Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Still no definitive answers! Need advice!


MK16

Recommended Posts

MK16 Rookie

3 GI doctors, tests, biopsy and still inconclusive!  
I’ve been suffering for 2 yrs now and still no resolution.  I started with my primary dr with symptoms of bloating, gas, and 1x day diarrhea.  She ran blood work which showed my IGG high at 14 and my IGA low at <1.  The lab comments were “serological evidence for celiac disease is present.  Consider IGA deficiency”.  So referred  to  1st GI who said no celiac I think you have SIBO.  Breath test positive for SIBO.  After 3 rounds of different antibiotics and still a positive Breath test I decided to get a 2nd opinion.  Next GI dr said yes!  You have celiac!  But let’s do an upper endo to biopsy.  Biopsy came back negative.  So she said no it’s not Celiac.  
So now I’m totally confused and try a 3rd GI with all of my lab work.  He says maybe celiac and runs genetic celiac panel blood work.  That came back as me having category 3 DQ8 gene with a moderate risk.  See pic.  He said he doesn’t think it’s celiac, maybe IBS.  
So at this point I give up!   These are all reputable GI doctors!  
Can anyone give me their thoughts based off of my tests?  I’m not sure what a high IGG means?  
Thanks sooo much!!!

B3DB6F13-BC9C-427B-A849-37A95727E097.webp


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



cyclinglady Grand Master
On 2/3/2018 at 7:23 AM, MK16 said:

3 GI doctors, tests, biopsy and still inconclusive!  
I’ve been suffering for 2 yrs now and still no resolution.  I started with my primary dr with symptoms of bloating, gas, and 1x day diarrhea.  She ran blood work which showed my IGG high at 14 and my IGA low at <1.  The lab comments were “serological evidence for celiac disease is present.  Consider IGA deficiency”.  So referred  to  1st GI who said no celiac I think you have SIBO.  Breath test positive for SIBO.  After 3 rounds of different antibiotics and still a positive Breath test I decided to get a 2nd opinion.  Next GI dr said yes!  You have celiac!  But let’s do an upper endo to biopsy.  Biopsy came back negative.  So she said no it’s not Celiac.  
So now I’m totally confused and try a 3rd GI with all of my lab work.  He says maybe celiac and runs genetic celiac panel blood work.  That came back as me having category 3 DQ8 gene with a moderate risk.  See pic.  He said he doesn’t think it’s celiac, maybe IBS.  
So at this point I give up!   These are all reputable GI doctors!  
Can anyone give me their thoughts based off of my tests?  I’m not sure what a high IGG means?  
Thanks sooo much!!!

B3DB6F13-BC9C-427B-A849-37A95727E097.webp

Why not trial a gluten free diet for six months?  Despite your negative biopsies, you have the potential (genes), and a positive on the celiac panel, which might indicate that you have Non-Celiac Gluten Sensitivity.  My hubby went Gluten Free per the advice of my allergist and his GP almost 20 years ago.  It worked.  The gluten free diet might help you too!  

Posterboy Mentor
On 2/3/2018 at 9:23 AM, MK16 said:

3 GI doctors, tests, biopsy and still inconclusive!  
I’ve been suffering for 2 yrs now and still no resolution.  I started with my primary dr with symptoms of bloating, gas, and 1x day diarrhea.  She ran blood work which showed my IGG high at 14 and my IGA low at <1.  The lab comments were “serological evidence for celiac disease is present.  Consider IGA deficiency”.  So referred  to  1st GI who said no celiac I think you have SIBO.  Breath test positive for SIBO.  After 3 rounds of different antibiotics and still a positive Breath test I decided to get a 2nd opinion.  Next GI dr said yes!  You have celiac!  But let’s do an upper endo to biopsy.  Biopsy came back negative.  So she said no it’s not Celiac.  
So now I’m totally confused and try a 3rd GI with all of my lab work.  He says maybe celiac and runs genetic celiac panel blood work.  That came back as me having category 3 DQ8 gene with a moderate risk.  See pic.  He said he doesn’t think it’s celiac, maybe IBS.  
So at this point I give up!   These are all reputable GI doctors!  
Can anyone give me their thoughts based off of my tests?  I’m not sure what a high IGG means?  
Thanks sooo much!!!

B3DB6F13-BC9C-427B-A849-37A95727E097.webp

MK16,

I am not best on the test's but I will try  and explain.

see this new article about why both an tTG and IGa test is performed.

https://www.celiac.com/articles/25017/1/Is-a-One-Two-Punch-of-Anti-tTG-Tests-a-Reliable-Way-to-Diagnose-Celiac-Disease/Page1.html

but this doesn't work well in those who have  an IGa Insuffiency/Deficeincy and why they were trying to rule it out.

That said when your biopsy proved negative they said your test was a false positive.

People who meet this diagnostic criteria usually fall into the NCGS spectrum.  Which basically in lays men's terms.  They don't think you have Celiac yet?

why is not true . . .you are just in the  NCGS phase of  the disease in my opinion.

(This is controversial)

But I find it takes a little while for doctors/clinician's to keep with the latest research.

Dr. Hyman wrote on the HuffPost 5+ years why ago he thinks people in your case are truly Celiac's and not the more clinical unspecific NCGS diagnosis.

when he said "Positve is Positive"

Here is the HuffPost article read it for yourself to help you understand your test results but I will quote some of it for easy reference.

Open Original Shared Link

quoting Dr. Hyman

"Intestinal biopsy (rarely needed if gluten antibodies are positive—based on my interpretation of the recent study)

When you get these tests, there are a few things to keep in mind.

In light of the new research on the dangers of gluten sensitivity without full blown celiac disease, I consider any elevation of antibodies significant and worthy of a trial of gluten elimination. Many doctors consider elevated anti-gliadin antibodies in the absence of a positive intestinal biopsy showing damage to be “false positives.” That means the test looks positive but really isn’t significant.

We can no longer say that. Positive is positive and, as with all illness, there is a continuum of disease, from mild gluten sensitivity to full-blown celiac disease. If your antibodies are elevated, you should go off gluten and test to see if it is leading to your health problems."

And I believe this is what is happening in your case.

***** this is not medical advise but how I would interrupt your test results.

Many people on this forum/board has received a very similar diagnosis of NCGS . .. Ie. positive blood serology without a "Positive Biopsy" to confirm the clinical suspicion of a Celiac diagnosis.

The 2nd Endo is right!  "Positive is Positive"

quoting Dr. Hyman again and I agree!

"This is ground-breaking research that proves you don’t have to have full-blown celiac disease with a positive intestinal biopsy (which is what conventional thinking tells us) to have serious health problems and complications—even death—from eating gluten"

Yet 5+ years later and clinicians' are still not aware of this medical fact.

Still relying on diagnostic tests 50+ years old basing their decisions on the "Gold standard" of a biopsy confirmed diagnosis.

Even though new research confirms this (biopsy confirmed diagnosis) is not necessary today. . . in light of new and better tests than they had then when the biopsy confirmed diagnosis was necessary.

I hope this is helpful.

2 Tim 2:7 “Consider what I say; and the Lord give thee understanding in all things” this included.

posterboy by the Grace of God,

 

 

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - Scott Adams replied to HAUS's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      7

      Sainsbury's Free From White Sliced Bread - Now Egg Free - Completely Ruined It

    2. - Scott Adams replied to deanna1ynne's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      13

      Inconclusive results

    3. - deanna1ynne replied to deanna1ynne's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      13

      Inconclusive results

    4. - cristiana replied to HAUS's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      7

      Sainsbury's Free From White Sliced Bread - Now Egg Free - Completely Ruined It


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,438
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    rednecksurfer
    Newest Member
    rednecksurfer
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Who's Online (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
      In the U.S., most regular wheat breads are required to be enriched with certain B-vitamins and iron, but gluten-free breads are not required to be. Since many gluten-free products are not enriched, we usually encourage people with celiac disease to consider a multivitamin.  In the early 1900s, refined white flour replaced whole grains, and people began developing serious vitamin-deficiency diseases: Beriberi → caused by a lack of thiamin (vitamin B1) Pellagra → caused by a lack of niacin (vitamin B3) Anemia → linked to low iron and lack of folate By the 1930s–40s, these problems were common in the U.S., especially in poorer regions. Public-health officials responded by requiring wheat flour and the breads made from it to be “enriched” with thiamin, riboflavin, niacin, and iron. Folic acid was added later (1998) to prevent neural-tube birth defects. Why gluten-free bread isn’t required to be enriched? The U.S. enrichment standards were written specifically for wheat flour. Gluten-free breads use rice, tapioca, corn, sorghum, etc.—so they fall outside that rule—but they probably should be for the same reason wheat products are.
    • Scott Adams
      Keep in mind that there are drawbacks to a formal diagnosis, for example more expensive life and private health insurance, as well as possibly needing to disclose it on job applications. Normally I am in favor of the formal diagnosis process, but if you've already figured out that you can't tolerate gluten and will likely stay gluten-free anyway, I wanted to at least mention the possible negative sides of having a formal diagnosis. While I understand wanting a formal diagnosis, it sounds like she will likely remain gluten-free either way, even if she should test negative for celiac disease (Approximately 10x more people have non-celiac gluten sensitivity than have celiac disease, but there isn’t yet a test for NCGS. If her symptoms go away on a gluten-free diet, it would likely signal NCGS).        
    • JoJo0611
    • deanna1ynne
      Thank you all so much for your advice and thoughts. We ended up having another scope and more bloodwork last week. All serological markers continue to increase, and the doc who did the scope said there villous atrophy visible on the scope — but we just got the biopsy pathology report back, and all it says is, “Duodenal mucosa with patchy increased intraepithelial lymphocytes, preserved villous architecture, and patchy foveolar metaplasia,” which we are told is still inconclusive…  We will have her go gluten free again anyway, but how soon would you all test again, if at all? How valuable is an official dx in a situation like this?
    • cristiana
      Thanks for this Russ, and good to see that it is fortified. I spend too much time looking for M&S gluten-free Iced Spiced Buns to have ever noticed this! That's interesting, Scott.  Have manufacturers ever said why that should be the case?  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.