Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×

  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):

    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Lab Test For Celiac

pixiegirl

Recommended Posts

pixiegirl Enthusiast
pixiegirl
Posted

I've been on this list a few years, I have celiac disease. My mom has felt for some time now that she has it too (or some sort of issue with gluten). However she is still having GI issues and has been going to her doctor. He ran blood tests for Celiac (I think 4 of them) and they all came back negative. HOWEVER, my mom has not eaten any gluten for at least a year. I told her that the tests are not even close to accurate if she has not been eating any gluten and she asked her doctor about this. His answer was you can NOT have celiac disease, the results of these tests say so.

She told him that I told her that she has to be eating gluten for the tests to be accurate and he said hogwash. She said, my daughter is sure of it, that I had read it on the internet. He made a comment about how not much on the internet is true. Sigh. But he did say show me where, on a reliable web site it says that.

So my question is, does anyone know of a place on the internet that I CAN show him that the tests won't be accurate unless she is eating gluten? I've been searching but most of what I've found is written by regular people not on medical web sites.

Any help would be greatly appreciated.

Susan

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


dally099 Contributor
dally099
Posted

hi there, i would say hogwash to the doctor, absolutley if shes been gluten free for a year blood work is going to come back negative. anyone here will tell you the same thing.

pixiegirl Enthusiast
pixiegirl
Posted
  • Author

Yes I understand that but my mother is 80 and was brought up to believe in her doctors, so what I am looking for is something from a website that says you have to be eating gluten for the test to be accurate so I can show her and her stupid doctor.

Susan

jerseyangel Proficient
jerseyangel
Posted

Hi Susan :)

Your mom's doctor is woefully ill informed.

Can you get your hands on a copy of Dr. Green's book--"Celiac Disease--A Hidden Epidemic"?

On page 52, he states:

"A key consideration for all of the tests described is whether the patient has been consuming gluten before being tested. Results of all the tests will return to normal on a gluten free diet."

He then goes on to describe the gluten challenge, which he states "involves a biopsy, not blood tests, after a period of eating gluten".

Phyllis28 Apprentice
Phyllis28
Posted

I found to following:

Open Original Shared Link

It might help.

Calle Rookie
Calle
Posted
Hi Susan :)

Your mom's doctor is woefully ill informed.

Can you get your hands on a copy of Dr. Green's book--"Celiac Disease--A Hidden Epidemic"?

On page 52, he states:

"A key consideration for all of the tests described is whether the patient has been consuming gluten before being tested. Results of all the tests will return to normal on a gluten free diet."

He then goes on to describe the gluten challenge, which he states "involves a biopsy, not blood tests, after a period of eating gluten".

I am reading Dr. Green's book now and have read other books besides doing research on the internet. I was diagnosed through Enterolab like several others on this board. I have fired many GI's in my area and was not going to do anymore invasive tests like the biopsy. I've been through enough over the past 25 years! The way I understand it is if you take the blood tests they are not accurate because if you do not have any damage in the small intestine, which some Celiac people do not, then the tests are a false negative. Not all Celiac's have damage in the small intestine, but that doesn't mean they don't have the disease. Also, on the biopsy's, if the doctor doesn't get the biopsy of the tissue where the damage is at then that will also come back negative and once again it doesn't necessarily mean that you don't have it. This is how I understand it and I don't know if that is correct or not.

Calle

Phyllis28 Apprentice
Phyllis28
Posted

I did a little more research. The New England Journal of Medicine has articles of Celiac but access is limited to a list or table of contents unless you are willing to pay for the article. I assume other promanent medical journals do the same thing. You might consider getting the list of articles and heading for the nearest library that carries medical journals.

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


aikiducky Apprentice
aikiducky
Posted

Open Original Shared Link

I hope the link works, this is the NIH consensus statement on Celiac disease, you can't get much more official than that, and it clearly states that all testing should be done while the patient is still consuming gluten. Hope this helps.

Pauliina

happygirl Collaborator
happygirl
Posted

Wow, it amazes me that drs are so misinformed.

Amazing because the tests measure an antibody response to gluten, and those who are Celiacs, once on a strict/maintained diet, return to "normal" levels (i.e., don't look like a Celiac anymore) because there is no gluten to react to.

"A gluten-free diet should not be started until all diagnostic tests are completed, as the withdrawal of gluten can change test results." Open Original Shared Link (again, Dr. Green)

Susan, good to see you on here again :)

pixiegirl Enthusiast
pixiegirl
Posted
  • Author

Thanks so much! Yeah this doctor use to be MY doctor but I changed after fighting with him for years about what was wrong with me. But my mom thinks he's the best - ugh!

Also thanks Happy girl for remembering me, I've been so busy lately I haven't posted but I do come back and read posts now and then!

Susan

sneezydiva Apprentice
sneezydiva
Posted

The Mayo Clinic info on Celiac says a gluten-free diet can cause blood tests and biopsies to appear normal. That is a site that most doctors would consider reliable.

Open Original Shared Link

Under Screening and Diagnosis--last paragraph.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):


  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      129,601
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748
    Karen Baumann
    Newest Member
    Karen Baumann
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.2k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):


  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Alibu
      Waiting on biopsy after positive bloodwork, but also not really believing this is real

      By Alibu · Posted

      I was tested back in 2017 and my TTG-IGA was mildly elevated (an 11 with reference range <4) but my EMA was negative and biopsy was negative. Fast forward to 2 weeks ago where I was like y'know what, I still have so many symptoms and I'm always so sick, I should repeat this, thinking it was not going to be positive.  I also found out through 23 and me that I do have the HLA-DQ2.5 gene so I thought it would be good to repeat given my ongoing symptoms. Well my blood work came back with a ttg-iga level of 152.6 with a reference range of <15 and my EMA was positive and EMA titer was 1:10 with reference range of <1:5. I guess I'm nervous that I'm going to do the biopsy and it's going to be negative again, especially since I also had an endoscopy in 2020, not to look for celiac but just as a regular 5 year thing I do because of all my GI issues, and they didn't see anything then either. I have no idea how long the EMA has been positive but I'm wondering if it's very recent, if the biopsy will show damage and if so, if they'll say well the biopsy is the gold standard so it's not celiac? I of course am doing all the things to convince myself that it isn't real. Do a lot of people go through this? I think because back in 2017 my ttg-iga was elevated but not a huge amount and my EMA was negative and my biopsy was negative, I keep thinking this time it's going to be different. But this time my ttg-iga is 152.6 with reference range <15, and my EMA was positive. BUT, my titer is only 1:10 and I keep reading how most people here had a ttg-iga in the hundreds or thousands, and the EMA titer was much higher. So now I am convinced that it was a false positive and when they do the biopsy it'll be negative.
    • trents
      Found coffee or coffee pods that contain gluten

      By trents · Posted

      Welcome to the forum, @linnylou73! Are you claiming this based on a reaction or based upon actual testing?
    • linnylou73
      Found coffee or coffee pods that contain gluten

      By linnylou73 · Posted

      Sams club membermark columbian coffee is either cross contaminated or the pods contain gluten
    • KimMS
      Helping child go strict gluten-free and concerns about growth/height

      By KimMS · Posted

      Thank you! Very helpful.
    • Scott Adams
      Helping child go strict gluten-free and concerns about growth/height

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      This varies a lot from person to person. I include foods that are not certified gluten-free but are labelled "gluten-free", while super sensitive people only use certified gluten-free. Both types of products have been found to contain gluten, so there are no guarantees either way: It you are in the super sensitive group, eating a whole foods based diet where you prepare everything is the safest bet, but it's also difficult. Eating out is the the most risky, even if a restaurant has a gluten-free menu. I also include items that are naturally gluten-free, for example refried beans, tuna, pasta sauces, salsas, etc., which have a low overall risk of contamination.
×
×
  • Create New...