Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Help Decoding Blood Test and Unserstanding


MissMegan

Recommended Posts

MissMegan Newbie

Hello! I was hoping someone would be able to explain a little more to me about the recent blood results I have received. 

Long story short, I am a female in my mid twenties, I lost 30 pounds in the span of three months with no explanation (5'6" 128lbs in February of 2020, down to 98lbs in April of 2020). I have since gained a few pounds over the last year, but not much, I now rest around 101/102lbs. I was tiny before, and now I am extremely underweight. I am eating normally and have been, no changes in exercise, no explanation. I noticed I started having typical GI issues related to Celiac, went to four different doctors who kept telling me I had an eating disorder (which I am eating the exact same as I always have and have not changed any exercise patterns) which was very frustrating because I knew something was wrong, but no one was taking me seriously. Finally one doctor decided to test me for Celiac and we got a positive result back on one of the tests and I now have to get an EGD and colonoscopy done (they want to look for multiple things at the same time for a biopsy from what I understand). However, no one has really explained anything to me so I have been trying to do my own research. (They tested me for other things such as diabetes, thyroid, etc. and nothing was positive except the celiac panel). 

These were the tests run and the results (picture of test and result numbers listed below):

  • Antigliadin Abs, IgA; Antigliadin Abs, IgG; t-Transglutaminase (tTG) IgA; t-Transglutaminase (tTG) IgG; Immunoglobulin A, Qn, Serum
  • image.png.bb56675cbb0d3b4060aca2c7f157558d.png

The only thing that came back positive was the t-Transglutaminase (tTG) IgG at a score of (7) which is scored as a weak positive. What does this mean? Is this also affected also by the amount of gluten that is consumed (I do not eat much to begin with because I picked up that it was gluten that was giving me issues and I have been reading that you have to eat a good amount of gluten to be able to get a solid positive test).

What does it mean that the TTG-IGG came back positive, but the TTG-IGA came back negative? And that none of the other ones came back positive? I've also been reading about sensitivities and specificities of the blood tests, but don't entirely understand what that means if someone can help explain that as well. 

Thank you all so much ahead of time, I really appreciate your help to help me understand the beginning of this journey!


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



trents Grand Master

The TTG is the most specific for celiac disease but it is not the most sensitive of the test battery you had run. Given that, if the TTG is positive I would think that is a strong indicator that you have celiac disease. The guideline for daily gluten consumption in order to get valid blood antibody tests is eating 1-2 slices of wheat bread (or the equivalent) for 8 weeks and for the endosocopy/biopsy, that amount of gluten for at least two weeks up to the day of testing. Since your consumption of gluten has been minimal I would suspect that it resulted in lower values than it would have if you had been consuming normal amounts of gluten prior to.

Scott Adams Grand Master

Welcome to the forum @MissMegan! I agree with @trents that your results would likely have been higher had you followed the testing protocol and eaten gluten daily before the test. It's astounding how many doctors, and now computer systems like the one Kaiser has and I use, that don't properly inform you of the requirements necessary to avoid false negative results with these blood tests. It seems like much of this could be programmed into computer systems that won't allow the appointment to be scheduled unless the patient has complied, or would at least send out an automated email when such an appointment is scheduled.

In any case, you need to eat gluten daily for at least two weeks before the biopsy, and I would not worry about it, it is routine and no big deal:

 Perhaps ask your gastro if they will be taking at least 4 samples, which is the current recommendation. 

MissMegan Newbie
18 hours ago, trents said:

The TTG is the most specific for celiac disease but it is not the most sensitive of the test battery you had run. Given that, if the TTG is positive I would think that is a strong indicator that you have celiac disease. The guideline for daily gluten consumption in order to get valid blood antibody tests is eating 1-2 slices of wheat bread (or the equivalent) for 8 weeks and for the endosocopy/biopsy, that amount of gluten for at least two weeks up to the day of testing. Since your consumption of gluten has been minimal I would suspect that it resulted in lower values than it would have if you had been consuming normal amounts of gluten prior to.

Thank you!

MissMegan Newbie
16 hours ago, Scott Adams said:

Welcome to the forum @MissMegan! I agree with @trents that your results would likely have been higher had you followed the testing protocol and eaten gluten daily before the test. It's astounding how many doctors, and now computer systems like the one Kaiser has and I use, that don't properly inform you of the requirements necessary to avoid false negative results with these blood tests. It seems like much of this could be programmed into computer systems that won't allow the appointment to be scheduled unless the patient has complied, or would at least send out an automated email when such an appointment is scheduled.

In any case, you need to eat gluten daily for at least two weeks before the biopsy, and I would not worry about it, it is routine and no big deal:

 Perhaps ask your gastro if they will be taking at least 4 samples, which is the current recommendation. 

Thank you so much! I will be calling and asking about the samples and to follow up on the protocol because they never told me about the gluten challenge or to purposefully continue to eat it. Would it be worthwhile to do the gluten challenge and have them redo the blood work or is that unnecessary at this point? This is all so crazy and new, but I'm glad that after a year of going back and forth with doctors, someone finally took me seriously and we are starting to get an answer!

Scott Adams Grand Master

You should definitely ask your doctor about a possible re-do of the blood test, but personally I don't think it's necessary (but if the doctors are willing to do it, why not?). The positive result is very specific for celiac disease, so I would just be sure she's eating a slice of wheat bread daily for at least two weeks before the biopsy. Should the biopsy be negative, to me it still would mean that she's likely in the non-celiac gluten sensitivity category, and should go gluten-free.

jkc830 Newbie

I also have similar test results, and am confused by the information I am finding online (my appt w/ my doctor isn't until next week). I did not alter my diet prior to testing, but was not specifically eliminating gluten. I definitely eat gluten daily (likely equivalent to 2 pieces of bread), if not at ever meal.

Serum Immunoglobulin A is high at 427 (so not IgA deficient)

Tissue transglutaminase IgG is very high at 34 , but tTG IgA is within normal range at 1

HLA DQ2 Positive

All other markers were within normal range:

ENDOMYSIAL ANTIBODY SCR (IGA) W/REFL TO TITER - Negative

Cultivated Wheat IgE - <0.10 (class 0)

Wheat IgE - <0.10 (class 0)

Gluten IgE - <0.10 (class 0)

Gliadin AB IgA - 7 

Gliadin AB IgG - 4 

----------------------------

From most of what I have read, tTg IgG is only relevant if you are Serum IgA deficient, which I am not.  I know my doctor will decode this for me soon, but I'd love some insight before then. 

Thank you.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Scott Adams Grand Master

@jkc830 Welcome to the forum. This article will be helpful:

 

  • 4 months later...
MissMegan Newbie
On 3/4/2021 at 1:33 PM, Scott Adams said:

You should definitely ask your doctor about a possible re-do of the blood test, but personally I don't think it's necessary (but if the doctors are willing to do it, why not?). The positive result is very specific for celiac disease, so I would just be sure she's eating a slice of wheat bread daily for at least two weeks before the biopsy. Should the biopsy be negative, to me it still would mean that she's likely in the non-celiac gluten sensitivity category, and should go gluten-free.

Hello again! I wanted to come back and ask a question since I had the EGD done. The biopsies were negative, and they gave me no answers other than "it's not celiac" and no further guidance. Since the blood test was positive, and the EGD was negative, would this mean there is a strong likelihood that I am non-celiac gluten sensitive? I still have issues with most anything that contains gluten, and I'm sure there is hidden gluten in many things I am eating. Is the best method to figure this out to completely go gluten-free and see if my body reacts well to it? I have gained a few more pounds over the year, I sit around 105 now, but I am still severely underweight and it seems like nothing I am doing is helping me to gain any weight back. 

Thank you so much for all of your helpful guidance, I really appreciate it!

RMJ Mentor

You could go strictly gluten free, see if you feel better, and see if the antibody levels go down. Celiac damage can be uneven and the surface area of the intestine is large. The doctor might have missed it.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,902
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Patty6133
    Newest Member
    Patty6133
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Xravith
      Yes, you are right. Indeed, I’ve been feeling anemic since the beginning of this week, and today I felt horrible during a lecture at the university, I was trembling a lot and felt all my body incredibly heavy, so I had to come back home. I’ll do a blood test tomorrow, but I’m just worried about the possibility of it coming back negative. I’ve been eating two cookies in the morning as my only source of gluten over the past two weeks—could that affect the final result?
    • trents
      Welcome to the forum, @Judy M! Yes, he definitely needs to continue eating gluten until the day of the endoscopy. Not sure why the GI doc advised otherwise but it was a bum steer.  Celiac disease has a genetic component but also an "epigenetic" component. Let me explain. There are two main genes that have been identified as providing the "potential" to develop "active" celiac disease. We know them as HLA-DQ 2.5 (aka, HLA-DQ 2) and HLA-DQ8. Without one or both of these genes it is highly unlikely that a person will develop celiac disease at some point in their life. About 40% of the general population carry one or both of these two genes but only about 1% of the population develops active celiac disease. Thus, possessing the genetic potential for celiac disease is far less than deterministic. Most who have the potential never develop the disease. In order for the potential to develop celiac disease to turn into active celiac disease, some triggering stress event or events must "turn on" the latent genes. This triggering stress event can be a viral infection, some other medical event, or even prolonged psychological/emotional trauma. This part of the equation is difficult to quantify but this is the epigenetic dimension of the disease. Epigenetics has to do with the influence that environmental factors and things not coded into the DNA itself have to do in "turning on" susceptible genes. And this is why celiac disease can develop at any stage of life. Celiac disease is an autoimmune condition (not a food allergy) that causes inflammation in the lining of the small bowel. The ingestion of gluten causes the body to attack the cells of this lining which, over time, damages and destroys them, impairing the body's ability to absorb nutrients since this is the part of the intestinal track responsible for nutrient absorption and also causing numerous other food sensitivities such as dairy/lactose intolerance. There is another gluten-related disorder known as NCGS (Non Celiac Gluten Sensitivity or just, "gluten sensitivity") that is not autoimmune in nature and which does not damage the small bowel lining. However, NCGS shares many of the same symptoms with celiac disease such as gas, bloating, and diarrhea. It is also much more common than celiac disease. There is no test for NCGS so, because they share common symptoms, celiac disease must first be ruled out through formal testing for celiac disease. This is where your husband is right now. It should also be said that some experts believe NCGS can transition into celiac disease. I hope this helps.
    • Judy M
      My husband has had lactose intolerance for his entire life (he's 68 yo).  So, he's used to gastro issues. But for the past year he's been experiencing bouts of diarrhea that last for hours.  He finally went to his gastroenterologist ... several blood tests ruled out other maladies, but his celiac results are suspect.  He is scheduled for an endoscopy and colonoscopy in 2 weeks.  He was told to eat "gluten free" until the tests!!!  I, and he know nothing about this "diet" much less how to navigate his in daily life!! The more I read, the more my head is spinning.  So I guess I have 2 questions.  First, I read on this website that prior to testing, eat gluten so as not to compromise the testing!  Is that true? His primary care doctor told him to eat gluten free prior to testing!  I'm so confused.  Second, I read that celiac disease is genetic or caused by other ways such as surgery.  No family history but Gall bladder removal 7 years ago, maybe?  But how in God's name does something like this crop up and now is so awful he can't go a day without worrying.  He still works in Manhattan and considers himself lucky if he gets there without incident!  Advice from those who know would be appreciated!!!!!!!!!!!!
    • Scott Adams
      You've done an excellent job of meticulously tracking the rash's unpredictable behavior, from its symmetrical spread and stubborn scabbing to the potential triggers you've identified, like the asthma medication and dietary changes. It's particularly telling that the rash seems to flare with wheat consumption, even though your initial blood test was negative—as you've noted, being off wheat before a test can sometimes lead to a false negative, and your description of the other symptoms—joint pain, brain fog, stomach issues—is very compelling. The symmetry of the rash is a crucial detail that often points toward an internal cause, such as an autoimmune response or a systemic reaction, rather than just an external irritant like a plant or mites. I hope your doctor tomorrow takes the time to listen carefully to all of this evidence you've gathered and works with you to find some real answers and effective relief. Don't be discouraged if the rash fluctuates; your detailed history is the most valuable tool you have for getting an accurate diagnosis.
    • Scott Adams
      In this case the beer is excellent, but for those who are super sensitive it is likely better to go the full gluten-free beer route. Lakefront Brewery (another sponsor!) has good gluten-free beer made without any gluten ingredients.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.