I think I was lucky- If you can say that with Celiac? Being on a regularly tested med allowed them to catch an absorption issue. I'm not sure I would ever have pursued any GI path if my ends hadn't been convinced Celiac was causing the dosing and control difficulties. I know many struggle for years to get on the right path and get the support they need. I had a Celiac diagnosis before I knew there was a problem!

cyclinglady Grand Master
cyclinglady
Posted

Lucky you! My Hashi's was swinging wildly just prior to my diagnosis, but my docs just attributed it to the last year of perimenopause. I went for a routine colonoscopy after I went through menopause. I was very anemic. Again, my other doctors just thought it was due to my Thalassemia (gentic anemia). But my GI guy caught it. At the time, I had no intestinal issues. My Hashi's finally stabilized but it took about two years.

nvsmom Community Regular
nvsmom
Posted

Most celiacs do not have visual damage during the biopsy.  That's pretty normal so far.  :)

 

If the biopsy does come back negative, keep in mind that the biopsy has a sensitivity as low as 80%, meaning up to 1 in every celiacs will have a negative biopsy.  A negative biopsy does NOT disregard positive blood tests, it just doesn't support it.  If you have two positive blood tests, the celiac disease is a sure thing.  :(  Page 12 of this report shows how specific the tests actually are: Open Original Shared Link

 

Good luck with the gluten-free diet.  :)

  • 2 weeks later...
Bttrfly62 Rookie
Bttrfly62
Posted
  • Author

Well, results officially came back negative. He basically said that I had 2 strong positive blood results and one weak positive and a negative biopsy, so let's assume no celiac and keep going on gluten until we can see damage and then it's Celaic. Kinda confused and super irritated. I guess I don't understand how specific Celiac tests come back positive but because I havent jeopardized my health enough (I have only had mild symptoms for 3 years and med absorption issues for about a year) to have Celiac? I realize that I can always make that gluten free step myself, but being told it isn't really doing any damage, is not a real motivator. I kinda feel like I was given a pregnancy test at the dr's office that came back positive, but was told "you aren't 12 weeks pregnant so you can keep drinking alcohol" or something. Anyway, just wanted to update-good, but confusing, results.

Palvyre Apprentice
Palvyre
Posted

Please ask for a genetic test and if positive move on to a trial gluten-free diet and retest antibodies in 3-4 months. I had a high positive test and my biopsy was negative. My doctor followed through with the genetic testing and then trial diet. My antibodies went to normal and I received an official diagnosis. Since then I had found out I have osteoporosis due to long term undiagnosed celiac disease, I am only 39 and male. This is not something to mess around with.

foam Apprentice
foam
Posted

You have auto immune disease , positive bloods. You have celiac disease. Genius idea to do nothing, wait for the damage to be permanent, wait till you get t cell cancer, hodgkins. Great idea:). STOP EATING THAT SHIT TODAY, thats what any sane doctor would tell you. Ps have the gene test, if you have that and eat enough bread you will get celiac disease... Eventually 

Bttrfly62 Rookie
Bttrfly62
Posted
  • Author

I felt the same way- i wasn't sure when the medical profession moved to "first do harm, then confirm it's harmful"- but I guess that's where Celiac is categorized? I've had the genetic testing- positive for the genes. Literally, he is not convinced without visible damage. Has anyone else had a GI dr who practiced that way? I do think it was inadvertently caught early (because of the med levels), but early is still positive, right? Has anyone ever had positive bloodwork, negative biopsy, stayed on gluten because doc says it probably isn't Celiac and never actually done any damage to the villi?

ravenwoodglass Mentor
ravenwoodglass
Posted

You really need to consider yourself diagnosed, IMHO. You have the genes and you had positive blood tests. You ARE celiac. Did you get a copy of your biopsy results? How many biopsies did the doctor do? Some idiot doctors won't diagnose until the villi are totally destroyed. Plus with you still on gluten chances are you will need lots more appointments and repeat endos so it is much better financially for the doc to keep you on gluten until your gut is totally destroyed. Celiac...the one disease that doctors want us half dead before they will diagnose.

foam Apprentice
foam
Posted

We are going to come down pretty harshly on this because the long term undiagnosed are living with unfixable problems. Keep eating gluten and you may as well roll a dice on your next autoimmune disease. Get unlucky there and you can end up with organ failure. Youll be at a very high risk of cancer, brain disease etc. Its like dead serious buisness, for you gluten is poison and thats the respect it needs.

Bttrfly62 Rookie
Bttrfly62
Posted
  • Author

It's funny because i actually already have 2 autoimmune diseases- I guess I just don't understand why he was so dismissive. It isn't like I'm hoping something is wrong. I actually expected negative bloodworm, but if the bloodwork doesn't matter, I guess I don't understand the point in doing it at all. I've generally been pretty happy with my medical care, but I can't say I'm at all happy this time. As many long term Celiacs can attest to on the forum, remaining gluten free can be a real challenge to maintain when you are told you don't have Celiac (and are only very mildly affected by the symptoms) and gluten will not affect you either way.

notme Experienced
notme
Posted

I felt the same way- i wasn't sure when the medical profession moved to "first do harm, then confirm it's harmful"- but I guess that's where Celiac is categorized? I've had the genetic testing- positive for the genes. Literally, he is not convinced without visible damage. Has anyone else had a GI dr who practiced that way? I do think it was inadvertently caught early (because of the med levels), but early is still positive, right? Has anyone ever had positive bloodwork, negative biopsy, stayed on gluten because doc says it probably isn't Celiac and never actually done any damage to the villi?

 

you have positive bloodwork!  not to mention the genes and the other AI diseases....  you have celiac.  get a new doctor.  i *was* half dead (ok, mostly dead!) before they even considered testing for celiac (never even heard of it, been going to doctor after doctor with seemingly unrelated symptoms)  start eating gluten free, read the newbie 101 section on the 'coping with' forum, and start feeling better!  what the crap is wrong with that doctor....  why in the world would he just dismiss such a serious (and systemic!) disease is beyond me.

 

welcome to the club you never wanted to join  <_<  the good news is that eating gluten free will probably make your other ai diseases more manageable.  good luck and welcome to the forum :)

bartfull Rising Star
bartfull
Posted

Get copies of all the blood work, the gene test, and of the biopsies. Then take them to a different doctor. If you're lucky enough to find a decent doctor he will look at those tests and give you an official diagnosis.

squirmingitch Veteran
squirmingitch
Posted

The bottom line here is that the vast majority of GI's STILL don't understand celiac disease nor how to diagnose it and apparently have their heads up their ass when they think it's okay for you to keep damaging yourself until THEY can see the damage. It's a very sad state of affairs. Those of us who have been on here a while have heard it over & over & over again and still it seems to shock us every time.

It's extremely difficult to find a GI who actually knows what they're talking about when it comes to celiac disease. 

nvsmom Community Regular
nvsmom
Posted

Well, results officially came back negative. He basically said that I had 2 strong positive blood results and one weak positive and a negative biopsy, so let's assume no celiac and keep going on gluten until we can see damage and then it's Celaic. Kinda confused and super irritated. I guess I don't understand how specific Celiac tests come back positive but because I havent jeopardized my health enough (I have only had mild symptoms for 3 years and med absorption issues for about a year) to have Celiac? I realize that I can always make that gluten free step myself, but being told it isn't really doing any damage, is not a real motivator. I kinda feel like I was given a pregnancy test at the dr's office that came back positive, but was told "you aren't 12 weeks pregnant so you can keep drinking alcohol" or something. Anyway, just wanted to update-good, but confusing, results.

 

 Ugh... This is why celiacs suffer for so many years.  :(  They MISSED the damage in the biopsy so you don't have celiac?! Sigh.

 

I agree that you most likely do have celiac disease.  A negative biopsy does not support your positive tests.  That's it.  It doesn't mean that it cancels them out.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):


  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,546
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748
    KimberlyAnne76
    Newest Member
    KimberlyAnne76
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):


  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Beverage
      Diagnosed celiac for 1-2 months ago and everything makes me bloated.

      By Beverage · Posted

      I had a very rough month after diagnosis. No exaggeration, lost so much inflammatory weight, I looked like a bag of bones, underneath i had been literally starving to death. I did start feeling noticeably better after a month of very strict control of my kitchen and home. What are you eating for breakfast and lunch? I ignored my doc and ate oats, yes they were gluten free, but some brands are at the higher end of gluten free. Lots of celics can eat Bob's Red Mill gluten-free oats, but not me. I can now eat them, but they have to be grown and processed according to the "purity protocol" methods. I mail order them, Montana Gluten-Free brand. A food and symptoms and activities log can be helpful in tracking down issues. You might be totally aware, but I have to mention about the risk of airborne gluten. As the doc that diagnosed me warned . . Remember eyes, ears, nose, and mouth all lead to your stomach and intestines.  Are you getting any cross contamination? Airborne gluten? Any pets eating gluten (they eat it, lick themselves, you pet them...)? Any house remodeling? We live in an older home, always fixing something. I've gotten glutened from the dust from cutting into plaster walls, possibly also plywood (glues). The suggestions by many here on vitamin supplements also really helped me. I had some lingering allergies and asthma, which are now 99% gone. I was taking Albuterol inhaler every hour just to breathe, but thiamine in form of benfotiamine kicked that down to 1-2 times a day within a few days of starting it. Also, since cutting out inflammatory seed oils (canola, sunflower, grapeseed, etc) and cooking with real olive oil, avocado oil, ghee, and coconut oil, I have noticed even greater improvement overall and haven't used the inhaler in months! It takes time to weed out everything in your life that contains gluten, and it takes awhile to heal and rebuild your health. At first it's mentally exhausting, overwhelming, even obsessive, but it gets better and second nature.
    • Jsingh
      Protein or fat?

      By Jsingh · Posted

      Hi,  I care for my seven year old daughter with Celiac. After watching her for months, I have figured out that she has problem with two kinds of fats- animal fat and cooking oils. It basically makes her intestine sore enough that she feels spasms when she is upset. It only happens on days when she has eaten more fat than her usual every day diet. (Her usual diet has chia seeds, flaxseeds, and avocado/ pumpkin seeds for fat and an occasional chicken breast.) I stopped using cooking oils last year, and when I reintroduced eggs and dairy, both of which I had held off for a few months thinking it was an issue of the protein like some Celiac patients habe mentioned to be the case, she has reacted in the same fashion as she does with excess fats. So now I wonder if her reaction to dairy and eggs is not really because of protein but fat.   I don't really have a question, just wondering if anyone finds this familiar and if it gets better with time.  Thank you. 
    • Chanda Richard
      High Cost of Gluten-Free Foods

      By Chanda Richard · Posted

      Hello, My name is Chanda and you are not the only one that gose through the same things. I have found that what's easiest for me is finding a few meals each week that last. I have such severe reactions to gluten that it shuts my entire body down. I struggle everyday with i can't eat enough it feels like, when I eat more I lose more weight. Make sure that you look at medication, vitamins and shampoo and conditioner also. They have different things that are less expensive at Walmart. 
    • petitojou
      Frequent nausea after gluten-free diet

      By petitojou · Posted

      Thank you so much! I saw some tips around the forum to make a food diary and now that I know that the community also struggles with corn, egg and soy, the puzzle pieces came together! Just yesterday I tried eating eggs and yes, he’s guilty and charged. Those there are my 3 combo nausea troublemakers. I’m going to adjust my diet ☺️ Also thank you for the information about MCAS! I’m from South America and little it’s talked about it in here. It’s honestly such a game changer now for treatment and recovery. I know I’m free from SIBO and Candida since I’ve been tested for it, but I’m still going to make a endoscopy to test for H. Pylori and Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). Thank you again!! Have a blessed weekend 🤍
    • knitty kitty
      Unusual bright yellow but odourless discharge

      By knitty kitty · Posted

      Yes, I, too, have osteoporosis from years of malabsorption, too.  Thiamine and magnesium are what keep the calcium in place in the bones.  If one is low in magnesium, boron, selenium, zinc, copper, and other trace minerals, ones bone heath can suffer.  We need more than just calcium and Vitamin D for strong bones.  Riboflavin B 2, Folate B 9 and Pyridoxine B 6 also contribute to bone formation and strength.   Have you had your thyroid checked?  The thyroid is important to bone health as well.  The thyroid uses lots of thiamine, so a poorly functioning thyroid will affect bone heath.  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.