Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Help interpreting test results


Tara90

Recommended Posts

Tara90 Rookie

Hi, 

I have received my blood test results back and would appreciate some assistance in interpreting them. My GP admitted she has limited knowledge/experience with coeliac disease and has referred me to a gastroenterologist for opinion, but I would like to have a bit more of an understanding of what my results mean before going into that appointment. 

Serology:  (NB: The reference range for all of the below is <15)

Deamidated Gliadin IgA: 1 U/ml

Deamidated Gliadin IgG: 39 U/mL 

Tissue Transglutaminase IgA <1 U/mL

Tissue Transglutaminase IgG <1 U/mL

It also states on the serology report that "if selective IgA deficiency is detected (<0.07g/L) which would render IgA-based serology non-informative this is also reported). I can't see anything in the results about this, so assume that I have not tested as IgA deficient. 

Gene Test:

"Hereterozygous for the haplotype, which is consistent with the DQ2 phenotype". 

From my limited knowledge and Google research it seems that TTG is the more sensitive and specific test for coeliac disease, whereas DGP IgG is most useful in the instance of IgA deficiency. Given that I have tested negatively for TTG and don't have IgA deficiency is it possible that the DGP is a false negative? I have no nausea/diarrhoea/bloating/etc, but do suffer from Chronic Fatigue Syndrome and also have chronic constipation and a lot of headaches. I've also been diagnosed with osteoporosis in my hips and lumbar spine (I'm 27 y.o), although my doc believes this is due to my past history of anorexia nervosa. 

I would appreciate any insights. Thanks. :) 

Edit: I should add that I have had the serology panel done 3 times now and the results were virtually identical each time. 


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



cyclinglady Grand Master
6 hours ago, Tara90 said:

Hi, 

I have received my blood test results back and would appreciate some assistance in interpreting them. My GP admitted she has limited knowledge/experience with coeliac disease and has referred me to a gastroenterologist for opinion, but I would like to have a bit more of an understanding of what my results mean before going into that appointment. 

Serology:  (NB: The reference range for all of the below is <15)

Deamidated Gliadin IgA: 1 U/ml

Deamidated Gliadin IgG: 39 U/mL 

Tissue Transglutaminase IgA <1 U/mL

Tissue Transglutaminase IgG <1 U/mL

It also states on the serology report that "if selective IgA deficiency is detected (<0.07g/L) which would render IgA-based serology non-informative this is also reported). I can't see anything in the results about this, so assume that I have not tested as IgA deficient. 

Gene Test:

"Hereterozygous for the haplotype, which is consistent with the DQ2 phenotype". 

From my limited knowledge and Google research it seems that TTG is the more sensitive and specific test for coeliac disease, whereas DGP IgG is most useful in the instance of IgA deficiency. Given that I have tested negatively for TTG and don't have IgA deficiency is it possible that the DGP is a false negative? I have no nausea/diarrhoea/bloating/etc, but do suffer from Chronic Fatigue Syndrome and also have chronic constipation and a lot of headaches. I've also been diagnosed with osteoporosis in my hips and lumbar spine (I'm 27 y.o), although my doc believes this is due to my past history of anorexia nervosa. 

I would appreciate any insights. Thanks. :) 

Edit: I should add that I have had the serology panel done 3 times now and the results were virtually identical each time. 

Your result is unusual, but your GP was correct in referring you to a GI.  Like you, I tested positive on only the DGP.  In my case, it was the IgA version.  All others in the panel have always been negative even in follow-up testing.  

The TTG is very good and catches MOST celiacs.  It is typically used as a screening test in order to save  costs and the fact it is very good.  But it did not catch you!  

Not all celiacs have the traditional GI symptoms.  Some even have zero symptoms.  When I was diagnosed, I just had anemia.  I even had a genetic anemia which masked my iron-deficiency anemia (that particular anemia was blamed on my monthly cycle which was totally incorrect).  Two months later, I fracture my back doing nothing.  My diagnosis was shocking (I had moderate to severe intestinal damage).  

Talk to your new GI.  Consider the endoscopy since you have so many issues.   This might be the answer!  

Take care and keep researching.   Your health is important!  

 

Tara90 Rookie

Thanks for the advice Cyclinglady. That's really helpful info. I have also been diagnosed with anaemia of chronic disease (low haemoglobin but not caused by iron deficiency), which my haematologist believes is likely a result of bone marrow suppression due to my past anorexia. I wonder if it could actually be related to a gluten issue?

Does anyone else have any thoughts?

cyclinglady Grand Master
1 hour ago, Tara90 said:

Thanks for the advice Cyclinglady. That's really helpful info. I have also been diagnosed with anaemia of chronic disease (low haemoglobin but not caused by iron deficiency), which my haematologist believes is likely a result of bone marrow suppression due to my past anorexia. I wonder if it could actually be related to a gluten issue?

Does anyone else have any thoughts?

Yes.  Learn more:

Open Original Shared Link

and....celiac disease can be considered as a chronic illness.  Seems like your hematologist can not get past your past anorexia diagnosis (and I am not discounting the impact anorexia may have had on your anemia or any other damage incurred).   It could be a combination of many of things.

Discuss this with your GI.   

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - Scott Adams replied to HAUS's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      7

      Sainsbury's Free From White Sliced Bread - Now Egg Free - Completely Ruined It

    2. - Scott Adams replied to deanna1ynne's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      13

      Inconclusive results

    3. - deanna1ynne replied to deanna1ynne's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      13

      Inconclusive results

    4. - cristiana replied to HAUS's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      7

      Sainsbury's Free From White Sliced Bread - Now Egg Free - Completely Ruined It


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,439
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Lillian Steele
    Newest Member
    Lillian Steele
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
      In the U.S., most regular wheat breads are required to be enriched with certain B-vitamins and iron, but gluten-free breads are not required to be. Since many gluten-free products are not enriched, we usually encourage people with celiac disease to consider a multivitamin.  In the early 1900s, refined white flour replaced whole grains, and people began developing serious vitamin-deficiency diseases: Beriberi → caused by a lack of thiamin (vitamin B1) Pellagra → caused by a lack of niacin (vitamin B3) Anemia → linked to low iron and lack of folate By the 1930s–40s, these problems were common in the U.S., especially in poorer regions. Public-health officials responded by requiring wheat flour and the breads made from it to be “enriched” with thiamin, riboflavin, niacin, and iron. Folic acid was added later (1998) to prevent neural-tube birth defects. Why gluten-free bread isn’t required to be enriched? The U.S. enrichment standards were written specifically for wheat flour. Gluten-free breads use rice, tapioca, corn, sorghum, etc.—so they fall outside that rule—but they probably should be for the same reason wheat products are.
    • Scott Adams
      Keep in mind that there are drawbacks to a formal diagnosis, for example more expensive life and private health insurance, as well as possibly needing to disclose it on job applications. Normally I am in favor of the formal diagnosis process, but if you've already figured out that you can't tolerate gluten and will likely stay gluten-free anyway, I wanted to at least mention the possible negative sides of having a formal diagnosis. While I understand wanting a formal diagnosis, it sounds like she will likely remain gluten-free either way, even if she should test negative for celiac disease (Approximately 10x more people have non-celiac gluten sensitivity than have celiac disease, but there isn’t yet a test for NCGS. If her symptoms go away on a gluten-free diet, it would likely signal NCGS).        
    • JoJo0611
    • deanna1ynne
      Thank you all so much for your advice and thoughts. We ended up having another scope and more bloodwork last week. All serological markers continue to increase, and the doc who did the scope said there villous atrophy visible on the scope — but we just got the biopsy pathology report back, and all it says is, “Duodenal mucosa with patchy increased intraepithelial lymphocytes, preserved villous architecture, and patchy foveolar metaplasia,” which we are told is still inconclusive…  We will have her go gluten free again anyway, but how soon would you all test again, if at all? How valuable is an official dx in a situation like this?
    • cristiana
      Thanks for this Russ, and good to see that it is fortified. I spend too much time looking for M&S gluten-free Iced Spiced Buns to have ever noticed this! That's interesting, Scott.  Have manufacturers ever said why that should be the case?  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.