Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Negative Blood And Entero Lab Results?


erin24

Recommended Posts

erin24 Explorer

Has anyone ever had negative results on their blood test and entero lab results but still find the gluten-free diet alleviated their symptoms?

I am asking this b/c:

Currently, my blood work came back negative and I am contimplating getting the Entereo Lab test. I am wondering if the stool test came back negative, just how discouraged I should be. I know everyone on this site says "If you feel better on the diet, who cares if you're not officially diagnosed". While I totally agree with that I just can't help but think maybe it's not celiac disease that is causing all of these symptoms but something else. I guess if I feel better who cares really what it is but it is nice to have some confirmation about what is going on inside my body.

I am just a little annoyed that I don't have any concrete answers. Ohh well, I think I will order the Entero lab test.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



e&j0304 Enthusiast

My daughter had negative blood tests despite lots of symptoms. She never had the biopsy. We started the diet and she was so much better but we too wanted more confirmation so we ordered tests from enterolab. They were positive for gluten sensitivity.

My son also had symptoms of celiac disease. He also had bloodwork that came back neg and he had the biopsy done which was also negative. We ordered enterolab tests for him and those were negative too. HOWEVER...he had had chronic diarrhea since birth and was not gaining weight. Since starting the gluten free diet, his diarrhea is gone and he is gaining weight.

I really don't have any answers for you, but that's our experience. Good luck finding your answers. I truely know how frustrating all of the uncertainty can be.

Shannon

jnclelland Contributor
Has anyone ever had negative results on their blood test and entero lab results but still find the gluten-free diet alleviated their symptoms?

Yup, this is what happened to me. I think I should have done Enterolab sooner; I did it after 8 months gluten-free and my results were negative (although high enough in the negative range to wonder if they might have been slightly positive 8 months earlier). However, my gene test was positive for one celiac gene and one non-celiac gluten sensitivity gene. So, while I still feel frustrated at not having a diagnosis, I'm still glad I had the test, because:

1) Since my gene test was positive, that gives me confidence that there's something real going on here, and it's not all in my head. Probably I just got lucky and figured out I needed to be gluten-free before I suffered really serious damage - and that's a GOOD thing!

2) The positive gene test gives me something concrete to tell the doctor if I ever decide that my kids need to be tested. (They aren't showing any troublesome symptoms now, but who knows what may happen down the road?)

Jeanne

Clark Bent as Stupor-Man Contributor

I was in the same position as you a month or 2 ago. I had a blood test done for gluten antibodies right at the start of the year, and that came back negative. There were 2 antibody levels that had been tested, and neither of them were even in the high part of the normal range. My primary doctor had dismissed celiac disease before the blood test (apparently she thought it didn't cause headaches) and reluctantly ordered the blood test in the first place.

I went on a strict gluten-free diet along with eliminating many other foods after the blood test. I felt some improvement the first couple weeks and was very up and down the next month. I ordered the enterolab test in mid-Feb. to confirm that I was on the right path with the whole gluten-free thing. My results came back positive for nearly everything including gluten and casein. The positive results enabled me to do things I had been hesitating on (ie. getting new pots and pans, etc.).

I don't think it's necessary to get a diagnosis, but I wanted one, mostly because I was too up and down to know for sure that I was on the right path. If you feel better even if your enterolab results come back negative, I would stay on the diet. Easier said then done, but feeling better should supercede any lab result.

- charlie

Sandyo Apprentice

"I went on a strict gluten-free diet along with eliminating many other foods after the blood test. I felt some improvement the first couple weeks and was very up and down the next month. "

Thanks Charlie,

I'm glad to hear that someone else is having ups and downs. I also had a negative blood test but had felt better after going gluten free to 3 days before the blood test. Then I eat gluten for 3 days right before they drew the blood. This probably messed it up. So even though the blood test was negative, I've been gluten free for about 2 weeks now. But last week it was very up and down and I got discourged and eat some bread. Well, the next day I felt terrible. All my symptoms were back. I was starting to get relieve from Cronic Constipation for years and next next day....."c" was back! Incredible how fast it effected my BM. So that is enough for me.....but I had already ordered the enterolab test and am waiting for it's arrival. I'm going to stay gluten free for months and see if I level off.

Sandy

Claire Collaborator

May I suggest that if you get the Enterolab test you get the one that includes non-celiac gluten sensitivity. Claire

erin24 Explorer

Thanks for everyone's responses. It is good to know what everyone else has been through and the things you have tried since it seems that you are pretty much your own doctor with Celiac. Actaully, it seems that we are more like each other's doctors :) This message board has been more informative and helpful than all of my doctors combined. You guys will talk to me immediately and don't make me schedule appointments 2 months after I call. I guess I am a little bitter, huh?


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,684
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Betty Siebert
    Newest Member
    Betty Siebert
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
      I'd go with a vodka tonic, but that's just me😉
    • Rejoicephd
      That and my nutritionist also said that drinking cider is one of the worst drink choices for me, given that I have candida overgrowth.  She said the combination of the alcohol and sugar would be very likely to worsen my candida problem.  She suggested that if I drink, I go for clear vodka, either neat or with a splash of cranberry.   So in summary, I am giving ciders a rest.  Whether it's a gluten risk or sugars and yeast overgrowth, its just not worth it.
    • Inkie
      Thank you for the information ill will definitely bring it into practice .
    • Scott Adams
      While plain, pure tea leaves (black, green, or white) are naturally gluten-free, the issue often lies not with the tea itself but with other ingredients or processing. Many flavored teas use barley malt or other gluten-containing grains as a flavoring agent, which would be clearly listed on the ingredient label. Cross-contamination is another possibility, either in the facility where the tea is processed or, surprisingly, from the tea bag material itself—some tea bags are sealed with a wheat-based glue. Furthermore, it's important to consider that your reaction could be to other substances in tea, such as high levels of tannins, which can be hard on the stomach, or to natural histamines or other compounds that can cause a non-celiac immune response. The best way to investigate is to carefully read labels for hidden ingredients, try switching to a certified gluten-free tea brand that uses whole leaf or pyramid-style bags, and see if the reaction persists.
    • Scott Adams
      This is a challenging and confusing situation. The combination of a positive EMA—which is a highly specific marker rarely yielding false positives—alongside strongly elevated TTG on two separate occasions, years apart, is profoundly suggestive of celiac disease, even in the absence of biopsy damage. This pattern strongly aligns with what is known as "potential celiac disease," where the immune system is clearly activated, but intestinal damage has not yet become visible under the microscope. Your concern about the long-term risk of continued gluten consumption is valid, especially given your family's experience with the consequences of delayed diagnosis. Since your daughter is now at an age where her buy-in is essential for a gluten-free lifestyle, obtaining a definitive answer is crucial for her long-term adherence and health. Given that she is asymptomatic yet serologically positive, a third biopsy now, after a proper 12-week challenge, offers the best chance to capture any microscopic damage that may have developed, providing the concrete evidence needed to justify the dietary change. This isn't about wanting her to have celiac; it's about wanting to prevent the insidious damage that can occur while waiting for symptoms to appear, and ultimately giving her the unambiguous "why" she needs to accept and commit to the necessary treatment. This article might be helpful. It breaks down each type of test, and what a positive results means in terms of the probability that you might have celiac disease. One test that always needs to be done is the IgA Levels/Deficiency Test (often called "Total IGA") because some people are naturally IGA deficient, and if this is the case, then certain blood tests for celiac disease might be false-negative, and other types of tests need to be done to make an accurate diagnosis. The article includes the "Mayo Clinic Protocol," which is the best overall protocol for results to be ~98% accurate.    
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.