Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Impossible Cheeseburger Pie/bisquick Substitute


NWLAX36Mom

Recommended Posts

NWLAX36Mom Rookie

I am craving an impossible cheeseburger pie which includes 1/2 c of bisquick and basically makes its own crust, if you haven't had it. I have some Pamela's baking mix and was wondering if anyone has suggestions on the best way to substitute it.

Thanks!


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



flagbabyds Collaborator

i googled it and this is what i found.

1 lb. ground beef

1 onion

Salt & pepper

1- 1/2 cups milk

3 eggs

3/4 cup G.F. flour mix

2 Tomatoes sliced (approx)

1 generous cup shredded cheese

Heat oven to 400 F

Brown ground beef and onion in frying pan

Put in 10' pie plate. Add salt and pepper

Beat milk, eggs and flour until smooth.

Pour over meat. Bake 25 minutes

Add sliced tomatoes

Add cheese on top of pie

Bake 5-8 minutes more

Let cool for a couple of minutes

Cut and enjoy

Serve with rice.

cruelshoes Enthusiast

I have subbed the Pamela's mix for bisquick in the imposible cheeseburger pie recipe from the Bisquick website lots of times. I just use it out 1:1 for the bisquick component of the recipe. It works great.

modiddly16 Enthusiast

Can you make this in a premade pie crust without bisquick?? perhaps using gluten-free flour?

123 Gluten Free biscuit mix might work? I dunno...

celiac-mommy Collaborator
I have subbed the Pamela's mix for bisquick in the imposible cheeseburger pie recipe from the Bisquick website lots of times. I just use it out 1:1 for the bisquick component of the recipe. It works great.

me too, direct substitute, works FANTASTIC!!

NWLAX36Mom Rookie

Thanks! I thought about making a separate crust and making it crustless. Making it the regular way sounds best of all. I can't wait!

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      133,162
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Carolyn harkless
    Newest Member
    Carolyn harkless
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):
  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      Let me hasten to add that if you will be undergoing an endoscopy/biopsy, it is critical that you do not begin efforts to reduce gluten beforehand. Doing so will render the results invalid as it will allow the small bowel lining to heal and, therefore, obscure the damage done by celiac disease which is what the biopsy is looking for.
    • Scott Adams
      This article, and the comments below it, may be helpful:    
    • Scott Adams
      That’s a really tough situation. A few key points: as mentioned, a gluten challenge does require daily gluten for several weeks to make blood tests meaningful, but negative tests after limited exposure aren’t reliable. Dermatitis herpetiformis can also be tricky to diagnose unless the biopsy is taken from normal-looking skin next to a lesion. Some people with celiac or DH don’t react every time they’re exposed, so lack of symptoms doesn’t rule it out. Given your history and family cancer risk, this is something I’d strongly discuss with a celiac-experienced gastroenterologist or dermatologist before attempting a challenge on your own, so risks and benefits are clearly weighed.
    • Greymo
      https://celiac.org/glutenexposuremarkers/    yes, two hours after accidents ingesting gluten I am vomiting and then diarrhea- then exhaustion and a headache. see the article above- There is research that shows our reactions.
    • trents
      Concerning the EMA positive result, the EMA was the original blood test developed to detect celiac disease and has largely been replaced by the tTG-IGA which has a similar reliability confidence but is much less expensive to run. Yes, a positive EMA is very strong evidence of celiac disease but not foolproof. In the UK, a tTG-IGA score that is 10x normal or greater will often result in foregoing the endoscopy/biopsy. Weaker positives on the tTG-IGA still trigger the endoscopy/biopsy. That protocol is being considered in the US but is not yet in place.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.