Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Biopsy Results


rebz

Recommended Posts

rebz Rookie

Here are my blood results.

total IgA - 4.38 g/L (0.8-2.8 normal range)

Endomysium IgA - negative

IgA gliadin - 35U/mL (15-30U/ml equivocal range)

IgG gliadin - 13 U.mL (15-30U/ml equivocal range)

IgA t-Transglutaminase 22 U/ml (normal range 0-15U/ml)

Biopsy results only showed ' subjective patchy increase in intraepithelial lymphocytes'

I am waiting for an appointment with GI doc to discuss results. Before the biopsy he said he thought it would be negative with these blood results.

I am totally confused - I think he will say that these results don't indicate celiac because there is no villous atrophy etc... I am thinking he will tell me I have IBS. Am I in denial about this do you think or are these results as borderline as I think they are...

Any comments are greatly appreciated

Rebecca


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



2kids4me Contributor

My daughter had borderline results in bloodwork too, GI said: " Her results are as low as they can get and still be called positive - I am doing the biopsy to rule out celiac as a cause for her intestinal symptoms plus we can get a better idea of what might be going on." [rather than saying - we are doing this to confirm celiac]

Biopsy confirmed celiac - subtotal villous flattening with lymphocytic infiltration.

Lymphocytes are the white blood cell that responds to antigens - be it viral, bacterial or gluten causing an immune response.

I read somewhere that dairy can cause villous blunting as well (if the person is intolerant), but not to the same degree at gluten.

IBS is not a diagnosis - its an adjective to describe inflammed bowel when they dont know the cause /havent found the cause. Many so called "IBS" patients respond very well to gluten free.

We had reduced gluten to one piece of bread or a serving of cereal in the weeks prior to biopsy, Kathryn hated eating that gluten! Even before the results were known, Kathryn decided she never wanted "that evil gluten" again.

Sandy

nikki-uk Enthusiast
Here are my blood results.

total IgA - 4.38 g/L (0.8-2.8 normal range)

Endomysium IgA - negative

IgA gliadin - 35U/mL (15-30U/ml equivocal range)

IgG gliadin - 13 U.mL (15-30U/ml equivocal range)

IgA t-Transglutaminase 22 U/ml (normal range 0-15U/ml)

Biopsy results only showed ' subjective patchy increase in intraepithelial lymphocytes'

I am waiting for an appointment with GI doc to discuss results. Before the biopsy he said he thought it would be negative with these blood results.

I am totally confused - I think he will say that these results don't indicate celiac because there is no villous atrophy etc... I am thinking he will tell me I have IBS. Am I in denial about this do you think or are these results as borderline as I think they are...

Any comments are greatly appreciated

Rebecca

It's possible that you've caught it before any real damage occured - or , damage can be patchy and maybe the biopsy sites missed it.

Something must have drove you to the docs in the first place symptom wise - so you've absolutely got nothing to lose by trying the gluten-free diet now you've had the biopsy :)

Nancym Enthusiast
Biopsy results only showed ' subjective patchy increase in intraepithelial lymphocytes'

I believe this is recognized as a pre-celiac changes I think Dr. Lewey, and others, write about this. You might want to google it up.

Here's one: Open Original Shared Link

rebz Rookie

thank you for your replies.

I shall wait and see what the GI says before making any decision on a gluten-free diet. I am reluctant to start without a definite diagnosis of celiac and these results are not convincing to me, though maybe others would think they are ?

aikiducky Apprentice

If you decide to not go gluten free at this point, in my opinion you certainly should get another biopsy some time in the future (a year or two). I think it's very likely that you're in the early stages of intestinal damage, and the most sensible thing would be to go gluten free now before any more damage has a chance to happen, but if you don't want to do that, you should have a follow up biopsy later to see if the damage has progressed.

Pauliina

ravenwoodglass Mentor
Here are my blood results.

IgA t-Transglutaminase 22 U/ml (normal range 0-15U/ml)

Biopsy results only showed ' subjective patchy increase in intraepithelial lymphocytes'

Any comments are greatly appreciated

Rebecca

Those were positive blood tests results. How many biopsies were done? 7 to 9 would be the optimum number but many doctors only take 1 to 3. You have 22 ft of small intestines, early in the disease the damage can be patchy and if the right spot is not biopsied you will not get an accurate result. If you need a good reason to stay gluten-free without a strong positive take a look at my signature. I do not show up in blood work and this delayed my diagnosis by many years. Without a positive blood test they never even thought to do an endo. I will never fully recover my brain function, after 5 years gluten-free what I live with is permanent. And I would not wish it on anyone. We do things backwards so often, doctors wait until damage is severe rather than 'inconvience' someone with a diagnosis that can prevent many other disease from ever showing up.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,663
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Funnybone
    Newest Member
    Funnybone
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Inkie
      Thank you for the information ill will definitely bring it into practice .
    • Scott Adams
      While plain, pure tea leaves (black, green, or white) are naturally gluten-free, the issue often lies not with the tea itself but with other ingredients or processing. Many flavored teas use barley malt or other gluten-containing grains as a flavoring agent, which would be clearly listed on the ingredient label. Cross-contamination is another possibility, either in the facility where the tea is processed or, surprisingly, from the tea bag material itself—some tea bags are sealed with a wheat-based glue. Furthermore, it's important to consider that your reaction could be to other substances in tea, such as high levels of tannins, which can be hard on the stomach, or to natural histamines or other compounds that can cause a non-celiac immune response. The best way to investigate is to carefully read labels for hidden ingredients, try switching to a certified gluten-free tea brand that uses whole leaf or pyramid-style bags, and see if the reaction persists.
    • Scott Adams
      This is a challenging and confusing situation. The combination of a positive EMA—which is a highly specific marker rarely yielding false positives—alongside strongly elevated TTG on two separate occasions, years apart, is profoundly suggestive of celiac disease, even in the absence of biopsy damage. This pattern strongly aligns with what is known as "potential celiac disease," where the immune system is clearly activated, but intestinal damage has not yet become visible under the microscope. Your concern about the long-term risk of continued gluten consumption is valid, especially given your family's experience with the consequences of delayed diagnosis. Since your daughter is now at an age where her buy-in is essential for a gluten-free lifestyle, obtaining a definitive answer is crucial for her long-term adherence and health. Given that she is asymptomatic yet serologically positive, a third biopsy now, after a proper 12-week challenge, offers the best chance to capture any microscopic damage that may have developed, providing the concrete evidence needed to justify the dietary change. This isn't about wanting her to have celiac; it's about wanting to prevent the insidious damage that can occur while waiting for symptoms to appear, and ultimately giving her the unambiguous "why" she needs to accept and commit to the necessary treatment. This article might be helpful. It breaks down each type of test, and what a positive results means in terms of the probability that you might have celiac disease. One test that always needs to be done is the IgA Levels/Deficiency Test (often called "Total IGA") because some people are naturally IGA deficient, and if this is the case, then certain blood tests for celiac disease might be false-negative, and other types of tests need to be done to make an accurate diagnosis. The article includes the "Mayo Clinic Protocol," which is the best overall protocol for results to be ~98% accurate.    
    • Scott Adams
      Welcome to the community! Generally, for a gluten challenge before celiac disease blood tests, Tylenol (acetaminophen) is considered safe and should not interfere with your antibody results. The medications you typically need to avoid are those like ibuprofen (Advil, Motrin) or naproxen (Aleve) that can cause intestinal irritation, which could potentially complicate the interpretation of an endoscopy if you were to have one. However, it is absolutely crucial that you confirm this with either your gastroenterologist or your surgeon before your procedure. They know the specifics of your case and can give you the definitive green light, ensuring your surgery is comfortable and your celiac testing remains accurate. Best of luck with your surgery tomorrow
    • Xravith
      Thank you for the advice. I’ve actually never checked for nutritional deficiencies, but for as long as I can remember, I’ve always taken vitamin and mineral supplements — otherwise my symptoms get worse. This week I stopped eating gluten to confirm whether my symptoms are really caused by it. Starting next week, I’ll reintroduce gluten — it’s sad to go back to how I was before — but at least I’ll be able to take the necessary tests properly. I think the diagnostic process will be long, but at least I’m happy that I finally decided to address this doubt I’ve had for years.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.