Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Positive Bloods But Negative Biopsy?


deviation

Recommended Posts

deviation Newbie

Hi all,

I'm new round here and have a quick question. (Apologies if it has been answered before). I've got positive blood test results for celiac, but am awaiting the results of my biopsy and of course all sorts of scenarios are running through my head. I'm wondering - in the case that my biopsy doesn't show celiac - why would someone test positive to celiac in blood results and it now show up through the biopsy? Would it mean, perhaps, gluten intolerance instead of celiac?

Many thanks in advance! :-)


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Guest j_mommy

It would still mean you have celiac. If teh antibodies are in your blood you have celiac.

If the biopsy is Neg, it could be that they missed an area affected. This happens if they don't take enough samples.

Lisa Mentor

These are the test for the Serologic Panel for Celiac:

Anti-gliadin antibodies (AGA) both IgA and IgG

Anti-endomysial antibodies (EMA) - IgA

Anti-tissue transglutaminase antibodies (tTG) - IgA

Total IgA level.

If these are in the positive range, you do have Celiac. A biopsy can be hit and miss as to where the samples are taken. A biopsy can confirm celiac, but it cannot rule it out. And, or course, and endoscopy exam can look for other issues.

deviation Newbie

Thanks momma-goose and j_mommy for the very quick replies. I don't have a copy of the results with me anymore but the total IgA level was just in the positive range. I guess I'm just afraid that if I go to the GP later this week and they say everything looks normal with the biopsy I'll just be sent home. I know shouldn't be catastrophising it before it happens (but that's part of my nature, LOL) but the wait for the results is so awful.

Lisa Mentor
Thanks momma-goose and j_mommy for the very quick replies. I don't have a copy of the results with me anymore but the total IgA level was just in the positive range. I guess I'm just afraid that if I go to the GP later this week and they say everything looks normal with the biopsy I'll just be sent home. I know shouldn't be catastrophising it before it happens (but that's part of my nature, LOL) but the wait for the results is so awful.

Well, sure they will send you home. There is nothing they can do for you other than recommend the gluten free diet. I think you know you have your answer.

Stop worrying and start reading up on the gluten free diet. And, welcome to the club! ;)

deviation Newbie
Well, sure they will send you home. There is nothing they can do for you other than recommend the gluten free diet. I think you know you have your answer.

Stop worrying and start reading up on the gluten free diet. And, welcome to the club! ;)

Very, very good advice MG, thanks! I am so glad I found this community. Thanks again for your responses - I am feeling a bit calmer about it all now :-)

jayhawkmom Enthusiast
but the total IgA level was just in the positive range. I guess I'm just afraid that if I go to the GP later this week and they say everything looks normal with the biopsy I'll just be sent home. I know shouldn't be catastrophising it before it happens (but that's part of my nature, LOL) but the wait for the results is so awful.

I'm pretty sure that the Total IgA is just run to make sure there isn't selective IgA deficiency... and that there really isn't a "positive or negative" range for TOTAL IgA. There is a "normal" range, but outside of it doesn't make it positive or negative, it means it deficient or "not." Right??

Or, am I mistaken...and it's a positive tTg IgA?


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



deviation Newbie
I'm pretty sure that the Total IgA is just run to make sure there isn't selective IgA deficiency... and that there really isn't a "positive or negative" range for TOTAL IgA. There is a "normal" range, but outside of it doesn't make it positive or negative, it means it deficient or "not." Right??

Or, am I mistaken...and it's a positive tTg IgA?

I'm a complete newbie at this, but I think what I meant was that my total IgA was just above the normal range. Not that I know what that means anyway! :-) Aaah the learning curve of a (possible) new condition!

Lisa Mentor

Open Original Shared Link

Here is some information from our achieves. I am not great at interpreting testing so perhaps this may help you determine where you are. But I do know that something is cooking.

jayhawkmom Enthusiast

That link confuses me even more... but also says the same thing, there really is no explanation for "over the limits" Total Serum IgA. My son had a similar issue. TOTAL IgA was "over the normal limits" but all other results (AGA's, tTg Ab's, EMA) were all within range. I was told it was just a "fluke." And, there was no further offer of explanation.

Lisa Mentor
That link confuses me even more... but also says the same thing, there really is no explanation for "over the limits" Total Serum IgA. My son had a similar issue. TOTAL IgA was "over the normal limits" but all other results (AGA's, tTg Ab's, EMA) were all within range. I was told it was just a "fluke." And, there was no further offer of explanation.

Laura (happygirl) would know. I'll see if I can knock on her door and see if she's home.

jayhawkmom Enthusiast

Thank you! I'm really not trying to argue or debate, I'm really just trying to understand. Thus far, no one has been able to give me any reason why my kiddo's IgA levels were so wonky. Though, one person told me that it's associated with diabetes, and that scared the bejeepers out of me.

deviation, I hope that we are able to help you out.... I really am not trying to "rat hole" your thread. I'm just trying to understand, as I know you are... too! =)

deviation Newbie
deviation, I hope that we are able to help you out.... I really am not trying to "rat hole" your thread. I'm just trying to understand, as I know you are... too! =)

No, that is totally fine... 'rat hole' away!!! :-) This discussion is really helping me! And thanks for that link to the archives, momma goose, will have a look at that a bit later.

nikky Contributor

if your biopsy is clear - dont be disheartened

it hapened to me, but my bloods were so high that my consultant decided to start me on the new diet in december

the normal range is 1-10, my bloods over 200, and the biopsy was still clear

i think it would depend on your range if it was only 5-10 over the 'limit' then and your biopsy was clear then they would probably just monitor you

jayhawkmom Enthusiast
the normal range is 1-10, my bloods over 200, and the biopsy was still clear

That depends on the lab... and total serum IgA doesn't typically have a range of 1-10 - it's significantly higher than that. In fact, for the lab we went through, their reference range for total serum IgA was 40 - 400. Anything within that range was considered normal. (again... that's for TOTAL SERUM IgA - nothing else) Mine was 331.

However, the other references ranges varied according to individual test.

Editing to add.... Total Serum IgA is also age based in some labs. The normal reference ranges for a 10 year old are significantly different than the reference ranges for a 30 year old, for example.

nikky Contributor
That depends on the lab... and total serum IgA doesn't typically have a range of 1-10 - it's significantly higher than that. In fact, for the lab we went through, their reference range for total serum IgA was 40 - 400. Anything within that range was considered normal. (again... that's for TOTAL SERUM IgA - nothing else) Mine was 331.

i was going by the UK NHS ranges, i didnt realise that it varies with age either

jayhawkmom Enthusiast

Perhaps since you are in the UK - there is a true "standard" that is THE standard with regards to Celiac testing???

In the US - there simply isn't one. Each lab has their own set of positive and negative criteria. Which, incidentally, could cause one lab to say someone's results are TOTALLY negative, where the same blood, at a different lab, might be thought to be extremely positive.

Wow, I wish there was a "standard" standard here in the US!!!!

With regards to the IGA, the optimal "level" isn't reached until after puberty - a small child automatically makes MUCH less IgA than a full grown adult. So, there are ranges established to compensate for age. Even still, children who are often deficient simply aren't old enough to produce (or have) optimal levels. But, not having enough - regardless of age - can render the other tests invalid.

I apologize if I'm not making much sense. I've had far too much chocolate today and I'm suffering from a sugar buzz. LOL!

nikky Contributor

ok, i feel sorry for people living in the U.S then

sorry for any confusion i caused, i was just going on what my GI told me

jayhawkmom Enthusiast
ok, i feel sorry for people living in the U.S then

sorry for any confusion i caused, i was just going on what my GI told me

It's ok!! And, yes... those of us, in the US, who are lucky enough to have a competent doctor on our sides also feel very sad and sorry for those who aren't able to find one! In the US, they are still fairly few and far between. =(

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,602
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Victor bowden
    Newest Member
    Victor bowden
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Wheatwacked
      Yes.  Now, if you hit your finger with a hammer once, wouldn't you do your best not to do it again?  You have identified a direct connection between gluten and pain.  Gluten is your hammer.  Now you have to decide if you need a medical diagnosis.  Some countries have aid benefits tgat you can get if you have the diagnosis, but you must continue eating a gluten-normal diet while pursuing the diagnosis. Otherwise the only reason to continue eating gluten is social. There are over 200 symptoms that could be a result of celiac disease.. Celiac Disease and Non Celiac Gluten Sensitivity  both cause multiple vitamin and mineral deficiency.  Dealing with that should help your recovery, even while eating gluten.  Phosphatidyl Choline supplements can help your gut if digesting fats is a problem,  Consider that any medications you take could be causing some of the symptoms, aside from gluten.        
    • trents
      Welcome to the forum, @Ben98! If you have been consciously or unconsciously avoiding gluten because of the discomfort it produces then it is likely that your blood antibody testing for celiac disease has been rendered invalid. Valid testing requires regular consumption of generous amounts of gluten. The other strong possibility is that you have NCGS (Non Celiac Gluten Sensitivity) which shares many of the same symptoms with celiac disease but does not have the autoimmune component and thus does not damage the small bowel lining. It is 10x mor common than celiac disease. There is currently no test for NCGS. Celiac disease must first be ruled out. Some experts in the field believe it can be a precursor to the development of celiac disease. Having one or both of the primary genes for developing celiac disease does not imply that you will develop active celiac disease. It simply establishes the potential for it. About 40% of the population has the genetic potential but only about 1% develop active celiac disease. 
    • Ben98
      TTG blood test and total IGA tested on many occasions which have always remained normal, upper GI pain under my ribs since 2022. I had an endoscopy in 2023 which showed moderate gastritis. no biopsy’s were taken unfortunately. genetic test was positive for HLADQ2. extreme bloating after eating gluten, it’ll feel like I’ve got bricks in my stomach so uncomfortably full. the pain is like a dull ache under the upper left almost like a stitch feeling after a long walk. I am just wanting some advice has anyone here experienced gastritis with a gluten issue before? thank you  
    • Wheatwacked
      "Conclusions: The urinary iodine level was significantly lower in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis, and iodine replacement may be important in preventing osteoporosis"  Body iodine status in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis Low iodine can cause thyroid problems, but Iodine deficiency will not show up in thyroid tests.  Iodine is important for healing, its job is to kill off defective and aging cells (Apoptosis). Skin, brain fog, nails, muscle tone all inproved when I started taking 600 mcg (RDA 150 - 1000 mcg) of Liquid Iodine drops. Some with dermatitis herpetiformis, Iodine exacerbates the rash.  I started at 1 drop (50 mcg) and worked up to 12 drops, but I don't have dermatitis herpetiformis.
    • cristiana
      That's great news, you can do this.  Let us know how things go and don't hesitate to ask if you have any more questions. Cristiana 😊
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.