Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Pitfalls Of Self-diagnosis


JerryK

Recommended Posts

quantumsugar Apprentice

I self-diagnosed, and I've seen a few problems with it. Some of them have been resolved, but I am trying to get a diagnosis now (based on past history and gene testing). In my personal opinion... if you can get into a doctor in the next few days--you might save yourself some problems later. You may want the diagnosis later and not be able to get one. It totally depends on which decision you will feel most comfortable with. A lot of people have no problems at all without a formal diagnosis or even prefer it; I'm not one of them. These are some of the issues I've had:

1. People were less willing to believe me or take the disease as seriously as I need them to.

2. Even though I had symptoms that were severe, and lessened immediately on the diet, I still never was ENTIRELY sure. There were times when this type of doubt would really bother me.

3. In college (as in other places), asking for special accomodations is often nearly impossible without a formal doctor's diagnosis.

4. For example, when trying to get additional loan money because my food expenses increased and I was too weak to work... I couldn't without that formal diagnosis.

5. If my doctor had seen bloodwork/a biopsy that indicated celiac disease, it would be less work to get tested for associated problems; my doctor would take my knowledge that I had celiac disease more seriously (because he would have been the one to tell me.

It sucks to stay on for a few more days (and I wouldn't advise doing it for much longer than that)... but it could be really helpful. Good luck deciding.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



  • Replies 59
  • Created
  • Last Reply
prinsessa Contributor

I agree it is a choice, but it is a choice to live a healthy live (and for some a choice between life and death). My DD's grandmother has diabetes, but still chooses to eat unhealthy food and not exercise. And then she complains about how bad her diabetes is (between drinking 5 glasses of coke in one sitting). I agree with everything Fiddle-Faddle said. Some days I feel like I have a choice and some days I don't. I just can't believe that some people would choose to be miserable. I was not happy before going gluten free (and I'm not happy when I get glutened). Pretty much everything we do in life is a choice....a lot of the time they just don't feel like choices.

olalisa Contributor
Can we just say that it's possible to loook at this both ways?

It's possible to view this as a lifestyle choice. This attitude gives some people a feeling of control.

It's equally possible to look at this and say, "Hey, there's no choice here." For some people, this is such a no-brainer that there really doesn't seem to be any choice.

Personally, I have some days where I feel like I am making a choice, and some days where I feel I haven't got any choice.

Please don't try to force Geoff to feel that he has a choice. You can't force feelings. Maybe he will come to feel he has a choice, maybe not. If he doesn't feel he has a choice, then he doesn't have a choice. Period.

For those of you who feel that you have a choice, you have made very inspiring arguments--but don't beat him up with those inspiring arguments, okay?

How you see things is not necessarily the same way someone else can see them--or live them.

Fiddle-Faddle,

Thanks for articulating so well what I was thinking as I read this thread. I felt like Geoff was getting pummelled for his point of view, and was trying to figure out how to say what I thought. You summed it up perfectly--especially the part about feeling like you have a choice some days and not others.

I don't think ANY of us would choose to have this disease and to have to be concerned about every molecule that goes into our mouths. That's what I think Geoff is trying to say, if I hear him correctly. And I couldn't agree with him more.

darlindeb25 Collaborator

I'm sorry Geoff, I guess I misunderstood you. I feel celiac's is a lifestyle change for me. I had to change so much in the last 5+ years. I didn't mean to be cruel. I'm sorry!

Fiddle-Faddle Community Regular

Deb, I'm scratching my head here. I went back and reread all of Geoff's posts, and I don't see a single one where he degrades anyone who feels that it is a lifestyle choice. If anything, I think people were degrading him.

His points were every bit as valid as yours. Could you be misunderstanding what he is saying about living in fear of buffets? As I understood it, if he were vegan, he wouldn't be afraid that eating a piece of meat by mistake at the buiffet would make him doubled over in agony for 2 weeks, whereas eating a bread crumb by mistake WOULD. Hence, the difference between lifestyle chlice and feeling of no choice.

I do think you are being unnecessarily rigid about your definition of "lifestyle choice." Geoff did say that he felt that this is a subject where you would have to agree to disagree. He tried to explain how HE feels--he never said that you were wrong.

darlindeb25 Collaborator

I was wrong, I'm sorry.

tarnalberry Community Regular
1. People were less willing to believe me or take the disease as seriously as I need them to.

2. Even though I had symptoms that were severe, and lessened immediately on the diet, I still never was ENTIRELY sure. There were times when this type of doubt would really bother me.

I find these two particularly interesting, because a formal diagnosis should have *NO* bearing on either of them - these should come *entirely* from respect and confidence. I haven't had too much issure with people not taking it too seriously (I don't give them the option; if *I* don't know, *I* don't eat it) and while I'm not *entirely* sure due to my inconclusive results and wonky dietary testing, I don't *need* to be *entirely* sure to follow the diet when I highly suspect that it helps...

I wonder what we, as the celiac community, can do to influence these two items...


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



par18 Apprentice
I find these two particularly interesting, because a formal diagnosis should have *NO* bearing on either of them - these should come *entirely* from respect and confidence. I haven't had too much issure with people not taking it too seriously (I don't give them the option; if *I* don't know, *I* don't eat it) and while I'm not *entirely* sure due to my inconclusive results and wonky dietary testing, I don't *need* to be *entirely* sure to follow the diet when I highly suspect that it helps...

I wonder what we, as the celiac community, can do to influence these two items...

I could not agree more. I have not had one instance in which someone wanted to see my "positive diagnosis" before they would give me a gluten free menu or disclose what was in a meal I wanted to order. Same goes with me refusing to eat or drink something that was offered outside the home. The key is to get more people to request gluten free in their lifestyle regardless of whether or not they have a diagnosis.

Tom

JerryK Community Regular
I could not agree more. I have not had one instance in which someone wanted to see my "positive diagnosis" before they would give me a gluten free menu or disclose what was in a meal I wanted to order. Same goes with me refusing to eat or drink something that was offered outside the home. The key is to get more people to request gluten free in their lifestyle regardless of whether or not they have a diagnosis.

Tom

I have lots of bowling buddies. (yes I'm a bowler God forbid) These guys are not all rocket scientists.

If they press me, I will explain it to them in terms they understand......"If I eat anything containing wheat, I will have the $hits for three days and feel like hell". Not many people are going to be interested in the technical explaination, but if you explain it in terms of symptoms....at least my bowling buddies seem to get it :P. They don't understand anything about the undigestable gliadin protein in

wheat causing multiple gastrointestinal, extraintestinal symptoms..including neurological manifestations...so you have to say it in terms they understand...

GeoffCJ Enthusiast
His points were every bit as valid as yours. Could you be misunderstanding what he is saying about living in fear of buffets? As I understood it, if he were vegan, he wouldn't be afraid that eating a piece of meat by mistake at the buiffet would make him doubled over in agony for 2 weeks, whereas eating a bread crumb by mistake WOULD. Hence, the difference between lifestyle chlice and feeling of no choice.

I do think you are being unnecessarily rigid about your definition of "lifestyle choice." Geoff did say that he felt that this is a subject where you would have to agree to disagree. He tried to explain how HE feels--he never said that you were wrong.

That's exactly it. I agree it is a choice to not be sick. I disagree that it's a lifestyle choice. I do not think that that term accurately describes the situation we're in, nor gives it the appropriate level of seriousness.

From Wikipedia -

In sociology, a lifestyle is the way a person (or a group) lives. This includes patterns of social relations, consumption, entertainment, and dress. A lifestyle typically also reflects an individual's attitudes, values or worldview.

Having a specific "lifestyle" implies a conscious or unconscious choice between one set of behaviours and some other sets of behaviours.

In business, "lifestyles" provide a means of targeting consumers as advertisers and marketers endeavor to match consumer aspirations with products.

The term "lifestyle" apparently first appeared in 1939. Alvin Toffler predicted an explosion of lifestyles ("subcults") as diversity increases in post-industrial societies. Pre-modern societies did not require a term approaching sub-culture or "lifestyle", as different ways of living were expressed as entirely different cultures, religions, ethnicities or by an oppressed minority racial group. As such the minority culture was always seen as alien or other. "Lifestyles", by comparison, are accepted or partially accepted differences within the majority culture or group. This tolerance of differentiation within a majority culture seems to be associated with modernity and capitalism.

None of that sounds like treating a disease, or choosing not to be sick.

Geoff

TestyTommy Rookie

I have absolutely no idea how people can think of celiac as a 'lifestyle choice'. It's a disease. If we eat gluten, we get sick and we will eventually die. I suppose there are people who have celiac and still eat gluten, but I can't imagine why. It's like slamming a door on your finger over and over again. You know it breaks your finger, but you keep doing it because it's your 'choice'? That's not making a lifestyle choice; that's being an idiot.

I agree with Geoff that we have to be careful about how we characterize this disease. If you say that you're gluten-free because of a 'lifestyle choice', then people will assume you're trying the latest fad diet. In fact, that's the response I get from most people: "Oh, you don't eat gluten? Maybe I should try that! I tried the Beverly Hills Cabbage and Coffee Diet. It did wonders for me! I lost 23 lbs!"

I have friends with lupus and MS, and they sure as heck don't call it a 'lifestyle choice'; they call it a disease. I think it's demeaning to say that I have a 'choice' of eating gluten or not eating gluten, or I have a 'choice' to be healthy or sick. I don't. And if I had a 'choice', I would certainly not 'choose' to have celiac disease!

PS: I also agree with being explicit about celiac, since so few people know what it is. I usually tell them that it's an autoimmune disease like lupus or MS, and if I eat so much as a bread crumb, my immune system will start shredding apart my intestines. That usually brings a little empathy.

Jestgar Rising Star

I had nothing cut off or cut open to treat this. I don't need mechanical devices to treat this. I don't need a prescription to treat this. My health is dependent entirely upon me. That's why I see it as a choice. This doesn't mean that I walk into a restaurant and say "Oh, I've chosen not to eat gluten, could you please...." I tell them I can't. Just like I can't eat cyanide.

par18 Apprentice
I have absolutely no idea how people can think of celiac as a 'lifestyle choice'. It's a disease. If we eat gluten, we get sick and we will eventually die. I suppose there are people who have celiac and still eat gluten, but I can't imagine why. It's like slamming a door on your finger over and over again. You know it breaks your finger, but you keep doing it because it's your 'choice'? That's not making a lifestyle choice; that's being an idiot.

I agree with Geoff that we have to be careful about how we characterize this disease. If you say that you're gluten-free because of a 'lifestyle choice', then people will assume you're trying the latest fad diet. In fact, that's the response I get from most people: "Oh, you don't eat gluten? Maybe I should try that! I tried the Beverly Hills Cabbage and Coffee Diet. It did wonders for me! I lost 23 lbs!"

I have friends with lupus and MS, and they sure as heck don't call it a 'lifestyle choice'; they call it a disease. I think it's demeaning to say that I have a 'choice' of eating gluten or not eating gluten, or I have a 'choice' to be healthy or sick. I don't. And if I had a 'choice', I would certainly not 'choose' to have celiac disease!

PS: I also agree with being explicit about celiac, since so few people know what it is. I usually tell them that it's an autoimmune disease like lupus or MS, and if I eat so much as a bread crumb, my immune system will start shredding apart my intestines. That usually brings a little empathy.

Well would you consider Celiac a "lifestyle" change?

Tom

TestyTommy Rookie

Absolutely. It's a huge change in how we live. I don't understand how people can think of it as a 'choice'. I'm a celiac; I can't eat gluten. It's not that I 'choose' not to eat gluten.

(And is anyone else getting an eerie vibe from this? Change 'celiac' to 'gay' and re-read this thread. . . .)

Jestgar Rising Star

But you don't "choose" do be gay. Nor do you "choose" to have Celiac.

But you do choose who you have sex with, and you do choose what you eat.

There have been many gay men who have chosen to have sex with a female wife in order to fit in. And there are Celiacs who choose to eat gluten in order to fit in.

And this thread is getting very abstract... :blink:

kbabe1968 Enthusiast
I agree it is a choice, but it is a choice to live a healthy live (and for some a choice between life and death). My DD's grandmother has diabetes, but still chooses to eat unhealthy food and not exercise. And then she complains about how bad her diabetes is (between drinking 5 glasses of coke in one sitting). I agree with everything Fiddle-Faddle said. Some days I feel like I have a choice and some days I don't. I just can't believe that some people would choose to be miserable. I was not happy before going gluten free (and I'm not happy when I get glutened). Pretty much everything we do in life is a choice....a lot of the time they just don't feel like choices.

You'd think! My grandmother is a diabetic and is EXACTLY the same way as your DD's grandmother!

Also, when I brought up on another forum that I had celiac (or at least a wheat intollerance - I self diagnosed! LOL :D)....I had this one woman jump all over me and tell me not to turn into one of those freaks at a restaurant who is picky about what they eat, etc.

After further prodding, she told me she had been diagnosed but just didn't want to inconvenience anyone with her health issues so she justs "sucks it up" and that was her advice for anyone with an ailment. Suck it up.

Sorry....not me....I KNOW beyond a shadow of a doubt that consuming gluten makes me sick as a dog. That may mean never eating out the rest of my life. Oh well. It beats having razor blades running thru my intestines and peeing out my bottom b/c the D is so severe.

:)

henrietta Newbie

Reading everyone's posts I tried to think how I feel.

To me eating bread is equivalent to sticking my hand in the fire, I have learned from trying it again after a few months of none that the reaction is sudden, violent and I feel ill for several days afterwards.

So it isn't a lifestyle choice more a necessary one, if I tuned up at the Drs' daily with a burned hand eventually they would section me, so to keep eating gluten is just as irresponsible.

I am still doscovering what I can and can't eat, for instance a taste of someone's sponge cake makes me visit the loo several times the next day, but if it's their Birthday cake I may take the risk!

A bread roll will make me sufficiently ill that I can't ever see me eating one in my lifetime.

No-one willingly makes themselves violently ill so I think it's a forced decision not a choice in the end...

ianm Apprentice
There is a postive side to self diagnosis...Celiac is not mentioned in your medical records. This can make it easier to get insurance (health and life). Insurance companies tend to write waivers on anything that is mentioned in your medical file.

My doctor doesn't recommend me getting tested for just this reason. There is no way I would get tested any way because I can't afford or want to be that sick ever again. I wasted the first 36 years of my life because of gluten and I'm not about to waste one minute more.

tarnalberry Community Regular

The semantics thing amuses me.

My opinion:

Having Celiac disease is not a choice, lifestyle or otherwise.

Being on the gluten free diet is a choice, and by the definition already posted, a lifestyle one.

Have a disease/condition/ailement is not a choice, but treating it is. It might be dumb not to treat it ('hey doc, I'm profusely bleeding from this gunshot wound, but don't even think of working on me to fix me' :lol: ), but it's still a choice.

rez Apprentice

I couldn't agree more. A choice is something we control. You can't control that you have the disease itself, but you can choose whether or not to treat it.

darlindeb25 Collaborator

Having Celiac disease is not a choice, lifestyle or otherwise.

Being on the gluten free diet is a choice, and by the definition already posted, a lifestyle one.

Have a disease/condition/ailement is not a choice, but treating it is. It might be dumb not to treat it ('hey doc, I'm profusely bleeding from this gunshot wound, but don't even think of working on me to fix me' ), but it's still a choice.

I totally agree Tiffany. Choice is the wrong word, it is not a lifestyle choice, it's a lifestyle change, even though in making the decision to go gluten-free, I have made a lifestyle choice. We are just mincing words. I chose to go gluten-free for my health, which, with this choice, I totally changed my lifestyle making it a lifestyle choice. There are many gluten sensitive people out there who chose to ignore the information given them, just as many Type 2 diabetic's chose to ignore the info given them. My ex is a Type 2 diabetic who did not take diabetes seriously and now he is totally diabled with heart disease--yet it was his choice to not change his lifestyle and he almost died because of it.

I know of a man in Michigan whom my sister did finally convince to go gluten-free. He was doing wonderful, his health returned, he felt as though he was given back his life. He was gluten-free for probably 4 years and one day he decided to have a sandwich. He then announced to my sister that he had not gotten ill, so therefore, his celiac's must have been cured. He continued eating gluten and in just a few months, he died of a massive heart attack. Did gluten kill him? Who knows, yet we all know that when he went back on gluten, he jeopardized his health and yes, gluten can certainly be a factor in his death. He made a choice, which definitely changed his lifestyle and now his family no longer have him.

Lifestyle choice, lifestyle change, lifestyle decision--all the same thing!

I too, do not tell people I have an allergy to wheat when I am talking about gluten free, although, my skin also reacts to wheat, so I am guessing I do have an allergy also. My sister always tries to explain gluten free as an intolerance when in restuarants, yet if they look confused, she tells them that if one tiny smigeon of gluten gets on her plate, she will fall on the floor, dying a slow and painful death. A little dramatic, yes--has she been glutened--nope!

We all need to agree that we are all correct!

hathor Contributor

What an interesting philosophical discussion. Like many, it comes down to definitions. Here, I think it comes down to how much of an existentialist/Buddhist/whatever concept of "choice" you have.

I would disagree that vegetarianism or veganism is necessarily a lifestyle choice in the "no consequences if you don't make it" sense. There are some who have medical conditions that improve with a very low fat vegan diet and feel poorly with any deviation from it. It can be frustrating when people don't understand this and want to try to force food on you. Although it hasn't happened to me or my husband personally, I've also heard several on a low fat vegan board mention nonvegans actually slipping ingredients into what they serve. They wouldn't try that with us; we're lawyers. :lol:

tarnalberry Community Regular
I would disagree that vegetarianism or veganism is necessarily a lifestyle choice in the "no consequences if you don't make it" sense.

But all choices have consequencies, even lifestyle choices. Change or choice... the term is similar in this context. Vegetarianism/veganism is a lifestyle choice because it is a decision amongst options that is repeated over the course of your life in many settings.

Choices aren't necessarily 'light and fluffy'. Choosing to treat or not treat brain cancer could kill you either way, but the choice is still important. Heck, even choosing the school and degree you get has very long term implications, and the choice can go many ways, but is still important. The choice of what you choose to wear lounging around the house... that's probably a 'light and fluffy' choice. ;)

Choice is the wrong word, it is not a lifestyle choice, it's a lifestyle change, even though in making the decision to go gluten-free, I have made a lifestyle choice.

I wouldn't say that Celiac disease is a lifestyle change. If you get diagnosed with it, you *can* make no change from the day before you were diagnosed. That is possible. (That is also a choice. ;) ) The treatment is a lifestyle change, and one has the choice to treat or not treat Celiac.

To most of us, it seems like such an obvious answer, it's hard to see the choice. It's like you're standing in the middle of the road, and there's a car heading straight for you that can't possibly stop in time to avoid hitting you. Do you jump out of the way or not? *That is a choice* but it seems like it's not because most people assume what the expected outcome should be. There's a choice in pretty much *everything* we do. (And to that choices in how we do the things we do, and so on... it's a choice world out there! hehehehehe ;) )

hathor Contributor
But all choices have consequencies, even lifestyle choices.

True. I was trying to summarize the distinction drawn by GeoffCJ in post 12 and saying that some veganism would be in the same category he was putting avoiding gluten into. My attempt to describe the category was rather inartful; I was trying to summarize what he was saying in a phrase. Or what I thought he was saying, to be more precise. :lol: Perhaps I needed to include "foreseeable, adverse health" before the word consequences.

I tend to agree with you that it is a choice, even if health-inspired.

Plenty of people choose to do things that are harmful to themselves.

par18 Apprentice
But all choices have consequencies, even lifestyle choices. Change or choice... the term is similar in this context. Vegetarianism/veganism is a lifestyle choice because it is a decision amongst options that is repeated over the course of your life in many settings.

Choices aren't necessarily 'light and fluffy'. Choosing to treat or not treat brain cancer could kill you either way, but the choice is still important. Heck, even choosing the school and degree you get has very long term implications, and the choice can go many ways, but is still important. The choice of what you choose to wear lounging around the house... that's probably a 'light and fluffy' choice. ;)

I wouldn't say that Celiac disease is a lifestyle change. If you get diagnosed with it, you *can* make no change from the day before you were diagnosed. That is possible. (That is also a choice. ;) ) The treatment is a lifestyle change, and one has the choice to treat or not treat Celiac.

To most of us, it seems like such an obvious answer, it's hard to see the choice. It's like you're standing in the middle of the road, and there's a car heading straight for you that can't possibly stop in time to avoid hitting you. Do you jump out of the way or not? *That is a choice* but it seems like it's not because most people assume what the expected outcome should be. There's a choice in pretty much *everything* we do. (And to that choices in how we do the things we do, and so on... it's a choice world out there! hehehehehe ;) )

I agree with choice. If someone doesn't think it applies to Celiac then go to the "Coping With" forum and read the post on "can't stop eating gluten". Sounds like a choice to me.

Tom

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,946
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Miva
    Newest Member
    Miva
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Who's Online (See full list)

  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Jacki Espo
      This happened to me as well. What’s weirder is that within a couple hours of taking paxlovid it subsided. I thought maybe I got glutened but after reading your post not so sure. 
    • Mari
      Hi Tiffany. Thank you for writing your dituation and  circumstancesin such detail and so well writte, too. I particularly noticed what you wrote about brain for and feeling like your brain is swelling and I know from my own experiences that's how it feel and your brain really does swell and you get migraines.    Way back when I was in my 20s I read a book by 2 MD allergist and they described their patient who came in complaining that her brain, inside her cranium, was swelling  and it happened when she smelled a certain chemical she used in her home. She kept coming back and insisting her brain actually swelled in her head. The Drs couldn't explain this problem so they, with her permission, performed an operation where they made a small opening through her cranium, exposed her to the chemical then watched as she brain did swell into the opening. The DRs were amazed but then were able to advise her to avoid chemicals that made her brain swell. I remember that because I occasionally had brain fog then but it was not a serious problem. I also realized that I was becoming more sensitive to chemicals I used in my work in medical laboratories. By my mid forties the brain fog and chemicals forced me to leave my  profession and move to a rural area with little pollution. I did not have migraines. I was told a little later that I had a more porous blood brain barrier than other people. Chemicals in the air would go up into my sinused and leak through the blood brain barrier into my brain. We have 2 arteries  in our neck that carry blood with the nutrients and oxygen into the brain. To remove the fluids and used blood from the brain there are only capillaries and no large veins to carry it away so all those fluids ooze out much more slowly than they came in and since the small capillaries can't take care of extra fluid it results in swelling in the face, especially around the eyes. My blood flow into my brain is different from most other people as I have an arterial ischema, adefectiveartery on one side.   I have to go forward about 20 or more years when I learned that I had glaucoma, an eye problem that causes blindness and more years until I learned I had celiac disease.  The eye Dr described my glaucoma as a very slow loss of vision that I wouldn't  notice until had noticeable loss of sight.  I could have my eye pressure checked regularly or it would be best to have the cataracts removed from both eyes. I kept putting off the surgery then just overnight lost most of the vision in my left eye. I thought at the I had been exposed to some chemical and found out a little later the person who livedbehind me was using some chemicals to build kayaks in a shed behind my house. I did not realize the signifance  of this until I started having appointments with a Dr. in a new building. New buildings give me brain fog, loss of balance and other problems I know about this time I experienced visual disturbances very similar to those experienced by people with migraines. I looked further online and read that people with glaucoma can suffer rapid loss of sight if they have silent migraines (no headache). The remedy for migraines is to identify and avoid the triggers. I already know most of my triggers - aromatic chemicals, some cleaning materials, gasoline and exhaust and mold toxins. I am very careful about using cleaning agents using mostly borax and baking powder. Anything that has any fragrance or smell I avoid. There is one brand of dishwashing detergent that I can use and several brands of  scouring powder. I hope you find some of this helpful and useful. I have not seen any evidence that Celiac Disease is involved with migraines or glaucoma. Please come back if you have questions or if what I wrote doesn't make senseto you. We sometimes haveto learn by experience and finding out why we have some problems. Take care.       The report did not mention migraines. 
    • Mari
      Hi Jmartes71 That is so much like my story! You probably know where Laytonville is and that's where I was living just before my 60th birthday when the new Dr. suggested I could have Celiacs. I didn't go on a gluten challange diet before having the Celiac panel blood test drawn. The results came back as equivical as one antibody level was very high but another, tissue transaminasewas normal. Itdid show I was  allergic to cows milk and I think hot peppers. I immediately went gluten free but did not go in for an endoscopy. I found an online lab online that would do the test to show if I had a main celiac gene (enterolab.com). The report came back that I had inherited a main celiac gene, DQ8, from one parent and a D!6 from the other parent. That combination is knows to sym[tons of celiac worse than just inheriting one main celiac gene. With my version of celiac disease I was mostly constipated but after going gluten-free I would have diarrhea the few times I was glutened either by cross contamination or eating some food containing gluten. I have stayed gluten-free for almost 20 years now and knew within a few days that it was right for me although my recovery has been slow.   When I go to see a  medical provide and tell them I have celiacs they don't believe me. The same when I tell them that I carry a main celiac gene, the DQ8. It is only when I tell them that I get diarrhea after eating gluten that they realize that I might have celiac disease. Then they will order th Vitamin B12 and D3 that I need to monitor as my B12 levels can go down very fast if I'm not taking enough of it. Medical providers haven't been much help in my recovery. They are not well trained in this problem. I really hope this helps ypu. Take care.      
    • knitty kitty
    • DebJ14
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.